Two procedures for ridge preservation of molar extraction sites affected by severe bone defect due to advanced periodontitis

  • Li-ping ZHAO ,
  • Wen-jie HU ,
  • Tao XU ,
  • Ya-lin ZHAN ,
  • Yi-ping WEI ,
  • Min ZHEN ,
  • Cui WANG
Expand
  • 1. Department of Periodontology
    2. Department of Emergency
    3. Department of General Dentistry, First Clinical Division, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China

Received date: 2019-03-18

  Online published: 2019-06-26

Supported by

Supported by the Capital Foundation for Clinical Characteristics Application Research (Z161100000516042), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities: Peking University Clinical Scientist Program (BMU2019LCKXJ010)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate and to compare dimensional alterations of hard and soft tissues in molar extraction sites with irregular deficiency of bone plates due to advanced periodontitis receiving two different procedures, namely the flapped and flapless techniques with Bio-Gide? membrane covering the Bio-Oss? material for ridge preservation. Methods: Twenty-three patients with 24 infected-molar extraction sites received ridge preservation procedure, the first consecutive 12 sites belonged to the flap group (a full thickness mucoperiosteal flap and primary soft tissue closure) and the following 12 sites belonged to the flapless group (minimal flap with a collagen sponge and a secondary soft tissue closure). Width of keratinized tissue was evaluated before tooth extraction and after 6-month healing. Parallel periapical radiographs were taken immediately and 6 months after extraction to evaluate vertical bone changes. The width of the ridge was measured in the center of the ridge at the time of tooth extraction and after 6 months at implant placement. Results: After 6 months, width of keratinized tissue decreased (1.6±1.5) mm in the flap group (P=0.004) when compared with (0.3±1.6) mm in the flapless group (P>0.05). Both groups showed increases in ridge height from the central aspect, (5.53±4.20) mm for flap group and (7.70±4.35) mm for flapless group. These differences between the groups were not statistically significant (P=0.226). The ridge widths were (9.5±2.2) mm for flap group and (9.3±1.0) mm for flapless group at the time of implant insertion, and no statistical significance was observed between the flap and flapless groups. Conclusion: The study points out that both ridge preservation techniques were effective in increasing ridge height and minimizing ridge resorption after tooth extraction, and the ridge width allowed the placement of implants 6 months after ridge preservation. The flapless technique gave positive outcome in terms of the keratinized gingival width than that of the flap technique.

Cite this article

Li-ping ZHAO , Wen-jie HU , Tao XU , Ya-lin ZHAN , Yi-ping WEI , Min ZHEN , Cui WANG . Two procedures for ridge preservation of molar extraction sites affected by severe bone defect due to advanced periodontitis[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019 , 51(3) : 579 -585 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.03.030

References

[1] Pietrokovski J, Massler M.Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1967, 17(1): 21-27.
[2] Araujo MG, Lindhe J.Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2005, 32(2): 212-218.
[3] Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, et al.A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(Suppl5): 1-21.
[4] Morton D, Martin WC, Ruskin JD.Single-stage Straumann dental implants in the aesthetic zone: considerations and treatment procedures[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2004, 62(9 Suppl 2): 57-66.
[5] Lopez-Martinez F, Gomez MG, Olivares-Ponce P, et al.Implants failures related to endodontic treatment. An observational retrospective study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(9): 992-995.
[6] Van der Weijden F, Dell’Acqua F, Slot DE. Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a syste-matic review[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2009, 36(12): 1048-1058.
[7] Horvath A, Mardas N, Mezzomo LA, et al.Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2013, 17(2): 341-363.
[8] Hammerle CH, Araujo MG, Simion M.Evidence-based know-ledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(Suppl 5): 80-82.
[9] Darby I, Chen ST, Buser D.Ridge preservation techniques for implant therapy[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009, 24(Suppl): 260-271.
[10] Macbeth N, Trullenque-Eriksson A, Donos N, et al.Hard and soft tissue changes following alveolar ridge preservation: a syste-matic review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017, 28(8): 982-1004.
[11] Araujo MG, Da SJ, de Mendonca AF, et al. Ridge alterations following grafting of fresh extraction sockets in man. A randomized clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(4): 407-412.
[12] 詹雅琳, 胡文杰, 甄敏, 等. 去蛋白牛骨基质和可吸收胶原膜的磨牙拔牙位点保存效果影像学评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(1): 19-26.
[13] 赵丽萍, 詹雅琳, 胡文杰, 等. 不同测量方法评价磨牙拔牙位点保存术后牙槽骨的变化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(1): 126-132.
[14] Zhao L, Xu T, Hu W, et al.Preservation and augmentation of molar extraction sites affected by severe bone defect due to advanced periodontitis: a prospective clinical trial[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2018, 20(3): 333-344.
[15] Zhao L, Wei YP, Xu T, et al.Changes in alveolar process dimensions following extraction of molars with advanced periodontal disease: a clinical pilot study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2019, 30(4): 324-335.
[16] Mardas N, Trullenque-Eriksson A, Macbeth N, et al.Does ridge preservation following tooth extraction improve implant treatment outcomes: a systematic review: Group 4: Therapeutic concepts & methods[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(Suppl 11): 180-201.
[17] Jambhekar S, Kernen F, Bidra AS.Clinical and histologic outcomes of socket grafting after flapless tooth extraction: a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015, 113(5): 371-382.
[18] Engler-Hamm D, Cheung WS, Yen A, et al.Ridge preservation using a composite bone graft and a bioabsorbable membrane with and without primary wound closure: a comparative clinical trial[J]. J Periodontol, 2011, 82(3): 377-387.
[19] Vignoletti F, Matesanz P, Rodrigo D, et al.Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(Suppl 5): 22-38.
[20] Araujo M, Linder E, Lindhe J.Effect of a xenograft on early bone formation in extraction sockets: an experimental study in dog[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009, 20(1): 1-6.
[21] Barone A, Toti P, Piattelli A, et al.Extraction socket healing in humans after ridge preservation techniques: comparison between flapless and flapped procedures in a randomized clinical trial[J]. J Periodontol, 2014, 85(1): 14-23.
[22] Bragger U.Digital imagining in periodontal radiography: a review[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 1998, 15(9): 551-557.
[23] Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, et al.Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2003, 23(4): 313-323.
Outlines

/