Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (2): 255-260. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.02.009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

A prospective cohort study of the influence of positive/negative effectivity on the mortality risk of the Chinese elderly

LIU Jie,GUO Chao()   

  1. Institute of Population Research, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • Received:2021-05-12 Online:2022-04-18 Published:2022-04-13
  • Contact: Chao GUO E-mail:chaoguo@pku.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Fund of China(82103955)

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the influence of positive/negative effectivity on the mortality risk of the Chinese elderly. Methods: Using the latest four surveys data of Chinese longitudinal healthy longevity survey in 2008, 2012, and 2014, as well as 2018 and selecting 10 993 elderly people who were aged 65 and above as research objects, this paper compared the positive/negative effectivity status and differences of the elderly in different gender and age groups. And then this paper analyzed the effect of positive/negative effectivity on elderly people’s mortality risk by constructing Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Compared with the female elderly, the male elderly had lower negative effectivity and higher positive effectivity. With the increase of age, the negative effectivity of the elderly increased, while the positive effectivity decreased. The results showed that after adjusting for the basic demographic characteristics, health status and living habits of the respondents in the baseline survey, in the positive effectivity dimension, “clean preference” (HR=0.922, 95%CI:0.889-0.956), “autonomy” (HR=0.933, 95%CI: 0.914-0.952) and “sense of youth” (HR=0.948, 95%CI:0.927-0.969), had a protective effect on the mortality risk of the elderly, while in the dimension of “open-minded view”, there was no significant difference in the mortality risk of the elderly with different answers. In the negative effecti-vity dimension, “tension and fear” (HR=1.039, 95%CI: 1.014-1.065), “loneliness” (HR=1.053, 95%CI:1.029-1.079) and “uselessness” had a harmful effect on the mortality risk of the elderly. The more positive effectivity, the lower the mortality risk of the elderly (HR=0.967, 95%CI: 0.956-0.978), while the more negative effectivity, the higher the mortality risk of the elderly (HR=1.024, 95%CI:1.013-1.035). Conclusion: The negative effectivity of the elderly in all dimensions may increase the mortality risk of elderly people. We ought to dredge the negative emotions of the elderly in time. In the health promotion of the elderly, we should also pay attention to the encouragement of positive effectivity in all dimensions, which requires the joint efforts of families, communities and governments.

Key words: Positive affectivity, Negative affectivity, Elderly, Mortality risk, Prospective cohort study

CLC Number: 

  • R592

Table 1

Basic information of respondents"

Items Value
Female, n(%) 5 894 (53.62)
Age/years, x -±s 84.84±10.74
Han nationalty, n(%) 10 237 (93.12)
Rural residents, n(%) 6 862 (62.42)
Education/years, x -±s 2.20±3.48
Logarithm of household income, n(%) 9.21 (1.47)
Marital status, n(%)
Married/partnered 7 059 (64.21)
Others 3 934(35.79)
Live with family, n(%) 9 019 (82.04)
Have a pension, n(%) 1 983 (18.04)
Self-rated health state, n(%) 5 560 (50.58)
Self-maintenance, n(%) 1 459 (13.27)
Suffering from chronic diseases, n(%) 5 162 (46.96)
Satisfied with life, n(%) 4 417 (40.18)
Smoke, n(%) 8 870 (80.69)
Drink, n(%) 8 918 (81.12)
Exercise, n(%) 7 617 (69.29)

Table 2

Positive / negative affectivity of the respondents"

Items Total Gender Age groups/years
Male Female P value 65-74 75-84 85-94 95-104 P value
Score of positive effectivity,
x -±s
Open-minded 3.86±0.70 3.91±0.67 3.81±0.72 <0.001 3.90±0.71 3.84±0.70 3.82±0.70 3.87±0.69 <0.001
Clean preference 3.82±0.67 3.74±0.68 3.88±0.65 <0.001 3.88±0.66 3.83±0.65 3.79±0.68 3.79±0.67 <0.001
Autonomy 3.65±1.20 3.84±1.17 3.48±1.21 <0.001 4.08±1.04 3.80±1.15 3.50±1.22 3.22±1.23 <0.001
Sense of youth 2.76±1.11 2.80±1.10 2.71±1.11 <0.001 2.88±1.07 2.78±1.10 2.74±1.12 2.62±1.11 <0.001
Score of negative effectivity,
x -±s
Tension and fear 1.98±0.97 1.86±0.93 2.08±0.99 <0.001 1.86±0.92 1.95±0.96 2.05±1.00 2.02±0.96 <0.001
Loneliness 2.04±1.02 1.94±0.99 2.13±1.04 <0.001 1.78±0.94 1.99±1.01 2.15±1.04 2.21±1.04 <0.001
Uselessness 2.78±1.18 2.66±1.18 2.89±1.17 <0.001 2.54±1.16 2.75±1.16 2.88±1.18 2.94±1.17 <0.001
Total score of positive
effectivity, x -±s
14.08±2.37 14.30±2.33 13.87±2.37 <0.001 14.75±2.19 14.26±2.28 13.85±2.40 13.50±2.39 <0.001
Total score of negative
effectivity, x -±s
6.80±2.42 6.46±2.35 7.09±2.44 <0.001 6.18±2.26 6.68±2.40 7.08±2.47 7.16±2.40 <0.001
[1] 国家统计局. 第七次全国人口普查公报(第五号)[EB/OL]. (2021-05-11)[2021-05-12] http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjgb/rkpcgb/qgrkpcgb/202106/t20210628_1818824.html.
[2] Larsen JT, Mcgraw AP. Further evidence for mixed emotions[J]. J Pers Soc Psychol, 2011, 100(6):1095-1110.
doi: 10.1037/a0021846 pmid: 21219075
[3] 王港, 傅宏, 史娟, 等. 老年人情绪复杂性与年龄的关系[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2020, 40(1):215-219.
[4] Gruehn D, Lumley MA, Diehl M, et al. Time-based indicators of emotional complexity: interrelations and correlates[J]. Emotion, 2013, 13(2):226-237.
doi: 10.1037/a0030363
[5] Tellegen A, Watson D, Clark LA, et al. On the dimensional and hierarchical structure of affect[J]. Psychol Sci, 1999, 10(4):297-303.
doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00157
[6] Russell JA. Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion[J]. Psychol Rev, 2003, 110(1):145-172.
pmid: 12529060
[7] Fredrickson BL. The role of positive emotions in positive psycho-logy: the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions[J]. Am Psychol, 2001, 56(3):218-226.
doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.56.3.218 pmid: 11315248
[8] Mitchell R, Phillips LH. The psychological, neurochemical and functional neuroanatomical mediators of the effects of positive and negative mood on executive functions[J]. Neuropsychologia, 2007, 45(4):617-629.
pmid: 16962146
[9] Peters ML, Flink IK, Boersma K, et al. Manipulating optimism: can imagining a best possible self be used to increase positive future expectancies?[J]. J Posit Psychol, 2010, 5(3):204-211.
doi: 10.1080/17439761003790963
[10] Watson D, Clark LA. Negative affectivity: the disposition to experience aversive emotional states[J]. Psychol Bull, 1984, 96(3):465-490.
pmid: 6393179
[11] Nock MK, Borges G, Bromet EJ, et al. Cross-national prevalence and risk factors for suicidal ideation, plans and attempts[J]. Br J Psychiatry, 2008, 192(2):98-105.
doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.040113
[12] 陈华峰, 陈华帅. 婚姻状态对老年负性情绪影响的队列研究[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2012, 26(2):104-110.
[13] 杨磊, 孟兆敏. 老年人无用感与认知功能障碍风险的关系研究[J]. 人口与发展, 2019, 25(2):50-56.
[14] Levy BR, Slade MD, Kasl SV. Longitudinal benefit of positive self-perceptions of aging on functional health[J]. J Gerontol B Psychol, 2002, 57(5):409-417.
[15] Yuan Z, Dupre ME, Li Q, et al. Changes in perceived uselessness and risks for mortality: evidence from a national sample of older adults in china[J]. Bmc Public Health, 2017, 17(1):561.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4479-1 pmid: 28599631
[16] Zeng Y, Vaupel W. The health longevity survey and the active life expectancy of the oldest-old in china[J]. Population, 2001(13):95-116.
[17] Palgi Y, Shrira A, Ben-Ezra M, et al. Age-related and death-related differences in emotional complexity[J]. Psychol Aging, 2014, 29(2):284-296.
doi: 10.1037/a0036302
[18] 罗雅楠. 社会支持对我国高龄老人死亡风险影响的Cox模型分析[J]. 南方人口, 2014, 29(3):62-70, 80.
[19] Zhao Y, Sautter JM, Qiu L, et al. Self-perceived uselessness and associated factors among older adults in china[J]. Bmc Geriatr, 2017, 17(1):101.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0494-4
[20] Glaser R, Kiecolt-Glaser JK. Stress-induced immune dysfunction: implications for health[J]. Nat Rev Immunol, 2005, 5(3):243-251.
[21] Moskowitz, Tedlie J. Positive affect predicts lower risk of aids mortality[J]. Sychosom Med, 2003, 65(4):620-626.
[22] Domburg R, Pedersen SS, Brand M, et al. Feelings of being disabled as a predictor of mortality in men 10 years after percuta-neous coronary transluminal angioplasty[J]. J Psychosom Res, 2001, 51(3):469-477.
pmid: 11602216
[23] Moreno PI, Moskowitz AL, Ganz PA, et al. Positive affect and inflammatory activity in breast cancer survivors: examining the role of affective arousal[J]. Psychosom Med, 2016, 78(5):532-541.
doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000300
[24] Cohen S, Alper CM, Doyle WJ, et al. Positive emotional style predicts resistance to illness after experimental exposure to rhinovirus or influenza a virus[J]. Psychosom Med, 2006, 68(6):809-815.
doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000245867.92364.3c
[25] 王建新, 牟冬莲. 国外负面情感状态研究述评[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2008, 177(6):227-229.
[26] Levy BR, Myers LM. Relationship between respiratory mortality and self-perceptions of aging[J]. Psychol Health, 2005, 20(5):553-564.
doi: 10.1080/14768320500066381
[27] 杜新, 陈天勇. 老年执行功能的认知可塑性和神经可塑性[J]. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18(9):115-124.
[28] 杨昭宁, 顾子贝, 王杜娟, 等. 愤怒和悲伤情绪对助人决策的影响:人际责任归因的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(3):393-403.
[29] Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect-the panas scales[J]. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1988, 54(6):1063-1070.
pmid: 3397865
[30] 尹伊湄, 龚艳. 新冠肺炎密切接触者情绪状态及疏导策略[J]. 中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2020, 40(5):110-114.
[1] Ming-xin AO,Xue-min LI,Yuan-yuan YU,Hui-juan SHI,Hong-shi HUANG,Ying-fang AO,Wei WANG. Effects of visual restoration on dynamic plantar pressure features in elder individuals [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 907-914.
[2] Wen TANG,Jun-yi GAO,Xin-yu MA,Chao-he ZHANG,Lian-tao MA,Ya-sha WANG. Application of recurrent neural network in prognosis of peritoneal dialysis [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(3): 602-608.
[3] Jian CHEN,Cai-hong ZUO,Cai-yi ZHANG,Ming YANG,Pei-xun ZHANG. Comparison of the effects of two cephalomedullary nails (zimmer natural nail and proximal femoral nail antirotation) in treatment of elderly intertrochan teric fractures [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(2): 283-287.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(4): 456 -458 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 125 -128 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 217 -220 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(1): 109 -111 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(3): 297 -301 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(5): 599 -601 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(5): 516 -520 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(1): 82 -84 .