Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2024, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (1): 157-160. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.01.024
Previous Articles Next Articles
Yifan CHEN,Zhongdi LIU,Peng ZHANG,Wei HUANG*()
CLC Number:
1 | 朱佩芳. 损伤严重程度评分的演进[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2005, 21 (1): 39- 42. |
2 |
Maduz R , Kugelmeier P , Meili S , et al. Major influence of interobserver reliability on polytrauma identification with the injury severity score (ISS): Time for a centralised coding in trauma registries?[J]. Injury, 2017, 48 (4): 885- 889.
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.02.015 |
3 |
Twiss E , Krijnen P , Schipper I , et al. Accuracy and reliability of injury coding in the national Dutch Trauma Registry[J]. Int J Qual Health Care, 2021, 33 (1): mzab041.
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab041 |
4 | 周志道, 冯须, 王绍光, 等. 矿区骨盆骨折125例分析[J]. 煤矿医学, 1983, 5 (3): 20- 22. |
5 |
都定元. 创伤评分的演进与AIS 2005[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2006, 8 (3): 193- 197.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4237.2006.03.001 |
6 |
李思齐, 汤曼力, 高伟, 等. AIS-ISS法在评估多发伤病情及预后中的作用[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2005, 7 (5): 357- 359.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4237.2005.05.014 |
7 | 赵威, 黄杨, 王玉同, 等. 损伤严重程度评分对重度创伤病情评估的意义与预后相关性研究[J]. 临床误诊误治, 2014, 27 (1): 7- 10. |
8 | 马飞. ISS评分对严重创伤患者病情及预后的预测价值[J]. 海南医学, 2018, 29 (6): 789- 791. |
9 | 陈小凤, 阳文新, 孙守松, 等. ISS评分与CRAMS评分在多发伤患者预后评估中的应用[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2017, 26 (6): 664- 668. |
10 | 王曼维, 李岩, 鱼锋, 等. 基于ISS评估急诊科多发创伤患者滞留时间与其转归分析[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2020, 29 (4): 578- 581. |
11 | 梁建军, 徐飞, 廖阳, 等. ISS与APACHEⅡ评分对急诊多发伤患者伤情评估的价值分析[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2020, 20 (6): 1138- 1141. |
[1] | Fu-zheng GUO,Xiu-juan ZHAO,Jiu-xu DENG,Zhe DU,Tian-bing WANG,Feng-xue ZHU. Early changes within the lymphocyte population are associated with the long term prognosis in severely injured patients [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(3): 552-556. |
[2] | Zhe DU,Wei HUANG,Zhi-wei WANG,Jing ZHOU,Jian XIONG,Ming LI,Peng ZHANG,Zhong-di LIU,Feng-xue ZHU,Chuan-lin WANG,Bao-guo JIANG,Tian-bing WANG. Application of multidisciplinary team (MDT) in the treatment of severe trauma [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(2): 298-301. |
|