Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2020, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (4): 646-650. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.04.009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Combined transperineal and transpubic urethroplasty for patients with complex male pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect

Jian-wei WANG,Li-bo MAN(),Xiao XU,Zhen-hua LIU,Feng HE,Guang-lin HUANG,Jian-po ZHAI,Ning ZHOU,Wei LI   

  1. Department of Urology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, the Fourth Medical College of Peking University, Beijing 100096, China
  • Received:2020-04-09 Online:2020-08-18 Published:2020-08-06
  • Contact: Li-bo MAN E-mail:manlibo@yeah.net

RICH HTML

  

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the clinical effects and characteristics of combined transperineal and transpubic urethroplasty for patients with complex pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect (PFUDD). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 17 male patients with complex posterior PFUDD from January 2010 to December 2019. The complications included urethrorectal fistulas in 2 patients (11.8%), urethroperineal fistula in 1 patient (5.9%). Ten patients had undergone previous treatments: dilatation in 3 patients (17.6%), internal urethrotomy in 1 patient, failed urethroplasty in 6 patients (35.3%), of whom 2 patients had two times of failed urethroplasties. All the patients were performed with urethroplasty by combined transperineal and transpubic approach with removing the entire pubic bone followed by the anastomosis. Results: The mean age of the patients included in this study was 35.5 (range: 21-62) years. The mean length of stricture was 5.5 (range: 4.5-7.0) cm, the mean follow-up was 27 (range: 7-110) months, the mean time of operation was 190 (range: 150-260) min, the mean evaluated blood loss was 460 (range: 200-1 200) mL. There were 5 patients who needed blood transfusion intraoperatively or postoperatively. Wound infection was seen in 4 out of 17 patients and thrombosis of lower extremities in 1 out of 17 patients. The last follow-up showed that the mean postoperative maximum urinary flow rate was 22.7 (range: 15.5-40.7) mL/s. After removing the catheter, one patient presented with decreased urinary flow and symptoms of urinary infection. Cystoscopy showed the recurrent anastomotic stricture, which was cured by internal urethrotomy. In our series, the success rate of the combined transperineal and transpubic urethroplasty was 94.1% (16/17). Conclusion: Combined transperineal and transpubic urtheroplasty can achieve a tension free anastomosis after removing the entire wedge of pubis in some patients with complex PFUDD. However, this procedure should be completed in a regional referral hospital due to the complexity of the operation and the high percentage of complications.

Key words: Posterior urethral anastomotic urethroplasty, Pelvic urethral distraction defect, Pubectomy

CLC Number: 

  • R699.6

Figure 1

Circumferentially mobilizing bulbar urethra by perineal approach"

Figure 2

Pubectomy with osteotomy"

Figure 3

Make sure the patency of urethra without false passage by the cystoscopy"

Figure 4

Satisfactory mobilization of the proximal and distal urethra"

Figure 5

Omental pedicle covering and surrounding the anastomosis"

[1] 满立波, 王建伟. 图解尿道成形术 [M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018: 43-51.
[2] 王建伟, 满立波, 黄广林, 等. 经会阴三步法手术策略治疗单纯性男性骨盆骨折后尿道离断[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018,50(4):617-620.
[3] Gelman J. Tips for successful open surgical reconstruction of posterior urethral disruption injuries[J]. Urol Clin North Am, 2013,40(3):381-392.
doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2013.04.007 pmid: 23905936
[4] Barratt RC, Bernard J, Mundy AR, et al. Pelvic fracture urethral injury in males—mechanisms of injury, management options and outcomes[J]. Transl Androl Urol, 2018,7(Suppl 1):S29-S62.
pmid: 29644168
[5] Koraitim MM. Predictors of surgical approach to repair pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects[J]. J Urol, 2009,182(4):1435-1439.
pmid: 19683294
[6] Horiguchi A. Management of male pelvic fracture urethral injuries: review and current topics[J]. Int J Urol, 2019,26(6):596-607.
[7] Pierce JM Jr. Exposure of the membranous and posterior urethra by total pubectomy[J]. J Urol, 1962,88:256-258.
pmid: 14486460
[8] Koraitim MM. The combined perineo-abdominal transpubic urehtroplasty[J]. Arab J Urol, 2015,13(1):24-26.
pmid: 26019974
[9] Koraitim MM. Optimising the outcome after anastomotic posterior urethroplasty[J]. Arab J Urol, 2015,13(1):27-31.
[10] Horiguchi A, Edo H, Soga S, et al. Pubourethral stump angle measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging predicts urethroplasty type for pelvic fracture urethral injury repair[J]. Urology, 2018,112:198-204.
[11] Barbagli G. History and evolution of transpubic urethroplasty: a lesson for young urologists in training[J]. Eur Urol, 2009,52(5):1290-1292.
[12] Johnsen NV, Moses RA, Ellliott SP, et al. Multicenter analysis of posterior urethroplasty complexity and outcomes following pelvic fracture urethral injury[J]. World J Urol, 2019,38(4):1073-1079.
[13] Angulo JC, Gómez RG, Nikolavsky D. Reconstruction of membranous urethral strictures[J]. Curr Urol Rep, 2018,19(6):37.
pmid: 29644478
[14] Mathur RK, Tiwari NS, Odiya SA. Transpubic urethroplasty: a single center experience[J]. Adv Urol, 2014,2014:826710. doi: 10.1155/2014/826710.
[15] Koraitim MM. Complex pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects revisited[J]. Scand J Urol, 2014,48(1):84-89.
[16] Podesta M, Podesta M Jr. Delayed surgical repair of posttraumatic posterior urethral distraction defects in children and adolesents: long-term results [J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2015, 11(2): 67.e1-6.
[17] Joshi PM, Batra V, Kulkarni SB. Controversies in the management of pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects[J]. Turk J Urol, 2019,45(1):1-6.
pmid: 30668305
[18] Kulkarni SB, Surana S, Desai DJ, et al. Management of complex and redo cases of pelvic fracture urethral injuries[J]. Asian J Urol, 2018,5(2):107-117.
pmid: 29736373
[19] Gomez RG, Mundy T, Dubey D, et al. SIU/ICUD consultation on urethral strictures: pelvic fracture urethral injuries[J]. Urology, 2014,83(3 Suppl):S48-S58.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.09.023 pmid: 24210734
[20] Pratap A, Agrawal CS, Pandit RK, et al. Factors contributing to a successful outcome of combined abdominal transpubic perineal urethroplasty for complex posterior urethral disruptions[J]. J Urol, 2006,176(6 Pt 1):2514-2517.
pmid: 17085145
[1] WANG Jian-wei,XU Xiao,BAO Zheng-qing,LIU Zhen-hua,HE Feng,HUANG Guang-lin,MAN Li-bo. Outcomes of partial pubectomy assisted anastomotic urethroplasty for male patients with pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(4): 798-802.
[2] WANG Jian-wei, MAN Li-bo, HUANG Guang-lin, WANG Hai, Xu Xiao, ZHU Xiao-fei, LI Wei, LIU Zhen-hua. “3-step” strategy of transperineal anastomotic urethroplasty for the simple pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect in male patients [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(4): 617-620.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!