Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) >
Influence of emergence profile designs on the peri-implant tissue in the mandibular molar: A randomized controlled trial
Received date: 2023-10-09
Online published: 2025-01-25
Supported by
the Beijing Natural Science Foundation(J230032);the Program for New Clinical Techniques and Therapies of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology(PKUSSNCT-21A10)
Copyright
Objective: To compare the influence of different emergence profile of implants in mandibular molar on the peri-implant soft tissue. Methods: Forty-four implants were divided into two equal groups by mucosal thickness, ≥2 mm (group A) or < 2 mm (group B), and were randomly included in the test group and the control group. In the control group, the patients were treated by a prosthesis with no transmucosal modifications (subgroups A1 and B1). In groups A1 and B1, the prostheses maintained the original emergence profile of the healing abutment. In the test group, the prostheses were designed based on a width-to-height ratio (W/H) of 1.3 ∶ 1 (subgroups A2 and B2). In group A2, the buccal transmucosal configuration design was slightly concave, and in group B2, the prostheses were designed with convex buccal transmucosal configuration. Assessments were made before delivery of the definitive restoration (T0), one month (T1) and 12 months (T2) after loading. The soft tissue and prosthesis information were obtained by intraoral scan and were converted to digital models. The digital models of different time were superimposed together. Buccal mucosal W/H, emergence angle (EA) and buccal mucosal margin recession (ΔGM) were measured. Results: One year after loading, the buccal mucosal margin recession in the test group (groups A2 and B2) was significantly lower than that in the control group (groups A1 and B1). The ΔGM in group A2 was significantly lower than that in group A1 (P=0.033), but in groups B1 and B2, it was not significantly different. The W/H in group A2 increased significantly one month after loading, but remained stable at one year. In the A1 group, the W/H changed little from initial to one month, but increased significantly at one year after loading. The W/H in group B2 remained stable from the beginning to one year, while in group B1, it changed little one month after loading, but increased significantly by one year. Conclusion: When the initial mucosal thickness was ≥2 mm, the slightly concave prosthesis designed based on the biological W/H significantly maintained the level of buccal mucosa. When the mucosal thickness was < 2 mm, the slightly convex prosthesis design maintained a more stable W/H over one year.
Juan WANG , Lixin QIU , Huajie YU . Influence of emergence profile designs on the peri-implant tissue in the mandibular molar: A randomized controlled trial[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2025 , 57(1) : 65 -72 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.01.010
| 1 | 吴敏杰, 张相皞, 邹立东, 等. 临时冠成型术后1年牙龈稳定性的临床观察[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014, 46 (6): 954- 957. |
| 2 | Linkevicius T , Puisys A , Linkeviciene L , et al. Crestal bone stability around implants with horizontally matching connection after soft tissue thickening: A prospective clinical trial[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015, 17 (3): 497- 508. |
| 3 | Kim S , Oh KC , Han DH , et al. Influence of transmucosal designs of three one-piece implant systems on early tissue responses: A histometric study in beagle dogs[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2010, 25 (2): 309- 314. |
| 4 | Lee YM , Kim DY , Kim JY , et al. Peri-implant soft tissue level secondary to a connective tissue graft in conjunction with imme-diate implant placement: A 2-year follow-up report of 11 consecutive cases[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2012, 32 (2): 213- 222. |
| 5 | Linkevicius T , Puisys A , Steigmann M , et al. Influence of vertical soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants with platform switching: A comparative clinical study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015, 17 (6): 1228- 1236. |
| 6 | Linkevicius T , Apse P , Grybauskas S , et al. The influence of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants: A 1-year prospective controlled clinical trial[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009, 24 (4): 712- 719. |
| 7 | Zhang Z , Shi D , Meng H , et al. Influence of vertical soft tissue thickness on occurrence of peri-implantitis in patients with periodontitis: A prospective cohort study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2020, 22 (3): 292- 300. |
| 8 | Spinato S , Stacchi C , Lombardi T , et al. Biological width establishment around dental implants is influenced by abutment height irrespective of vertical mucosal thickness: A cluster randomized controlled trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2019, 30 (7): 649- 659. |
| 9 | Borges T , Leitao B , Pereira M , et al. Influence of the abutment height and connection timing in early peri-implant marginal bone changes: A prospective randomized clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018, 29 (9): 907- 914. |
| 10 | Wennstrom JL . Mucogingival considerations in orthodontic treatment[J]. Semin Orthod, 1996, 2 (1): 46- 54. |
| 11 | Bengazi F , Wennstrom JL , Lekholm U . Recession of the soft tissue margin at oral implants: A 2-year longitudinal prospective study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1996, 7 (4): 303- 310. |
| 12 | Nozawa T , Enomoto H , Tsurumaki S , et al. Biologic height-width ratio of the buccal supra-implant mucosa[J]. Eur J Esthet Dent, 2006, 1 (3): 208- 214. |
| 13 | Farronato D , Manfredini M , Mangano F , et al. Ratio between height and thickness of the buccal tissues: A pilot study on 32 single implants[J]. Dent J (Basel), 2019, 7 (2): 40. |
| 14 | Wang J , Tang Y , Qiu L , et al. Influence of buccal emergence profile designs on peri-implant tissues: A randomized controlled trial[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2022, 24 (3): 329- 338. |
| 15 | Du JK , Li HY , Wu JH , et al. Emergence angles of the cementoenamel junction in natural maxillary anterior teeth[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2011, 23 (6): 362- 369. |
| 16 | Katafuchi M , Weinstein BF , Leroux BG , et al. Restoration contour is a risk indicator for peri-implantitis: A cross-sectional radiographic analysis[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2018, 45 (2): 225- 232. |
| 17 | Yi Y , Koo KT , Schwarz F , et al. Association of prosthetic features and peri-implantitis: A cross-sectional study[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2020, 47 (3): 392- 403. |
| 18 | González-Martín O , Lee E , Weisgold A , et al. Contour management of implant restorations for optimal emergence profiles: Guidelines for immediate and delayed provisional restorations[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2020, 40 (1): 61- 70. |
| 19 | 王鹃, 尉华杰, 邱立新. 前牙种植修复体穿龈形态设计的研究进展[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2020, 55 (6): 417- 420. |
| 20 | Rompen E , Raepsaet N , Domken O , et al. Soft tissue stability at the facial aspect of gingivally converging abutments in the esthetic zone: A pilot clinical study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2007, 97 (Suppl 6): S119- S125. |
| 21 | Su H , Gonzalez-Martin O , Weisgold A , et al. Considerations of implant abutment and crown contour: Critical contour and subcritical contour[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2010, 30 (4): 335- 343. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |