Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) ›› 2019, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (5): 813-818. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.05.004

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Mobile terminal-based survey on the birth characteristics for Chinese newborns

Li-jun ZHAO,Hong-tian LI(),Ya-li ZHANG,Yu-bo ZHOU,Jian-meng LIU()   

  1. Institute of Reproductive and Child Health, Ministry of Health Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2017-08-29 Online:2019-10-18 Published:2019-10-23
  • Contact: Hong-tian LI,Jian-meng LIU E-mail:liht@bjmu.edu.cn;liujm@pku.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Key(2016YFC1000401);the Wyeth Nutrition Research Program

RICH HTML

  

Abstract:

Objective: To describe the birth characteristics for Chinese newborns, to assess the feasibility of collecting basic data on maternal and child health, and to conduct relevant epidemiological studies by using mobile terminals. Methods: From June 2016 to January 2017, pregnant women who delivered in hospitals were recruited in 166 hospitals scattered across 23 provinces of China. The data on their maternal and child health including delivery mode, gestational age and birth weight, were collected by self-administered questionnaires embedded in a mobile application. The incidences or means of cesa-rean section, preterm birth, birth weight, length and head circumference were calculated and compared with recognized national data, including 2005 Growth Standards for Chinese Children Under 7 Years of Age, 2006 World Health Organization Child Growth Standards and 2014 Chinese Neonatal Birth Weight Standards by Gestational Age. Results: A total of 9 986 women were investigated, among whom those aged ≥35 years accounted for 11.7% and those received well education (college and above) accounted for 70.2%. The rate of cesarean section, preterm delivery, low birth weight and macrosomia were 38.1%, 4.5%, 2.2%, and 7.8%, respectively. The means were (3.33±0.44) kg [male (3.36±0.44) kg, female (3.29±0.43) kg] for birth weight, (50.97±2.32) cm [male (51.04±2.32) cm, female (50.89±2.32) cm] for birth length, and (33.99±1.56) cm [male (34.01±1.57) cm, female (33.97±1.55) cm] for head circumference, respectively. As compared with the national data, the cesarean section rate and birth weights by gestational age for term-born neonates were similar to the latest national data in 2014, while the means of birth weight and length were obviously higher than those of the 2005 Growth Standards for Chinese Children Under 7 Years of Age and 2006 World Health Organization Child Growth Standards. Conclusion: As compared with the national data 10 years ago, the mean birth weights for male and female newborns were increased by 40 g and 80 g respectively and mean lengths by 0.6 cm and 1.3 cm, but changes for mean head circumferences were negligible, indicating that the physical health condition for Chinese newborns improved significantly over past 10 years and emerging information technology likely provided a new approach for epidemiological research.

Key words: Epidemiology, Maternal and child health, Newborn, Mobile terminal, Data collection

CLC Number: 

  • R174

Table 1

General maternal and neonatal characteristics"

Items Number Proportion/%
Maternal age/years*
≤19 89 1.0
20-34 7 743 87.3
≥35 1 039 11.7
Education*
College and above 5 790 70.2
High school 1 343 16.3
Middle school or below 1 117 13.5
Parity
First 6 046 60.5
Second 3 607 36.1
Third and above 333 3.3
Hospital level
Tertiary 6 247 62.6
Secondary 3 196 32.0
Primary 543 5.4
Economic regions
East 6 200 62.1
Middle 1 641 16.4
West 2 145 21.5
Neonatal gender
Male 5 646 56.5
Female 4 340 43.5

Table 2

Distribution of maternal characteristics in different economic regions"

Items East, n (%) Middle, n (%) West, n (%)
Maternal age/years*
≤19 55 (1.1) 11 (0.7) 23 (1.1)
20-34 4 458 (86.7) 1 361 (84.6) 1 924 (90.7)
≥35 628 (12.2) 236 (14.7) 175 (8.3)
Education*
College and above 3 153 (65.4) 1 089 (76.2) 1 548 (77.4)
High school 860 (17.8) 201 (14.1) 282 (14.1)
Middle school or below 807 (16.7) 139 (9.7) 171 (8.6)
Parity
First 3 602 (58.1) 943 (57.5) 1 501 (70.0)
Second 2 353 (38.0) 638 (38.9) 616 (28.7)
Third and above 245 (4.0) 60 (3.7) 28 (1.3)
Hospital level
Tertiary 3 845 (62.0) 1 227 (74.8) 1 175 (54.8)
Secondary 1 862 (30.0) 414 (25.2) 920 (42.9)
Primary 493 (8.0) 0 (0) 50 (2.3)

Table 3

Incidence of major maternal and child health indicators"

Items Cesarean section, n (%) Preterm birth, n (%) Low birth weight, n (%) Macrosomia, n (%)
Overall 3 802 (38.1) 452 (4.5) 218 (2.2) 780 (7.8)
Maternal age/years
≤19 23 (25.8)# 8 (9.0)# 3 (3.4) 5 (5.6)
20-34 2 707 (35.0) 326 (4.2) 158 (2.0) 597 (7.7)
≥35 564 (54.3) 70 (6.7) 28 (2.7) 90 (8.7)
Education
College and above 2 061 (35.6)# 214 (3.7)# 94 (1.6)# 428 (7.4)
High school 548 (40.8) 81 (6.0) 40 (3.0) 117 (8.7)
Middle school or below 422 (37.8) 73 (6.5) 43 (3.9) 94 (8.4)
Parity
Primipara 1 960 (32.4)# 252 (4.2)* 125 (2.1) 469 (7.8)
Multipara 1 842 (46.8) 200 (5.1) 93 (2.4) 311 (7.9)
Economic regions
East 2 451 (39.5)# 305 (4.9)* 150 (2.4) 526 (8.5)#
Middle 652 (39.7) 58 (3.5) 25 (1.5) 120 (7.3)
West 699 (32.6) 89 (4.2) 43 (2.0) 134 (6.3)
Hospital level
Tertiary 2 493 (39.9)# 281 (4.5) 132 (2.1) 493 (7.9)
Secondary and below 1 309 (35.0) 171 (4.6) 86 (2.3) 287 (7.7)
Neonatalgender
Male 2 088 (37.0)* 264 (4.7) 107 (1.9)* 511 (9.1)#
Female 1 714 (39.5) 188 (4.3) 111 (2.6) 269 (6.2)

Table 4

Comparison with 2005 Growth Standards for Chinese Children and 2006 WHO Child Growth Standards"

Items Male Female
Birth weight/kg Length/cm Head circumference/cm Birth weight/kg Length/cm Head circumference/cm
This survey 3.36±0.44 51.0±2.3 34.0±1.6 3.29±0.43 51.0±2.3 34.0±1.6
2005 Chinese Standards 3.32±0.39* 50.4±1.8* 34.5±1.2* 3.21±0.39* 49.7±1.7* 34.0±1.2
2006 WHO Standards 3.35±0.49* 49.9±1.9* 34.5±1.3* 3.23±0.46* 49.1±1.9* 33.9±1.2*

Figure 1

Comparison with 1987 and 2014 Chinese Neonatal Birth Weight Standards for term-born neonates A, comparison with 1987 standards for male; B, comparison with 1987 standards for female; C, comparison with 2014 standards for male; D, comparison with 2014 standards for female.Pn, stands for the N percentile."

[1] Li HT, Luo S, Trasande L , et al. Geographic variations and temporal trends in cesarean delivery rates in China, 2008—2014[J]. JAMA, 2017,317(1):69-76.
[2] 朱丽, 张蓉, 张淑莲 , 等. 中国不同胎龄新生儿出生体重曲线研制[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2015,53(2):97-103.
[3] 首都儿科研究所, 九市儿童体格发育调查协作组. 中国七岁以下儿童体重、身长/身高和头围的生长标准值及标准化生长曲线[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2009,47(3):173-178.
[4] 赖建强, 荫士安, 马冠生 , 等. 我国婴幼儿出生与喂养状况调查研究[J]. 营养学报, 2006,28(1):4-7.
[5] Chan YY, Wang P, Rogers L , et al. The asthma mobile health study, a large-scale clinical observational study using ResearchKit[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2017,35(4):354-362.
[6] 乐杰 . 妇产科学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2008: 86-125.
[7] 中华人民共和国国家统计局. 中国农业碳排放的结构特征及时空差异研究[EB/OL]. ( 2016- 09- 21) [2017-12-13]. .
[8] WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO child growth standards: Length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height and body mass index-for-age: Methods and development[M]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2006: 13-138.
[9] WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO child growth standards: Head circumference-for-age, arm circumference-for-age, triceps skinfold-for-age and subscapular skinfold-for-age: Methods and development[M]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2007: 7-55.
[10] 张宝林 . 中国15城市不同胎龄男女新生儿出生体重值修正报告[J]. 中国实用儿科杂志, 1992,7(6):306-307.
[11] Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu AM , et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08[J]. Lancet, 2010,375(9713):490-499.
[12] 侯磊, 李光辉, 邹丽颖 , 等. 全国剖宫产率及剖宫产指征构成比调查的多中心研究[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2014,49(10):728-735.
[13] 崔好胜, 李宏田, 朱丽萍 , 等. 1993—2005年中国南方部分地区经产妇剖宫产和孕妇要求剖宫产率变化趋势[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2013,45(3):422-426.
[14] 邓松清, 陈海天, 王冬昱 , 等. 二孩政策前后剖宫产率及剖宫产指征变化[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2017,20(1):47-50.
[15] 张亚钦, 李辉 . 我国初生儿体格发育水平30年变化[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2011,14(11):660-665.
[16] Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ , et al. National, regio-nal, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a syste-matic analysis and implications[J]. Lancet, 2012,379(9832):2162-2172.
[17] 杨惠娟, 于莹, 刘凯波 , 等. 二胎政策放开对北京市早产儿发生率及结局的影响分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2017,32(1):10-12.
[18] 刘兰, 刘建蒙, 刘英惠 , 等. 中国10县(市)1993—2005年单胎儿早产流行状况研究[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2007,28(11):1051-1054.
[19] 中华人民共和国国家统计局. 2016年国民经济实现“十三五”良好开局[EB/OL]. ( 2017- 01- 20) [2017-12-13]. .
[20] 谭琳, 蒋永萍, 姜秀花 . 2008—2012年:中国性别平等与妇女发展报告 [M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2013: 51-52.
[21] 陈芳芳, 滕红红, 滕越 , 等. 北京城区1996—2010年多胎妊娠变化趋势及妊娠结局[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2014,35(3):276-279.
[22] 杜晓娜 . 2009—2011年北京市中心城区以人群为基础的出生缺陷流行病学分析[J]. 中国生育健康杂志, 2014,25(4):374-375.
[1] Zi-kai WANG,Jia-li MO,Meng ZHANG,Ji-ping LIAO. Epidemiology and hospitalization costs analysis of female inpatients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Beijing from 2013 to 2020 [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(6): 1074-1081.
[2] Zhe WANG,Wei SUN,Xue YANG,Ying SONG,Ai-ping JI,Jie BAI. Clinical analysis of patients with oral and maxillofacial infections in oral emergency [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(3): 543-547.
[3] Si-wei DENG,Ze-yi CHEN,Zhi-ke LIU,Jian WANG,Lin ZHUO,Shuang-qing GAO,Jia-kuo YU,Si-yan ZHAN. Epidemiological study of bone and joint injury based on urban medical insurance database [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(3): 527-534.
[4] Ju BAO,Jia LIU,Yuan QU,Dong-liang MU. Predictive value of umbilical arterial cord pH on complications during hospitalization in neonates after cesarean section [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(1): 159-164.
[5] ZHANG Xin, RU Xi-fang, WANG Ying, LI Xing, SANG Tian, FENG Qi. Clinical characteristics of neonatal fungal sepsis in neonatal intensive care unit [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(5): 789-793.
[6] ZHOU Yu-Bo, LUO Shu-Sheng, LI Hong-Tian, GAO Yan-Qiu, LIU Jian-Meng. Secular trends of premarital medical examination in China during 1996 and 2013 [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(3): 437-442.
[7] DENG Qiu-ju, PAN Ya-qi, WANG Chao-yi, LI Feng-lei, LV Shao-jiang, HU Shao-yong, NING Tao, GUO Chuan-hai, HE Zhong-hu, KE Yang. Prevalence and risk factors for hepatitis B in Hua County, Henan Province [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2013, 45(6): 965-970.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!