Establishment and evaluation of a similarity measurement model for orthognathic patients based on the 3D craniofacial features

  • Ling WU ,
  • Jiakun FANG ,
  • Xiaojing LIU ,
  • Zili LI ,
  • Yang LI ,
  • Xiaoxia WANG
Expand
  • Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices, Beijing 100081, China
LI Zili, kqlzl@sina.com

Received date: 2024-10-08

  Online published: 2025-01-25

Supported by

the National Natural Science Foundation of China(82171012);Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research(CFH 2022-2-4104);Beijing Natural Science Foundation(7232222)

Copyright

, 2025, All rights reserved, without authorization

Abstract

Objective: To establish a similarity measurement model for patients with dentofacial deformity based on 3D craniofacial features and to validate the similarity results with quantifying subjective expert scoring. Methods: In the study, 52 cases of patients with skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusions who underwent bimaxillary surgery and preoperative orthodontic treatment at Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from January 2020 to December 2022, including 26 males and 26 females, were selected and divided into 2 groups by sex. One patient in each group was randomly selected as a reference sample, and the others were set as test samples. Three senior surgeons rated the similarity scores between the test samples and the reference sample. Similarity scores ranged from 1 to 10, where 1 was completely different, and 10 was exactly the same. Scores larger than 7.5 was considered as clinically similar. Preoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and 3D facial images of the patients were collected. The three-dimensional hard and soft tissue features, including distances, angles and 3D point cloud features were extracted. The similarity measurement model was then established to fit with the experts' similarity scoring by feature selection algorithm and linear regression model. To verify the reliability of the model, 14 new patients were selected and input to similarity measurement model for finding similar cases. The similarity scoring of these similar cases were rated by experts, and used to evaluate the reliability of the model. Results: The similarity metric models indicated that the features of the middle and lower craniofacial features were the main features to influence the craniofacial similarity. The main features that were related to the expert' s similarity scoring included distance of anterior nasal spine-menton (ANS-Me), distance of right upper canion point-Frankfurt horizontal plane (U3RH), distance of left superior point of the condyle-left gonion (CoL-GoL), distance of left gonion-menton (CoL-Me), distance of pogonion-midsagittal plane (Pog-MSP), distance of right alar base-left alar base (AlR-AlL), angle of pronasale-soft tissue pogonion-labrale inferius (Pn-Pog' -Li), distance of trichion-right tragus (Tri-TraR), distance of left exocanthion-left alar base (ExL-AlL), lower 1/3 of skeletal face, middle and lower 2/3 of skeletal face and upper lip region of soft tissue. Fourteen new patients were chosen to evaluate the model. The similar cases selected by the model had an average experts' similarity scoring of 7.627± 0.711, which was not significantly different with 7.5. Conclusion: The similarity measurement model established by this model could find the similar cases which highly matched experts' subjective similarity scoring. The study could be further used for similar cases retrieval in skeletal Ⅲ malocclusion patients.

Cite this article

Ling WU , Jiakun FANG , Xiaojing LIU , Zili LI , Yang LI , Xiaoxia WANG . Establishment and evaluation of a similarity measurement model for orthognathic patients based on the 3D craniofacial features[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2025 , 57(1) : 128 -135 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.01.019

References

1 Jansma J , Schepers RH . Adjunctive aesthetic procedures in orthognathic surgery[J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 2023, 35 (1): 139- 152.
2 Jie B , Han B , Yao B , et al. Automatic virtual reconstruction of maxillofacial bone defects assisted by ICP (iterative closest point) algorithm and normal people database[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2022, 26 (2): 2005- 2014.
3 Zheng X , Zhao JL , Lv ZH , et al. Skull similarity comparison based on SPCA[J]. Multimed Tools Appl, 2020, 79 (31/32): 22423- 22446.
4 Zhang D , Wu Z , Wang X , et al. 3D skull and face similarity measurements based on a harmonic wave kernel signature[J]. Vis Comput, 2021, 37 (4): 749- 764.
5 Xiao D , Wang L , Deng H , et al. Estimating reference bony shape model for personalized surgical reconstruction of posttraumatic facial defects[J]. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv, 2019, 11768, 327- 335.
6 Fang X , Deng HH , Kuang T , et al. Patient-specific reference model estimation for orthognathic surgical planning[J]. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg, 2024, 19 (7): 1439- 1447.
7 Wang L , Ren Y , Gao YZ . Estimating patient-specific and anato-mically correct reference model for craniomaxillofacial deformity via sparse representation[J]. Med Phys, 2015, 42 (10): 5809- 5816.
8 Li Z , Teng S , Cheng Y , et al. Craniomaxillofacial deformity correction via sparse representation in coherent space[J]. IEEE Access, 2015, 8, 69- 76.
9 Cheung LK , Chan YM , Jayaratne YSN , et al. Three-dimensional cephalometric norms of Chinese adults in Hong Kong with balanced facial profile[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2011, 112 (2): e56- e73.
10 Fagertun J , Harder S , Rosengren A , et al. 3D facial landmarks: Inter-operator variability of manual annotation[J]. BMC Med Imaging, 2014, 14 (1): 1- 9.
11 Paulsen RR, Juhl KA, Haspang TM, et al. Multi-view consensus CNN for 3D facial landmark placement[C]. Cham: Springer, 2019.
12 Rusinkiewicz S, Levoy M. Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm[C]. Quebec City: IEEE, 2001.
13 Lo LJ , Weng JL , Ho CT , et al. Three-dimensional region-based study on the relationship between soft and hard tissue changes after orthognathic surgery in patients with prognathism[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13 (8): e0200589.
14 Gopika N, MKME A. Correlation based feature selection algorithm for machine learning[C]. Cairo: IEEE, 2018.
15 Rupperti S , Winterhalder P , Krennmair S , et al. Changes in the facial soft tissue profile after maxillary orthognathic surgery[J]. J Orofac Orthop, 2022, 83 (3): 215- 220.
16 Hou L , He Y , Yi B , et al. Evaluation of soft tissue prediction accuracy for orthognathic surgery with skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion using maxillofacial regional aesthetic units[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2023, 27 (1): 173- 182.
17 Olivetti EC , Nicotera S , Marcolin F , et al. 3D soft-tissue prediction methodologies for orthognathic surgery: A literature review[J]. Appl Sci, 2019, 9 (21): 4550.
Outlines

/