Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2023, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (2): 324-327. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.02.017

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Quality of psychomotility recovery after propofol sedation for painless gastroscopy and colonoscopy

Cheng-mei SHI,Yang ZHOU,Ning YANG,Zheng-qian LI,Yi-fan TAO,Ying DENG,Xiang-yang GUO*()   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2020-06-12 Online:2023-04-18 Published:2023-04-12
  • Contact: Xiang-yang GUO E-mail:puthmzk@hsc.pku.edu.cn

RICH HTML

  

Abstract:

Objective: To study the effect of propofol used for painless gastroscopy and colonoscopy on psychomotility recovery. Methods: One hundred adult patients undergoing painless gastroscopy and colonoscopy were recruited, aged 18-72 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status Ⅰ-Ⅱ. According to age, the patients were divided into youth group (20-39 years old, 27 cases), middle age group (40-54 years old, 37 cases), and elder group (55-64 years old, 36 cases). Propofol was continuously infused according to the patients' condition to mantain the bispectal index (BIS) score 55-64. All the patients received psychomotility assesment 30 min before the operations when the discharge criteria were met including number cancellation test, number connection test and board test. The heart rate, blood pressure, saturation of pulse oximetry, electrocardiograph and BIS were monitored during the operation. The operating time, recovery time, total volume of propofol and discharge time were recorded. If the results obtained were inferior to those before operation, a third assessment was taken 30 minutes later until the results recovered or being superior to the baseline levels. Results: All the patients completed the first and second assessments, and 25 patients had taken the third assessment. There was no statistically significant difference in the results of psychomotility assessment when the patients met the discharge standard. Furthermore, the results were analyzed by grouping with age, and there was no statistical difference in the test results of the youth and middle age groups compared with the preoperative group, among which, the efficiency of the number cancellation test was significantly better than that before operation in the youth group (P < 0.05). However, in the elderly patients the number cancellation efficiency, number connection test and board test were significantly inferior to that before operation (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the accuracy of number cancellation compared with that before operation. The patients who needed the third test in the elder group were significantly more than in the other groups (P < 0.05). Compared with the preoperative results, there was no statistical difference in the test results of those who completed the third test. Conclusion: The psychomotility function of the patients who underwent painless gastroscopy and colonoscopy was recovered when they met discharge criteria. The elderly patients had a prolonged recovery period.

Key words: Propofol, Gastroscopy, Colonoscopy, Anesthesia recovery period, Psychomotility

CLC Number: 

  • R614

Table 1

Demographic characteristics of the three groups"

Items Youth group (n=27) Middle age group (n=37) Elder group (n=36)
Gender, Female/Male 12/15 18/19 16/20
BMI/(kg/m2), ${\bar x}$±s 23.7±4.3 24.0±3.8 23.7±5.0
Operating time/min, ${\bar x}$±s 27.6±3.8 29.4±5.8 28.7±7.6
Emergence time/min, ${\bar x}$±s 5.3±2.3 5.8±2.0 6.3±2.0
Dosage of propofol/mg, ${\bar x}$±s 299.9±45.2 288.7±40.2 265.6±58.4

Table 2

Psychomotility test of all patients and three subgroups 30 minutes before operation and at the time of meeting discharge criteria"

Items 30 min before operation Meeting the discharge criteria
Total patients (n=100)
   Number cancellation accuracy 94%±1% 93%±1%
   Number cancellation efficiencya 301.77±96.8 298.2±96.7
   Number connection time/s 103.76±31.95 104.63±37.04
   Board time/s 55.37±11.12 56.17±13.06
Youth group (n=27)
   Number cancellation accuracy 94%±46% 99%±31%*
   Number cancellation efficiencya 354.38±67.56 359.15±69.44
   Number connection time/s 59.15±69.44 79.11±14.11
   Board time/s 48.70±4.66 47.67±5.78
Middle age group (n=37)
   Number cancellation accuracy 97%±41% 96%±9%
   Number cancellation efficiencya 306.30±97.40 308.08±89.42
   Number connection time/s 95.27±16.84 96.37±25.10
   Board time/s 55.08±8.52 54.68±9.13
Elder group (n=36)
   Number cancellation accuracy 86%±11% 84%±15%
   Number cancellation efficiencya 257.70±96.04 242.33±91.92*
   Number connection time/s 129.83±34.39 135.94±38.74*
   Board time/s 60.67±13.98 64.08±15.80*
1 中华医学会麻醉学分会, 中华医学会消化内镜学分会. 中国消化内镜诊疗镇静/麻醉的专家共识[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2014, 30 (9): 920- 927.
2 王菲, 赵阳阳, 关明, 等. 静脉给药镇静技术在2 582例口腔外科门诊手术中的临床应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52 (1): 181- 186.
3 Allampati S , Wen S , Liu F , et al. Recovery of cognitive function after sedation with propofol for outpatient gastrointestinal endoscopy[J]. Saudi J Gastroenterol, 2019, 25 (3): 188- 193.
doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_369_18
4 史成梅, 周永德, 张利萍, 等. 右美托咪定复合丙泊酚在高龄患者无痛胃肠镜检查中的应用[J]. 中国新药杂志, 2016, 25 (19): 2229- 2233.
5 武睿, 戈之铮, 戴军, 等. 无痛上消化道内镜检查对术后早期认知功能的影响[J]. 胃肠病学, 2014, 19 (9): 544- 548.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7125.2014.09.008
6 Vasudevan AE , Goh KL , Bulgiba AM . Impairment of psychomotor responses after conscious sedation in cirrhotic patients undergoing therapeutic upper GI endoscopy[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2002, 97 (7): 1717- 1721.
doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05831.x
7 赵国庆, 曹莉. 对武术运动员高级神经活动强度和灵活性的研究[J]. 湖北体育科技, 1996, (3): 68- 71.
8 鞠辉, 赫金鑫, 冯艺. 氟马西尼对使用丙泊酚无痛胃肠镜后苏醒和认知功能的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2013, 29 (2): 121- 123.
9 朱姝, 陈志勇, 朱美华. 不同剂量丙泊酚对无痛胃镜检查患者苏醒质量的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2016, 32 (7): 705- 706.
10 Willey J , Vargo JJ , Connor JT , et al. Quantitative assessment of psychomotor recovery after sedation and analgesia for outpatient EGD[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2002, 56 (6): 810- 816.
11 Maslekar S , Gardiner A , Hughes M , et al. Randomized clinical trial of Entonox versus midazolam-fentanyl sedation for colonoscopy[J]. Br J Surg, 2009, 96 (4): 361- 368.
12 李蓓蕾, 林磊, 董奇, 等. 儿童精细动作能力的发展及与其学业成绩的关系[J]. 心理学报, 2002, 34 (5): 494- 499.
13 朱丹瑶, 周加仙. 基本动作技能发展的神经机制及其教育促进策略[J]. 教育生物学杂志, 2021, 9 (3): 204- 210.
14 刘平平. 手部精细动作的意义及测量[J]. 武警医学, 2013, 24 (7): 639- 640.
[1] Jun LI,Fang GU,Zai-ling LI,Yu-min LU. Pediatric colonoscopy findings and changing patterns from Beijing in one institutional experience over 12 years [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(5): 819-823.
[2] Kun-peng LIU,Bao-ning WANG,Yan-yan SHEN,Wei-xia LI,Zhao LI,Lan YAO. Effects of thoracic epidural administration of lidocaine on hemodynamic and arousal responses of double lumen tracheal intubation during induction of anesthesia [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(4): 742-747.
[3] WANG Yu-jie, GUO Xiang-yang, WANG Jun. Influences of repeated propofol anesthesia on hippocampal apoptosis and long-term learning and memory abilities of neonatal rats [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(2): 310-314.
[4] ZHANG Zhe, JU Rui-jun, LI Xue-tao, ZHANG Dong-xiao, WU Ren-rong, CHEN Xue-jun, LU Wan-liang. Pharmacokinetics for the solutable type injections of propofol glycoside in rats [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(5): 846-852.
[5] LI Zhi-Hong, LIU Dan, HE Zi-Jing, FAN Zhi-Yi. Influence of dexamethasone on the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(4): 685-689.
[6] GUAN Ming, WANG En-bo, LIU Yu, ZHANG Wei. Evaluation of propofol target controlled infusion with fentanyl intravenous sedation on the removal of impacted wisdom tooth [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2014, 46(1): 107-110.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!