Email Alert | RSS

Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (4): 746-750. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.04.026

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty combined with ultrasonic lithotripsy via nephroscope for treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with renal calculi

Li-zhe AN,Liu-lin XIONG*(),Liang CHEN,Huan-rui WANG,Wei-nan CHEN,Xiao-bo HUANG   

  1. Urology and Lithotripsy Center, Peking University People' s Hospital, Peking University Applied Lithotripsy Institute, Beijing 100034, China
  • Received:2022-03-31 Online:2022-08-18 Published:2022-08-11
  • Contact: Liu-lin XIONG E-mail:xiongliulin@sina.com

RICH HTML

 10   

PDF (PC)

78

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic pyeloplasty combined with ultrasonic lithotripsy via nephroscope in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) with renal calculi. Methods: From June 2016 to January 2022, eight patients including five males and three females underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty combined with ultrasonic lithotripsy via 19.5F(1F≈0.33 mm) nephroscope in Peking University People' s Hospital. The age ranged from 23-51 years (mean: 40.5 years) and the body mass index (BMI) ranged from 18.8-32.4 kg/m2 (mean 27.0 kg/m2). The lesion located on the left side in all of the eight patients. Two patients had solitary kidney and one patient had horseshoe kidney. Solitary stone was seen in one patient and the other seven patients suffered multiple stones, with two patients had staghorn stones. The largest diameter of stones ranged from 0.6-2.5 cm (mean: 1.5 cm). CT or ultrasound showed that moderate nephrosis was seen in five patients and severe nephrosis was seen in three patients. During surgery, after exposure of renal pelvis and proximal ureter, a small incision of 1.5 cm was performed in the anterior wall of the renal pelvis, and a 19.5F nephroscope was introduced into renal pelvis through laparoscopic trocar and renal pelvis incision. Stones were fragmented and sucked out by 3.3 mm ultrasonic probe placed through nephroscope. After stones were removed, modified laparoscopic pyeloplasty was performed. Results: Surgery was successfully completed in all of the eight patients without conversion to open surgery. The operation time ranged from 160-254 min (mean 213 min) and the time of nephroscopic management time was 25-40 min (mean: 33 min). The hemoglobin was decreased by 3-21 g/L (mean: 10.3 g/L). The stone-free rate was 75% (6/8 cases), stones were incompletely removed in two patients due to abnormal intrarenal structure. The modified Clavien classification system (MCCS) grade ⅢA complication occurred in one patient postoperatively, which was nephrosis due to intrarenal bleeding, and nephrostomy was performed. With the mean follow-up of 30 months (ranged from 2-68 months), there was no evidence of obstruction in all the patients, and one patient underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy to treat residual calculi. Conclusion: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty combined with ultrasonic lithotripsy via 19.5F nephroscope is feasible and safe, and could be a complementary method to treat UPJO and renal calculi.

Key words: Ureteropelvic junction obstruction, Kidney calculi, Laparoscopy, Pyeloplasty

CLC Number: 

  • R691.2

Figure 1

Procedure of nephroscopic ultrasonic lithotripsy A, the kidney was scanned by laparoscopic ultrasound probe to confirm the location of stones; B, 19.5F nephroscope was introduced into renal pelvic through small incision of renal pelvis; C, the stone was located in a calyx with narrow neck, and it was very difficult to be removed by forceps or basket; D, the stone was fragmented and sucked out by ultrasonic probe."

Figure 2

Preoperative and postoperative KUB images of patient with UPJO and multiple small stones A, preoperative KUB showed a large number of small stones located in lower calyx (white arrow); B, postoperative KUB showed that stones was completely removed. KUB, kidney, ureter and bladder."

Table 1

Clinical data of patients underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty and nephroscopic ultrasonic lithotripsy"

No. Age/years Gender BMI/(kg/m2) Symptom Side Solitary kidney Degree of nephrosis Staghorn stones Multiple stones Diameter of the largest stone/cm
1 31 Male 25.1 Loin pain Left No Severe No Yes 0.6
2 49 Female 29.8 Loin pain Left No Moderate No No 1.3
3 23 Female 18.8 Loin pain Left No Severe No Yes 1.2
4 48 Male 31.1 None Left No Moderate No Yes 1.2
5 25 Male 32.4 Flank pain Left Yes Moderate Yes Yes 2
6 47 Male 23.7 None Left No Moderate No Yes 2.3
7 50 Female 29.4 Hematuria Left Yes Moderate Yes Yes 2.5
8 51 Male 26.0 Loin pain Left No Severe No Yes 1.1
No. Operative time/min Time of nephroscopic management/min Hb drop/(g/L) Postoperative complication Clavien grade Hospital stay after surgery/d Stone free Stone recurrence Follow-up/ months
1 230 39 14 Yes ⅢA 10 Yes No 68
2 175 25 3 None 5 Yes No 42
3 186 28 8 None 6 Yes No 40
4 207 27 7 None 4 Yes No 37
5 248 40 21 None 4 No Yes 36
6 254 32 9 None 4 Yes No 13
7 247 38 11 None 5 No No 3
8 160 33 9 None 5 Yes No 2
1 Skolarikos A , Dellis A , Knoll T . Ureteropelvic obstruction and renal stones: etiology and treatment[J]. Urolithiasis, 2015, 43 (1): 5- 12.
doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0736-2
2 Paik ML , Wainstein MA , Spirnak JP , et al. Current indications for open stone surgery in the treatment of renal and ureteral calculi[J]. J Urol, 1998, 159 (2): 374- 379.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63922-3
3 Yanke BV , Lallas CD , Pagnani C , et al. The minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A review of our experience during the last decade[J]. J Urol, 2008, 180 (4): 1397- 1402.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.06.020
4 Klingler HC , Remzi M , Janetschek G , et al. Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction[J]. Eur Urol, 2003, 44 (3): 340- 345.
doi: 10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00297-5
5 Mufarrij PW , Woods M , Shah OD , et al. Robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: A 6-year, multi-institutional experience[J]. J Urol, 2008, 180 (4): 1391- 1396.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.06.024
6 Srivastava A , Singh P , Gupta M , et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy: Is it an effective mode of treatment?[J]. Urol Int, 2008, 80 (3): 306- 309.
doi: 10.1159/000127347
7 Stein RJ , Turna B , Nguyen MM , et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy: Technique and outcomes[J]. J Endourol, 2008, 22 (6): 1251- 1255.
doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0003
8 Atug F , Castle EP , Burgess SV , et al. Concomitant management of renal calculi and pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction with robotic laparoscopic surgery[J]. BJU Int, 2005, 96 (9): 1365- 1368.
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05819.x
9 Jensen PH , Berg KD , Azawi NH . Robot-assisted pyeloplasty and pyelolithotomy in patients with ureteropelvic junction stenosis[J]. Scand J Urol, 2017, 51 (4): 323- 328.
doi: 10.1080/21681805.2017.1300188
10 中华医学会泌尿外科学分会结石学组, 中国泌尿系结石联盟. 经皮肾镜取石术中国专家共识[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2020, 41 (6): 401- 404.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112330-20200530-00006
11 Yang K , Yao L , Li X , et al. A modified suture technique for transperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty of pelviureteric junction obstruction[J]. Urology, 2015, 85 (1): 263- 267.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.09.031
12 Nayyar R , Gupta NP , Hemal AK . Robotic management of complicated ureteropelvic junction obstruction[J]. World J Urol, 2010, 28 (5): 599- 602.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-009-0469-y
13 Yang C , Zhou J , Lu ZX , et al. Simultaneous treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction complicated by renal calculi with robotic laparoscopic surgery and flexible cystoscope[J]. World J Urol, 2019, 37 (10): 2217- 2223.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2608-9
14 Meretyk I , Meretyk S , Clayman RV . Endopyelotomy: Comparison of ureteroscopic retrograde and antegrade percutaneous techniques[J]. J Urol, 1992, 148 (3): 775- 783.
15 Knudsen BE , Cook AJ , Watterson JD , et al. Percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy: Long-term results from one institution[J]. Urology, 2004, 63 (2): 230- 234.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.049
16 Minervini A , Davenport K , Keeley FJ , et al. Antegrade versus retrograde endopyelotomy for pelvi-ureteric junction (PUJ) obstruction[J]. Eur Urol, 2006, 49 (3): 536- 543.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.11.025
17 杨波, 胡浩, 王佳, 等. 经皮肾"三明治"腔内肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47 (4): 634- 637.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2015.04.017
18 Agarwal A , Varshney A , Bansal BS . Concomitant percutaneous nephrolithotomy and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction complicated by stones[J]. J Endourol, 2008, 22 (10): 2251- 2255.
doi: 10.1089/end.2008.9726
19 Schuessler WW , Grune MT , Tecuanhuey LV , et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty[J]. J Urol, 1993, 150 (6): 1795- 1799.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)35898-6
20 Jarrett TW , Chan DY , Charambura TC , et al. Laparoscopic pyelo- plasty: The first 100 cases[J]. J Urol, 2002, 167 (3): 1253- 1256.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65276-7
21 Moon DA , El-Shazly MA , Chang CM , et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Evolution of a new gold standard[J]. Urology, 2006, 67 (5): 932- 936.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.11.024
22 Ramakumar S , Lancini V , Chan DY , et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy[J]. J Urol, 2002, 167 (3): 1378- 1380.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65305-0
23 Hong P , Li Z , Zhu D , et al. A simple modification for the usage of flexible cystoscope in modified laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction with renal calculi: A flexible guiding tube[J]. Urol Int, 2019, 102 (3): 262- 268.
doi: 10.1159/000495569
24 丁光璞, 彭意吉, 杨昆霖, 等. 改良经腹腹腔镜肾盂成形术联合孙氏镜治疗UPJO合并肾结石的初步经验[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2019, 40 (9): 680- 684.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2019.09.008
25 郑蒙蒙, 丁光璞, 朱伟杰, 等. 术前三维影像重建在治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52 (4): 705- 710.
[1] Ling-fu ZHANG,Chun-sheng HOU,Zhi XU,Li-xin WANG,Xiao-feng LING,Gang WANG,Long CUI,Dian-rong XIU. Clinical effect of laparoscopic transcystic drainage combined with common bile duct exploration for the patients with difficult biliary stones [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(6): 1185-1189.
[2] ZHANG Fan,CHEN Qu,HAO Yi-chang,YAN Ye,LIU Cheng,HUANG Yi,MA Lu-lin. Relationship between recovery of urinary continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and preoperative/postoperative membranous urethral length [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(2): 299-303.
[3] ZHANG Fan,HUANG Xiao-juan,YANG Bin,YAN Ye,LIU Cheng,ZHANG Shu-dong,HUANG Yi,MA Lu-lin. Relationship between prostate apex depth and early recovery of urinary continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(4): 692-696.
[4] Bing-wei HUANG,Jie WANG,Peng ZHANG,Zhe LI,Si-cheng BI,Qiang WANG,Cai-bo YUE,Kun-lin YANG,Xue-song LI,Li-qun ZHOU. Application of indocyanine green in complex upper urinary tract repair surgery [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 651-656.
[5] Shu-dong ZHANG,Peng HONG,Bin-shuai WANG,Shao-hui DENG,Fan ZHANG,Li-yuan TAO,Cai-guang CAO,Zhen-hua HU,Lu-lin MA. Usefulness of the indocyanine green fluorescence imaging technique in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 657-662.
[6] Meng-meng ZHENG,Guang-pu DING,Wei-jie ZHU,Kun-lin YANG,Shu-bo FAN,Bao GUAN,Xin-fei LI,Yu-kun CAI,Jin-sheng ZHANG,Xue-song LI,Li-qun ZHOU. Application of preoperative three-dimensional image reconstruction in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 705-710.
[7] Sheng-wei XIONG,Jie WANG,Wei-jie ZHU,Si-da CHENG,Lei ZHANG,Xue-song LI,Li-qun ZHOU. Advance in re-do pyeloplasty for the management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after surgery [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 794-798.
[8] Si-da CHENG,Xin-fei LI,Sheng-wei XIONG,Shu-bo FAN,Jie WANG,Wei-jie ZHU,Zi-ao LI,Guang-pu DING,Ting YU,Wan-qiang LI,Yong-ming SUN,Kun-lin YANG,Lei ZHANG,Han HAO,Xue-song LI,Li-qun ZHOU. Robot-assisted laparoscopic upper urinary tract reconstruction surgery: A review of 108 cases by a single surgeon [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 771-779.
[9] Hai-yue ZHAO,Xiong-jun YE,Wei-nan CHEN,Li-zhe AN,Jun LIU,Liu-lin XIONG,Xiao-bo HUANG. Treatment of crossing vessels in laparoscopic pyeloplasty [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(4): 660-664.
[10] Si-da CHENG,Wan-qiang LI,Li MU,Guang-pu DING,Bo ZHANG,Cheng SHEN,Ze-wei YING,Kun-lin YANG,Han HAO,Xue-song LI,Li-qun ZHOU. Application of totally extraperitoneal renal autotransplantation with Boari flap-pelvis anastomosis in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas treatment [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(4): 758-763.
[11] Hai-wen HUANG,Bing YAN,Mei-xia SHANG,Li-bo LIU,Han HAO,Zhi-jun XI. Propensity-matched comparison of laparoscopic and open radical cystectomy for female patients with bladder cancer [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(4): 698-705.
[12] Ling-fu ZHANG,Chun-sheng HOU,Yong-hui HUANG,Zhi XU,Li-xin WANG,Xiao-feng LING,Gang WANG,Long CUI,Dian-rong XIU. Comparison of the minimally invasive treatments of laparoscopic and endosopic for common bile duct stones after gastrojejunostomy [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(2): 345-348.
[13] Xiao-jun TIAN,Min QIU,Zhuo LIU,Ruo-tao XIAO,Yi HUANG,Guo-liang WANG,Xiao-fei HOU,Shu-dong ZHANG,Shen-rong ZHUANG,Lu-lin MA. Single-center study of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with Mayo 0-2 level inferior vena cava thrombectomy [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(6): 1053-1056.
[14] XU Ben, ZHANG Zhe-nan, LUO Cheng, SONG Hai-feng, ZHANG Qian. Comparison of safety and effectiveness between retroperitoneal laparoscopic tumor aspiration and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the treatment of renal angiomyolipoma [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(4): 700-704.
[15] CHEN Wei-nan, YE Xiong-jun, LIU Shi-jun, XIONG Liu-lin, HUANG Xiao-bo, XU Tao, WANG Xiao-feng. Comparison of three surgical methods of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in therapeutic effect and complication [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(5): 817-821.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2001, 33(1): 50 -53 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2002, 34(2): 140 -143 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(4): 476 -479 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2008, 40(2): 208 -210 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2008, 40(5): 459 -464 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(4): 434 -436 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2001, 33(3): 288 -289 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2002, 34(2): 97 -98 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2002, 34(2): 112 -116 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2011, 43(1): 29 -33 .
Copyright © Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd