Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) >
Urodynamic classification of male patients with symptoms of overactive bladder and the outcome classification
Received date: 2018-03-14
Online published: 2019-12-19
Objective: To introduce a urodynamic classification of male patients with symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB) and discuss its clinical significance in practice.Methods: From January 2015 to January 2017, there were 181 male patients from Peking University People’s Hospital who were diagnosed clinically with OAB and underwent preoperative urodynamic test. Finally 126 male patients were enrolled in the research. Male OAB patients could be stratified into four groups based on the chief complaints (whether or not presenting urgency) and the results of urodynamic test (whether or not presenting detrusor overactivity and the ability to stop the involuntary contraction). The contents of this follow-up study included the basic information, the preoperative and postoperative scores of the OAB symptom score (OABSS), the preoperative and postoperative scores of the international prostate symptom score (IPSS), and the amount of the concomitant diseases.Results: According to the classification, the amounts of the four types of OAB patients were 32 (25.40%) for type Ⅰ, 27 (21.43%) for type Ⅱ, 59 (46.83%) for type Ⅲ, and 8 (6.35%) for type Ⅳ, respectively. The data of their heights showed no statistical significance (P>0.05). The ages, weights and the amount of the concomitant diseases of type Ⅳ were obviously higher than those of the other three types (P<0.05). And the ages, weights and the amount of the concomitant diseases of the other three types had shown no statistical significance (P>0.05). The improvement of the OABSS and IPSS scores of the type Ⅳ were obviously inferior to the other three types (P<0.05). The improvements of the OABSS and IPSS scores of type Ⅲ were obviously higher than those of the other three (P<0.05). The discrepancy of the OABSS and IPSS scores of type Ⅰ and type Ⅱ had shown no statistical significance (P>0.05).Conclusion: Type Ⅳ has the worst outcome and type Ⅲ has the best among the four types of OAB. And this classification system will certainly have a profound significance in guiding and directing our clinical diagnosis and treatments, and evaluating the prognosis of the patients with OAB.
Key words: Male; Overactive bladder; Urination disorders; Urodynamics
Tao WANG , Ke-xin XU , Wei-yu ZHANG , Hao HU , Xiao-wei ZHANG , Huan-rui WANG , Xian-hui LIU , Jing-wen CHEN , Xiao-peng ZHANG . Urodynamic classification of male patients with symptoms of overactive bladder and the outcome classification[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019 , 51(6) : 1048 -1051 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.06.012
| [1] | Abrams P, Cardoz L, Fall M , et al. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2002,21(2):167-178. |
| [2] | Kurosch M, Mager R, Gust K , et al. Diagnosis of overactive bladder (OAB)[J]. Urologe A, 2015,54(3):421-427. |
| [3] | Chen SL, Ng SC, Huang YH, Chen GD . Are patients with bladder oversensitivity different from those with urodynamically proven detrusor overactivity in female overactive bladder syndrome?[J]. J Chin Med Assoc, 2017,80(10):644-650. |
| [4] | D’Ancona CA, Bassani JW, Querne FA , et al. New method for minimally invasive urodynamic assessment in men with lower urinary tract symptoms[J]. Urology, 2008,71(1):75-78. |
| [5] | Flisser AJ, Walmsley K, Blaivas JG . Urodynamic classification of patients with symptoms of overactive bladder[J]. J Urol, 2003,169(2):529-533. |
| [6] | Fall M, Geirsson G, Lindstrom S . Toward a new classification of overactive bladders[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 1995,14(6):635-646. |
| [7] | Yamaguchi O, Nishizawa O, Takeda M , et al. Clinical guidelines for overactive bladder[J]. Int J Urol, 2009,16(2):126-142. |
| [8] | H?fner K . Terminology and pathophysiology of overactive bladder (OAB)[J]. Aktuelle Urol, 2016,47(6):468-474. |
| [9] | Daly D, Chapple C . Relationship between overactive bladder (OAB) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS): concurrent disorders with a common pathophysiology?[J]. BJU Int, 2013,111(4):530-531. |
| [10] | Vahabi B, Drake MJ . Physiological and pathophysiological implications of micromotion activity in urinary bladder function[J]. Acta Physiol (Oxf), 2015,213(2):360-370. |
| [11] | Bothig R, Domurath B, Kaufmann A , et al. Neuro-urological diagnosis and therapy of lower urinary tract dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injury: S2k Guideline of the German-Speaking Medical Society of Paraplegia (DMGP)[J]. Urologe A, 2017,56(6):785-792. |
| [12] | Mehnert U, Nehiba M . Neuro-urological dysfunction of the lower urinary tract in CNS diseases: pathophysiology, epidemiology, and treatment options[J]. Urologe A, 2012,51(2):189-197. |
| [13] | Gill BC, Pizarro-Berdichevsky J, Bhattacharyya PK , et al. Real-time changes in brain activity during sacral neuromodulation for overactive bladder[J]. J Urol, 2017,198(6):1379-1385. |
| [14] | Sakakibara R, Panicker J, Fowler CJ , et al. Is overactive bladder a brain disease? The pathophysiological role of cerebral white matter in the elderly[J]. Int J Urol, 2014,21(1):33-38. |
| [15] | Elser DM . Stress urinary incontinence and overactive bladder syndrome: current options and new targets for management[J]. Postgrad Med, 2012,124(3):42-49. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |