Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (4): 672-679. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.04.021

• Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Preventive effects of ulinastatin on acute respiratory distress syndrome

JIA Li-jing1,2, YI Liang3, YANG Zhi-xu3, WANG Shu-peng4, LI Gang4, ZHU Xi1△   

  1. (1. ICU, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; 2. ICU, Cangzhou People’s Hospital, Cangzhou 061000, Hebei, China; 3. ICU, Xiyuan Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100091, China; 4. ICU, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China)
  • Online:2016-08-18 Published:2016-08-18
  • Contact: ZHU Xi E-mail:xizhuccm@163.com
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81372043), the Capital Medical Development and Scientific Research Fund (2009-1014), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7162199), and Techpool Research Fund (01201113)

Abstract:

Objective:To explore the effect of ulinastatin on prevention of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: A prospective multicentral cohort study was conducted. The patients from three intensive care units (ICUs) of grade A tertiary hospitals in Beijing and a ICU of grade A tertiary hospitals in Cangzhou from January 2012 to December 2014, included 77 ARDS atrisk patients with ulinastatin treatment and 108 ARDS atrisk patients without ulinastatin treatment (control) were eligible. Both groups received normal treatment; additionally, the intervention group received 600 000 units of ulinastatin via intravenous infusion for 5 days. The control group received the same amount of saline via intravenous infusion for 5 days. Venous blood human neutrophil elastase (HNE) and peptidase inhibitor 3 (PI3) levels were measured on days 1, 3, and 7, respectively. Other outcomes included acute physiology and chronic health evaluation scoring Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ), body temperature, respiratory rate, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, white blood cell counts, PaO2/FiO2, ARDS incident, mechanical ventilation time, ICU treatment and hospitalization duration, 28 days mortality.  Results: The PI3 levels showed no statistical difference on day 1, but significant differences on day 3 and day 7 between the two groups (P<0.01). HNE/PI3 ratio showed no statistical difference on day 1, but significant differences on day 3 and day 7 (P<0.05). PaO2/FiO2 was significantly higher in ulinastatin group on day 3 and day 7 (P<0.05). The incident rate for ulinastatin group was 15.58%, lower than that for the control group (33.33%), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The mechanical ventilation time and ICU treatment time in ulinastatin group was shorter than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There were no significant effects in other factors. Conclusion: Increased dose of ulinastatin can recover the balance of HNE and its antagonist, lower the HNE’s damage to lungs, and further reduce the ARDS incident rate.

Key words: Ulinastatin, Respiratory distress syndrome, adult, Leukocyte elastase

CLC Number: 

  • R563.8
[1] Xiaoqian SI,Xiujuan ZHAO,Fengxue ZHU,Tianbing WANG. Risk factors for acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with traumatic hemorrhagic shock [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(2): 307-312.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!