Email Alert | RSS

Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) ›› 2019, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (3): 579-585. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.03.030

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Two procedures for ridge preservation of molar extraction sites affected by severe bone defect due to advanced periodontitis

Li-ping ZHAO1,2,Wen-jie HU1△(),Tao XU1,2,Ya-lin ZHAN1,3,Yi-ping WEI1,Min ZHEN1,Cui WANG1   

  1. 1. Department of Periodontology
    2. Department of Emergency
    3. Department of General Dentistry, First Clinical Division, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2019-03-18 Online:2019-06-18 Published:2019-06-26
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Capital Foundation for Clinical Characteristics Application Research (Z161100000516042), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities: Peking University Clinical Scientist Program (BMU2019LCKXJ010)

RICH HTML

 35   

PDF (PC)

352

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate and to compare dimensional alterations of hard and soft tissues in molar extraction sites with irregular deficiency of bone plates due to advanced periodontitis receiving two different procedures, namely the flapped and flapless techniques with Bio-Gide? membrane covering the Bio-Oss? material for ridge preservation. Methods: Twenty-three patients with 24 infected-molar extraction sites received ridge preservation procedure, the first consecutive 12 sites belonged to the flap group (a full thickness mucoperiosteal flap and primary soft tissue closure) and the following 12 sites belonged to the flapless group (minimal flap with a collagen sponge and a secondary soft tissue closure). Width of keratinized tissue was evaluated before tooth extraction and after 6-month healing. Parallel periapical radiographs were taken immediately and 6 months after extraction to evaluate vertical bone changes. The width of the ridge was measured in the center of the ridge at the time of tooth extraction and after 6 months at implant placement. Results: After 6 months, width of keratinized tissue decreased (1.6±1.5) mm in the flap group (P=0.004) when compared with (0.3±1.6) mm in the flapless group (P>0.05). Both groups showed increases in ridge height from the central aspect, (5.53±4.20) mm for flap group and (7.70±4.35) mm for flapless group. These differences between the groups were not statistically significant (P=0.226). The ridge widths were (9.5±2.2) mm for flap group and (9.3±1.0) mm for flapless group at the time of implant insertion, and no statistical significance was observed between the flap and flapless groups. Conclusion: The study points out that both ridge preservation techniques were effective in increasing ridge height and minimizing ridge resorption after tooth extraction, and the ridge width allowed the placement of implants 6 months after ridge preservation. The flapless technique gave positive outcome in terms of the keratinized gingival width than that of the flap technique.

Key words: Periodontal diseases, Alveolar ridge augmentation, Molars, Parallel periapical radiograph

CLC Number: 

  • R782.1

Figure 1

Step-by-step flap procedures for ridge preservation with a flap procedure Flap procedure: A, view of the hopeless mandible molar; B, site after atraumatic extraction; C, socket filled and condensed with Bio-Oss? under light pressure; D, collagen membrane trimmed and placed over bone graft; E, advanced coronally flap and soft tissue primary closure; F, site evaluation after 6 months; G, periapical image before extraction; H, periapical image 6 months after ridge preservation; I, periapical image immediately after implant placement."

Figure 2

Step-by-step flapless procedures for ridge preservation with a flapless procedure Flapless procedure: A, view of the hopeless mandible molar; B, site after atraumatic extraction; C, socket filled, condensed with Bio-Oss? under light pressure and covered by collagen membrane; D, collagen sponge; E, collagen sponge to cover collagen membrane and wound sutured; F, site evaluation after 6 months; G, periapical image before extraction; H, periapical image 6 months after ridge preservation; I, periapical image immediately after implant placement."

Figure 3

Parallel periapical radiographs obtained immediately (A) and after 6 months (B) healing after ridge preservation MHplate, the distance between the alveolar ridge and reference at the mesial aspect; CHplate, the distance between the alveolar ridge and refe-rence at the central aspect; DHplate, the distance between the alveolar ridge and reference at the distal aspect; CEJ, cemento-enamel junction."

Table 1

Patient- and site-related characteristics in the two procedure groups"

ItemsFlap groupFlapless groupP
Age/years, x?±s49.3±7.446.1±5.90.247
Gender (male ∶female), n9 ∶38 ∶4
Total number of teeth, n1212
Tooth position, n
Maxillary molar22
Mandible molar1010
Probing depth/mm, x?±s5.9±1.45.9±2.00.972
Gingival recession/mm, x?±s1.0±0.91.4±1.20.442
Bleeding index, x?±s3.1±0.63.3±0.90.517
Healingtime/months, x?±s6.5±0.67.2±3.10.423

Table 2

Mean changes in keratinized width from baseline to 6 months"

ItemsFlap groupFlapless groupP
Baseline/mm, x?±s5.1±1.64.5±1.50.362
6 months/mm, x?±s3.5±2.14.2±1.30.325
Differences/mm, x?±s-1.6±1.5-0.3±1.60.054
P0.0040.478

Table 3

Changes in ridge width and ridge width 6 months after alveolar ridge preservation"

ItemsFlap groupFlapless groupP
BLWC/mm, x?±s-2.5±1.3-1.9±2.50.510
BLW/mm, x?±s9.5±2.29.3±1.00.772

Table 4

Vertical dimensional changes after alveolar ridge preservation"

ItemsBaseline6 monthsDifferencesP
MHplate/mm, x?±sFlap group4.47±3.183.80±1.380.67±2.390.875
Flapless group5.06±2.543.81±1.771.25±2.410.100
P0.561
CHplate/mm, x?±sFlap group9.45±4.593.92±2.165.53±4.200.001
Flapless group11.86±4.394.17±2.267.70±4.350.000
P0.226
DHplate/mm, x?±sFlap group5.35±3.453.07±1.842.28±2.460.008
Flapless group3.45±1.712.93±2.160.52±1.380.222
P0.044
[1] Pietrokovski J, Massler M.Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1967, 17(1): 21-27.
doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(67)90046-7
[2] Araujo MG, Lindhe J.Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2005, 32(2): 212-218.
doi: 10.1111/cpe.2005.32.issue-2
[3] Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, et al.A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(Suppl5): 1-21.
[4] Morton D, Martin WC, Ruskin JD.Single-stage Straumann dental implants in the aesthetic zone: considerations and treatment procedures[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2004, 62(9 Suppl 2): 57-66.
[5] Lopez-Martinez F, Gomez MG, Olivares-Ponce P, et al.Implants failures related to endodontic treatment. An observational retrospective study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(9): 992-995.
doi: 10.1111/clr.2015.26.issue-9
[6] Van der Weijden F, Dell’Acqua F, Slot DE. Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a syste-matic review[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2009, 36(12): 1048-1058.
doi: 10.1111/cpe.2009.36.issue-12
[7] Horvath A, Mardas N, Mezzomo LA, et al.Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2013, 17(2): 341-363.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0758-5
[8] Hammerle CH, Araujo MG, Simion M.Evidence-based know-ledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(Suppl 5): 80-82.
doi: 10.1111/clr.2011.23.issue-s5
[9] Darby I, Chen ST, Buser D.Ridge preservation techniques for implant therapy[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009, 24(Suppl): 260-271.
[10] Macbeth N, Trullenque-Eriksson A, Donos N, et al.Hard and soft tissue changes following alveolar ridge preservation: a syste-matic review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017, 28(8): 982-1004.
doi: 10.1111/clr.2017.28.issue-8
[11] Araujo MG, Da SJ, de Mendonca AF, et al. Ridge alterations following grafting of fresh extraction sockets in man. A randomized clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(4): 407-412.
[12] 詹雅琳, 胡文杰, 甄敏, 等. 去蛋白牛骨基质和可吸收胶原膜的磨牙拔牙位点保存效果影像学评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(1): 19-26.
[13] 赵丽萍, 詹雅琳, 胡文杰, 等. 不同测量方法评价磨牙拔牙位点保存术后牙槽骨的变化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(1): 126-132.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.01.023
[14] Zhao L, Xu T, Hu W, et al.Preservation and augmentation of molar extraction sites affected by severe bone defect due to advanced periodontitis: a prospective clinical trial[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2018, 20(3): 333-344.
doi: 10.1111/cid.2018.20.issue-3
[15] Zhao L, Wei YP, Xu T, et al.Changes in alveolar process dimensions following extraction of molars with advanced periodontal disease: a clinical pilot study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2019, 30(4): 324-335.
doi: 10.1111/clr.2019.30.issue-4
[16] Mardas N, Trullenque-Eriksson A, Macbeth N, et al.Does ridge preservation following tooth extraction improve implant treatment outcomes: a systematic review: Group 4: Therapeutic concepts & methods[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(Suppl 11): 180-201.
[17] Jambhekar S, Kernen F, Bidra AS.Clinical and histologic outcomes of socket grafting after flapless tooth extraction: a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015, 113(5): 371-382.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.009
[18] Engler-Hamm D, Cheung WS, Yen A, et al.Ridge preservation using a composite bone graft and a bioabsorbable membrane with and without primary wound closure: a comparative clinical trial[J]. J Periodontol, 2011, 82(3): 377-387.
doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.090342
[19] Vignoletti F, Matesanz P, Rodrigo D, et al.Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(Suppl 5): 22-38.
[20] Araujo M, Linder E, Lindhe J.Effect of a xenograft on early bone formation in extraction sockets: an experimental study in dog[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009, 20(1): 1-6.
[21] Barone A, Toti P, Piattelli A, et al.Extraction socket healing in humans after ridge preservation techniques: comparison between flapless and flapped procedures in a randomized clinical trial[J]. J Periodontol, 2014, 85(1): 14-23.
doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.120711
[22] Bragger U.Digital imagining in periodontal radiography: a review[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 1998, 15(9): 551-557.
[23] Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, et al.Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2003, 23(4): 313-323.
[1] CHEN Zhen,GU Bao-xin,TANG Yu-fang,YAN Zi-yu,NI Fang-duan,CUI Nian-hui. Constructions of the scale of difficulty in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars by using Delphi method [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(1): 100-104.
[2] Yi-fan YANG,Qing-xian LUAN. Correlation between cigarette smoking and periodontal status: A survey on the population of a community above 35-year-old in Beijing [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(6): 1144-1149.
[3] Wei QI,Jian-nan LI,Jing-ren ZHAO,Hai-xia XING,Jie PAN. Effect of triangular flap design and healing procedure on the sequelae after extraction of impacted lower third molars [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(5): 949-953.
[4] Yue LEI,Ying-ting YANG,Yuan ZHAN. Evaluation of bioceramic putty repairment in primary molars pulpotomy [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(1): 70-74.
[5] DOU Gui-li， WU Nan, ZHAO Shuang-yun, XIA Bin. Two-year outcomes of pulpotomy in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate: a retrospective study [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(1): 170-175.
[6] ZHAN Ya-lin, HU Wen-jie, XU Tao, ZHEN Min, LU Rui-fang. Histomorphometric evaluation of ridge preservation after molar tooth extraction [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(1): 169-175.
[7] ZHU Jie,OUYANG Xiang-ying. Observation of bone morphology in furcation defects of mandibular molars using cone beam computed tomography [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(1): 67-070.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(1): 82 -84 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(4): 351 -354 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(4): 361 -364 .
Copyright © Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd