Email Alert | RSS

Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2020, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (4): 762-770. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.04.031

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation of clinical efficacy of a kind of digital complete denture

Ling WEI1,Dong ZOU2,Hu CHEN1,Shao-xia PAN1,△(),Yu-chun SUN1,△(),Yong-sheng ZHOU1   

  1. 1. Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
    2. Centre of Stomatology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
  • Received:2019-09-19 Online:2020-08-18 Published:2020-08-06
  • Contact: Shao-xia PAN,Yu-chun SUN E-mail:panshaoxia@vip.163.com;polarshining@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Capital Health Research and Development of Special(2016-1-4101);Program for New Clinical Techniques and Therapies of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology(PKUSSNCT-15A09)

RICH HTML

 19   

PDF (PC)

237

Abstract:

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of a kind of complete dentures fabricated using computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) workflow with that of the complete denture fabricated using conventional workflow. Methods: Twenty edentulous patients were included in this prospective, single-blind, self-controlled clinical trial. Two pairs of complete dentures were fabricated for each participant: one using the functional suitable denture (FSD) system with CAD/CAM, and the other using conventional fabrication workflow. In the final delivery appointment, the conventional dentures worn by the participant for 3 months at first. Then the participant swapped to wear digital denture for another 3 months. The patients’ satisfaction and oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL) were measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and oral health impact profile (OHIP-20E) at baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months following denture delivery. In addition, the masticatory efficiency of each pair of dentures was measured after three months adaptation period for each type of dentures. Results: The VAS scores of the twenty patients in FSD denture group on general satisfaction, ease of cleaning, ability to speak, esthetics, stability and oral health status on these six domains were higher than that of conventional denture group 3 months after delivery. While the VAS cores in FSD denture group on comfort, ability to chew and ability to chew up were the same as those of conventional denture group. But there was no significant difference (P>0.05). The VAS score on each domain in FSD denture group was higher than that of conventional denture group 3 months after delivery, three domains of which reached statistical significance (P<0.05), involving functional limitation, psychological discomfort and total. The masticatory performance of the FSD denture (1.20±0.54) was slightly higher than that for the conventional denture (1.16±0.53), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.691). Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of the FSD complete denture is comparable to that of the conventional complete denture. As for patient satisfaction and oral health related quality of life, FSD dentures received comparable scores as conventional complete dentures did.

Key words: Computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing, Functional suitable denture system, Complete denture, Clinical efficacy

CLC Number: 

  • R783.2

Figure 1

Flow chart of the clinical efficacy comparison between FSD denture and conventional denture"

Figure 2

Comparison of VAS scores at baseline and 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months and 3 months following delivery of FSD *P<0.05, #P <0.01, △P < 0.001, vs. baseline."

Figure 3

Comparison of VAS scores at baseline and 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months and 3 months following delivery of conventional denture *P<0.05, #P <0.01, △P < 0.001, vs. baseline."

Figure 4

Total VAS scores of patients’ denture satisfaction at each observation time point for FSD and conventional complete dentures group"

Figure 5

Comparison of OHIP-20E scores at baseline and 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months and 3 months following delivery of FSD *P<0.05, #P <0.01, △P < 0.001, vs. baseline."

Figure 6

Comparison of OHIP-20E scores at baseline and 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months and 3 months following delivery of conventional denture *P<0.05, #P <0.01, △P < 0.001, vs. baseline."

Figure 7

Total scores of OHIP-20E at each observation time point for FSD and conventional complete dentures group"

[1] Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2002,15(4):413-414.
[2] Heydecke G, Locker D, Awad MA, et al. Oral and general health-related quality of life with conventional and implant dentures[J]. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 2003,31(3):161-168.
[3] Awad MA, Lund JP, Dufresne E, et al. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2003,16(2):117-122.
[4] Emami E, Heydecke G, Rompre PH, et al. Impact of implant support for mandibular dentures on satisfaction, oral and general health-related quality of life: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials[J]. Clin Oral Imp, 2009,20(6):533-544.
[5] Andreiotelli M, Att W, Strub JR. Prosthodontic complications with implant overdentures: a systematic literature review[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2010,23(3):195-203.
pmid: 20552083
[6] Bozini T, Petridis H, Garefis K, et al. A meta-analysis of prosthodontic complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in edentulous patients after an observation period of at least 5 years[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2011,26(2):304-318.
pmid: 21483883
[7] Bidra AS, Farrell K. Prospective cohort pilot study of 2-visit CAD/CAM monolithic complete dentures and implant-retained overdentures: clinical and patient-centered outcomes[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2016,115(5):578-586.
[8] Douglass CW, Shih A, Ostry L. Will there be a need for complete dentures in the United States in 2020[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2002,87(1):5-8.
pmid: 11807476
[9] Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, et al. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience[J]. Dent Mater J, 2009,28(1):44-56.
pmid: 19280967
[10] Wimmer T, Gallus K, Eichberger M, et al. Complete denture fabrication supported by CAD/CAM[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2016,115(5):541-546.
pmid: 26774323
[11] Matsuda T, Goto T, Yagi K, Kashiwabara T, et al. Part-digitizing system of impression and interocclusal record for complete denture fabrication[J]. J Prosthodont, 2016,25(6):503-509.
[12] Goodacre CJ, Garbacea A, Naylor WP, et al. CAD/CAM fabricated complete dentures: concepts and clinical methods of obtaining required morphological data[J]. Prosthet Dent, 2012,107(1):34-46.
[13] Inokoshi M, Kanazawa M, Minakuchi S. Evaluation of a complete denture trial method applying rapid prototyping[J]. Dent Mater J, 2012,31(1):40-46.
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2011-113
[14] Zhang YD, Jiang JG, Liang T, et al. Kinematics modeling and experimentation of the multi-manipulator tooth-arrangement robot for full denture manufacturing[J]. J Med Syst, 2011,35(6):1421-1429.
pmid: 20703775
[15] Kanazawa M, Inokoshi M, Minakuchi S, et al. Trial of a CAD/CAM system for fabricating complete dentures[J]. Dent Mater J, 2011,30(1):93-96.
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2010-112
[16] Bidra AS, Taylor TD. Computer-aided technology for fabricating complete dentures: systematic review of historical background, current status, and future perspectives[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2013,109(6):361-366.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60318-2 pmid: 23763779
[17] 孙玉春, 吕培军, 王勇. 参数化定位全口义齿人工牙三维图形数据库的研究[J]. 口腔颌面修复学杂志, 2007,8(4):257-260.
[18] 王勇, 吕培军, 赵占芳. 用于全口义齿的人工牙三维坐标系的建立[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2005,21(5):653-655.
[19] 孙玉春, 吕培军, 王勇. 计算机辅助设计与快速成形技术辅助制作全口义齿的探讨[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2007,42(6):324-329.
[20] 孙玉春, 吕培军, 王勇. 用于全口义齿计算机辅助设计的虚拟半可调牙合架[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2008,40(1):92-96.
[21] Sun YC, Lv PJ, Wang Y. Study on CAD & RP for removable complete denture[J]. Comput Meth Prog Bio, 2009,93(93):266-272.
[22] Chen H, Wang H, Lv PJ. Quantitative evaluation of tissue surface adaption of CAD-designed and 3D printed wax pattern of maxillary complete denture[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2015,2015:453968.
pmid: 26583108
[23] Chen H, Yang X, Chen L, et al. Application of FDM three-dimensional printing technology in the digital manufacture of custom dentulous mandible trays[J]. Sci Rep, 2016,6:19207.
doi: 10.1038/srep19207 pmid: 26763620
[24] Yuan FS, Lv PJ, Wang PF, et al. Custom fabrication of try-inwax complete denture[J]. Rapid Prototyp J, 2016,22(3):539-543.
[25] Critchlow SB, Ellis JS. Prognostic indications for conventional complete denture therapy: a review of the literature[J]. J Dent, 2010,38(1):2-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.08.004 pmid: 19695302
[26] 冯海兰, 徐军. 口腔修复学[M]. 2版. 北京: 北京大学医学出版社, 2015: 294.
[27] Reeve PE. The role of personality in the management of complete denture patients[J]. Br Dent J, 1984,156(10):356-362.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4805366 pmid: 6587876
[28] Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the oral health impact profile[J]. Community Dent Health, 1994,11(1):3-11.
pmid: 8193981
[29] Awad MA, Lund JP, Shapiro SH, et al. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2003,16(4):390-396.
pmid: 12956494
[30] Bolender CL. The Cornell Medical Index as prognostic aid for complete denture patients[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1969,22(1):20-29.
doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(69)90268-6 pmid: 5254404
[31] Vervoorn JM, Duinkerke AS, Luteijn F, et al. Assessment of denture satisfaction[J]. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 1988,16(6):364-367.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1988.tb00583.x pmid: 3060310
[32] Bear ML. The use of the psychological measures in predicting patient satisfaction with complete dentures[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 1992,5(3):221-226.
pmid: 1524644
[33] Kalk W, Baat C. Patients’ complaints and satisfaction 5 years after complete denture treatment[J]. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 1990,18(1):27-31.
pmid: 2404654
[1] Yu-chun SUN,Yong WANG,Ke-hui DENG,Hu CHEN,Wei-wei LI,Yi-jiao ZHAO,Shao-xia PAN,Hong-qiang YE,Yong-sheng ZHOU. Independent innovation research of functionally suitable denture digital system [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(2): 390-394.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(4): 456 -458 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 125 -128 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 135 -140 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 158 -161 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 217 -220 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(1): 52 -55 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(1): 109 -111 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(3): 297 -301 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(5): 599 -601 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(5): 516 -520 .
Copyright © Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd