Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) ›› 2018, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (6): 1057-1062. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2018.06.021

• Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of risk factors for acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome after esophagectomy

Jia-xuan XU,Hong-zhi WANG(),Jun DONG,Xiao-jie CHEN,Yong YANG,Ren-xiong CHEN,Guo-dong WANG   

  1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing 100142, China
  • Received:2017-06-23 Online:2018-12-18 Published:2018-12-18
  • Contact: Hong-zhi WANG E-mail:doctorwhz@163.com

RICH HTML

  

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the incidence and risk factors for the acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after resection of esophageal carcinoma.Methods:We retrospectively analyzed 422 consecutive patients admitted to the Department of Critical Care Medicine with eso-phageal carcinoma undergoing esophagectomy from January 2010 to December 2016 in Peking University Cancer Hospital. ALI/ARDS were diagnosed, the patients were divided into ALI/ARDS group and control group without ALI/ARDS, the differences of clinical features were contrasted between the two groups, and the multivariate Logistic regression modeling was used to identify the independent risk factors for ALI/ARDS.Results:In the study, 41 ALI/ARDS cases were diagnosed, making up 9.7% (41/422) of all the enrolled patients undergoing esophagectomy. Comparisons of the ALI/ARDS group and the control group indicated significant statistical differences in the average length of their hospital stay [(18.9±9.7) d vs. (14.8±3.6) d, P=0.011], the proportion of the patients who needed mechanical ventilation support [51.2% (21/41) vs. 9.4% (36/381), P<0.001] and in-hospital mortality [31.7% (13/41) vs. 5.0% (19/381), P<0.001]. Univariate analysis showed significant differences between the patients with ALI/ARDS and without ALI/ARDS in smoking history (P=0.064), preoperative forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) (P=0.020), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (P=0.011), body weight index (BMI) (P=0.044), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification (P=0.049) and one lung ventilation duration (P=0.008), while multivariate Logistic regression analysis indicated that preoperative FEV1/FVC (OR=1.053, P=0.016, 95%CI 1.010-1.098), ASA physical status classification (OR=2.392, P=0.033, 95%CI 1.073-5.335) and one lung ventilation duration (OR=0.994, P=0.028, 95%CI 0.989-0.999) were the independent risk factors for ALI/ARDS after esophagectomy.Conclusion:ALI/ARDS was a serious complication in patients undergoing esophagectomy associated with increment in length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis indicated that preoperative FEV1/FVC, ASA classification and one lung ventilation duration were the independent risk factors for ALI/ARDS after esophagectomy. Carefully assessing the patient before operation, shortening one lung ventilation duration were the key points in preventing ALI/ARDS after esophagectomy.

Key words: Esophagectomy, Respiratory distress syndrome, adult, Postoperative complications, Esophageal neoplasms, Risk factors

CLC Number: 

  • R735.1

Table 1

The comparison of correlation factors from ALI/ARDS group and control group"

Factor ALI/ARDS (n=41) Control(n=381) P value
Gender (male/female) 35/6 313/68 0.607
Age/years 64.2±7.5 63.9±7.6 0.839
Pathology (squamous/adenocarcinoma) 36/5 357/24 0.274
Stage 0.483
14 98
15 170
12 113
Chemotherapy (yes/no) 11/30 110/271 0.784
Smoking (yes/no) 29/12 212/169 0.064
FEV1/FVC 69.7%±9.7% 73.4%±7.0% 0.020
MVV/(L/min) 85.6±19.3 89.7±22.0 0.257
Decreased DLCO (yes/no) 8/33 26/355 0.011
BMI/(kg/m2) 23.6±2.4 22.7±2.7 0.044
ASA classification 0.049
Ⅰ/Ⅱ 26 298
15 83
Surgical approach (thoracoscopic/non-thoracoscopic) 8/33 38/343 0.110
Operation duration/min 400.2±98.9 428.4±114.1 0.128
One lung ventilation duration/min 194.4±65.4 168.6±58.1 0.008
Perioperative fluid in first 24 h/mL 5 716.2±2 281.4 5 376.3±1 323.6 0.354
Intra-operative vasopressor infusion (yes/no) 5/36 35/346 0.532
Blood transfusion in first 24 h (yes/no) 16/25 104/277 0.114
PaO2/FiO2 on arrival in Department of Critical Care Medicine 285.6±106.7 291.8±99.4 0.703

Table 2

The Logistic regression analysis of the ALI/ARDS cases"

Factor P value Odds ratio 95%CI
FEV1/FVC 0.016 1.053 1.010-1.098
ASA classification 0.033 2.392 1.073-5.335
One-lung ventilation 0.028 0.994 0.989-0.999
[1] Licker M, de Perrot M, Spiliopoulos A , et al. Risk factors for acute lung injury after thoracic surgery for lung cancer[J]. Anesth Analg, 2003,97(6):1558-1565.
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000087799.85495.8A pmid: 14633519
[2] Levitt JE, Matthay MA . Clinical review: Early treatment of acute lung injury-paradigm shift toward prevention and treatment prior to respiratory failure[J]. Crit Care, 2012,16(3):223.
doi: 10.1186/cc11144 pmid: 22713281
[3] Brun-Buisson C, Minelli C, Bertolini G , et al. Epidemiology and outcome of acute lung injury in European intensive care units. Results from the ALIVE study[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2004,30(1):51-61.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2022-6
[4] 马晓春, 王辰, 方强 , 等. 急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征诊断和治疗指南(2006)[J]. 中国危重病急救医学, 2006,16(12):1-6.
doi: 10.3760/j.issn:0578-1426.2007.05.037
[5] 赫捷, 邵康 . 中国食管癌流行病学现状、诊疗现状及未来对策[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2011(7):501-504.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3969.2011.07.001
[6] Muller JM, Erasmi H, Stelzner M , et al. Surgical therapy of oesophageal carcinoma[J]. Br J Surg, 1990,77(8):845-857.
doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1365-2168
[7] Morita M, Otsu H, Kawano H , et al. Advances in esophageal surgery in elderly patients with thoracic esophageal cancer[J]. Anticancer Res, 2013,33(4):1641-1647.
doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2012.01.008 pmid: 23564809
[8] Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT , et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin definition[J]. JAMA, 2012,307(23):2526-2533.
[9] 杜斌 . 急性呼吸窘迫综合征的柏林定义: 究竟改变了什么[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2013,34(2):201-203.
[10] Eichenbaum KD, Neustein SM . Acute lung injury after thoracic surgery[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2010,24(4):681-690.
doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2009.10.032 pmid: 20060320
[11] Tandon S, Batchelor A, Bullock R , et al. Peri-operative risk factors for acute lung injury after elective oesophagectomy[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2001,86(5):633-638.
doi: 10.1093/bja/86.5.633 pmid: 11878539
[12] Misthos P, Katsaragakis S, Milingos N , et al. Postresectional pulmonary oxidative stress in lung cancer patients. The role of one-lung ventilation[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2005,27(3):379-382.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.12.023 pmid: 15740942
[13] 森山博史, 平田哲, 久保良彦 . 食道癌,肺癌手術周術期における血中エンドトキシン,顆粒球エラスターゼおよび凝固線溶系分子マーカーの変動[J]. 臨床病理, 1995,43(3):233-237.
[14] Hackett NJ, De Oliveira GS, Jain UK , et al. ASA class is a reliable independent predictor of medical complications and mortality following surgery[J]. Int J Surg, 2015(18):184-190.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.079 pmid: 25937154
[15] 刘勇恩, 寇瑛琍 . 食管癌术后肺部并发症发生的原因及防治进展[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2008,15(2):138-142.
[16] 刘丽霞, 胡振杰, 赵钗 . 食管癌手术前肺功能试验与术后急性呼吸窘迫综合征的相关性[J]. 癌症, 2006,25(3):335-338.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-467X.2006.03.015
[17] Della RG, Coccia C . Acute lung injury in thoracic surgery[J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2013,26(1):40-46.
doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32835c4ea2 pmid: 23235524
[18] Rocker GM, Wiseman MS, Pearson D , et al. Neutrophil degranulation and increased pulmonary capillary permeability following oesophagectomy: a model of early lung injury in man[J]. Br J Surg, 1988,75(9):883-886.
doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800750918 pmid: 3179665
[19] Michelet P , D’Journo XB, Roch A, et al. Protective ventilation influences systemic inflammation after esophagectomy: a rando-mized controlled study[J]. Anesthesiology, 2006,105(5):911-919.
doi: 10.1097/00000542-200611000-00011
[20] Gao Q, Mok HP, Wang WP , et al. Effect of perioperative glucocorticoid administration on postoperative complications following esophagectomy: A meta-analysis[J]. Oncol Lett, 2014,7(2):349-356.
doi: 10.3892/ol.2013.1748 pmid: 24396446
[1] Zhicun LI, Tianyu WU, Lei LIANG, Yu FAN, Yisen MENG, Qian ZHANG. Risk factors analysis and nomogram model construction of postoperative pathological upgrade of prostate cancer patients with single core positive biopsy [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(5): 896-901.
[2] Ye YAN,Xiaolong LI,Haizhui XIA,Xuehua ZHU,Yuting ZHANG,Fan ZHANG,Ke LIU,Cheng LIU,Lulin MA. Analysis of risk factors for long-term overactive bladder after radical prostatectomy [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(4): 589-593.
[3] Yan CHEN,Kuangmeng LI,Kai HONG,Shudong ZHANG,Jianxing CHENG,Zhongjie ZHENG,Wenhao TANG,Lianming ZHAO,Haitao ZHANG,Hui JIANG,Haocheng LIN. Retrospective study on the impact of penile corpus cavernosum injection test on penile vascular function [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(4): 680-686.
[4] Bo PANG,Tongjun GUO,Xi CHEN,Huaqi GUO,Jiazhang SHI,Juan CHEN,Xinmei WANG,Yaoyan LI,Anqi SHAN,Hengyi YU,Jing HUANG,Naijun TANG,Yan WANG,Xinbiao GUO,Guoxing LI,Shaowei WU. Personal nitrogen oxides exposure levels and related influencing factors in adults over 35 years old in Tianjin and Shanghai [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(4): 700-707.
[5] Jing HE,Zhongze FANG,Ying YANG,Jing LIU,Wenyao MA,Yong HUO,Wei GAO,Yangfeng WU,Gaoqiang XIE. Relationship between lipid metabolism molecules in plasma and carotid atheroscle-rotic plaques, traditional cardiovascular risk factors, and dietary factors [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(4): 722-728.
[6] Shan CAI,Yihang ZHANG,Ziyue CHEN,Yunfe LIU,Jiajia DANG,Di SHI,Jiaxin LI,Tianyu HUANG,Jun MA,Yi SONG. Status and pathways of factors influencing physical activity time among elementary and junior high school students in Beijing [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(3): 403-410.
[7] Zuhong ZHANG,Tianjiao CHEN,Jun MA. Associations between puberty timing and cardiovascular metabolic risk factors among primary and secondary students [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(3): 418-423.
[8] Yuting LIN,Huali WANG,Yu TIAN,Litong GONG,Chun CHANG. Factors influencing cognitive function among the older adults in Beijing [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(3): 456-461.
[9] Xiuwen FEI,Si LIU,Bo WANG,Aimei DONG. Clinical characteristics and treatment in adults and children with histiocytic necroti-zing lymphadenitis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(3): 533-540.
[10] Yifan WU,Yingxiang YU,Lan XIE,Zhida ZHANG,Cuiqing CHANG. Characteristics of resting energy expenditure and evaluation of prediction formulas in young men with different body mass indexes [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(2): 247-252.
[11] Jinrong ZHU,Yana ZHAO,Wei HUANG,Weiwei ZHAO,Yue WANG,Song WANG,Chunyan SU. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 infection in patients undergoing hemodialysis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(2): 267-272.
[12] Zhanhong LAI,Jiachen LI,Zelin YUN,Yonggang ZHANG,Hao ZHANG,Xiaoyan XING,Miao SHAO,Yuebo JIN,Naidi WANG,Yimin LI,Yuhui LI,Zhanguo LI. A unicenter real-world study of the correlation factors for complete clinical response in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(2): 284-292.
[13] Xiaoqian SI,Xiujuan ZHAO,Fengxue ZHU,Tianbing WANG. Risk factors for acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with traumatic hemorrhagic shock [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(2): 307-312.
[14] Yangyang LI,Lin HOU,Zijun MA,Shanyamei HUANG,Jie LIU,Chaomei ZENG,Jiong QIN. Association of pregnancy factors with cow's milk protein allergy in infants [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(1): 144-149.
[15] Xiaoqiang LIU,Yin ZHOU. Risk factors of perioperative hypertension in dental implant surgeries with bone augmentation [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(1): 93-98.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!