Computed tomographic features of desmoplastic ameloblastoma of the jaw

  • Chong-ke SUN ,
  • Jian-yun ZHANG ,
  • Zhi-peng SUN ,
  • Kai-yuan FU ,
  • Yan-ping ZHAO ,
  • Zu-yan ZHANG ,
  • Xu-chen MA
Expand
  • 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology,Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
    2. Department of Oral Pathology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China

Received date: 2017-10-11

  Online published: 2019-12-19

Supported by

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(81500877)

Abstract

Objective: To retrospectively analyze the clinical and CT imaging features of desmoplastic ameloblastomas (DA) in comparison with other types of ameloblastomas.Methods: Patients diagnosed with ameloblastoma histopathologically in Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from July 2000 to August 2017 were reviewed to analyze the constituent ratios and characteristics of DA. CT imaging features of DA (28 cases) were investigated in comparison with consecutive cases of solid/multicystic and unicystic ameloblastomas. The following imaging perspectives were analyzed: the border, internal structure, three-dimensional shape, tooth, the periodontium, the cortex and the expansion of the tumors. CT values were measured in the region of interest for quantitative analysis.Results: Among the 1 269 cases of ameloblastomas, 50 (3.9%) were DA,which showed predilections for males (74.0%). The average age of DA was about 43.9 years old, which was higher than the other two types. The anterior incisor-canine region (62.0%) and premolar region (30.0%) were most frequently affected. The incidence rate of DA in mandibule was 56.0% (28/50), which was slightly higher than that of maxilla (44.0%). The DA characteristically showed scallop border and honeycomb-like or soap-bubble internal structure with bone formation on CT. The mean ratios of height to mesio-distal and buccal-lingual to mesio-distal distances were 0.76 and 0.63, which were higher than the other two types. According to the degree of internal bone formation, three subtypes of DA could be observed: densely ossifying type (Ⅰ), honeycomb/soap bubble type (Ⅱ) and sparsely ossifying type (Ⅲ). The means and standard deviations of CT values of DA were significantly higher than those of the other two types, which were (488.8±164.0) HU (type Ⅰ), (171.7±102.8) HU (type Ⅱ), (42.1±8.8) HU (type Ⅲ).Conclusion: CT is helpful for diagnosis of DA, which shows as solid tumor with varying degrees of internal ossification.

Cite this article

Chong-ke SUN , Jian-yun ZHANG , Zhi-peng SUN , Kai-yuan FU , Yan-ping ZHAO , Zu-yan ZHANG , Xu-chen MA . Computed tomographic features of desmoplastic ameloblastoma of the jaw[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019 , 51(6) : 1138 -1143 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.06.028

References

[1] 于世凤, 高岩, 李铁军 , 等. 口腔组织学与病理学[M]. 北京: 北京大学医学出版社, 2009: 359-361.
[2] Eversole LR, Leider AS, Hansen LS . Ameloblastomas with pronounced desmoplasia[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1984,42(11):735-740.
[3] Kramer IR, Pindborg JJ, Shear M . The WHO histological typing of odontogenic tumours. A commentary on the Second Edition[J]. Cancer, 1992,70(12):2988-2994.
[4] Thompson L . World Health Organization classification of tumours: Pathology and genetics of head and neck tumours[J]. Ear Nose Throat J, 2006,85(2):74.
[5] 刘浏, 张新宇, 胡永杰 , 等. 890例颌骨成釉细胞瘤发病构成比分析[J]. 口腔颌面外科杂志, 2015,25(3):213-215.
[6] 李江, 张伟国 . 15例促结缔组织增生型成釉细胞瘤的临床病理分析[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 1998,25(2):405-410.
[7] El-Naggar AK, Chan JKC, Grandis JR , et al. WHO classification of head and neck tumours[M].4th ed. Lyon, France: IARC Press, 2017: 215-218.
[8] 王世平, 陈新明, 程勇 , 等. 促结缔组织增生性成釉细胞瘤的X线分析[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2001,36(4):253-255.
[9] 郭小科, 刘冰, 赵怡芳 . 76例单囊型成釉细胞瘤的回顾性分析[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2015,31(5):296-298.
[10] 马绪臣 . 口腔颌面医学影像诊断学[M]. 6版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社. 2012: 121-123.
[11] 王恩博, 李铁军, 俞光岩 , 等. 109例成釉细胞瘤病理类型、影像学表现、治疗方法和预后的对比研究[J]. 现代口腔医学杂志, 2002,16(4):352-354.
[12] 左金华, 刘道峰, 李金荣 , 等. 153例成釉细胞瘤X线分析[J]. 滨州医学院学报, 2008,31(2):101-103.
[13] 张炳, 刘鸿雁, 王国华 , 等. 颌骨成釉细胞瘤与牙源性角化囊性瘤的CT鉴别诊断[J]. 中国医学计算机成像杂志, 2016,22(4):313-316.
[14] Gardner DG . Some current concepts on the pathology of ameloblastomas[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 1996,82(6):660-669.
[15] 郭兰田, 马珍珍, 秦东京 . 单囊型成釉细胞瘤临床病理及螺旋CT征象分析[J]. 滨州医学院学报, 2013,36(1):38-40.
[16] 郭兰田, 马珍珍, 王宁 , 等. 单囊型成釉细胞瘤149例临床及X线征象分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志: 电子版, 2011,5(8):2480-2482.
Outlines

/