Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2020, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (6): 1124-1129. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.06.023

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application of mixed reality technique for the surgery of oral and maxillofacial tumors

Zu-nan TANG,Yuh SOH Hui,Lei-hao HU,Yao YU,Wen-bo ZHANG,Xin PENG()   

  1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2020-02-20 Online:2020-12-18 Published:2020-12-13
  • Contact: Xin PENG E-mail:pxpengxin@263.net
  • Supported by:
    Key Research and Development Program of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region(2018BEG02012)

RICH HTML

  

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the application of mixed reality technique for the surgery of oral and maxillofacial tumors. Methods: In this study, patients with a diagnosis of an oral and maxillofacial tumor who were referred to Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from December 2018 to January 2020 were selected. The preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography data of the patients were imported into StarAtlas Holographic Medical Imaging System (Visual 3D Corp., Beijing, China). Three-dimensional (3D) model of tumor and key structures, such as skeleton and vessels were reconstructed to three-dimensionally present the spatial relationship between them, followed with the key structures delineation and preoperative virtual surgical planning. By using mixed reality technique, the real-time 3D model was displayed stereotactically in the surgical site. While keeping sterile during operation, the surgeon could use simple gestures to adjust the 3D model, and observed the location, range, and size of tumor and the key structures adjacent to the tumor. Mixed reality technique was used to assist the operation: 3D model registration was performed for guidance before tumor excision; intraoperative real-time verification was performed during tumor exposure and after excision of the tumor. The Likert scale was used to evaluate the application of mixed reality technique after the operation. Results: Eight patients underwent mixed reality assisted tumor resection, and all of them successfully completed the operation. The average time of the 3D model registration was 12.0 minutes. In all the cases, the surgeon could intuitively and three-dimensionally observe the 3D model of the tumor and the surrounding anatomical structures, and could adjust the model during the operation. The results of the Likert scale showed that mixed reality technique got high scores in terms of perceptual accuracy, helping to locate the anatomical parts, the role of model guidance during surgery, and the potential for improving surgical safety (4.22, 4.19, 4.16, and 4.28 points respectively). Eight patients healed well without perioperative complications. Conclusion: By providing real-time stereotactic visualization of anatomy of surgical site and guiding the operation process through 3D model, mixed reality technique could improve the accuracy and safety of the excision of oral and maxillofacial tumors.

Key words: Mixed reality(MR), Oral and maxillofacial tumor, 3D reconstruction

CLC Number: 

  • R782.05

Figure 1

The application process of mixed reality technique"

Figure 2

Obtained CT data A, sagittal CT slice; B, horizontal CT slice; C, coronal CT slice."

Figure 3

3D reconstruction model"

Figure 4

3D reconstruction model of the tumor and surrounding anatomical structure observed by the operator"

Figure 5

The registration effect of 3D model"

Table 1

Description of the 8 patients with the oral and maxillofacial tumors"

Case Gander Age/years Lesion range Image registration time/min Pathology Complication Follow-up time/months
1 Male 78 Parapharyngeal 14 Pleomorphic adenoma No 13
2 Male 51 Upper neck 10 carotid body tumor No 12
3 Male 34 Mandibular 13 Ameloblastoma No 11
4 Male 45 Maxilla 12 Ameloblastic fibroma No 11
5 Male 32 Mandibular 11 Ameloblastoma No 8
6 Male 19 Maxilla 14 Odontogenic myxoma No 7
7 Male 69 Maxilla 13 Osteosarcoma No 2
8 Male 50 Parotid gland 9 Sarcoma No 1

Figure 6

Results of the Likert scale questionnaire"

[1] 章文博, 于尧, 王洋, 等. 数字化外科技术在上颌骨缺损重建中的应[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017,49(1):1-5.
[2] Bouchard C, Magill JC, Nikonovskiy V, et al. Osteomark: a surgical navigation system for oral and maxillofacial surgery[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012,41(2):265-270.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.10.017 pmid: 22103996
[3] Haddock NT, Monaco C, Weimer KA, et al. Increasing bony contact and overlap with computer-designed offset cuts in free fibula mandible reconstruction[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2012,23(6):1592-1595.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318257576c pmid: 23147284
[4] Pietruski P, Majak M, wiatek-Najwer E, et al. Navigation-guided fibula free flap for mandibular reconstruction: A proof of concept study[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2019,72(4):572-580.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.01.026 pmid: 30803870
[5] Tepper OM, Rudy HL, Lefkowitz A, et al. Mixed reality with holoLens: where virtual reality meets augmented reality in the operating room[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2017,140(5):1066-1070.
pmid: 29068946
[6] Mitsuno D, Ueda K, Hirota Y, et al. Effective application of mixed reality device hololens: simple manual alignment of surgical field and holograms[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2019,143(2):647-651.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005215 pmid: 30688914
[7] Incekara F, Smits M, Dirven C, et al. Clinical feasibility of a wearable mixed-reality device in neurosurgery[J]. World Neurosurg, 2018,118:e422-e427.
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.208 pmid: 30257298
[8] Zhu H, Li Y, Wang C, et al. A first attempt of inferior vena cava filter successfully guided by a mixed-reality system: a case report[J]. J Geriatr Cardiol, 2019,16(7):575-577.
doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.07.008 pmid: 31447896
[9] Saito Y, Sugimoto M, Imura S, et al. Intraoperative 3d hologram support with mixed reality techniques in liver surgery[J]. Ann Surg, 2020,271(1):e4-e7.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003552 pmid: 31425293
[10] Rose AS, Kim H, Fuchs H, et al. Development of augmented-reality applications in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery[J]. Laryngoscope, 2019,129(S3):S1-S11.
[11] 乔晨. 增强现实牙科虚拟手术的关键技术研究[D]. 北京理工大学, 2011.
[12] 张益. 数字化外科技术及眼眶骨折精确重建[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2012,47(8):463-465.
[13] 于尧, 章文博, 王洋, 等. iPlan CMF软件辅助下增强CT三维重建在头颈部肿瘤治疗中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017,49(5):878-882.
[14] 赵峰, 高勃, 刘震侠, 等. Dicom标准和Mimics软件辅助建立下颌骨三维有限元模型[J]. 西南国防医药, 2005,15(5):479-481.
[15] Sauer IM, Queisner M, Tang P, et al. Mixed reality in visceral surgery: development of a suitable workflow and evaluation of intraoperative use-cases[J]. Ann Surg, 2017,266(5):706-712.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002448 pmid: 28767561
[16] Léger É, Drouin S, Collins DL, et al. Quantifying attention shifts in augmented reality image-guided neurosurgery[J]. Healthc Technol Lett, 2017,4(5):188-192.
doi: 10.1049/htl.2017.0062 pmid: 29184663
[17] Khor WS, Baker B, Amin K, et al. Augmented and virtual reality in surgery-the digital surgical environment: applications, limitations and legal pitfalls[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2016,4(23):454.
doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.12.23 pmid: 28090510
[18] Gregory TM, Gregory J, Sledge J, et al. Surgery guided by mixed reality: presentation of a proof of concept[J]. Acta Orthop, 2018,89(5):480-483.
doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1506974 pmid: 30350756
[19] McJunkin JL, Jiramongkolchai P, Chung W, et al. Development of a mixed reality platform for lateral skull base anatomy[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2018,39(10):e1137-e1142.
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001995 pmid: 30239435
[20] 叶哲伟, 吴星火. 混合现实技术在骨科的最新应用进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018,26(1):13-14.
[21] Zhang WB, Mao C, Liu XJ, et al. Outcomes of orbital floor reconstruction after extensive maxillectomy using the computer-assisted fabricated individual titanium mesh technique[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015,73(10):2065.
pmid: 26188101
[22] Sukegawa S, Kanno T, Furuki Y. Application of computer-assisted navigation systems in oral and maxillofacial surgery[J]. Jpn Dent Sci Rev, 2018,54(3):139-149.
pmid: 30128061
[23] 陈宝权, 秦学英. 混合现实中的虚实融合与人机智能交融[J]. 中国科学(信息科学), 2016,46(12):1737-1747.
[24] Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes[J]. Arch Psychol, 1932,22:5-55.
[1] Fei WANG,Yang-yang ZHAO,Ming GUAN,Jing WANG,Xiang-liang XU,Yu LIU,Xin-li ZHAI. Application of intravenous sedation in 2 582 cases of oral and maxillofacial surgery [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2020, 52(1): 181-186.
[2] Ming-zhe LI,Xiao-xia WANG,Zi-li LI,Biao YI,Cheng LIANG,Wei HE. Accuracy analysis of computer assisted navigation for condylectomy via intraoral approach [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(1): 182-186.
[3] Ling GAO,Yun LIU,Xu-dong YANG. Effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine for children undergoing dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(6): 1078-1082.
[4] YU Yao, ZHANG Wen-bo, WANG Yang, LIU Xiao-jing, GUO Chuan-bin, YU Guang-yan, PENG Xin. Application of three-dimensional reconstruction of the enhanced CT with iPlan CMF software in head and neck neoplasms [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 0, (): 878-882.
[5] YU Yao, ZHANG Wen-bo, WANG Yang, LIU Xiao-jing, GUO Chuan-bin, YU Guang-yan, PENG Xin. Application of three-dimensional reconstruction of the enhanced CT with iPlan CMF software in head and neck neoplasms [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(5): 878-882.
[6] GE Na, GUAN Ming, LI Xi, LI Shuai, WANG En-bo. Application of flexible laryngeal mask airway in oral & maxillofacial day surgery [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(6): 1010-1014.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!