Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) ›› 2015, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 1000-1004. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671167X.2015.06.020

• Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Resting pressure of the tongue body on the tongue anchorage pad

ZENG Jing-jing, XU Kai-fan, GAO Xue-mei, XU Tian-min△   

  1. (Department of Orthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China)
  • Online:2015-12-18 Published:2015-12-18
  • Contact: XU Tian-min E-mail:tmxuortho@gmail.com
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the National Clinical Key Specialty Construction Project(4161604)

Abstract:

Objective:To measure the resting pressure of the tongue body on the sagittal and vertical dimensions of the tongue anchorage pad (TAP), and to investigate the proper position of TAP as an anchorage. Methods: Nineteen volunteers with individual normal occlusion (4 males and 15 females, age 23-33 years) were recruited in the study. Individualized TAP was designed and made for each subject. On the sagittal dimension, the pressure along the midline at the level of the distal of the second premolar (PM2), the first molar (M1) and the second molar (M2) were measured. On the vertical dimension, pressures on TAPs with height of -3 mm, 0 mm, and 3 mm were measured, with 0 mm standing for the reference point recorded by the tongue position record. The tongue resting pressure of the volunteers in the upright position was measured by miniature sensors (FSS1500NS, Honeywell, USA) embedded in TAP. Nonparametric analysis was applied with the significant level of 0.05. Results: On the vertical dimension, the pressure obtained at the height of -3 mm, 0 mm, and 3 mm were 105.83 Pa, 167.75 Pa, and 254.25 Pa, respectively (P<0.001). On the sagittal dimension, the pressure detected at the level of PM2, M1, and M2 were 177.64 Pa, 126.72 Pa, and 109.37 Pa, respectively (P<0.001). Conclusion: Tongue pressure rises significantly with the increase of TAP height. On the sagittal dimension, pressure decreases along the palatal midline in an anteroposterior direction. But in the clinical practice, we should also put comfort into consideration.

Key words: Tongue, Muscle strength, Orthodontic appliances, Deglutition, Tongue anchorage pad

CLC Number: 

  • R783.5
[1] Junqi SU,Xiaoying WANG,Zhiqiang SUN. Establishment and verification of a prognostic nomogram for survival of tongue squamous cell carcinoma patients who underwent cervical dissection [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(1): 120-130.
[2] WANG Jing, HE Lu. Effect of mechanical selfcleaning of tongue coating on malodor in halitosis patients originating from tongue coating [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(2): 344-348.
[3] JIA Ling-fei, GAN Ye-hua, YU Guang-yan. Relationships between microRNA expressions and prognosis in patients with tongue squamous cell carcinoma and the mechanisms microRNA regulating tongue squamous cell carcinoma biological behavior [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(1): 5-9.
[4] ZHANG Qun, LIU Xue-nan, CHANG Qing, AO Shuang, ZHENG Shu-guo, XU Tao. Analysis of volatile sulfur compounds production of oral cavity in preschool children and influencing factors [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(6): 983-989.
[5] HUANG Hong-shi, JIANG Yan-fang, YANG Jie, YU Yuan-yuan, WANG Yi, XU Yan, AO Ying-fang. Effect of anterior cruciate ligament rupture on hamstring∶quadriceps ratio during isokinetic knee extension and flexion at 30 degrees of flexion [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(5): 787-790.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!