Email Alert | RSS

Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2023, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (3): 502-510. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.03.017

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Secular trends of age at menarche and age at menopause in women born since 1951 from a county of Shandong Province, China

Xiao-wei WANG1,2,Ying-chao MU3,*(),Zhen-yu GUO1,2,Yu-bo ZHOU1,2,Yong ZHANG3,Hong-tian LI1,2,4,*(),Jian-meng LIU1,2,4   

  1. 1. Institute of Reproductive and Child Health, Peking University; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health, Beijing 100191, China
    2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China
    3. Women & Children's Health Care Hospital of Huantai, Zibo 256400, Shandong, China
    4. Center for Intelligent Public Health, Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2023-02-14 Online:2023-06-18 Published:2023-06-12
  • Contact: Ying-chao MU,Hong-tian LI E-mail:1319094858@qq.com;lihongtian@pku.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(BMU2021RCZX029)

RICH HTML

   

PDF (PC)

Abstract:

Objective: To describe the secular trends of age at menarche and age at natural menopause of women from a county of Shandong Province. Methods: Based on the data of the Premarital Medical Examination and the Cervical Cancer and Breast Cancer Screening of the county, the secular trends of age at menarche in women born in 1951 to 1998 and age at menopause in women born in 1951 to 1975 were studied. Joinpoint regression was used to identify potential inflection points regarding the trend of age at menarche. Average hazard ratios (AHR) of early menopause among women born in different generations were estimated by performing multivariate weighted Cox regression. Results: The average age at menarche was (16.43±1.89) years for women born in 1951 and (13.99±1.22) years for women born in 1998. The average age at menarche was lower for urban women than that for rural women, and the higher the education level, the lower the average age at menarche. Joinpoint regression analysis identified three inflection points: 1959, 1973 and 1993. The average age at menarche decreased annually by 0.03 (P < 0.001), 0.08 (P < 0.001), and 0.03 (P < 0.001) years respectively for women born during 1951-1959, 1960-1973, and 1974-1993, while it remained stable for those born during 1994-1998 (P=0.968). As for age at menopause, compared with women born during 1951-1960, those born during 1961-1965, 1966-1970 and 1971-1975 showed a gradual decrease in the risk of early menopause and a tendency to delay the age at menopause. The stratified analysis presented that the risk of early menopause gradually decreased and the age of menopause showed a significant delay among those with education level of junior high school and below, but this trend was not obvious among those with education level of senior high school and above, where the risk of early menopause decreased and then increased among those with education level of college and above, and the corresponding AHRs were 0.90 (0.66-1.22), 1.07 (0.79-1.44) and 1.14 (0.79-1.66). Conclusion: The age at menarche for women born since 1951 gradually declined until 1994 and leveled off, with a decrease of nearly 2.5 years in these years. The age at menopause for women born between 1951 and 1975 was generally delayed over time, but the trend of first increase and then decrease was observed among those with relatively higher education levels. In the context of the increasing delay in age at marriage and childbearing and the decline of fertility, this study highlights the necessity of the assessment and monitoring of women' s basic reproductive health status, especially the risk of early menopause.

Key words: Menarche, Menopause, Age, Women' s health, Reproductive health

CLC Number: 

  • R173

Figure 1

The flow chart of subjects' inclusion on the analyses of secular trends of age at menarche and age at menopause"

Table 1

Distribution of age at menarche in different population groups (n=58 114)"

Characteristic Total, n(%)Age at menarcheP value
Mean±SD M (P25, P75)
Birth cohort < 0.001
   1951-1959 7 247 (12.47) 16.23±1.93 16.00 (15.00, 18.00)
   1960-1969 20 766 (35.73) 15.56±1.55 15.00 (15.00, 16.00)
   1970-1979 17 365 (29.88) 14.89±1.34 15.00 (14.00, 16.00)
   1980-1989 8 245 (14.19) 14.43±1.28 15.00 (14.00, 15.00)
   1990-1998 4 491 (7.73) 14.05±1.25 14.00 (13.00, 15.00)
Region < 0.001
   Urban 40 598 (69.86) 15.10±1.57 15.00 (14.00, 16.00)
   Rural 17 516 (30.14) 15.34±1.70 15.00 (14.00, 16.00)
Educational level < 0.001
   Primary school or below 17 559 (30.21) 15.75±1.72 15.00 (15.00, 17.00)
   Junior high school 24 094 (41.46) 15.18±1.49 15.00 (14.00, 16.00)
   Senior high school 8 432 (14.51) 14.80±1.47 15.00 (14.00, 16.00)
   College or above 7 973 (13.72) 14.24±1.31 14.00 (13.00, 15.00)
   Unknown 56 (0.10) 14.68±1.16 15.00 (14.00, 15.00)

Figure 2

Secular trend of age at menarche A, total (${\bar x}$±s); B, by region."

Table 2

Segmented general linear model regression analysis of age at menarche"

Birth cohort β SE t P value
1951-1959 -0.03 0.008 -4.38 < 0.001
1960-1973 -0.08 0.002 -47.55 < 0.001
1974-1993 -0.03 0.002 -17.55 < 0.001
1994-1998 0.00 0.014 0.04 0.97

Table 3

Distribution of age at menopause in different population groups (n=38 483)"

Characteristic Total, n(%) Postmenopausal, n(%)Age at menopauseχ2 P value
Mean±SEa M (P25, P75)b
Birth cohort 42.969 < 0.001
   1951-1960 7 853 (20.41) 7 845 (99.90) 50.24±0.05 50.00 (48.00, 53.00)
   1961-1965 10 275 (26.70) 10 015 (97.47) 50.71±0.04 51.00 (49.00, 53.00)
   1966-1970 11 815 (30.70) 8 046 (68.10) 50.95±0.04 51.00 (49.00, 53.00)
   1971-1975 8 540 (22.19) 1 670 (19.56) 50.10±0.19 51.00 (49.00, 52.00)
Region 7.605 0.006
   Urban 26 083 (67.78) 18 302 (70.17) 50.81±0.03 51.00 (49.00, 53.00)
   Rural 12 400 (32.22) 9 274 (74.79) 50.60±0.04 51.00 (49.00, 53.00)
Educational level 29.068 < 0.001
   Primary school or below 16 092 (41.82) 13 280 (82.53) 50.49±0.03 51.00 (48.00, 53.00)
   Junior high school 17 335 (45.05) 11 281 (65.08) 50.89±0.03 51.00 (49.00, 53.00)
   Senior high school 3 613 (9.39) 2 335 (64.63) 50.96±0.07 51.00 (49.00, 53.00)
   College or above 1 443 (3.75) 680 (47.12) 51.13±0.11 51.00 (50.00, 53.00)

Figure 3

Kaplan-Meier curve of age at menopause among women in different birth cohorts"

Figure 4

Kaplan-Meier curve of age at menopause among women in different birth cohorts (by region)"

Figure 5

Kaplan-Meier curve of age at menopause among women in different birth cohorts (by educational level)"

Table 4

Association between birth cohorts and early menopause"

Birth cohortAdjusted AHR (95%CI)
1951-1960 1961-1965 1966-1970 1971-1975
Total Reference 0.91 (0.88-0.94) 0.89 (0.86-0.91) 0.80 (0.75-0.84)
Region
   Rural Reference 0.90 (0.86-0.95) 0.84 (0.80-0.89) 0.71 (0.64-0.78)
   Urban Reference 0.92 (0.89-0.96) 0.91 (0.88-0.95) 0.85 (0.79-0.91)
Educational level
   Primary school or below Reference 0.96 (0.92-1.00) 0.87 (0.83-0.91) 0.81 (0.73-0.89)
   Junior high school Reference 0.92 (0.86-0.98) 0.94 (0.88-1.00) 0.86 (0.79-0.94)
   Senior high school Reference 0.81 (0.72-0.90) 0.86 (0.77-0.97) 0.87 (0.72-1.06)
   College or above Reference 0.90 (0.66-1.22) 1.07 (0.79-1.44) 1.14 (0.79-1.66)
1 Gold EB . The timing of the age at which natural menopause occurs[J]. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 2011, 38 (3): 425- 440.
doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2011.05.002
2 Nichols HB , Trentham-Dietz A , Hampton JM , et al. From menarche to menopause: Trends among US women born from 1912 to 1969[J]. Am J Epidemiol, 2006, 164 (10): 1003- 1011.
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj282
3 Gomula A , Koziel S . Secular trend and social variation in age at menarche among Polish schoolgirls before and after the political transformation[J]. Am J Hum Biol, 2018, 30 (1): e23048.
doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23048
4 InterLACE Study Team . Variations in reproductive events across life: A pooled analysis of data from 505 147 women across 10 countries[J]. Hum Reprod, 2019, 34 (5): 881- 893.
doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez015
5 Appiah D , Nwabuo CC , Ebong IA , et al. Trends in age at natural menopause and reproductive life span among US women, 1959-2018[J]. JAMA, 2021, 325 (13): 1328- 1330.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0278
6 Leone T , Brown LJ . Timing and determinants of age at menarche in low-income and middle-income countries[J]. BMJ Glob Health, 2020, 5 (12): e003689.
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003689
7 Gottschalk MS , Eskild A , Hofvind S , et al. Temporal trends in age at menarche and age at menopause: A population study of 312 656 women in Norway[J]. Hum Reprod, 2020, 35 (2): 464- 471.
doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez288
8 Wu X , Cai H , Kallianpur A , et al. Age at menarche and natural menopause and number of reproductive years in association with mortality: Results from a median follow-up of 11.2 years among 31 955 naturally menopausal Chinese women[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9 (8): e103673.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103673
9 Canoy D , Beral V , Balkwill A , et al. Age at menarche and risks of coronary heart and other vascular diseases in a large UK cohort[J]. Circulation, 2015, 131 (3): 237- 244.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010070
10 Copeland W , Shanahan L , Miller S , et al. Outcomes of early pubertal timing in young women: A prospective population-based study[J]. Am J Psychiatry, 2010, 167 (10): 1218- 1225.
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09081190
11 Dreyfus JG , Lutsey PL , Huxley R , et al. Age at menarche and risk of type 2 diabetes among African-American and white women in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study[J]. Diabetologia, 2012, 55 (9): 2371- 2380.
doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2616-z
12 Farahmand M , Ramezani Tehrani F , Khalili D , et al. Is there any association between age at menarche and anthropometric indices? A 15-year follow-up population-based cohort study[J]. Eur J Pediatr, 2020, 179 (9): 1379- 1388.
doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03575-x
13 Yang L , Li L , Millwood IY , et al. Adiposity in relation to age at menarche and other reproductive factors among 300 000 Chinese women: Findings from China Kadoorie Biobank study[J]. Int J Epidemiol, 2017, 46 (2): 502- 512.
14 Dossus L , Allen N , Kaaks R , et al. Reproductive risk factors and endometrial cancer: The European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition[J]. Int J Cancer, 2010, 127 (2): 442- 451.
15 Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer . Menarche, menopause, and breast cancer risk: Individual participant meta-analysis, including 118 964 women with breast cancer from 117 epidemiological studies[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2012, 13 (11): 1141- 1151.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70425-4
16 Ding QJ , Hesketh T . Family size, fertility preferences, and sex ratio in China in the era of the one child family policy: Results from national family planning and reproductive health survey[J]. BMJ, 2006, 333 (7564): 371- 373.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38775.672662.80
17 Wu X , Bao L , Du Z , et al. Secular trends of age at menarche and the effect of famine exposure on age at menarche in rural Chinese women[J]. Ann Hum Biol, 2022, 49 (1): 35- 40.
doi: 10.1080/03014460.2022.2041092
18 Lewington S , Li L , Murugasen S , et al. Temporal trends of main reproductive characteristics in ten urban and rural regions of China: The China Kadoorie biobank study of 300 000 women[J]. Int J Epidemiol, 2014, 43 (4): 1252- 1262.
doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu035
19 Rauch G , Brannath W , Brückner M , et al. The average hazard ratio: A good effect measure for time-to-event endpoints when the proportional hazard assumption is violated?[J]. Methods Inf Med, 2018, 57 (3): 89- 100.
doi: 10.3414/ME17-01-0058
20 Schemper M , Wakounig S , Heinze G . The estimation of average hazard ratios by weighted Cox regression[J]. Stat Med, 2009, 28 (19): 2473- 2489.
doi: 10.1002/sim.3623
21 Dunkler D , Ploner M , Schemper M , et al. Weighted cox regression using the R package coxphw[J]. J Stat Softw, 2018, 84 (2): 1- 26.
22 Parent AS , Teilmann G , Juul A , et al. The timing of normal puberty and the age limits of sexual precocity: Variations around the world, secular trends, and changes after migration[J]. Endocr Rev, 2003, 24 (5): 668- 693.
doi: 10.1210/er.2002-0019
23 Gohlke B , Woelfle J . Growth and puberty in German children: Is there still a positive secular trend?[J]. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2009, 106 (23): 377- 382.
24 Vercauteren M , Susanne C . The secular trend of height and me-narche in Belgium: Are there any signs of a future stop?[J]. Eur J Pediatr, 1985, 144 (4): 306- 309.
doi: 10.1007/BF00441769
25 Liu W , Yan X , Li C , et al. A secular trend in age at menarche in Yunnan Province, China: A multiethnic population study of 1 275 000 women[J]. BMC Public Health, 2021, 21 (1): 1890.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11951-x
26 Meng X , Li S , Duan W , et al. Secular trend of age at menarche in Chinese adolescents born from 1973 to 2004[J]. Pediatrics, 2017, 140 (2): e20170085.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-0085
27 von Schnurbein J , Moss A , Nagel SA , et al. Leptin substitution results in the induction of menstrual cycles in an adolescent with leptin deficiency and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism[J]. Horm Res Paediatr, 2012, 77 (2): 127- 133.
doi: 10.1159/000336003
28 Yermachenko A , Dvornyk V . Nongenetic determinants of age at menarche: A systematic review[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2014, 2014, 371583.
29 Yang B , Ostbye T , Huang X , et al. Maternal age at menarche and pubertal timing in boys and girls: A cohort study from Chongqing, China[J]. J Adolesc Health, 2021, 68 (3): 508- 516.
doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.06.036
30 Schoenaker DA , Jackson CA , Rowlands JV , et al. Socioeconomic position, lifestyle factors and age at natural menopause: A syste-matic review and meta-analyses of studies across six continents[J]. Int J Epidemiol, 2014, 43 (5): 1542- 1562.
doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu094
31 Gentry-Maharaj A , Glazer C , Burnell M , et al. Changing trends in reproductive/lifestyle factors in UK women: Descriptive study within the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS)[J]. BMJ Open, 2017, 7 (3): e011822.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011822
32 Duarte E , de Sousa B , Cadarso-Suarez C , et al. Structured additive regression modeling of age of menarche and menopause in a breast cancer screening program[J]. Biom J, 2014, 56 (3): 416- 427.
doi: 10.1002/bimj.201200260
33 Martelli M , Zingaretti L , Salvio G , et al. Influence of work on andropause and menopause: A systematic review[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18 (19): 10074.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910074
34 Zhu D , Chung HF , Pandeya N , et al. Relationships between intensity, duration, cumulative dose, and timing of smoking with age at menopause: A pooled analysis of individual data from 17 observational studies[J]. PLoS Med, 2018, 15 (11): e1002704.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002704
35 Mishra GD , Chung HF , Cano A , et al. EMAS position statement: Predictors of premature and early natural menopause[J]. Maturitas, 2019, 123, 82- 88.
doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.03.008
36 毕丹, 林秀文, 程红玲, 等. 卵巢早衰的性激素水平分析及临床发病率[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2005, 20 (19): 2568- 2569.
37 郭琪, 梁晓燕. 干细胞在早发性卵巢功能不全中的应用[J]. 中华生殖与避孕杂志, 2021, 41 (6): 557- 561.
38 林丽玲, 郑棒, 吕筠, 等. 中国10个地区成年女性初潮年龄与身高和腿长的关联研究[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2016, 37 (11): 1454- 1458.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2016.11.004
39 肖悦, 高文会, 王鲜, 等. 轮班对妇女绝经年龄及行经年限的影响[J]. 中华劳动卫生职业病杂志, 2021, 39 (6): 472- 474.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20201110-00622
40 Rödström K , Bengtsson C , Lissner L , et al. Reproducibility of self-reported menopause age at the 24-year follow-up of a population study of women in Göteborg, Sweden[J]. Menopause, 2005, 12 (3): 275- 280.
doi: 10.1097/01.GME.0000135247.11972.B3
41 Lundblad MW , Jacobsen BK . The reproducibility of self-reported age at menarche: The Tromsø Study[J]. BMC Womens Health, 2017, 17 (1): 62.
doi: 10.1186/s12905-017-0420-0
[1] Qingwei MENG, Meng FAN, Huangda GUO, Hanyu ZHANG, Mengying WANG, Siyue WANG, Hexiang PENG, Xueheng WANG, Tianjiao HOU, Xueying QIN, Dafang CHEN, Jing LI, Yiqun WU, Tao WU, Hongbo CHEN, Yonghua HU. Prognostic analysis of anticoagulation therapy in elderly patients with cardioembolic stroke [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2026, 58(3): 536-542.
[2] Mengxi LU, Binghan WANG, Jiali KANG, Qiuping LIU, Yifan ZHOU, Yexiang SUN, Peng SHEN, Hongbo LIN, Xun TANG, Pei GAO. Application of biological age for cardiovascular risk prediction in a community-based Chinese cohort [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2026, 58(3): 543-550.
[3] Bo PENG, Fangfang LIU, Wei YANG, Ruiping XU, Lei CHEN, Baozhong LI, Xinjia WANG, Ji KE, Wenlei YANG, Yu HE, Zhen LIU, Bolin HOU, Liqun ZHANG, Miaoping LIN, Lixin ZHANG, Fan ZHANG, Fen CAI, Huawen XU, Mengfei LIU, Ying LIU, Yaqi PAN, Zhonghu HE, Yang KE. Perioperative hyperglycemia predicts poorer prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with esophagectomy [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2026, 58(3): 567-574.
[4] Rui YUAN, Hanxing LIN, Qingbo XU, Xinran LIU, Danni SHI, Chun CHANG, Junyang CAO. Impact of effective health information acquisition on hemophilia-related health literacy among caregivers of underage hemophilia patients [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2026, 58(3): 584-591.
[5] Qingxian LUAN. To create the era of oral health management in China [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2026, 58(2): 244-246.
[6] Hao FU, Luyan SHEN, Bingyang HUANG, Shaohua MA. Clinical strategies for perioperative management of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the immunotherapy era [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2026, 58(2): 266-271.
[7] Jingheng WU, Yunhao XUE, Shanlin CHEN, Yintao GUO, Yuntao LIU, Wei ZHANG. Super microsurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis for limb lymphedema: An outcome analysis based on clinical stage and indocyanine green pattern [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2026, 58(2): 359-364.
[8] Lingyu MENG, Yonghui HUANG, Xiu'e YAN, Yingchun WANG. Establishment of rabbit model of benign circumferential esophageal stricture [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2026, 58(2): 380-387.
[9] Zhuoma GONGJUE, Yiting MAO, Puzhen DAWA, Ciren LABA, Qi YAN. Sex-specific hemoglobin thresholds for oxygen saturation: A non-linear regression analysis based on Tibetan inpatients [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2026, 58(1): 196-200.
[10] Yayun ZHAO, Mengfan NI, Xue LI, Bei WANG, Gong CHENG, Jing HE, Yuebo JIN. Clinical efficacy and safety of rituximab in treating renal injury in primary Sjögren syndrome [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2025, 57(6): 1051-1060.
[11] Jingwen LAN, Zhe CHEN, Yongjing CHENG, Like ZHAO. Clinical characteristics, efficacy and safety of antifibrotic agents in elderly patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2025, 57(6): 1101-1106.
[12] Ping ZHENG, Kunhong LIN, Mengyuan LIU, Xuyan ZHAO, Yangxin XIAO, Yan XING. A follow-up study on the physical and motor development of premature infants with small for gestational age within 2 years after birth [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2025, 57(6): 1124-1131.
[13] Yuehui WEI, Weiyan JIAN. Association between socioeconomic status and vision impairment among Chinese elderly [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2025, 57(6): 1136-1144.
[14] Xuliang DENG, Mingming XU, Chenlin DU. Artificial intelligence in stomatology: Innovations in clinical practice, research, education, and healthcare management [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2025, 57(5): 821-826.
[15] Lingfu ZHANG, Gang WANG, Chunsheng HOU, Long CUI, Lixin WANG, Xiaofeng LING, Zhi XU. Laparoscopic modified transcystic biliary drainage for the treatment of biliary stones and diagnosis of biliary disease [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2025, 57(4): 748-752.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright © Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd