Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) >
Efficacy analysis of autologous facet joint bone block in lumbar interbody fusion of osteoporosis patients
Received date: 2022-11-01
Online published: 2023-10-09
Supported by
the National Natural Science Foundation of China(82100933)
Objective: To compare and analyze the feasibility of autologous facet joint bone block as an alternative to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage in lumbar intervertebral fusion surgery for patients with osteoporosis. Methods: From December 2018 to June 2021, the case data of patients with osteoporosis (T value ≤ -2.5 on dual energy X-ray bone density) who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the Fourth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. All the cases were followed up for no less than 12 months and were divided into two groups according to the differences of interbody fusion materials: the autologous facet joint bone block group (autogenous bone group) and the PEEK cage group (PEEK group). The general data [such as age, gender, body mass index (BMI), primary diagnosis, distribution of fusion segments, bone mineral density of lumbar (BMD), incidence of preoperative complications], the perioperative data (such as duration of operation, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion rate), and the incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Imaging parameters (disc height, lumbar lordosis angle, segment lordosis angle, segmental lordosis angle, disc height improvement rate, and fusion rate) and lumbar functional scores [visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Japanese Orthopedics Association (JOA) score for lower back pain] were compared to evaluate the clinical efficacy between the kinds of intervertebral fusion materials 1 week, 3 months and 6 months postoperative and at the last follow-up. Results: A total of 118 patients were enrolled, including 68 cases in the autogenous bone group and 50 cases in the PEEK group, there were no statistical differences in age, gender, BMI, primary diagnosis, distribution of fusion segments, BMD, incidence of preoperative complications, duration of operation, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion rate, incidence of postoperative complications, all the preoperative imaging parameters and all the lumbar function scores between the two groups (P>0.05). Postoperative superficial surgical site infections occurred in 3 patients in the autogenous bone group and 2 patients in the PEEK group. At the last follow-up, 3 cases of intervertebral graft collapse occurred in the autogenous bone group and 5 cases in the PEEK group, 1 case of graft subsidence in the autogenous bone group and 1 case in the PEEK group. All the imaging parameters showed significant differences between postoperation and preoperation (P < 0.05), and all the imaging parameters showed significant differences between 1 week and 3 months postoperative in both groups (P < 0.05). The height, angle of fusion gap in the autogenous bone group were lower than those in the PEEK group 1 week postoperatively (P < 0.05), and the fusion gap height improvement rate in the autogenous bone group was lower than that in the PEEK group (P < 0.05). The cases in both groups started to show final fusion 3 months after surgery, and the fusion rate in the autogenous bone group was 75% 6 months postoperatively, which was significantly higher than the rate of 56% in the PEEK group (P < 0.05), and there was no statistically significant difference in the final fusion rate between the two groups (P>0.05). The ODI, the postoperative VAS score was significantly lower than that in preoperation, while the postoperative JOA score was significantly higher than that in preoperation (P < 0.05). The ODI was lower while the JOA score was higher of the autogenous bone group than that of the PEEK group 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). Conclusion: In osteoporosis patients, good interbody fusion rate and improvement of lumbar vertebral function can be obtained by using autologous facet joint bone block or PEEK cage, while the fusion rate and the improvement of lumbar function with autologous facet joint bone block are better than those with PEEK cage 6 months post-operatively. PEEK cage is superior to autologous facet joint bone block in intervertebral distraction and improvement of lumbar lordosis. Significant disc space subsidence occurred in osteoporotic patients within 3 months after lumbar interbody fusion, and the subsidence of PEEK cage was more obvious than that of autologous facet joint bone block.
Da-wei WANG , Hua-dong WANG , Li LI , Xin YIN , Wei HUANG , Ji-dong GUO , Ya-feng YANG , Yi-hao LIU , Yang ZHENG . Efficacy analysis of autologous facet joint bone block in lumbar interbody fusion of osteoporosis patients[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2023 , 55(5) : 899 -909 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.05.019
| 1 | Wolfert AJ , Rompala A , Beyer GA , et al. The impact of osteoporosis on adverse outcomes after short fusion for degenerative lumbar disease[J]. Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2022, 30 (12): 573- 579. |
| 2 | Reid PC , Morr S , Kaiser MG . State of the union: A review of lumbar fusion indications and techniques for degenerative spine disease[J]. Neurosurg Spine, 2019, 31 (1): 1- 14. |
| 3 | Zou D , Jiang S , Zhou S , et al. Prevalence of osteoporosis in patients undergoing lumbar fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: A combination of DXA and Hounsfield units[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2020, 45 (7): E406- E410. |
| 4 | 孟海, 杨雍, 孙天胜, 等. 腰椎后路手术椎间融合器应用的专家共识[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2021, 31 (4): 379- 384. |
| 5 | 王东亮, 毛兆虎, 杨文玖, 等. 自体下关节突骨块在腰椎椎间融合中的应用解剖[J]. 中华实验外科杂志, 2013, 30 (12): 2726- 2727. |
| 6 | Kai Y , Oyama M , Morooka M . Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using local facet joint autograft and pedicle screw fixation[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2004, 29 (1): 41- 46. |
| 7 | 张绍东, 唐天驷, 杨惠林, 等. 保留部分关节突后路腰椎间融合治疗腰椎间盘退变性疾病[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2004, 14 (6): 360- 363. |
| 8 | Siepe CJ , Stosch-Wiechert K , Heider F , et al. Anterior stand-alone fusion revisited: A prospective clinical, X-ray and CT investigation[J]. Eur Spine J, 2015, 24 (4): 838- 851. |
| 9 | 高志强, 李洋, 罗飞, 等. 对脊柱椎间融合的影像学评价策略[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2015, 19 (48): 7825- 7830. |
| 10 | Yao YC , Chou PH , Lin HH , et al. Risk factors of cage subsi-dence in patients received minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2020, 45 (19): E1279- E1285. |
| 11 | Park MK , Kim KT , Bang WS , et al. Risk factors for cage migration and cage retropulsion following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion[J]. Spine J, 2019, 19 (3): 437- 447. |
| 12 | Strage KE , Parry JA , Mauffrey C . Standardizing statistics and data reporting in orthopaedic research[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2021, 31 (1): 1- 6. |
| 13 | 杨喆, 谭志军, 张杨, 等. 医学研究中计量资料组间比较统计分析方法的正确应用[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2019, 27 (10): 1157- 1160. |
| 14 | Kuslich SD , Ulstrom CL , Griffith SL , et al. The Bagby and Kuslich method of lumbar interbody fusion: History, techniques, and 2-year follow-up results of a United States prospective, multicenter trial[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1998, 23 (11): 1267- 1278. |
| 15 | 唐强, 钟德君, 王清, 等. 椎间自体骨植骨面积比与椎间融合率的关系[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2021, 25 (36): 5821- 5826. |
| 16 | Amorim-Barbosa T , Pereira C , Catelas D , et al. Risk factors for cage subsidence and clinical outcomes after transforaminal and posterior lumbar interbody fusion[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2022, 32 (7): 1291- 1299. |
| 17 | Meng B , Bunch J , Burton D , et al. Lumbar interbody fusion: Recent advances in surgical techniques and bone healing strategies[J]. Eur Spine J, 2021, 30 (1): 22- 33. |
| 18 | 白文媛, 顾洪生, 廖振华, 等. 正常成人腰椎间盘相关参数的测量和意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2013, 31 (5): 505- 510. |
| 19 | 中国健康促进基金会基层医疗机构骨质疏松症诊断与治疗专家共识委员会. 基层医疗机构骨质疏松症诊断和治疗专家共识(2021)[J]. 中国骨质疏松杂志, 2021, 27 (7): 937- 944. |
| 20 | Wagner SC , Kang DG , Steelman T , et al. Diagnosing the undiagnosed: Osteoporosis in patients undergoing lumbar fusion[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2016, 41 (21): E1279- E1283. |
| 21 | Khalid SI , Nunna RS , Maasarani S , et al. Association of osteopenia and osteoporosis with higher rates of pseudarthrosis and revision surgery in adult patients undergoing single-level lumbar fusion[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2020, 49 (2): E6. |
| 22 | Yu Y , Robinson DL , Ackland DC , et al. Influence of the geometric and material properties of lumbar endplate on lumbar interbody fusion failure: A systematic review[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2022, 17 (1): 224. |
| 23 | 赵龙, 曾建成, 谢天航, 等. 腰椎椎间融合术后椎间融合器沉降的研究进展[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2021, 35 (8): 1063- 1067. |
| 24 | 郭新虎, 孟妍, 齐强, 等. 后路腰椎椎体间融合术后cage移位的危险因素分析及处理策略[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2022, 32 (1): 42- 49. |
| 25 | Govindarajan V , Diaz A , Perez-Roman RJ , et al. Osteoporosis treatment in patients undergoing spinal fusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2021, 50 (6): E9. |
| 26 | Tani S , Ishikawa K , Kudo Y , et al. The effect of denosumab on pedicle screw fixation: A prospective 2-year longitudinal study using finite element analysis[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2021, 16 (1): 219. |
| 27 | 金贺荣, 崔敬斌, 邵苍, 等. 椎间融合器材料: 临床应用的优势与关注热点[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2022, 26 (22): 3592- 3597. |
| 28 | Formica M , Vallerga D , Zanirato A , et al. Fusion rate and influence of surgery-related factors in lumbar interbody arthrodesis for degenerative spine diseases: A meta-analysis and systematic review[J]. Musculoskelet Surg, 2020, 104 (1): 1- 15. |
| 29 | 万东东, 胡茂忠, 许东浩, 等. 髂骨取骨术后并发症的研究进展[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2016, 24 (12): 1096- 1100. |
| 30 | 刘军, 万豫尧, 王慧敏, 等. 改良自体棘突腰椎椎体间植骨融合术的临床应用[J]. 广东医学, 2006, 27 (7): 994- 996. |
| 31 | Tavares WM , de Franca SA , Paiva WS , et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of fusion rate enhancements and bone graft options for spine surgery[J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12 (1): 7546. |
| 32 | Geurts J , Ramp D , Sch?ren S , et al. Georg-Schmorl-Prize of the German Spine Society (DWG) 2016: Comparison of in vitro osteogenic potential of iliac crest and degenerative facet joint bone autografts for intervertebral fusion in lumbar spinal stenosis[J]. Eur Spine J, 2017, 26 (5): 1408- 1415. |
| 33 | 万标林, 梁伟国, 王斌, 等. 自体椎板关节突柱状植骨融合治疗腰椎退行性疾病的疗效分析[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2012, 20 (11): 964- 967. |
| 34 | 王璐璐, 陈晓亮, 马进峰, 等. 自体下关节突骨块与Cage椎体间融合效果比较[J]. 青岛大学医学院学报, 2012, 48 (1): 30- 32. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |