Email Alert | RSS

Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (1): 120-125. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.01.018

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation of wear property of Giomer and universal composite in vivo

MU Hai-li1,2,TIAN Fu-cong3,WANG Xiao-yan1,Δ(),GAO Xue-jun1   

  1. 1. Department of Cariology and Endodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
    2. First Clinical Division, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100034, China
  • Received:2020-10-09 Online:2021-02-18 Published:2021-02-07
  • Contact: Xiao-yan WANG E-mail:wangxiaoyan@pkuss.bjmu.edu.cn

RICH HTML

 22   

PDF (PC)

194

Abstract:

Objective: To observe the wear performance of Giomer and universal composite for posterior restorations by 3D laser scan method, in order to guide the material selection in clinic.Methods: In this study,48 patients (108 teeth) were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All the patients in need of a minimum of 2 Class Ⅰ and/or Class Ⅱ restorations were invited to join the study. The teeth were restored with Giomer (Beautifil Ⅱ, BF) and universal composite (Filtek Z350, Z350) randomly. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and after 6-, 18-, 48-month using the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria for clinical performance. The in vivo images and gypsum replicas were taken at each recall. A 3D-laser scanner and Geomagic Studio 12 were used to analyze the wear depth quantitatively. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 20.0.Results: After 4 years, 89.6% patients were recalled. The survival rate of both materials was 95.8% (Kaplan-Meier survival analysis). Seven restorations of the two materials failed due to loss of restoration, bulk fracture, secondary caries and pulp necrosis. The wear patterns of restorations were divided into 2 classes. Pattern Ⅰ: occlusal contact areas showed the deepest and fastest wear depth; pattern Ⅱ: the wear depth was slow and uniform. Both materials showed a rapid wear in the first 6 months. Then the wear rate was decreased. The occlusal wear depth after 4 years were (58±22) μm and (54±16) μm for BF group and Z350 group respectively, which were in accordance with the American Dental Association (ADA) guidelines (wear depth for 3 years <100 μm). No significant differences (P>0.05) were observed between the two groups. Regarding the restorations with wear pattern Ⅰ, the wear depth of BF group was higher than Z350 group at 6- and 48-month (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference between restorations with wear pattern Ⅱ (P>0.05).Conclusion: Within the limitation of the study, after 4 years, the survival rate and wear resistance of Giomer met ADA guidelines for tooth-colored restorative materials for posterior teeth. When the two materials were applied in occlusal contact areas, wear resistance of Giomer was slightly lower than universal composite resin. No significant difference was found when they were applied in none of the occlusal contact areas.

Key words: Composite resins, Dental restoration wear, Imaging, three-dimensional

CLC Number: 

  • R783.1

Figure 1

Process of scanning and analysis A and C, in vivo and scanning images of 37° restoration at baseline (1 week); B and D, in vivo and scanning images of 37° restoration after 4 years; E, align images by Geomagic Studio 12; F, difference image."

Figure 2

The variation of wear depth and wear rate with time in BF group and Z350 group"

Table 1

Wear depth of different tooth type and cavity type"

Items Wear depth/μm, x-±s
Tooth type Cavity type
Premolar Molar Class Ⅰ Class Ⅱ
BF group
6 months 40±13 45±16 51±16 40±13
18 months 48±14 53±18 56±16 48±15
48 months 53±17 66±27 64±21 57±23
Mann-Whitney U test P>0.05 P>0.05
Z350 group
6 months 38±16 36±10 39±12 37±14
18 months 50±20 45±10 46±13 47±16
48 months 50±14 58±18 59±18 53±17
Mann-Whitney U test P>0.05 P>0.05

Figure 3

Wear condition was analyzed by 3D-laser scanning images A-D (pattern Ⅰ), the occlusal contact areas showed the deepest and fastest wear, lesser vertical loss around the areas; E-H (pattern Ⅱ), the wear was uniform; A and E, representative clinical picture; B and F, 6 months; C and G, 18 months; D and H, 48 months."

Table 2

Wear patterns of BF group and Z350 group"

Items Pattern Ⅰ Pattern Ⅱ Total
BF group 16 27 43
Z350 group 17 25 42
Total 33 52 85

Figure 4

Comparison of wear depth in different wear types between BF group and Z350 group A, pattern Ⅰ; B, pattern Ⅱ."

[1] Gordan VV, Blaser PK, Watson RE, et al. A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2014,145(10):1036-1043.
[2] Manhart J, Chen HY, Hickel R. Clinical evaluation of the poste-rior composite Quixfil in class Ⅰ and Ⅱ cavities: 4-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2010,12(3):237-243.
doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a17551 pmid: 20157663
[3] Oz FD, Ergin E, Canatan S. Twenty-four-month clinical perfor-mance of different universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse, selective etching and self-etch application modes in NCCL: a randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2019,27:e20180358.
doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0358 pmid: 30994773
[4] Koc Vural U, Meral E, Ergin E, et al. Twenty-four-month clinical performance of a glass hybrid restorative in non-carious cervical lesions of patients with bruxism: a split-mouth, randomized clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2020,24(3):1229-1238.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02986-x pmid: 31297658
[5] Hayashi M, Wilson NH. Failure risk of posterior composites with post-operative sensitivity[J]. Oper Dent, 2003,28(6):681-688.
pmid: 14653280
[6] Heintze SD. Clinical relevance of tests on bond strength, microleakage and marginal adaptation[J]. Dent Mater, 2013,29(1):59-84.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.07.158
[7] Naoum S, Ellakwa A, Martin F, et al. Fluoride release, recharge and mechanical property stability of various fluoride-containing resin composites[J]. Oper Dent, 2011,36(4):422-432.
doi: 10.2341/10-414-L pmid: 21819201
[8] Ikemura K, Tay FR, Endo T, et al. A review of chemical-approach and ultramorphological studies on the development of fluoride-releasing dental adhesives comprising new pre-reacted glass ionomer (PRG) fillers[J]. Dent Mater J, 2008,27(3):315-339.
doi: 10.4012/dmj.27.315 pmid: 18717159
[9] Saku S, Kotake H, Scougall-Vilchis RJ, et al. Antibacterial acti-vity of composite resin with glass-ionomer filler particles[J]. Dent Mater J, 2010,29(2):193-198.
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2009-050 pmid: 20379030
[10] Kitagawa H, Miki-Oka S, Mayanagi G, et al. Inhibitory effect of resin composite containing S-PRG filler on Streptococcus mutans glucose metabolism[J]. J Dent, 2018,70:92-96.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.12.017 pmid: 29294301
[11] Kakuta K, Wonglamsam A, Goto S, et al. Surface textures of composite resins after combined wear test simulating both occlusal wear and brushing wear[J]. Dent Mater J, 2012,31(1):61-67.
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2010-091
[12] Ruivo MA, Pacheco RR, Sebold M, et al. Surface roughness and filler particles characterization of resin-based composites[J]. Microsc Res Tech, 2019,82(10):1756-1767.
doi: 10.1002/jemt.23342 pmid: 31313442
[13] Condo R, Cerroni L, Pasquantonio G, et al. A deep morphological characterization and comparison of different dental restorative materials[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2017,2017:7346317.
doi: 10.1155/2017/7346317 pmid: 28752095
[14] Heintze SD, Faouzi M, Rousson V, et al. Correlation of wear in vivo and six laboratory wear methods[J]. Dent Mater, 2012,28(9):961-973.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.006
[15] Heintze SD, Ilie N, Hickel R, et al. Laboratory mechanical parameters of composite resins and their relation to fractures and wear in clinical trials: A systematic review[J]. Dent Mater, 2017,33(3):e101-e114.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.013 pmid: 27993372
[16] Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2007,11(1):5-33.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-006-0095-7 pmid: 17262225
[17] Leinfelder KF, Taylor DF, Barkmeier WW, et al. Quantitative wear measurement of posterior composite resins[J]. Dent Mater, 1986,2(5):198-201.
doi: 10.1016/S0109-5641(86)80013-6 pmid: 3468024
[18] Mehl A, Gloger W, Kunzelmann KH, et al. A new optical 3-D device for the detection of wear[J]. J Dent Res, 1997,76(11):1799-1807.
doi: 10.1177/00220345970760111201 pmid: 9372798
[19] Palotie U, Eronen AK, Vehkalahti K, et al. Longevity of 2- and 3-surface restorations in posterior teeth of 25- to 30-year-old attending Public Dental Service: A 13-year observation[J]. J Dent, 2017,62:13-17.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.012 pmid: 28529175
[20] The American Dental Association. ADA acceptance program guidelines: resin based composites for posterior restorations [R]. Chicago: ADA Council on Scientific Affairs, 2001.
[21] Lempel E, Toth A, Fabian T, et al. Retrospective evaluation of posterior direct composite restorations: 10-year findings[J]. Dent Mater, 2015,31(2):115-122.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.11.001 pmid: 25480695
[22] Demarco FF, Correa MB, Cenci MS, et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials[J]. Dent Mater, 2012,28(1):87-101.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.003
[23] Hewlett ER, Orro ME, Clark GT. Accuracy testing of three-dimensional digitizing systems[J]. Dent Mater, 1992,8(1):49-53.
doi: 10.1016/0109-5641(92)90053-f pmid: 1521684
[24] Thongthammachat S, Moore BK, Barco MT 2nd, et al. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time[J]. J Prosthodont, 2002,11(2):98-108.
pmid: 12087547
[25] Palaniappan S, Bharadwaj D, Mattar DL, et al. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite[J]. Dent Mater, 2009,25(11):1302-1314.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.001
[26] Palaniappan S, Elsen L, Lijnen I, et al. Nanohybrid and microfilled hybrid versus conventional hybrid composite restorations: 5-year clinical wear performance[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2012,16(1):181-190.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0500-0 pmid: 21221678
[27] Goldberg AJ, Rydinge E, Santucci EA, et al. Clinical evaluation methods for posterior composite restorations[J]. J Dent Res, 1984,63(12):1387-1391.
doi: 10.1177/00220345840630120901 pmid: 6239885
[28] da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Cenci MS, Donassollo TA, et al. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings[J]. J Dent, 2006,34(7):427-435.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.09.006 pmid: 16314023
[29] Wilson NHF, Norman RD. Five-year findings of a multiclinical trial for posterior composite[J]. J Dent, 1991,19(3):153-159.
doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(91)90005-j pmid: 1939815
[30] Satou N, Khan AM, Satou K, et al. In-vitro and in-vivo wear profile of composite resins[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 1992,19(1):31-37.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1992.tb01588.x pmid: 1316435
[31] Salgado VE, Cavalcante LM, Silikas N, et al. The influence of nanoscale inorganic content over optical and surface properties of model composites[J]. J Dent, 2013,41(Suppl 5):e45-53.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.05.011
[32] Lim BS, Ferracane JL, Condon JR, et al. Effect of filler fraction and filler surface treatment on wear of microfilled composites[J]. Dent Mater, 2002,18(1):1-11.
doi: 10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00103-2
[33] Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila L. Characterization of fluoride releasing restorative dental materials[J]. Dent Mater J, 2018,37(2):293-300.
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2017-161 pmid: 29279547
[34] Gonulol N, Ozer S, Sen Tunc E. Water sorption, solubility, and color stability of giomer restoratives[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2015,27(5):300-306.
doi: 10.1111/jerd.12119 pmid: 25145876
[35] Park CA, Hyun SH, Lee JH, et al. Evaluation of polymerization in fluoride-containing composite resins[J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2007,18(8):1549-1556.
doi: 10.1007/s10856-007-3023-8 pmid: 17437069
[1] LIU Si-min,ZHAO Yi-jiao,WANG Xiao-yan,WANG Zu-hua. In vitro evaluation of positioning accuracy of trephine bur at different depths by dynamic navigation [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(1): 146-152.
[2] QIU Shu-ting,ZHU Yu-jia,WANG Shi-min,WANG Fei-long,YE Hong-qiang,ZHAO Yi-jiao,LIU Yun-song,WANG Yong,ZHOU Yong-sheng. Preliminary clinical application verification of complete digital workflow of design lips symmetry reference plane based on posed smile [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(1): 193-199.
[3] Guo-yong REN,Xue-mei WU, ,Jie-yu LI,Wei-ping SUN,Yi-ning HUANG. Susceptibility vessel sign in subacute stroke patients with large vessel occlusion [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(6): 1133-1138.
[4] Yuan LI,Hong LIN,Tie-jun ZHANG. Comparative study on radio-opacity of dental composite resin materials’determination using film imaging and digital imaging [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 995-1001.
[5] Gang YANG,Wen-jie HU,Jie CAO,Deng-gao LIU. Three-dimensional morphology analysis of the supraosseous gingival profile of periodontally healthy maxillary anterior teeth [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 990-994.
[6] Zhen-xing SHAO,Qing-fa SONG,Yu-qing ZHAO,Guo-qing CUI. An arthroscopic “inlay” Bristow procedure with suture button fixation: Surgical technique and radiology evaluation [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 896-901.
[7] Yi-fan WU,Xiao-yuan ZHANG,Shuang REN,Ying-xiang YU,Cui-qing CHANG. Measurement and evaluation of the quadriceps muscle mass in young men based on magnetic resonance imaging [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 843-849.
[8] HAN Song-chen,HUANG Zi-xiong,LIU Hui-xin,XU Tao. Renal functional compensation after unilateral radical nephrectomy of renal cell carcinoma [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(4): 680-685.
[9] LI Xin-fei, PENG Yi-ji, YU Xiao-teng, XIONG Sheng-wei, CHENG Si-da, DING Guang-pu, YANG Kun-lin, TANG Qi, MI Yue, WU Jing-yun, ZHANG Peng, XIE Jia-xin, HAO Han, WANG He, QIU Jian-xing, YANG Jian, LI Xue-song, ZHOU Li-qun. Three dimensional nephrometry system for partial nephrectomy: Our initial exploration [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(3): 613-622.
[10] HU Di,ZHANG Miao,KANG Hui-ying,PENG Yun. Investigation and validation of magnetic resonance white matter atlas for 0 to 2 years old infants [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(2): 341-347.
[11] CHEN Di,XU Xiang-yu,WANG Ming-rui,LI Rui,ZANG Gen-ao,ZHANG Yue,QIAN Hao-nan,YAN Guang-rong,FAN Tian-yuan. Preparation and in vitro evaluation of fused deposition modeling 3D printed verapa-mil hydrochloride gastric floating formulations [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(2): 348-354.
[12] MENG Yuan,ZHANG Li-qi,ZHAO Ya-ning,LIU Deng-gao,ZHANG Zu-yan,GAO Yan. Three-dimentional radiographic features of 67 maxillary radicular cysts [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(2): 396-401.
[13] HUANG Xin-rui,LI Sha,GAO Song. Progress in filters for denoising cryo-electron microscopy images [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(2): 425-433.
[14] YUE Zhao-guo,ZHANG Hai-dong,YANG Jing-wen,HOU Jian-xia. Comparison of residual cement between CAD/CAM customized abutments and stock abutments via digital measurement in vitro [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(1): 69-75.
[15] XU Xiao-xiang,CAO Ye,ZHAO Yi-jiao,JIA Lu,XIE Qiu-fei. In vitro evaluation of the application of digital individual tooth tray in the impression making of mandibular full-arch crown abutments [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(1): 54-61.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Author. English Title Test[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(1): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(1): 82 -84 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .
Copyright © Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd