Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (4): 798-802. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.04.030

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Outcomes of partial pubectomy assisted anastomotic urethroplasty for male patients with pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect

WANG Jian-wei,XU Xiao,BAO Zheng-qing,LIU Zhen-hua,HE Feng,HUANG Guang-lin,MAN Li-bo()   

  1. Department of Urology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, the Fourth Medical College of Peking University, Beijing 100096, China
  • Received:2021-03-15 Online:2021-08-18 Published:2021-08-25
  • Contact: Li-bo MAN E-mail:mmanlibo@sohu.com
  • Supported by:
    Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program(PX2021017)

RICH HTML

  

Abstract:

Objective: To summarize the clinical outcomes of partial pubectomy assisted anastomotic urethroplasty for male patients with pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect (PFUDD) and discuss the skills of partial pubectomy. Methods: The clinical data of 63 male patients with PFUDD were retrospective reviewed. The procedure of the anastomotic urethroplasty was as follows: (1) circumferentially mobilizing the bulbar urethra; (2) separating the corporal bodies; (3) performing the urethral anastomosis after partial pubectomy and exposure of the healthy two ends of the urethra. Results: The mean age of the patients was (39.2±15.6) years (range: 15-72 years). The median time between incidents and operation was 15 months (range: 3-240 months) and the mean length of stricture was (3.85±0.91) cm (range: 1.5-5.5 cm). All the patients had undergone suprapubic cystostomy in acute setting. Thirteen patients (20.6%) were re-do cases and the patients who had undergone dilation, direct vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU), and open primary realignment were 22 (34.9%), 8 (12.7%), and 8 (12.7%), respectively. Assisted with partial pubectomy, the anastomotic urethroplasty had been successfully performed in all the patients. The mean time of operation was (160.2±28.1) min (110-210 min), and the mean evaluated blood loss was (261.1±130.3) mL (100-800 mL). There were 3 cases (4.8%) with perioperative blood transfusions. The postoperative complications were bleeding and urinary tract infection, which were controlled conservatively. The mean maximum urine flow rate was (23.7±7.4) mL/s (15.0-48.2 mL/s) after removing the catheters 4 weeks after urethroplasty. The median follow-up was 23 months (12-37 months). The urethroscopy showed 2 cases of stricture recurrences and 1 case of iatrogenic penile urethral stricture due the symptoms of urinary tract infection and decreased urine flow and all of them were successfully managed with dilation. Conclusion: Partial pubectomy can effectively reduce the gap between the ends of the urethra and promote tension-free anastomosis during the anastomotic urethroplsty for patients with PFUDD. The skills of the procedure include good exposure of the anterior surface of pubic symphysis between the separated corporal bodies, carefully mobilizing and securing the deep dorsal vein of the penis, removing the partial pubic bone and the harden scar beneath the pubic bone for good exposure of the proximal urethral end.

Key words: Partial pubectomy, Posterior urethral anastomotic urethroplasty, Pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect, Urethral stricture

CLC Number: 

  • R699.6

Figure 1

Circumferentially mobilizing the bulbar urethra and dissecting it in the site of urethral obliteration"

Figure 2

Separating the corpra cavernosa"

Figure 3

Mobilizing the deep dorsal vein of the penis"

Figure 4

Exposure of pubic bone and preparation for partial pubectomy The rectangle shows the margins of partial pubectomy, and the white arrow is the mobilized and secured deep dorsal vein."

Figure 5

Removing bone fragments"

Figure 6

The position of urethra after successful anastomosis"

Figure 7

The exposure of proximal urethral end A, secured deep dorsal vein of penis; B, the scar between the removed bone fragments and the proximal urethral end; C, the proximal urethral end."

[1] Xu YM, Song LJ, Wang KI, et al. Changing trends in the causes and management of male urethral stricture disease in China: An observational descriptive study from 13 centers [J]. BJU Int, 2015, 116(6):938-944.
doi: 10.1111/bju.12945
[2] 满立波, 王建伟. 图解尿道成形术[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018: 43-49.
[3] Joshi PM, Batra V, Kulkarni SB. Controversies in the management of pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects [J]. Turk J Urol, 2019, 45(1):1-6.
[4] Horiguchi A. Management of male pelvic fracture urethral injuries: review and current topics [J]. Int J Urol, 2019, 26(6):596-607.
doi: 10.1111/iju.13947 pmid: 30895658
[5] Wessells H, Angermeier KW, Elliott S, et al. Male urethral stricture: American Urological Association guideline [J]. J Urol, 2017, 197(1):182-190.
doi: S0022-5347(16)30961-2 pmid: 27497791
[6] Horiguchi A, Shinchi M, Masunaga A, et al. Do transurethral treatment increase the complexity of urethral stricture? [J]. J Urol, 2018, 199(2):508-514.
doi: S0022-5347(17)77417-4 pmid: 28866464
[7] Koraitim MM. Optimising the outcome after anastomotic posterior urethroplasty [J]. Arab J Urol, 2015, 13(1):27-31.
doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2014.12.006
[8] Andrich DE, Malley KJO, Summerton DJ, et al. The type of urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect cannot be predicted preoperatively [J]. J Urol, 2003, 170(2 Pt 1):464-467.
doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000076752.32199.40
[9] Horiguchi A, Edo H, Soga S, et al. Pubourethral stump angle measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging predeicts urethroplasty type for pelvic fracture injury repair [J]. Urology, 2018, 112:198-204.
doi: S0090-4295(17)31199-8 pmid: 29158171
[10] Joshi PM, Desai DJ, Shah D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging procedure for pelvic fracture urethral injuries and recto urethral fistulas: A simple protocaol [J]. Turk J Urol, 2021, 47(1):35-42.
[11] Yin L, Li Z, Kong C, et al. Urethral pull-through operation for the management of pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects [J]. Urology, 2011, 78(4):946-950.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.05.027
[12] Kulkarni SB, Joshi PM, Hunter C, et al. Complex posterior urethral injury [J]. Arab J Urol, 2015, 13(1):43-52.
doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2014.11.008
[13] 王建伟, 满立波, 徐啸, 等. 耻骨会阴联合切口后尿道吻合术治疗复杂男性骨盆骨折后尿道离断 [J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(4):646-650.
[14] 王建伟, 满立波, 黄广林, 等. 经会阴三步法手术策略治疗单纯性男性骨盆骨折后尿道离断 [J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(4):617-620.
[15] Saini DK, Sinha RJ, Solhal AK, et al. Analysis of anastomotic urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect: Decadal experience from a high-volume tertiary care center [J]. Urol Ann, 2019, 11(1):77-82.
doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_48_17
[16] Webster GD, Peterson AC. Simple perineal and elaborated peri-neal posterior urethroplasty [J]. Arab J Urol, 2015, 13(1):17-23.
doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2015.01.002
[17] Johnsen NV, Moses RA, Elliott SP, et al. Multicenter analysis of posterior urethroplasty complexity and outcomes following pelvic fracture urethral injury [J]. World J Urol, 2020, 38(4):1073-1079.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02824-5 pmid: 31144093
[18] Ríosa E, Martínez-Piñeirob L. Treatment of posterior urethral distractions defects following pelvic fracture [J]. Asian J Urol, 2018, 5(3):164-171.
[1] Jian-wei WANG,Li-bo MAN,Xiao XU,Zhen-hua LIU,Feng HE,Guang-lin HUANG,Jian-po ZHAI,Ning ZHOU,Wei LI. Combined transperineal and transpubic urethroplasty for patients with complex male pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 646-650.
[2] Jian-wei WANG,Li-bo MAN,Guang-lin HUANG,Feng HE,Hai WANG,Hai-dong WANG,Xiao XU,Wei LI,Jian-po ZHAI,Zhen-hua LIU. Single-stage repair of penile urethral stricture using combined dorsal onlay oral mucosa grafting with ventral onlay penile skin flap [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(4): 641-645.
[3] WANG Jian-wei, MAN Li-bo, HUANG Guang-lin, WANG Hai, Xu Xiao, ZHU Xiao-fei, LI Wei, LIU Zhen-hua. “3-step” strategy of transperineal anastomotic urethroplasty for the simple pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect in male patients [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(4): 617-620.
[4] XIE Tian-Peng, HUANG Xiao-Bo, XU Qing-Quan, YE Hai-Yun, YANG Qing-Ya, WANG Xiao-Feng. Balloon dilation by B ultrasound monitoring for treatment of urethral stricture: 5 case reports [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2014, 46(4): 657-658.
[5] HUANG Guang-Lin, MAN Li-Bo, WANG Hai, WANG Jian-Wei, DI Jian-Po, ZHU Xiao-Fei, ZHOU Ning, XU Xiao. Management of female urethral obliteration with the rotary excision appliance [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2014, 46(4): 574-577.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!