Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) ›› 2019, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (1): 177-181. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.01.030

Previous Articles     Next Articles

C5-6 nerve root block technique for postoperative analgesia of shoulder arthroscope: a randomized controlled trial

Ying DENG,Yan LI,Yao YAO,Dan-dan FENG,Mao XU()   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2018-08-08 Online:2019-02-18 Published:2019-02-26
  • Contact: Mao XU E-mail:anae@163.com

RICH HTML

  

Abstract:

Objective:To compare the effects of ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block and C5-6 nerve root block for analgesia after shoulder arthroscopy. Methods: In the study, 40 patients of ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ were selected for elective general anesthesia to repair the shoulder ligament rupture in Peking University Third Hospital, who were randomly divided into two groups, respectively for the intermuscular brachial plexus block group (group I) and C5-6 nerve root block group (group C), n=20. The forty patients underwent ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block or C5-6 nerve root block before general anesthesia. Group I: 0.2% ropivacaine 10 mL was injected into brachial plexus intermuscular approach; Group C: 0.2% ropivacaine 10 mL was injected around the nerve roots of C5 and C6, and the ultrasound images showed that the liquid wrapped nerve roots. The time of sensory and motor block after puncture, operation time, the time of postoperative analgesia, numerical rating scale (NRS) scores at 1, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively and the finger movements were recorded. The adverse drug reactions and the patient satisfaction were recorded. The primary end point was the study of shoulder rest and movement pain in the patients with postoperative nerve blockage; the secondary end point was the patient’s limb movements and thepatient satisfaction. Results: The duration of analgesia was (571.50±70.11) min in group I and (615.60±112.15) min in group C, and there was no difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The static and dynamic NRS scores at 1, 6, and 12 h in group C were lower than those in group I (P<0.05). There was no difference in static and dynamic NRS scores between the two groups during 24 hours (P>0.05). There was a significant difference in grade of muscle strength between group C [5(4,5)] and group I [4(2,4)] in the patients with nerve block hind limb (P<0.01), and there were significant differences between the two groups’ sensation in the radial nerve group C [1(0,2)] and group I [2(1,2)], the median nerve group C [0(0,2)] and group I [2(1,2)], and the ulnar nerves group C [0(0,1)] and group I [1(1,2)] (P<0.01). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the sencation of the shoulder, group C 2(1,2) and group I 2(1,2) , P>0.05. Compared with group I 8(6,9), group C 9(8,10) was a significant difference in satisfaction (P<0.01). Conclusion: Interscalene brachial plexus block and C5-6 nerve root block could satisfy the needs of analgesia after shoulder arthroscopy, but C5-6 nerve root blockage does not limit the limb activity, the numbness is less, and the patient’s satisfaction is higher.

Key words: Interscalene brachial plexus nerve block, Cervical nerve root block, Shoulder surgery, Analgesia

CLC Number: 

  • R614.4

Figure 1

Ultrasound image of intermuscular sulcus brachial plexus The intermuscular sulcus brachial plexus is in the red circle. SA, scalenus anterior; SM, scalenus medius."

Figure 2

Ultrasound image of C5-6 nerve root The red circle was C5 nerve root, the green circle was C6 nerve root, the white thread was the path of the puncture. AT, anterior tubercle; PT, posterior nodule; TP, transverse process."

Table 1

Demographic data between two groups (n=20, x?±s)"

Items Group I (n=20) Group C (n=20) t value P value
Age/year 50.75±11.27 46.90±12.57 1.020 0.314
Height/cm 167.30±5.89 169.60±5.74 0.506 0.219
Weight/kg 65.95±7.24 69.55±8.09 0.971 0.146
Gender(male/female) 13/7 15/5 0.496
Duration of surgery/min 110.75±48.78 111.90±53.91 -0.071 0.944
Duration of anesthetic/min 170.70±62.15 169.00±62.62 0.086 0.932
Duration of analgesic/min 571.50±70.11 615.60±112.15 -1.491 0.144

Table 2

Grade of muscle strength, patient satisfaction and the sense of nerve sensation between two groups [Median (min, max)]"

Items Muscle strength Radial nerve sensation Median nerve sensation Ulnar nerve sensation Shoulder sensation Patient satisfaction
Group I (n=20) 4(2,4) 2(1,2) 2(1,2) 1(1,2) 2(1,2) 8(6,9)
Group C (n=20) 5(4,5) 1(0,2) 0(0,2) 0(0,1) 2(1,2) 9(8,10)
t value -7.122 4.471 6.669 7.883 -0.588 -4.181
P value 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.553 0.000

Table 3

Static and moving NRS in each time point postoperation [Median (min, max)]"

Items 1 h NRS 6 h NRS 12 h NRS 24 h NRS
Static state Movement Static state Movement Static state Movement Static state Movement
Group I (n=20) 2(0,3) 2(0,3) 3(0,4) 3(1,5) 5(2,7) 5(3,8) 5(3,7) 6(4,7)
Group C (n=20) 0(0,3) 0(0,3) 1(0,4) 2(0,4) 4(0,7) 5(0,8) 4(2,6) 5(4,7)
t value 2.859 2.859 4.098 5.342 2.298 2.618 1.473 1.122
P value 0.006 0.006 0.000 0.000 0.038 0.020 0.176 0.263
[1] Hussain N, Goldar G, Raqina N . Suprascapular and interscalene nerve block for shoulder surgery: a systematic review and meta analysis[J]. Anesthesiology, 2017,127(6):998-1013.
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001894
[2] Marhofer P, Harrop-Griffiths W, Willschke H , et al. Fifteen years of ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia: part 2. recent developments in block techniques[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2010,104(6):673-683.
doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq086 pmid: 20418267
[3] Madison SJ, Humsi J, Loland VJ , et al. Ultrasound-guided root/trunk (interscalene) block for hand and forearm anesthesia[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2013,38(3):226-232.
doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182890d50 pmid: 23528646
[4] Dhir S, Sondekoppam RV, Sharma R . A comparison of combined suprascapular and axillary nerve blocks to interscalene nerve block for analgesia in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: an equivalence stu-dy[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2016,41(5):564-571.
doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000436 pmid: 27380105
[5] Riazi S, Carmichael N, Awad L , et al. Effect of local anaesthetic volume (20 vs. 5 mL) on the efficacy and respiratory consequences of ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2008,101(4):549-556.
doi: 10.1093/bja/aen229 pmid: 18682410
[6] Lang RS, Kentor ML, Vallejo M , et al. The impact of local anesthetic distribution on block onset in ultrasound-guided interscalene block[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2012,56(9):1146-1151.
doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02745.x pmid: 22845687
[7] Sinha SK, Abrams JH, Barnett JT , et al. Decreasing the local anesthetic volume from 20 to 10 mL for ultrasound-guided interscalene block at the cricoid level does not reduce the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2011,36(1):17-20.
doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182030648 pmid: 21751435
[8] Vandepitte C, Gautier P, Xu D , et al. Effective volume of ropi-vicaine 0.75% through a catheter required for interscalene brachial plexus blockade[J]. Anesthesiology, 2013,118(4):863-867.
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182850dc7
[9] Winnie AP . Interscalene brachial plexus block[J]. Anesth Analg, 1970,49:455-466.
[10] Mendelsohn AH, Deconde A, Lambert HW , et al. Cervical variations of the phrenic nerve[J]. Laryngoscope, 2011,121(9):1920-1923.
doi: 10.1002/lary.21894 pmid: 22024845
[11] Lee J, Kim K, Kim S . Threatment of a symptomatic cervical perineural cyst with ultrasound-guided cervical selective nerve root block: a case report[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018,97(37):e12412.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012412
[12] van Geffen GJ, Moayeri N, Bruhn J , et al. Correlation between ultrasound imaging, cross-sectional anatomy, and histology of the brachial plexus: a review[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2009,34(5):490-497.
doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181add8a3 pmid: 19920425
[13] Kapral S, Greher M, Huber G , et al. Ultrasonographic guidance improves the success rate of interscalene brachial plexus blockade[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2008,33(3):253-258.
doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.10.011 pmid: 18433677
[14] Shin HJ, Na HS, Oh AY ,et a1. A prospective,randomized and controlled study of interscalene brachiaI plexus block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a comparison of C5 and con-ventional approach, a CONSORT-compliant article[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2016,95(37):e4921.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004921
[15] Marhofer P, Greher M, Kapral S . Ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2005,94(1):7-17.
doi: 10.1093/bja/aer111 pmid: 15277302
[16] 周玉弟, 姜慧丽, 汤洋 , 等. 超声引导下选择性颈神经根阻滞在肩关节镜术后镇痛中的应用[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2017,12(33):1167-1170.
[17] Junq HS, Seo KH, Kanq JH . Optimal dose of perineural dexmedetomidine for inerscalene brachial plexus block to control post-operative pain in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder sur-gery: a prospective, double-blind,randomized controlled study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018,97(16):e0440.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010440
[18] Marhofer D, Marhofer P, Triffterer L , et al. Dislocation rates of perineural catheters: a volunteer study[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2013,111(5):800-806.
doi: 10.1093/bja/aet198 pmid: 23748198
[19] 张大志, 刘永盛, 周海滨 . 舒芬太尼与地塞米松对罗哌卡因神经阻滞作用影响的比较研究[J]. 中国药物警戒, 2012,9(12):710-712.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8629.2012.12.003
[1] Jiangjing WANG,Shunyi WEI,Yingfang AO,Yuping YANG. Comparison of the early analgesic efficacy of three different drugs after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(2): 293-298.
[2] Fei WANG,Yang-yang ZHAO,Ming GUAN,Jing WANG,Xiang-liang XU,Yu LIU,Xin-li ZHAI. Application of intravenous sedation in 2 582 cases of oral and maxillofacial surgery [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2020, 52(1): 181-186.
[3] LI Yan, WANG Hui, DENG Ying, YAO Yao, LI Min. Effect of dexmedetomidine on supraclavicular brachial plexus block: a randomized double blind prospective study [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(5): 845-849.
[4] MENG Tian, ZHANG Zhi-yong, ZHANG Xiao, CHEN Yu-huan, LI Jing-qi, CHENG Quan, LIU Wen-shu, GAO Wei. Preemptive analgesia with loxoprofen sodiumorally in extraction of impacted teeth [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(1): 165-169.
[5] ZHAO Min-wei, WANG Ning, ZENG Lin, LI Min, ZHAO Zhong-kai, ZHANG Han, TIAN Hua . Comparision for clinical efficiency of continuous adductor canal block and femoral nerve block in total knee arthroplasty [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(1): 142-147.
[6] LI Bing-yan, GENG Zhi-yu, WANG Dong-xin. Effect of dexmedetomidine infusion on postoperative recovery for patients undergoing major spinal surgery during propofol anesthesia [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(3): 529-533.
[7] YI Jun, XU Li, LIN Hui-hua . Postoperative analgesia effect of different background volumes of ropivacaine in continuous tibial nerve block in patients with calcaneal surgery [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(2): 283-286.
[8] CHI Li-Qun, LU Xin, WANG Lei, LIU Shu-Ping, DING Nan, ZHANG Hong-Ying, E Wen. Detection of cytochrome P450 3A4 gene polymorphism guides for labor analgesia with sufentanil medication [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(4): 653-656.
[9] LIU Hui-li, MA Cai-hong, ZHANG Xiao-qing, YANG Yan, SONG Xue-ling, GUO Xiang-yang. Combined efficacy of parecoxib and incisional ropivacaine infiltration on pain  management after diagnostic hysteroscopy and laparoscopy [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2013, 45(6): 901-905.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!