Early constant observation of the effect of deferoxamine mesylate on improvement of vascularized bone regeneration in SD rat skull critical size defect model

  • Wen-yu DU ,
  • Jing-wen YANG ,
  • Ting JIANG
Expand
  • Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China

Received date: 2019-12-12

  Online published: 2021-12-13

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(81771045);Research Foundation of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology(PKUSS20180106)

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of local administration of deferoxamine mesylate (DFO) on vascularization and osteogenesis and its ability to maintain the activity of hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), by constantly observing early changes of vessel-like structures and bone tissues during bone defects healing. Methods: Skull critical bone defect models were constructed on a total of thirty male SD rats (6-8 weeks old). The rats were randomly divided into experimental group (DFO group) or control group (normal saline group). 300 μL 200 μmol/L DFO solution or normal saline was locally injected on the 4th day after the defect was made. On the 5th, 7th, 10th, 14th, and 28th days after surgery, three rats in each group were sacrificed respectively. HE staining and Masson staining were performed to observe new bone formation and mineralization. HIF-1α immunohistochemistry staining was performed to examine relative expression of protein. Qualitative analysis and comparation were performed by t-tests on relative expression of HIF-1α, numbers of blood vessels and percentages of mineralization tissues of new bone areas. Results: On the 5th, 7th, 10th, 14th and 28th days after surgery, the average numbers of blood vessels were 30.40±12.15, 62.00±17.87, 73.43±15.63, 40.00±7.84, 48.71±11.64 in the DFO group, and 18.75±6.63, 19.13±2.80, 51.35±16.21, 27.18±7.32, 30.88±13.43 in the control group. The number of blood vessels in the DFO group was significantly higher than that of the control group at each time point (P<0.05). The mass of new bone in the DFO group was higher than that in the control group on the 14th and 28th days after surgery. The percentage of mineralization tissues of new bone area on the 14th and 28th days after injection were (27.73±5.93)% and (46.53±3.66)% in the DFO group, and (11.99±2.02)% and (31.98±4.22)% in the control group. The percentage of mineralization tissues in the DFO group was significantly higher than that of the control group at each time point (P<0.001). The relative expression of HIF-1α in the DFO group compared with the control group was 2.86±0.48, 1.32±0.26, 1.32±0.32, 1.28±0.38 and 1.05±0.34 on the 5th, 7th, 10th, 14th and 28th days, with significant expression difference on the 5th day (P<0.01). Conclusion: Use of DFO in bone defects promotes vascularization and osteogenesis in the defect area, and maintains the protein activity of HIF-1α temporarily.

Cite this article

Wen-yu DU , Jing-wen YANG , Ting JIANG . Early constant observation of the effect of deferoxamine mesylate on improvement of vascularized bone regeneration in SD rat skull critical size defect model[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2021 , 53(6) : 1171 -1177 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.06.027

References

[1] Yellowley CE, Genetos DC. Hypoxia signaling in the skeleton: Implications for bone health[J]. Curr Osteoporos Rep, 2019, 17(1):26-35.
[2] Holden P, Nair L. Deferoxamine: An angiogenic and antioxidant molecule for tissue regeneration[J]. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 2019, 25(6):461-470.
[3] Temiz G, Sirinoglu H, Yesiloglu N, et al. Effects of deferoxamine on fat graft survival[J]. Facial Plast Surg, 2016, 32(4):438-443.
[4] Farzan R, Moeinian M, Abdollahi A, et al. Effects of amniotic membrane extract and deferoxamine on angiogenesis in wound healing: An in vivo model[J]. J Wound Care, 2018, 27(Suppl 6):s26-s32.
[5] Ram M, Singh V, Kumawat S, et al. Deferoxamine modulates cytokines and growth factors to accelerate cutaneous wound healing in diabetic rats[J]. Eur J Pharmacol, 2015, 764:9-21.
[6] Gao SQ, Chang C, Li JJ, et al. Co-delivery of deferoxamine and hydroxysafflor yellow A to accelerate diabetic wound healing via enhanced angiogenesis[J]. Drug Deliv, 2018, 25(1):1779-1789.
[7] Yang Q, He GW, Underwood MJ, et al. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of endothelial ischemia/reperfusion injury: Perspectives and implications for postischemic myocardial protection[J]. Am J Transl Res, 2016, 8(2):765-777.
[8] Jia P, Chen H, Kang H, et al. Deferoxamine released from poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) promotes healing of osteoporotic bone defect via enhanced angiogenesis and osteogenesis[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2016, 104(10):2515-2527.
[9] 姚洋, 杜宇, 古霞, 等. 局部注射外源性神经生长因子促进小鼠钛种植体周骨胶原早期成熟的研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2018, 36(2):128-132.
[10] Koivunen P, Serpi R, Dimova EY. Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl 4-hydroxylase inhibition in cardiometabolic diseases[J]. Pharmacol Res, 2016, 114:265-273.
[11] Lanigan S, Corcoran AE, Wall A, et al. Acute hypoxic exposure and prolyl-hydroxylase inhibition improves synaptic transmission recovery time from a subsequent hypoxic insult in rat hippocampus[J]. Brain Res, 2018, 1701:212-218.
[12] Farberg AS, Sarhaddi D, Donneys A, et al. Deferoxamine enhances bone regeneration in mandibular distraction osteogenesis[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2014, 133(3):666-671.
[13] Zhang J, Zheng L, Wang Z, et al. Lowering iron level protects against bone loss in focally irradiated and contralateral femurs through distinct mechanisms[J]. Bone, 2019, 120:50-60.
[14] Einhorn TA, Gerstenfeld LC. Fracture healing: mechanisms and interventions[J]. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 2015, 11(1):45-54.
[15] Morgan EF, Giacomo A, Gerstenfeld LC. Overview of skeletal repair (fracture healing and its assessment)[J]. Methods Mol Biol, 2021, 2230:17-37.
[16] Donneys A, Deshpande SS, Tchanque-Fossuo CN, et al. Deferoxa-mine expedites consolidation during mandibular distraction osteogenesis[J]. Bone, 2013, 55(2):384-390.
[17] Zimna A, Kurpisz M. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 in physiological and pathophysiological angiogenesis: Applications and therapies[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2015, 2015:549412.
[18] Drager J, Harvey EJ, Barralet J. Hypoxia signalling manipulation for bone regeneration[J]. Expert Rev Mol Med, 2015, 17:e6.
[19] Matsubara H, Hogan DE, Morgan EF, et al. Vascular tissues are a primary source of BMP2 expression during bone formation induced by distraction osteogenesis[J]. Bone, 2012, 51(1):168-180.
[20] Bouletreau PJ, Warren SM, Spector JA, et al. Hypoxia and VEGF up-regulate BMP-2 mRNA and protein expression in microvascular endothelial cells: Implications for fracture healing[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2002, 109(7):2384-2397.
Outlines

/