Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (1): 100-104. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.01.016

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Constructions of the scale of difficulty in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars by using Delphi method

CHEN Zhen,GU Bao-xin,TANG Yu-fang,YAN Zi-yu,NI Fang-duan,CUI Nian-hui()   

  1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NHC Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry & NMPA Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2021-10-11 Online:2022-02-18 Published:2022-02-21
  • Contact: Nian-hui CUI E-mail:kqcuinianhui@bjmu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Program for New Clinical Techniques and Therapies of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology(PKUSSNCT-20B09)

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the relevant indicators affecting difficulty in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars and score difficulty of different operation and risk indicators, so as to build an intuitive and accurate scale to help operators make more accurate analysis and prediction of difficulty before the operation. Methods: Based on literature and the clinical review, the difficulty indicators of tooth extraction were summarized. Firstly, 10 doctors from Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology who had been engaged in alveolar surgery for a long time established an expert nominal group, and then rated whether the summarized indicators needed to be retained in the form of face-to-face questionnaires. A level 1 and 2 item frame for evaluating difficulty in the tooth extraction was formed after discussion; Then Delphi method was used to send a questionnaire to 30 experts by e-mail. After two rounds of scoring and modification, the scale of difficulty in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars was formed. Results: The recycling rate of two rounds of questionnaires was 100.0%,which showed that the experts were very enthusiastic about the study; The authority coefficients (Cr) of the two rounds of Delphi expert consultation were both 0.92, which showed that the results were representative and authoritative. After two rounds of grading and revision, the variable coefficient (CV) decreased and the Kendall’s concordance coefficient (W) increased, which were statistically significant: In the first round, the CV was 0.24 and W was 0.56 (P<0.001), and in the second, the CV was 0.19 and W was 0.72 (P<0.001), which indicated that there was a good convergence among the expert opinions. Finally, a scale of difficulty in the tooth extraction containing 12 items at level A and 37 items at level B was formed, including operation difficulty indicators, risk difficulty indicators and common difficulty indicators. Conclusion: Based on comprehensive literature retrieval, the study has put forward the concept that difficulty in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars is composed of operation difficulty and risk difficulty. Using Delphi method, the long-term clinical experience and professional knowledge of experts are transformed into quantitative indicators as a scoring scale. The scale has certain representativeness and authority.

Key words: Impacted mandibular third molars, Tooth extraction, The scale of difficulty, Delphi method

CLC Number: 

  • R782

Table 1

Basic information about the nominal group"

Basic information Items Number
Gender Male 6
Female 4
Age/years 31-40 1
41-49 3
≥50 6
Years of clinical work 10-15 1
15-20 3
≥20 6
Final degree Bachelor 1
Master 0
Doctor 9
Professional title Attending physician 1
Associate
chief physician
4
Chief physician 5

Table 2

Basic information about the Delphi experts"

Basic information Items Number
Age/years 31-40 9
41-50 11
>50 10
Years of clinical work 5-10 5
11-15 5
16-20 6
>20 14
Final degree Bachelor 4
Master 5
Doctor 21
Professional title Attending physician 8
Associate
chief physician
13
Chief physician 9
Research direction Alveolar surgery 22
Oral and maxillofacial surgery 5
Others 3
[1] Sanchez-Torres A, Soler-Capdevila J, Ustrell-Barral M, et al. Patient, radiological, and operative factors associated with surgical difficulty in the extraction of third molars: A systematic review[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2020, 49(5):655-665.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.10.009
[2] Montserrat-Bosch M, Figueiredo R, Nogueira-Magalhaes P, et al. Efficacy and complications associated with a modified inferior alveolar nerve block technique. A randomized, triple-blind clinical trial[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2014, 19(4):E391-E397.
[3] Sigron G, Pourmand P, Mache B, et al. The most common complications after wisdom-tooth removal: Part 1: A retrospective study of 1 199 cases in the mandible[J]. Swiss Dent J, 2014, 124(10):1042-1046, 1052.
pmid: 25342545
[4] 赵珺如, 刘乙澍, 崔念晖. 下颌第三磨牙拔除术后并发双侧广泛性皮下气肿及纵隔气肿1例报告[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2021, 14(2):253-256.
[5] Diniz-Freitas M, Lago-Mendez L, Gude-Sampedro F, et al. Pederson scale fails to predict how difficult it will be to extract lower third molars[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007, 45(1):23-26.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.12.004
[6] Al-Samman AA. Evaluation of Kharma scale as a predictor of lower third molar extraction difficulty[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2017, 22(6):e796-e799.
[7] Zhang X, Wang L, Gao Z, et al. Development of a new index to assess the difficulty level of surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars in an Asian population[J/OL]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2019, 77(7): 1358.e1-1351.e8 [2021-10-01]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30959010/ .
[8] 王芷乔. 应用德尔菲法确立甲状腺癌中医证候及分型指标的调查研究[D]. 北京中医药大学, 2016.
[9] Humphrey-Murto S, Varpio L, Gonsalves C, et al. Using consensus group methods such as Delphi and Nominal Group in medical education research[J]. Med Teach, 2017, 39(1):14-19.
doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1245856 pmid: 27841062
[10] 史静琤, 莫显昆, 孙振球. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2012, 37(2):49-52.
[11] Lakhani A, Watling DP, Zeeman H, et al. Nominal group technique for individuals with cognitive disability: A systematic review[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2018, 40(18):2105-2115.
doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1325946 pmid: 28503963
[12] 王青, 朱晓丹, 常茹, 等. 基于德尔菲专家咨询法构建稳定期精神分裂症康复方案的研究[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2021, 37(14):2357-2361.
[13] Sutherland K, Yeung W, Mak Y, et al. Envisioning the future of clinical analytics: A modified Delphi process in New South Wales, Australia[J]. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 2020, 20(1):210.
doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01226-7
[14] Langmack KA, Newton LA, Jordan S, et al. Cone beam CT dose reduction in prostate radiotherapy using Likert scale methods [J/OL]. Br J Radiol, 2016, 89: 20150460 [2021-10-01]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26689092/ .
[15] Wu C, Wu P, Li P, et al. Construction of an index system of core competence assessment for infectious disease specialist nurse in China: A Delphi study[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2021, 21(1):791.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06402-2
[16] Niederberger M, Spranger J. Delphi technique in health sciences: A map[J]. Front Public Health, 2020, 8:457.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00457 pmid: 33072683
[17] Nasa P, Jain R, Juneja D. Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness[J]. World J Methodol, 2021, 11(4):116-129.
[18] Jiang F, Liu T, Zhou H, et al. Developing medical record-based, healthcare quality indicators for psychiatric hospitals in China: A modified Delphi-analytic hierarchy process study[J]. Int J Qual Health Care, 2019, 31(10):733-740.
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzz005 pmid: 30753601
[19] Carvalho RF, Vasconcelos BC. Pernambuco index: Predictability of the complexity of surgery for impacted lower third molars[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2018, 47(2):234.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.07.013
[20] 史嘉昕. 下颌第三磨牙拔除时间的多因素相关分析及预测模型建立[D]. 天津医科大学, 2020.
[1] WANG Si-wen,YOU Peng-yue,LIU Yu-hua,WANG Xin-zhi,TANG Lin,WANG Mei. Efficacy of two barrier membranes and deproteinized bovine bone mineral on bone regeneration in extraction sockets: A microcomputed tomographic study in dogs [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(2): 364-370.
[2] Hang-ci ZHENG,Xiao-tong LI,Peng MEN,Xiang MA,Qiang WANG,Yao-long CHEN,Suo-di ZHAI. Selecting and defining the clinical questions and outcomes of Guideline for the Emergency Treatment of Anaphylaxis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 715-718.
[3] WANG Tian-jiao, LIU Yu, GUAN Ming. Intravenous sedation with midazolam and propofol target controlled infusion on patients’ perioperative anxiety under the mandibular third molar extraction [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(6): 1044-1049.
[4] ZHAO Li-ping, ZHAN Ya-lin, HU Wen-jie, WANG Hao-jie, WEI Yi-ping, ZHEN Min, Xu Tao, LIU Yun-song. Dental implantation and soft tissue augmentation after ridge preservation in a molar site: a case report [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(6): 1090-1094.
[5] LI Dan, GUO Chuan-bin, LIU Yu, WANG En-bo. Applicational evaluation of split tooth extractions of upper molars using piezosurgery [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(4): 709-713.
[6] HUANG Jun-qiang, LIU Shi-yao, JIANG Jiu-hui. Therapeutic evaluation of the correction of the severe bi-maxillary protrusion cases by Tweed-Merrifield technique [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(3): 555-561.
[7] ZHAN Ya-Lin, HU Wen-Jie, ZHEN Min, Xu-Tao, Lu-Rui-Fang. Radiographic evaluation of ridge preservation after molar tooth extraction: a controlled clinical trial [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(1): 19-26.
[8] GUAN Ming, WANG En-bo, LIU Yu, ZHANG Wei. Evaluation of propofol target controlled infusion with fentanyl intravenous sedation on the removal of impacted wisdom tooth [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2014, 46(1): 107-110.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 158 -161 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 329 -332 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 12 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(4): 355 -360 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(4): 409 -411 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(4): 412 -415 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(4): 429 -431 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(4): 434 -436 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(5): 453 -457 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(5): 494 -497 .