Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) >
Evaluation of micro crestal flap-alveolar ridge preservation following extraction of mandibular molars with severe periodontitis
Received date: 2024-10-08
Online published: 2025-01-25
Supported by
the Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research(2022-2-4103);Capital Foundation for Clinical Characteristics and Application Research(Z161100000516042)
Copyright
Objective: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic efficacy of micro crestal flap-alveolar ridge preservation following extraction of mandibular molars with severe periodontitis compared with natural healing, and to preliminarily propose the surgical indication. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from patients with mandibular molars with severe periodontitis either receiving micro crestal flap-alveolar ridge preservation (MCF-ARP group) or undergoing natural healing in department of periodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from September 2013 to June 2021. Cone-beam computed tomography scannings performed before/immediately after extraction (as baseline) and repeated before implantation (after the extraction socket healing) were used to measure the ridge width, height and volumetric changes of the sockets, and the proportion of guided bone regeneration (GBR) during implant therapy were compared between the two groups. Results: Between baseline and healing, significant differences in changes of MCF-ARP group [(8.34±2.81) mm] and natural healing group [(3.82±3.58) mm] in the distances from mandibular canal to center of the tooth socket were recorded (P < 0.001). The ridge width at 1 mm below the most coronal aspect of the crest increased by (3.50±4.88) mm in the MCF-ARP group but decreased by (0.16±5.70) mm in the natural healing group, respectively (P=0.019). After healing, the MCF-ARP group showed the distances from mandibular canal to center of the tooth socket >8 mm in all the cases, with 97.1% exceeding 10 mm. Natural healing group displayed 23.1% of the cases with center bone height < 8 mm and 61.5% exceeding 10 mm. Volume changes at the buccal and lingual aspect as well as the total socket were significantly greater in the MCF-ARP group compared with natural healing group (P < 0.001).At the time of implantation, GBR was performed in 5 out of 68 subjects (8.3%) in the MCF-ARP group, whereas 8 out of 26 subjects (30.8%) in the natural healing group required GBR, reflecting significant difference (P=0.003). Conclusion: In the sites of mandibular molars with severe periodontitis, when the distances from mandibular canal to center of the tooth socket was not enough (less than 7 mm), clinicians could consider performing the micro crestal flap-alveolar ridge preservation to achieve augmentation for alveolar ridge and reduce the proportion of guided bone regeneration during implant therapy to reduce the difficulty and risk of injuries during implant therapy.
Yutong SHI , Yiping WEI , Wenjie HU , Tao XU , Haoyun ZHANG . Evaluation of micro crestal flap-alveolar ridge preservation following extraction of mandibular molars with severe periodontitis[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2025 , 57(1) : 33 -41 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.01.006
| 1 | Sun HY , Jiang H , Du MQ , et al. The prevalence and associated factors of periodontal disease among 35 to 44-year-old Chinese adults in the 4th national oral health survey[J]. Chin J Dent Res, 2018, 21 (4): 241- 247. |
| 2 | Dannewitz B , Krieger JK , Hüsing J , et al. Loss of molars in periodontally treated patients: A retrospective analysis five years or more after active periodontal treatment[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2006, 33 (1): 53- 61. |
| 3 | Blanes RJ , Bernard JP , Blanes ZM , et al. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. Ⅰ: Clinical and radiographic results[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2007, 18 (6): 699- 706. |
| 4 | Steinberg MJ , Kelly PD . Implant-related nerve injuries[J]. Dent Clin North Am, 2015, 59 (2): 357- 373. |
| 5 | Greenstein G , Tarnow D . The mental foramen and nerve: Clinical and anatomical factors related to dental implant placement: A literature review[J]. J Periodontol, 2006, 77 (12): 1933- 1943. |
| 6 | Couso-Queiruga E , Stuhr S , Tattan M , et al. Post-extraction dimensional changes: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2021, 48 (1): 126- 144. |
| 7 | Fok MR , Pelekos G , Tonetti MS . Feasibility and needs for simultaneous or staged bone augmentation to place prosthetically guided dental implants after extraction or exfoliation of first molars due to severe periodontitis[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2020, 47 (10): 1237- 1247. |
| 8 | Avila-Ortiz G , Chambrone L , Vignoletti F . Effect of alveolar ridge preservation interventions following tooth extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2019, 46 (Suppl 21): 195- 223. |
| 9 | 赵丽萍, 胡文杰, 徐涛, 等. 罹患重度牙周病变磨牙拔牙后两种牙槽嵴保存方法的比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51 (3): 579- 585. |
| 10 | 徐涛, 胡文杰, 毕小成, 等. 针对罹患重度牙周病变磨牙实施微创拔牙和位点保存术的初步探索(附1例报告)[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2018, 11 (1): 37- 43. |
| 11 | Wei Y , Xu T , Zhao L , et al. Ridge preservation in maxillary molar extraction sites with severe periodontitis: A prospective observational clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2022, 26 (3): 2391- 2399. |
| 12 | 宿玉成. 口腔种植学[M]. 2版 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2014: 82-83, 85. |
| 13 | 孟焕新. 临床牙周病学[M]. 2版 北京: 北京大学医学出版社, 2014: 251. |
| 14 | Zhao L , Xu T , Hu W , et al. Preservation and augmentation of molar extraction sites affected by severe bone defect due to advanced periodontitis: A prospective clinical trial[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2018, 20 (3): 333- 344. |
| 15 | Zhang H , Xu T , Wei Y , et al. Assessment of soft and hard tissue changes following micro crestal flap-Alveolar ridge preservation and augmentation at molar extraction sites in patients with stage Ⅲ/Ⅳ periodontitis: A randomized controlled trial[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2024, 51 (10): 1311- 1322. |
| 16 | 胡文杰. 牙槽嵴保存术的临床实施问题探讨[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48 (3): 249- 258. |
| 17 | Burklein S , Grund C , Schafer E . Relationship between root apices and the mandibular canal: A cone-beam computed tomographic analysis in a german population[J]. J Endod, 2015, 41 (10): 1696- 1700. |
| 18 | Watanabe H , Mohammad Abdul M , Kurabayashi T , et al. Mandible size and morphology determined with CT on a premise of dental implant operation[J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 2010, 32 (4): 343- 349. |
| 19 | 绳兰兰, 曲卫国, 李阳, 等. 正常青年人下颌管全长三维走向及下颌骨形态的锥形束CT测量[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2016, 34 (2): 156- 161. |
| 20 | Vignoletti F , Matesanz P , Rodrigo D , et al. Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23 (Suppl 5): 22- 38. |
| 21 | Sun DJ , Lim HC , Lee DW . Alveolar ridge preservation using an open membrane approach for sockets with bone deficiency: A randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2019, 21 (1): 175- 182. |
| 22 | Horváth A , Mardas N , Mezzomo LA , et al. Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2013, 17 (2): 341- 363. |
| 23 | Ben Amara H , Kim JJ , Kim HY , et al. Is ridge preservation effective in the extraction sockets of periodontally compromised teeth? A randomized controlled trial[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2021, 48 (3): 464- 477. |
| 24 | Benic GI , Haemmerle CHF . Horizontal bone augmentation by means of guided bone regeneration[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2014, 66 (1): 13- 40. |
| 25 | Chiapasco M , Casentini P . Horizontal bone-augmentation procedures in implant dentistry: Prosthetically guided regeneration[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2018, 77 (1): 213- 240. |
| 26 | Cardaropoli D , Tamagnone L , Roffredo A , et al. Evaluation of dental implants placed in preserved and nonpreserved postextraction ridges: A 12-month postloading study[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2015, 35 (5): 677- 685. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |