Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (2): 313-318. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2026.02.014

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and inflammatory factor expression levels in patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia

Qianying WEN1,2, Liqing ZHANG1,*(), Anlin QIN1, Xiaofeng LI3   

  1. 1. Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Shanxi Fenyanq Hospital, Fenyang 032200, Shanxi, China
    2. Linfen Maternal and Child Health Hospital Children's Hospital, Linfen 041000, Shanxi, China
    3. Department of Rheumatology and lmmunology, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
  • Received:2024-05-16 Online:2026-04-18 Published:2026-03-12
  • Contact: Liqing ZHANG
  • Supported by:
    Lvliang Key Research and Development Plan (Social Development) Project in Shanxi Province(2022SHFZ19)

RICH HTML

  

Abstract:

Objective: To analyze the incidence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) in patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia (HUA) and the serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in patients with asymptomatic HUA and SIBO. Methods: A total of 87 asymptomatic HUA patients and 40 healthy controls from Shanxi Fenyang Hospital from June 2023 to June 2024 were selected as the study subjects, and the baseline data, laboratory indicators were collected. Lactulose methane-hydrogen breath test (LHBT) was used to detect the occurrence of SIBO, and the asymptomatic HUA patients was divided into SIBO-positive group and SIBO-negative group according to the test results of LHBT. The positive rate of SIBO in the asymptomatic HUA patients was analyzed, and the concentrations of H2 and CH4, the levels of CRP, IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α at each time point between the asymptomatic HUA patients and the healthy controls were compared, and the levels of CRP, IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α were compared between the SIBO-positive group and the SIBO-negative group. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the influencing factors of SIBO in asymptomatic HUA. Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between CRP, IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α levels and SIBO in asymptomatic HUA patients. Results: The positive rate of SIBO in the asymptomatic HUA patients was 58.62%, which was higher than that in the healthy controls (20.00%), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=16.431, P < 0.001). There were significant differences in exhaled H2 concentration between the asymptomatic HUA patients and the healthy controls at 0, 30, 60 and 90 min (P < 0.05), and there was no significant difference in exhaled CH4 concentration at each time point (P>0.05). The levels of CRP, IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α in the asymptomatic HUA patients were significantly higher than those in the healthy controls (P < 0.05). The serum levels of CRP, IL-1β and IL-6 in the SIBO-positive group were significantly higher than those in the SIBO-negative group (P < 0.05), while the levels of TNF-α were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression ana-lysis of the influencing factors of SIBO in the asymptomatic HUA showed that increased IL-1β (OR=1.332, 95%CI: 1.005-1.764, P=0.046) and increased IL-6 (OR=1.586, 95%CI: 1.216-2.069, P=0.001) were independent risk factors for SIBO in the HUA patients. In asymptomatic HUA patients with SIBO, the LHBT set value was positively correlated with serum IL-1β (r=0.594, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Asymptomatic HUA patients are more likely to develop SIBO than healthy people, and SIBO in asymptomatic HUA patients is closely related to the level of inflammatory factors, so attention should be paid to the detection and intervention of SIBO in asymptomatic HUA patients.

Key words: Hyperuricemia, Asymptomatic diseases, Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, Inflammatory cytokines, Gastrointestinal microbiome

CLC Number: 

  • R589

Table 1

Comparison of basic information and SIBO positive rate between asymptomatic HUA patients and healthy controls"

Items Asymptomatic HUA (n=87) Healthy control (n=40) Statistic P value
Gender, n(%) χ2=0.543 0.461
  Male 62 (71.26) 31 (77.50)
  Female 25 (28.74) 9 (22.50)
Age/years, ${\bar x}$±s 40.11±7.65 38.13±8.17 t=-1.333 0.185
BMI/(kg/m2), ${\bar x}$±s 26.33±2.33 24.83±2.61 t=-1.394 0.167
SIBO, n(%) χ2=16.431 <0.001
  Positive 51 (58.62) 8 (20.00)
  Negative 36 (41.38) 32 (80.00)

Table 2

LHBT results for asymptomatic HUA patients and healthy controls"

Items Asymptomatic HUA (n=87) Healthy controls (n=40) Z value P value
H2M(P25, P75)
  Baseline 7.00 (4.00, 12.00) 5.00 (4.00, 9.00) -2.100 0.036
  30 min 11.00 (6.00, 15.00) 6.00 (4.25, 11.50) -2.676 0.007
  60 min 10.00 (5.00, 16.00) 5.00 (4.00, 11.25) -2.910 0.004
  90 min 12.00 (8.00, 24.00) 8.00 (5.00, 14.00) -3.049 0.002
CH4M(P25, P75)
  Baseline 6.00 (4.00, 9.00) 6.50 (4.00, 8.00) -0.329 0.742
  30 min 7.00 (4.00, 9.00) 7.00 (5.25, 8.00) -0.089 0.929
  60 min 6.00 (4.00, 10.00) 6.00 (5.00, 8.00) -0.723 0.470
  90 min 7.00 (5.00, 12.00) 7.00 (4.00, 8.00) -1.714 0.086

Table 3

Comparison of inflammatory factors between asymptomatic HUA patients and healthy controls"

Items Asymptomatic HUA (n=87) Healthy controls (n=40) Z value P value
CRP/(mg/L),M(P25, P75) 20.00 (10.00, 33.00) 5.00 (3.00, 11.00) -7.596 <0.001
IL-1β/(ng/L),M(P25, P75) 4.67 (3.38, 6.62) 2.03 (1.45, 2.77) -5.955 <0.001
IL-6/(ng/L),M(P25, P75) 3.42 (2.01, 6.07) 2.46 (1.22, 3.65) -2.852 0.004
TNF-α/(ng/L),M(P25, P75) 1.21 (0.81, 1.77) 0.97 (0.61, 1.23) -2.943 0.003

Table 4

Comparison of clinical and laboratory indicators between the SIBO positive and SIBO negative groups of asymptomatic HUA patients"

Items SIBO positive group (n=51) SIBO negative group (n=36) Statistics P value
Gender χ2=0.634 0.426
  Male 38 (74.51) 24 (66.67)
  Female 13 (37.25) 12 (33.33)
Age/years 40.98±5.35 38.89±10.01 t=1.144 0.258
BMI/(kg/m2) 26.14±2.20 26.60±2.50 t=-0.917 0.362
Laboratory indicators
  WBC/(×109/L) 7.12±1.94 7.37±2.43 t=-0.512 0.610
  HGB/(g/L) 160.71±13.54 158.42±11.65 t=0.822 0.413
  PLT/(×109/L) 239.00±40.74 233.83±40.74 t=0.550 0.584
  NLR 2.36 (1.56, 3.40) 2.11 (1.51, 2.36) Z=1.896 0.058
  ALT/(U/L) 28.45±9.05 25.66±6.50 Z=1.674 0.098
  AST/(U/L) 30.35±7.81 30.28±13.59 t=0.033 0.976
  BUN/(mmol/L) 5.73±1.10 5.51±1.33 t=0.820 0.415
  GGT/(mmol/L) 35.63±15.19 38.22±16.28 t=-0.762 0.448
  Scr/(μmol/L) 81.45±17.31 78.60±19.24 t=0.321 0.749
  UA/(μmol/L) 507.94±44.72 504.25±51.96 t=0.354 0.724
  TC/(mmol/L) 4.74±0.88 4.64±0.71 t=0.571 0.570
  TG/(mmol/L) 3.09±0.82 4.64±0.71 t=0.739 0.462
  HDL-C/(mmol/L) 1.00±0.32 1.08±0.21 t=-1.601 0.113
  LDL-C/(mmol/L) 2.83±0.68 2.73±0.63 t=0.631 0.535
  CRP/(mg/L) 24.00 (13.00, 36.00) 16.50 (7.25, 29.75) Z=2.069 0.039
  IL-1β/(ng/L) 5.23 (3.67, 7.21) 4.04 (3.04, 5.64) Z=2.366 0.018
  IL-6/(ng/L) 4.54 (3.18, 8.02) 2.13 (0.97, 3.53) Z=4.456 <0.001
  TNF-α/(ng/L) 1.25 (0.88, 1.86) 1.10 (0.77, 1.74) Z=1.418 0.156

Table 5

Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of the influencing factors of SIBO in asymptomatic HUA patients"

Items B SE Wald χ2 P OR (95%CI)
CRP -0.017 0.020 0.730 0.393 0.983 (0.946-1.022)
IL-1β 0.286 0.144 3.983 0.046 1.332 (1.005-1.764)
IL-6 0.461 0.136 11.549 0.001 1.586 (1.216-2.069)

Figure 1

Scatter plot of the correlation between LHBT values and serum IL-1β levels in asymptomatic HUA patients with SIBO HUA, hyperuricemia; SIBO, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth; LHBT, lactulose methane-hydrogen breath test; IL-1β, interleukin-1β."

1
封番番, 张蓓, 周连锁, 等. 无症状高尿酸血症的诊治和管理[J]. 江苏医药, 2021, 47 (11): 1182- 1185.
2
Zhu B , Wang Y , Zhou W , et al. Trend dynamics of gout prevalence among the Chinese population, 1990-2019: A joinpoint and age-period-cohort analysis[J]. Front Public Health, 2022, 10, 1008598.

doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1008598
3
Chen B , Zhu S , Du L , et al. Reduced interstitial cells of Cajal and increased intraepithelial lymphocytes are associated with deve-lopment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in post-infectious IBS mouse model[J]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2017, 52 (10): 1065- 1071.

doi: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1342141
4
中华医学会内分泌学分会. 中国高尿酸血症与痛风诊疗指南(2019)[J]. 中华内分泌代谢杂志, 2020, 36 (1): 1- 13.
5
Rezaie A , Buresi M , Lembo A , et al. Hydrogen and methane-based breath testing in gastrointestinal disorders: The North American consensus[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2017, 112 (5): 775- 784.

doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.46
6
Pimentel M , Saad RJ , Long MD , et al. ACG clinical guideline: Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2020, 115 (2): 165- 178.

doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000501
7
Adarsh MB , Sharma SK , Sinha SK , et al. Gastrointestinal dysmotility and infections in systemic sclerosis: An Indian scenario[J]. Curr Rheumatol Rev, 2018, 14 (2): 172- 176.

doi: 10.2174/1573397113666170425145405
8
Sawicka-Gutaj N , Gruszczyński D , Zawalna N , et al. Microbiota alterations in patients with autoimmune thyroid diseases: A syste-matic review[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23 (21): 13450.

doi: 10.3390/ijms232113450
9
Shah A , Morrison M , Burger D , et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: The prevalence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in inflammatory bowel disease[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2019, 49 (6): 624- 635.

doi: 10.1111/apt.15133
10
Hasan A , Hasan LK , Schnabl B , et al. Microbiome of the aero-digestive tract in health and esophageal disease[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2021, 66 (1): 12- 18.

doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06720-6
11
Kim HW , Yoon EJ , Jeong SH , et al. Distinct gut microbiota in patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia: A potential protector against gout development[J]. Yonsei Med J, 2022, 63 (3): 241- 251.

doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.3.241
12
王帅, 左丽娟, 高扬, 等. 小肠细菌过度生长的治疗研究进展[J]. 临床消化病杂志, 2021, 33 (4): 303- 306.
13
Leite G , Morales W , Weitsman S , et al. The duodenal micro-biome is altered in small intestinal bacterial overgrowth[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15 (7): e0234906.

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234906
14
Ostojic SM . Inadequate production of H2 by gut microbiota and Parkinson disease[J]. Trends Endocrinol Metab, 2018, 29 (5): 286- 288.

doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2018.02.006
15
Rana SV , Sharma S , Sinha SK , et al. Incidence of predominant methanogenic flora in irritable bowel syndrome patients and appa-rently healthy controls from North India[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2009, 54 (1): 132- 135.

doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0315-x
16
Fahim SM , Donowitz JR , Smirnova E , et al. Small intestine bacterial overgrowth is associated with increased Campylobacter and epithelial injury in duodenal biopsies of Bangladeshi children[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2024, 18 (3): e0012023.

doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012023
17
Wang M , Lin X , Yang X , et al. Research progress on related mechanisms of uric acid activating NLRP3 inflammasome in chro-nic kidney disease[J]. Ren Fail, 2022, 44 (1): 615- 624.

doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2036620
18
Kim S , Lee KS , Choi S , et al. NF-κB-responsive miRNA-31-5p elicits endothelial dysfunction associated with preeclampsia via down-regulation of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase[J]. J Biol Chem, 2018, 293 (49): 18989- 19000.

doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.005197
19
Crişan TO , Cleophas MCP , Oosting M , et al. Soluble uric acid primes TLR-induced proinflammatory cytokine production by human primary cells via inhibition of IL-1Ra[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2016, 75 (4): 755- 762.

doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206564
20
Ghoshal UC , Srivastava D . Irritable bowel syndrome and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: Meaningful association or unneces-sary hype[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20 (10): 2482- 2491.

doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i10.2482
21
阚美佳, 张尤历, 徐岷. 炎症性肠病与小肠细菌过度生长关系的荟萃分析[J]. 胃肠病学和肝病学杂志, 2019, 28 (11): 1256- 1261.
22
Yu X , Li Y , Xiang F , et al. Correlation between small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and irritable bowel syndrome and the prognosis of treatment[J]. Ann Palliat Med, 2021, 10 (3): 3364- 3370.

doi: 10.21037/apm-21-427
23
Srivastava D , Ghoshal U , Mittal RD , et al. Associations between IL-1RA polymorphisms and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth among patients with irritable bowel syndrome from India[J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2014, 26 (10): 1408- 1416.

doi: 10.1111/nmo.12399
[1] Dan HAN, Yangjin CIREN, Qiuhong LI, Jun LI. Changes of intestinal microflora in patients with colorectal benign and malignant tumors in high altitude area and comparison with the normal population in low altitude area [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2025, 57(3): 578-583.
[2] Qiang FU,Guan-ying GAO,Yan XU,Zhuo-hua LIN,You-jing SUN,Li-gang CUI. Comparative study of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of asymptomatic anterosuperior acetabular labrum tears [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(4): 665-669.
[3] Wen-han BAO,Wen TANG. Changes of gut microflora in newly diagnosed IgA nephropathy patients and its correlation with clinical risk factors [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(1): 124-132.
[4] Jia-he ZHANG, Jia-qi SHI, Zhang-jian CHEN, Guang JIA. Effects of nano titanium dioxide on gut microbiota based on human digestive tract microecology simulation system in vitro [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(3): 468-476.
[5] WANG Zi-jing,LI Zai-ling. Characteristics of gastric microbiota in children with Helicobacter pylori infection family history [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(6): 1115-1121.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!