Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (4): 709-713. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.04.028

• Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Applicational evaluation of split tooth extractions of upper molars using piezosurgery

LI Dan1, GUO Chuan-bin2, LIU Yu2△, WANG En-bo2△   

  1. (1. Department of Second Dental Center; 2. Department of oral and maxillofacial surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China)
  • Online:2016-08-18 Published:2016-08-18
  • Contact: LIU Yu, WANG En-bo E-mail:liuyu4149@sina, comebwang-hlg@163.com

Abstract:

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of Piezosurgery in split teeth extractions. Methods:A single-center, randomized, split-mouth study was performed using a consecutive serious of unrelated healthy patients attending the departing of oral and maxillofacial surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology. 40 patients were selected for extraction of maxillary molars without reservation value,splitting or nonvital teeth. They were divided into control (20 patients) and test groups (20 patients) randomly. Surgical treatments for both groups were under local anesthesia. Molar teeth of control group were extracted by common equipments like dental elevators, chisels, forceps, etc. While molar teeth of experimental group were extracted by Piezosurgery, aided with the use of common equipments if needed. Then we compared the duration of surgery, frequency of the usage of chisels, expansion of postoperative bony socket surgical discomfort and postoperative pain between two groups. Results: The ave-rage of operation time was (629.5±171.0) s in control group and (456.0±337.2) s in test group. The buccal alveolar bone reduced (1.07±0.64) mm in control group and (1.49±0.61) mm in test group. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). The duration of surgery for experimental group was significantly longer than that of the control group, but the change of buccal alveolar bone was lower than the control group. For visual analogue scale (VAS) value of surgical discomfort, expansion of postoperative bony socket and the operative fear rate, there were no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusion:Piezosugery can be better to preserve alveolar bone, reduce trauma and patient’s fear. Application of the piezosugery reflect the characteristics of minimally invasive extraction, which has the value of promotion. The Piezosurgery technique have the advantage of reducing change of buccal alveolar bone during the surgery, but a longer surgical time was required when compared with the conventional technique. VAS value of surgical discomfort, expansion of postoperative bony socket and the operative fear rate, there were no significant difference. Minimally invasive tooth extraction technique has good clinical results and high satisfaction. Piezosurgery proved its worth as the instrument adapted to limiting the destruction of bone tissue.

Key words: Piezosurgery, Molar, Tooth extraction

CLC Number: 

  •  
[1] CHEN Zhen,GU Bao-xin,TANG Yu-fang,YAN Zi-yu,NI Fang-duan,CUI Nian-hui. Constructions of the scale of difficulty in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars by using Delphi method [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(1): 100-104.
[2] JIANG You-sheng,FENG Lin,GAO Xue-jun. Influence of base materials on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with endocrowns [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(4): 764-769.
[3] WANG Si-wen,YOU Peng-yue,LIU Yu-hua,WANG Xin-zhi,TANG Lin,WANG Mei. Efficacy of two barrier membranes and deproteinized bovine bone mineral on bone regeneration in extraction sockets: A microcomputed tomographic study in dogs [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(2): 364-370.
[4] Wei QI,Jian-nan LI,Jing-ren ZHAO,Hai-xia XING,Jie PAN. Effect of triangular flap design and healing procedure on the sequelae after extraction of impacted lower third molars [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(5): 949-953.
[5] Li-ping ZHAO,Wen-jie HU,Tao XU,Ya-lin ZHAN,Yi-ping WEI,Min ZHEN,Cui WANG. Two procedures for ridge preservation of molar extraction sites affected by severe bone defect due to advanced periodontitis [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(3): 579-585.
[6] Yue LEI,Ying-ting YANG,Yuan ZHAN. Evaluation of bioceramic putty repairment in primary molars pulpotomy [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(1): 70-74.
[7] DOU Gui-li, WU Nan, ZHAO Shuang-yun, XIA Bin. Two-year outcomes of pulpotomy in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate: a retrospective study [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(1): 170-175.
[8] WU Ling, LIU Xiao-jing, LI Zi-li, WANG Xing. Evaluation of accuracy of virtual occlusal definition in Angle class Ⅰ molar relationship [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(1): 154-159.
[9] WANG Tian-jiao, LIU Yu, GUAN Ming. Intravenous sedation with midazolam and propofol target controlled infusion on patients’ perioperative anxiety under the mandibular third molar extraction [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(6): 1044-1049.
[10] ZHAN Yuan, LIU He. Unerupted first deciduous molar located higher to the first premolar: a case report [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(1): 181-183.
[11] ZHU Jie,OUYANG Xiang-ying. Observation of bone morphology in furcation defects of mandibular molars using cone beam computed tomography [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(1): 67-070.
[12] ZHAO Li-ping, ZHAN Ya-lin, HU Wen-jie, WANG Hao-jie, WEI Yi-ping, ZHEN Min, Xu Tao, LIU Yun-song. Dental implantation and soft tissue augmentation after ridge preservation in a molar site: a case report [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(6): 1090-1094.
[13] HUANG Jun-qiang, LIU Shi-yao, JIANG Jiu-hui. Therapeutic evaluation of the correction of the severe bi-maxillary protrusion cases by Tweed-Merrifield technique [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(3): 555-561.
[14] ZHAO Li-ping, ZHAN Ya-lin, HU Wen-jie, XU Tao, WEI Yi-ping, ZHEN Min, WANG Cui. Evaluation with different measuring methods for the alveolar bone change of ridge preservation in molar sites [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(1): 126-132.
[15] ZHAN Ya-Lin, HU Wen-Jie, ZHEN Min, Xu-Tao, Lu-Rui-Fang. Radiographic evaluation of ridge preservation after molar tooth extraction: a controlled clinical trial [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(1): 19-26.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(1): 82 -84 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(4): 361 -364 .