Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis for end-stage ankle and hindfoot arthropathy: Short- and mid-term clinical outcomes

  • Wenjing LI ,
  • Baozhou ZHANG ,
  • Heng LI ,
  • Liangpeng LAI ,
  • Hui DU ,
  • Ning SUN ,
  • Xiaofeng GONG ,
  • Ying LI ,
  • Yan WANG ,
  • Yong WU
Expand
  • Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100035, China

Received date: 2023-01-06

  Online published: 2024-04-10

Supported by

the Wu Jieping Medical Foundation(320.6750.2021-7-15)

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the clinical data of patients with end-stage ankle and hindfoot arthropathy who underwent tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis by the same surgeon, explore the short- and mid-term clinical results, complications and functional improvement, and discuss the clinical prognosis and precautions of TTC arthrodesis. Methods: Retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 40 patients who underwent TTC arthrodesis by the same surgeon from March 2011 to December 2020. In this study, 23 males and 17 females were included, with an average age of (49.1±16.0) years. All the patients underwent unilateral surgery. The clinical characteristics, imaging manifestations, main diagnosis and specific surgical techniques of the patients were recorded. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by comparison of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score and visual analogue scale (VAS) between pre-operation and at the last follow-up. The fusion healing time, symptom improvement (significant improvement, certain improvement, no improvement or deterioration) and postoperative complications were also recorded. Results: The median follow-up time was 38.0 (26.3, 58.8) months. The preoperative VAS score was 6.0 (4.0, 7.0), and the AOFAS score was 33.0 (25.3, 47.3). At the last follow-up, the median VAS score was 0 (0, 3.0), and the AOFAS score was 80.0 (59.0, 84.0). All the significantly improved compared with their preoperative corresponding values (P < 0.05). There was no wound necrosis or infection in the patients. One patient suffered from subtalar joint nonunion, which was syphilitic Charcot arthropathy. The median bony healing time of other patients was 15.0 (12.0, 20.0) weeks. Among the included patients, there were 25 cases with significant improvement in symptom compared with that preoperative, 8 cases with certain improvement, 4 cases with no improvement, and 3 cases with worse symptoms than that before operation. Conclusion: TTC arthrodesis is a reliable method for the treatment of the end-stage ankle and hindfoot arthropathy. The function of most patients was improved postoperatively, with little impact on daily life. The causes of poor prognosis included toe stiffness, stress concentration in adjacent knee joints, nonunion and pain of unknown causes.

Cite this article

Wenjing LI , Baozhou ZHANG , Heng LI , Liangpeng LAI , Hui DU , Ning SUN , Xiaofeng GONG , Ying LI , Yan WANG , Yong WU . Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis for end-stage ankle and hindfoot arthropathy: Short- and mid-term clinical outcomes[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2024 , 56(2) : 299 -306 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.02.015

References

1 Brage ME , Mathews CS . Ankle and tibiotalocalcaneal fusion[J]. Foot Ankle Clin, 2022, 27 (2): 343- 353.
2 Sto?tny T , Dugie??o B , Pasek J , et al. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis in osteoarthritis deformation of ankle and subtalar joint: Evaluation of treatment results[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2022, 61 (1): 205- 211.
3 Yao Y , Mo Z , Wu G , et al. A personalized 3D-printed plate for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: Design, fabrication, biomechanical evaluation and postoperative assessment[J]. Comput Biol Med, 2021, 133, 104368.
4 Perez-Aznar A , Gonzalez-Navarro B , Bello-Tejeda LL , et al. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a retrograde intramedullary nail: A prospective cohort study at a minimum five year follow-up[J]. Int Orthop, 2021, 45 (9): 2299- 2305.
5 Pitts C , Alexander B , Washington J , et al. Factors affecting the outcomes of tibiotalocalcaneal fusion[J]. Bone Joint J, 2020, 102-B (3): 345- 351.
6 Kitaoka HB , Alexander IJ , Adelaar RS , et al. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 1994, 15 (7): 349- 353.
7 Reed MD , van Nostran W . Assessing pain intensity with the visual analog scale: A plea for uniformity[J]. J Clin Pharmacol, 2014, 54 (3): 241- 244.
8 Martínez-de-Albornoz P , Monteagudo M . Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis in severe hindfoot deformities[J]. Foot Ankle Clin, 2022, 27 (4): 847- 866.
9 Burns PR , Dunse A . Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis for foot and ankle deformities[J]. Clin Podiatr Med Surg, 2017, 34 (3): 357- 380.
10 Monteagudo M , Martínez-de-Albornoz P . Deciding between ankle and tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis for isolated ankle arthritis[J]. Foot Ankle Clin, 2022, 27 (1): 217- 231.
11 Rana B , Patel S . Results of ankle and hind foot arthrodesis in diabetic Charcot neuroarthropathy: A retrospective analysis of 44 patients[J]. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2021, 23, 101637.
12 Chraim M , Krenn S , Alrabai HM , et al. Mid-term follow-up of patients with hindfoot arthrodesis with retrograde compression intramedullary nail in Charcot neuroarthropathy of the hindfoot[J]. Bone Joint J, 2018, 100-B (2): 190- 196.
13 Kollig E , Esenwein SA , Muhr G , et al. Fusion of the septic ankle: Experience with 15 cases using hybrid external fixation[J]. J Trauma, 2003, 55 (4): 685- 691.
14 Hartmann R , Grubhofer F , Waibel FWA , et al. Treatment of hindfoot and ankle infections with Ilizarov external fixator or spacer, followed by secondary arthrodesis[J]. J Orthop Res, 2021, 39 (10): 2151- 2158.
15 Baumbach SF , Massen FK , H?rterer S , et al. Comparison of arthroscopic to open tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis in high-risk patients[J]. Foot Ankle Surg, 2019, 25 (6): 804- 811.
16 Rausch S , Loracher C , Fr?ber R , et al. Anatomical evaluation of different approaches for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2014, 35 (2): 163- 167.
17 Wu M , Scott D , Abar B , et al. Does a fibula-sparing approach improve outcomes in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis?[J]. Foot Ankle Surg, 2023, 29 (1): 90- 96.
18 Carranza-Bencano A , Tejero S , Del CG , et al. Minimal incision surgery for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2014, 35 (3): 272- 284.
19 Pellegrini MJ , Schiff AP , Adams SJ , et al. Outcomes of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis through a posterior Achilles tendon-splitting approach[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2016, 37 (3): 312- 319.
20 Eckholt S , Garcia-Elvira R , Fontecilla N , et al. Role of extra-articular tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis and posterior approach in highly complex cases[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2018, 39 (2): 219- 225.
21 Gong J , Zhou B , Tao X , et al. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with headless compression screws[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2016, 11 (1): 91.
22 Gutteck N , Schilde S , Reichel M , et al. Posterolateral plate fixation with Pantalarlock? is more stable than nail fixation in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis in a biomechanical cadaver study[J]. Foot Ankle Surg, 2020, 26 (3): 328- 333.
23 Richman J , Cota A , Weinfeld S . Intramedullary nailing and external ring fixation for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis in Charcot arthropathy[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2017, 38 (2): 149- 152.
Outlines

/