Email Alert | RSS

Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (4): 764-769. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.04.024

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Influence of base materials on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with endocrowns

JIANG You-sheng,FENG Lin(),GAO Xue-jun   

  1. Department of Cariology and Endodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology,Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2021-06-15 Online:2021-08-18 Published:2021-08-25
  • Contact: Lin FENG E-mail:1165155446@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    Beijing Natural Science Foundation(7113176)

RICH HTML

 15   

PDF (PC)

166

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the influence of base materials on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with endocrowns using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Methods: A maxillary second premolar was scanned by Micro-CT and a three-dimensional finite element model of ceramic endocrown with 1 mm thickness of base was established. A model without base was also established as a negative control. Four kinds of conventional base materials with different elastic modulus were adopted: light cure glass ionomer(3M Vitrebond, 3 657 MPa), flowable composite resin(3M Filtek Z350XT Flowable Restorative, 7 300 MPa), high strength glass ionomer(GC Fuji Ⅸ, 13 130 MPa), and posterior composite resin(3M Filtek P60, 19 700 MPa). With a 200 N force loaded vertically and obliquely, the distribution and magnitude of stress in the tooth tissue and adhesive layer were investigated by three-dimensional finite element analysis. Results: The maximum von Mises stress values(vertical/oblique) in dentin and adhesive layer were measured as follows: (1) no base material: 19.39/70.49 MPa in dentin and 6.97/17.97 MPa in adhesive layer; (2) light cure glass ionomer: 19.00/69.75 MPa in dentin and 6.87/16.30 MPa in adhesive layer; (3) flowable composite resin: 18.78/69.33 MPa in dentin and 6.79/16.17 MPa in adhesive layer; (4) high strength glass ionomer: 18.71/69.20 MPa in dentin and 6.74/16.07 MPa in adhesive layer; (5) posterior composite resin: 18.61/69.03 MPa in dentin and 6.70/16.01 MPa in adhesive layer. Under the same loading condition, models with different elastic moduli of base materials had similar stress distribution patterns. The von Mises stress of tooth tissue was mainly concentrated in the tooth cervix. Under oblique load, the regions where von Mises stress concentrated in were similar to those under a vertical load, but the values increased. The stress concentration in the tooth cervix was alleviated in models with base materials compared with the model without base material. The maximum von Mises stress in the tooth tissue and adhesive layer decreased when the elastic modulus of base materials increased and got close to that of dentin. Conclusion: The posterior composite resin of which the elastic moduli is high and close to that of dentin is recommended as base material for premolar endocrowns to alleviate the concentration of stress in tooth cervix and adhesive layer.

Key words: Finite element analysis, Endocrown, Base materials, Maxillary premolar

CLC Number: 

  • R782.1

Figure 1

Sectional view of solid models A, 1 mm thickness of base material; B, no base material."

Figure 2

Solid model of maxillary premolar restored with endocrown"

Figure 3

Finite-element model of maxillary premolar restored with endocrowns"

Table 1

Properties of materials used in finite element analysis models"

Materials Elastic modulus/MPa Poisson ratio
Enamel 84 100 0.33
Dentin 18 600 0.31
Periodontal ligament 70 0.45
Cortical bone 13 700 0.30
Cancellous bone 1 370 0.30
Endocrown 10 000 0.20
Adhesive layer 5 000 0.29
Light cure glass ionomer 3 657 0.36
Flowable composite resin 7 300 0.39
High strength glass ionomer 13 130 0.30
Posterior composite resin 19 700 0.32

Table 2

Maximum von Mises stress values in enamel, dentin, adhesive layer, and restoration /MPa"

Items Enamel Dentin Adhesive layer Base material Restoration
Vertical Oblique Vertical Oblique Vertical Oblique Vertical Oblique Vertical Oblique
No base material 51.20 152.00 19.39 70.49 6.97 17.97 409.90 447.50
Light cure glass ionomer 50.45 151.20 19.00 69.75 6.87 16.30 4.89 14.09 448.80 429.20
Flowable composite resin 49.61 149.80 18.78 69.33 6.79 16.17 5.81 14.44 448.90 429.20
High strength glass ionomer 48.96 148.60 18.71 69.20 6.74 16.07 7.46 17.14 449.00 429.30
Posterior composite resin 48.55 147.80 18.61 69.03 6.70 16.01 8.56 20.73 449.10 429.30

Figure 4

von Mises stress distributions in maxillary premolar restored with endocrowns and different base materials under oblique load of 200 N A, enamel; B, dentin; C, restoration; D, adhesive layer; E, base material. Unit: MPa."

Figure 5

von Mises stress distributions in maxillary premolar restored with endocrowns and different base materials under vertical load of 200 N A, enamel; B, dentin; C, restoration; D, adhesive layer; E, base material. Unit: MPa."

Figure 6

Von Mises stress distributions in the lingual wall of pulp chamber under oblique load of 200 N Arrows shows the stress concentration inside the pulp chamber. Unit: MPa."

[1] Zelic K, Vukicevic A, Jovicic G, et al. Mechanical weakening of devitalized teeth: three-dimensional finite element analysis and prediction of tooth fracture [J]. Int Endod J, 2015, 48(9):850-863.
doi: 10.1111/iej.12381 pmid: 25243348
[2] 包旭东. 椅旁计算机辅助设计与辅助制作嵌体冠粘接修复大面积缺损根管治疗牙的利与弊 [J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2018, 53(4):221-225.
[3] Bindl A, Mörmann WH. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years-preliminary results [J]. J Adhes Dent, 1999, 1(3):255-265.
pmid: 11725673
[4] 李智, 高承志, 许永伟, 等. 铸造陶瓷高嵌体修复根管治疗后前磨牙的3年临床效果观察 [J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2015, 33(3):263-266.
[5] Belleflamme MM, Geerts SO, Louwette MM, et al. No post-nocore approach to restore severely damaged posterior teeth: An up to 10-year retrospective study of documented endocrown cases [J]. J Dent, 2017, 63:1-7.
doi: S0300-5712(17)30093-3 pmid: 28456557
[6] 冯娟, 郭慧慧, 申晋斌, 等. 磨牙髓室底垫底厚度对全瓷嵌体冠应力分布的影响 [J]. 牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志, 2017, 27(1):16-21.
[7] 王惠芸. 我国人牙的测量和统计 [J]. 中华口腔科杂志, 1959, 7(3):149-155.
[8] 张丹, 白保晶, 张振庭. 垫底厚度对全瓷嵌体修复应力分布影响的三维有限元分析 [J]. 北京口腔医学, 2015, 23(2):105-108.
[9] Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the TM technology [J]. Dent Mater, 2011, 27(4):348-355.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.014
[10] Yap AUJ, Wang X, Wu X, et al. Comparative hardness and modulus of tooth-colored restoratives: A depth-sensing microindentation study [J]. Biomaterials, 2004, 25(11):2179-2185.
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.003
[11] Papadogiannis DY, Lakes RS, Papadogiannis Y, et al. The effect of temperature on the viscoelastic properties of nano-hybrid composites [J]. Dent Mater, 2008, 24(2):257-266.
pmid: 17640723
[12] Zhu J, Rong Q, Wang X, et al. Influence of remaining tooth structure and restorative material type on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars: A finite element analysis [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017, 117(5):646-655.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.023
[13] Coldea A, Fischer J, Swain MV, et al. Damage tolerance of indirect restorative materials (including PICN) after simulated bur adjustments [J]. Dent Mater, 2015, 31(6):684-694.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.03.007
[14] Chung SM, Yap AUJ, Koh WK, et al. Measurement of Poisson’s ratio of dental composite restorative materials [J]. Biomaterials, 2004, 25(13):2455-2460.
pmid: 14751729
[15] 冯瑞明, 薛明. 根管治疗后牙体粘接修复前的髓腔处理 [J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2017, 10(4):193-197.
[16] Farah JW, Powers JM, Dennison JB, et al. Effects of cement bases on the stresses and deflections in composite restorations [J]. J Dent Res, 1976, 55(1):115-120.
pmid: 1060645
[17] Yamamoto T, Takeishi S, Momoi Y. Finite element stress analysis of indirect restorations prepared in cavity bases [J]. Dent Mater J, 2007, 26(2):274-279.
doi: 10.4012/dmj.26.274
[1] LI Zhi,XU Yong-xiang,BAO Xu-dong,WANG Xiao-yan. Effects of the resin base and retention depth on fracture resistance of molars restored with nano-ceramic endocrowns [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(1): 95-99.
[2] Wei ZHOU,Jin-gang AN,Qi-guo RONG,Yi ZHANG. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of traumatic mechanism of mandibular symphyseal fracture combined with bilateral intracapsular condylar fractures [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 983-989.
[3] Shuang REN,Hui-juan SHI,Jia-hao ZHANG,Zhen-long LIU,Jia-yi SHAO,Jing-xian ZHU,Xiao-qing HU,Hong-shi HUANG,Ying-fang AO. Finite element analysis of the graft stresses after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 865-870.
[4] Chun-ping LIN,Song-he LU,Jun-xin ZHU,Hong-cheng HU,Zhao-guo YUE,Zhi-hui TANG. Influence of thread shapes of custom-made root-analogue implants on stress distribution of peri-implant bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(6): 1130-1137.
[5] Jia-hao ZHANG,Shuang REN,Jia-yi SHAO,Xing-yue NIU,Xiao-qing HU,Ying-fang AO. Anatomical and finite element analysis of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction within biomechanical insertion [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(3): 586-590.
[6] Hong-yu FU,Fang-fang WANG,Xiao-mei HOU. Construction and mechanical analysis of finite element model for bending property of controlled memory wire nickel-titanium rotary file [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(1): 131-135.
[7] . Stress change of periodontal ligament of the anterior teeth at the stage of space closure in lingual appliances: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(1): 141-147.
[8] ZHAO Xu, ZHANG Lei, SUN Jian, YANG Zhen-yu, XIE Qiu-fei. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of influence of occlusal surface height on stress distribution around posterior implant-supported single crown [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(1): 94-100.
[9] ZHEN Min, HU Wen-jie, RONG Qi-guo. Finite element analysis of the maxillary central incisor with crown lengthening surgery and post-core restoration in management of crown-root fracture [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(6): 1015-1021.
[10] ZHOU Tuan-Feng, ZHANG Xiang-Hao, WANG Xin-Zhi. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of one-piece computer aided design and computer aided manufacture involved zirconia post and core [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(1): 78-84.
[11] YANG Xue, RONG Qi-Guo, YANG Ya-Dong. Influence of attachment type on stress distribution of implant-supported removable partial dentures [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(1): 72-77.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(4): 456 -458 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 125 -128 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 135 -140 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 158 -161 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 217 -220 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(1): 52 -55 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(1): 109 -111 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(3): 297 -301 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(5): 505 -515 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(5): 599 -601 .
Copyright © Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd