Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) >
Relationship between the CT features of colorectal cancer metastases calcification and tumor response to chemotherapy
Received date: 2018-01-09
Online published: 2019-12-19
Supported by
Supported by the Project of the Science and Technology Department in Sichuan Province(2014SZ0150)
Objective: To investigate the relationship between CT features of metastatic calcification and the response to chemotherapy in colorectal cancer metastases.Methods: A total of 27 patients with 30 sites of calcified metastases who underwent chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy (cetuximab) between January 2011 and December 2016 comprised this retrospective study population. Two radiologists independently evaluated the occurrence of tumor calcification before and after treatment, and evaluated the tumor response after therapy. According to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (version 1.1), the best curative effect evaluation of the patients was recorded. The patients were divided into groups as below: (1) Patients who showed complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) were assigned to the response group, and the stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) were assigned to the non-response group. (2) Patients showed CR or PR, or patients showed SD with longer progress free survival (PFS) were assigned to the benefit group, and the remaining patients were assigned to the no benefit group. The difference of different imaging calcification features (morphology, maximum density, and density-time slope) were analyzed.Results: The most common site of metastases calcification was liver (63.3%), followed by lymph nodes (26.7%). There were 12 cases in the response group, 15 cases in the non-response group; and 13 cases in the benefit group, 14 cases in the no benefit group. The density time growth slope was higher in the response group when compared with the non-response group (P=0.025). The proportion of thhe patients with increased number of calcified foci in the benefit group (61.5%) was higher than that in the no benefit group (14.3%), P=0.018. There was no significant difference in the maximum density between the groups. The calcification of liver metastases were all amorphous calcification, with central calcification (36.8%), eccentric calcification (36.8%), garland calcification (15.8%) and diffuse calcification (10.6%). The lymph node metastases could be diffuse (75.0%), and curve or egg-shell calcification (25.0%). There was no statistical difference between the groups.Conclusion: In patients with advanced colorectal cancer metastases treated with cetu-ximab combined chemotherapy, rapid growth of calcification density and increased calcification number may be valuable imaging features of therapeutic efficacy. The maximal calcification density and morphology of calcification are not related to the therapeutic efficacy.
Key words: Colorectal carcinoma; Metastases; Calcification
Jing ZHANG , Yu-wen ZHOU , Meng QIU , Lan-qing YANG , Bing WU . Relationship between the CT features of colorectal cancer metastases calcification and tumor response to chemotherapy[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019 , 51(6) : 1078 -1084 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.06.018
| [1] | Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD , et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016,66(2):115-132. |
| [2] | Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A . Cancer statistics, 2018[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018,68(1):7-30. |
| [3] | Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J , et al. New response eva-luation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2009,45(2):228-247. |
| [4] | Easson AM, Barron PT, Cripps C , et al. Calcification in colorectal hepatic metastases correlates with longer survival[J]. J Surg Oncol, 1996,63(4):221-225. |
| [5] | Hale HL, Husband JE, Gossios K , et al. CT of calcified liver metastases in colorectal carcinoma[J]. Clin Radiol, 1998,53(10):735-741. |
| [6] | 姜昊, 姜慧杰, 潘文彬 , 等. 不同来源肝转移瘤多层螺旋CT影像学特征的分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2017,6(1):41-45. |
| [7] | Roy B, Verma S, Awasthi R , et al. Correlation of phase values with CT Hounsfield and R2*values in calcified neurocysticercosis[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2011,34(5):1060-1064. |
| [8] | Giachelli CM . Ectopic calcification:Gathering hard facts about soft tissue mineralization[J]. Am J Pathol, 1999,154(3):671-675. |
| [9] | Agarwal A, Yeh BM, Breiman RS , et al. Peritoneal calcification: Causes and distinguishing features on CT[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2004,182(2):441-445. |
| [10] | 邓祥春, 郑波, 童朝阳 , 等. 多层螺旋CT对黏液性与非黏液性结直肠癌的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2015,13(8):80-83. |
| [11] | Sweeney DJ, Low VH, Robbins PD , et al. Calcified lymph node metastases in adenocarcinoma of the colon[J]. Australas Radiol, 1994,38(3):233-234. |
| [12] | Caskey CI, Fishman EK . Computed tomography of calcified meta-stases to skeletal muscle from adenocarcinoma of the colon[J]. J Comput Tomogr, 1988,12(3):199-202. |
| [13] | Yoshikawa H, Kameyama M, Ueda T , et al. Ossifying intramuscular metastasis from colon cancer: Report of a case[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 1999,42(9):1225-1227. |
| [14] | Yu MH, Kim YJ, Park HS , et al. Imaging patterns of intratumoral calcification in the abdominopelvic cavity[J]. Korean J Radiol, 2017,18(2):323-335. |
| [15] | Günhan-Bilgen I, Oktay A . Management of microcalcifications developing at the lumpectomy bed after conservative surgery and radiation therapy[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2007,188(2):393-398. |
| [16] | Goyer P, BenoistE S, Julie C , et al. Complete calcification of colorectal liver metastases on imaging after chemotherapy does not indicate sterilization of disease[J]. J Visc Surg, 2012,149(4):E271-E274. |
| [17] | Cheng JM, Tirumani SH, Kim KW , et al. Malignant abdominal rocks: where do they come from?[J]. Cancer Imaging, 2013,13(4):527-539. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |