Email Alert | RSS

Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (3): 447-452. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.03.002

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of the composite of buckwheat-oat-pea on blood glucose in diabetic rats

YIN Xue-qian,ZHANG Xiao-xuan,WEN Jing,LIU Si-qi,LIU Xin-ran,ZHOU Ruo-yu,WANG Jun-boΔ()   

  1. Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2021-01-27 Online:2021-06-18 Published:2021-06-16
  • Contact: Jun-bo WANG E-mail:bmuwjbxy@bjmu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    National Key Research and Development Program of China(2017YFD0401202)

RICH HTML

 29   

PDF (PC)

276

Abstract:

Objective: To study the effects of buckwheat-oat-pea (BOP) composite flour [buckwheat ∶oats ∶peas=6 ∶1 ∶1 (quality ratio)] on blood glucose in diabetic rats. Methods: In this study, 64 male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 8 groups by fasting blood glucose (FBG) and body weight: normal control group, model control group, metformin group, buckwheat group, oats group, BOP low-dose group (BOP-L), medium-dose group (BOP-M), and high-dose group (BOP-H). The rats in the normal control group were fed with normal diet, the rats in the model control group and metformin group were fed with a high-fat diet (HFD), and the rats in the buckwheat group, oats group, and BOP-L, BOP-M, BOP-H groups were fed with HFD containing 10% buckwheat flour, 10% oat flour, 3.3% BOP, 10% BOP, 30% BOP, respectively. The HFD in all the groups had the same percentage of energy from fat (45%). After 30 days, the rats fed with HFD received intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin (30 mg/kg, once a week for two weeks) to establish diabetes mellitus. After the model was successful established, the rats were fed for another 28 days. During the study, the body weight, food intake/body weight (FI/BW) and water intake/body weight (WI/BW), food utilization rate, 24 h urine volume, FBG, glucose area under curve (GAUC) of oral glucose tolerance test were measured regularly. At the end of the study, the fasting serum glucose and insulin were measured, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated. Results: With the inducing of HFD and streptozotocin, compared with the normal control group, the rats in the model control group had higher FI/BW, WI/BW, 24 h urine volume, FBG, GAUC, HOMA-IR (P<0.05), and lower body weight, food utilization rate (P<0.05). Compared with the model control group, the rats in the three BOP groups all had higher body weight, food utilization rate (P<0.05), and lower WI/BW, HOMA-IR (P<0.05); the rats in the BOP-L and BOP-M groups had lower FI/BW, 24 h urine volume, FBG (P<0.05), and the rats in the BOP-M group also had lower GAUC (P<0.05). After the establishment of diabetes, there was no significant difference in blood glucose and the other indicators between the rats in the three BOP groups and the buckwheat group or the oats group (P>0.05). Conclusion: The BOP had the effects of reducing blood glucose, insulin resistance and diabetic symptoms on diabetic rats, and had the value for further development and utilization.

Key words: Diet,diabetic, Food,formulated, Blood glucose, Rats,Sprague-Dawley

CLC Number: 

  • R587.1

Figure 1

Effect of the BOP on the body weight of diabetic rats ($\bar{x} \pm s$, n=8) * P<0.05, compared with the MC group; # P<0.05, compared with the OA group. Abbreviations as in Table 1."

Table 1

Effects of the BOP on the food intake/body weight, food utilization rate, water intake/body weight and 24 h urine volume of diabetic rats"

Group Food intake/body weight/
[g/(kg·d)]($\bar{x} \pm s$, n=8)		 Food utilization rate
of 1-10 weeks/%
($\bar{x} \pm s$, n=8)		 Water intake/body weight/[mL/(kg·d)]
[P50(P25, P75), n=8]		 24 h urine
volume/mL
($\bar{x} \pm s$, n=6)
1-4 weeks 5-10 weeks 1-4 weeks 5-10 weeks
NC 55.8±3.1* 42.5±2.5* 17.3±2.6* 93.1 (91.5, 154.4) 74.2 (72.1, 125.0)* 13.0±2.7*
MC 48.9±4.6 61.4±1.7 6.5±4.3 125.0 (104.0, 132.5) 300.2 (297.8, 329.2) 71.6±8.5
MET 50.1±4.5 50.7±7.8* 10.8±3.1* 102.1 (96.5, 108.9) 253.4 (145.5, 290.5)* 36.6±18.7*
BU 52.1±3.1 51.6±2.7* 11.6±2.9* 123.7 (120.2, 130.2) 283.9 (240.6, 301.3)* 39.1±13.0*
OA 50.7±3.7 52.0±4.2* 12.4±3.9* 120.6 (107.1, 124.7) 260.1 (205.1, 262.3)* 42.5±22.2*
BOP-L 52.0±3.2 50.9±7.7* 11.6±4.0* 96.3 (84.6, 96.7) 274.5 (215.1, 287.5)* 35.3±14.3*
BOP-M 50.0±3.7 51.0±3.9* 12.6±3.2* 108.8 (105.7, 116.2) 243.5 (217.3, 270.2)* 48.5±9.2*
BOP-H 55.5±6.0 56.1±6.9 11.1±1.3* 119.6 (104.0, 133.2) 257.3 (248.9, 265.5)* 58.9±20.8

Figure 2

Effect of the BOP on the fasting blood glucose of diabetic rats ($\bar{x} \pm s$, n=8) * P<0.05, compared with the MC group. Abbreviations as in Table 1."

Figure 3

Effect of the BOP on the GAUC of diabetic rats ($\bar{x} \pm s$, n=8) * P<0.05, compared with the MC group. GAUC, glucose area under curve; Other abbreviations as in Table 1."

Table 2

Effect of the BOP on the insulin of diabetic rats ($\bar{x} \pm s$, n=8)"

Group Insulin/(mIU/L)
NC 48.2±13.2
MC 57.5±36.4
MET 33.1±23.1
BU 23.5±22.6
OA 30.8±23.2
BOP-L 24.9±24.4
BOP-M 29.6±16.5
BOP-H 28.0±22.4

Figure 4

Effect of the BOP on the HOMA-IR of diabetic rats ($\bar{x} \pm s$, n=8) * P<0.05, compared with the MC group. HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; Other abbreviations as in Table 1."

[1] International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas[EB/OL]. (2019-11-14) [2020-08-24]. https://www.diabetesatlas.org.
[2] Li L, Lietz G, Seal C. Buckwheat and CVD risk markers: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Nutrients, 2018,10(5):619.
doi: 10.3390/nu10050619
[3] He LX, Zhao J, Huang YS, et al. The difference between oats and beta-glucan extract intake in the management of HbA1c, fasting glucose and insulin sensitivity: a meta-analysis of rando-mized controlled trials[J]. Food Funct, 2016,7(3):1413-1428.
doi: 10.1039/C5FO01364J
[4] Al-Malki AL. Oat Attenuation of hyperglycemia-induced retinal oxidative stress and NF-kappaB activation in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats[J]. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2013,2013:983923.
[5] Hashemi Z, Fouhse J, Im HS, et al. Dietary pea fiber supplementation improves glycemia and induces changes in the composition of gut microbiota, serum short chain fatty acid profile and expression of mucins in glucose intolerant rats[J]. Nutrients, 2017,9(11):1236.
doi: 10.3390/nu9111236
[6] 何宇纳, 赵丽云, 于冬梅, 等. 中国成年居民粗杂粮摄入状况[J]. 营养学报, 2016,38(2):115-118.
[7] Ruggiero E, Bonaccio M, Di Castelnuovo A, et al. Consumption of whole grain food and its determinants in a general Italian population: Results from the INHES study[J]. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 2019,29(6):611-620.
doi: S0939-4753(19)30066-3 pmid: 30956028
[8] 韩珍华, 王瑞, 吕万勇. 糖尿病患者营养教育中粗杂粮摄入情况分析[J]. 海南医学, 2013,24(12):1842-1844.
[9] Qiu J, Liu Y, Yue Y, et al. Dietary tartary buckwheat intake attenuates insulin resistance and improves lipidprofiles in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Nutr Res, 2016,36(12):1392-1401.
doi: S0271-5317(16)30673-X pmid: 27919453
[10] 杨兰兰, 徐曼, 董方虹, 等. 燕麦饮食干预在社区2型糖尿病饮食治疗中的应用研究[J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2018,28(19):75-79.
[11] Li X, Cai X, Ma X, et al. Short- and long-term effects of wholegrain oat intake on weight management and glucolipid metabolism in overweight type-2 diabetics: a randomized control trial[J]. Nutrients, 2016,8(9):549.
doi: 10.3390/nu8090549
[12] 梁云. 荞麦早餐饮食对糖尿病患者餐后血糖的影响[J]. 临床合理用药杂志, 2018,11(17):116-117.
[13] 方海滨, 亢春雨, 郭梦冉, 等. 薏米燕麦膨化食品对高血糖血脂大鼠模型的降糖降脂作用研究[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2018,41(6):87-91.
[14] 中国食品药品监督管理局. 辅助降血糖功能评价方法[EB/OL]. (2012-04-23) [2020-08-27]. http://www.cfda.com.cn/NewsDetail.aspx?id=53366.
[15] Perez-Ramirez IF, Becerril-Ocampo LJ, Reynoso-Camacho R, et al. Cookies elaborated with oat and common bean flours improved serum markers in diabetic rats[J]. J Sci Food Agric, 2018,98(3):998-1007.
doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2018.98.issue-3
[16] 杨月欣, 王光亚, 潘兴昌. 中国食物成分表[M]. 2版. 北京: 北京大学医学出版社, 2009.
[17] Beitane I, Krumina-Zemture G, Sabovics M. Technological properties of pea and buckwheat flours and their blends[M]// Treija S, Skujeniece S. Research for rural development. Jelgava: Latvia Univ Life Sciences & Technologies, 2016: 137-142.
[18] Angioloni A, Collar C. Nutritional and functional added value of oat, Kamut, spelt, rye and buckwheat versus common wheat in breadmaking[J]. J Sci Food Agric, 2011,91(7):1283-1292.
doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4314
[19] 齐婧, 吕莹果. 多谷物面条的配方优化[J]. 河南工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018,39(3):58-64.
[20] 刘淑梅, 韩淑英, 张宝忠, 等. 荞麦种子总黄酮对糖尿病高脂血症大鼠血脂、血糖及脂质过氧化的影响[J]. 中成药, 2003,25(8):60-61.
[21] Peng L, Zhang Q, Zhang Y, et al. Effect of tartary buckwheat, rutin, and quercetin on lipid metabolism in rats during high dietary fat intake[J]. Food Sci Nutr, 2020,8(1):199-213.
doi: 10.1002/fsn3.v8.1
[22] Liu M, Zhang Y, Zhang H, et al. The anti-diabetic activity of oat β-d-glucan in streptozotocin-nicotinamide induced diabetic mice[J]. Int J Biol Macromol, 2016,91:1170-1176.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.06.083
[23] Shen RL, Cai FL, Dong JL, et al. Hypoglycemic effects and biochemical mechanisms of oat products on streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice[J]. J Agric Food Chem, 2011,59(16):8895-8900.
doi: 10.1021/jf200678q
[24] 张慧娟, 黄莲燕, 尹梦, 等. 燕麦多肽降血糖功能的研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2017,38(10):360-363, 384.
[25] 柳春, 王艳杰, 刘洋, 等. 苦荞麦提取物对糖尿病模型大鼠肾脏的保护作用及机制[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2016,36(3):557-559.
[26] Hu Y, Hou Z, Yi R, et al. Tartary buckwheat flavonoids ameliorate high fructose-induced insulin resistance and oxidative stress associated with the insulin signaling and Nrf2/HO-1 pathwaysin mice[J]. Food Funct, 2017,8(8):2803-2816.
doi: 10.1039/C7FO00359E
[27] Hashemi Z, Yang K, Yang H, et al. Cooking enhances beneficial effects of pea seed coat consumption on glucosetolerance, incretin, and pancreatic hormones in high-fat-diet-fed rats[J]. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, 2015,40(4):323-333.
doi: 10.1139/apnm-2014-0380 pmid: 25794240
[1] ZHU Zhen-jie, XU Qing-quan, HUANG Xiao-bo, HONG Yang, YANG Qing-ya, WANG Shu, AN Li-zhe, XU Tao. Risk factor analysis of systemic inflammatory response syndrome in type 2 diabetics after percutaneous nephrolithotomy [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(4): 643-649.
[2] SUN Ke-Xin, LIU Zhi, CAO Ya-Ying, JUAN Juan, XIANG Xiao, YANG Cheng, HUANG Shao-Ping, LIU Xiao-Fen, LI Na, TANG Xun, LI Jin, WU Tao, CHEN Da-Fang, HU Yong-Hua- . Relationship between brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity and glycemic control of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in Beijing community population [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(3): 431-436.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(1): 82 -84 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(4): 351 -354 .
Copyright © Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd