Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (1): 177-181. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.01.028

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of the outcomes between open and hybrid approaches in the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms repair

LI Wei-hao,LI Wei(),ZHANG Xue-min,LI Qing-le,JIAO Yang,ZHANG Tao,JIANG Jing-jun,ZHANG Xiao-ming   

  1. Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2020-06-16 Online:2022-02-18 Published:2022-02-21
  • Contact: Wei LI E-mail:mailtowei@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities: Peking University Medicine Seed Fund for Interdisciplinary Research(BMU2018MX015);Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities: Peking University Clinical Medicine Plus X-Young Scholars Project(PKU2019LCXQ009);Peking University People’s Hospital Research and Development Funds(RDH2018-02)

Abstract:

Objective: Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm is one of the most challenging aortic diseases. Open surgical repair remains constrained with considerable perioperative morbidity and mortality. The emergence of a hybrid approach utilizing visceral debranching with endovascular aneurysm repair has brought an alternative for high-risk patients. This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes between hybrid and open repairs in the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Methods: In this retrospectively observational study, patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm treated in a single center between January 2008 and December 2019 were reviewed, of whom 11 patients with hybrid repair, and 18 patients with open repair were identified. Demographic characteristic, operative data, perioperative morbidity and mortality, freedom from reintervention, and long-term survival were compared between the two groups. Results: In the hybrid repair group, the patients with dissection aneurysm, preoperative combined renal insufficiency, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of 3 or more were significantly overwhelming than in the open repair group. The operation time of debranching hybrid repair was (445±85) min, and the intraoperative blood loss was (955±599) mL. There were 2 cases of complications in the early 30 days after surgery, without paraplegia, and 1 case died. The 30-day complication rate was 18.2%, and the 30-day mortality was 9.1%. The operation time of the patients with open repair was (560±245) min, and the intraoperative blood loss was (6 100±4 536) mL. Twelve patients had complications in the early 30 days after surgery, including 1 paraplegia and 4 deaths within 30 days. The 30-day complication rate was 66.7%, and the 30-day mortality was 22.2%. The bleeding volume in hybrid repair was significantly reduced compared with open repair (P<0.001). Besides, the incidence of 30-day complications in hybrid surgery was significantly reduced (P=0.011). During the follow-up period, there were 4 reinterventions and 3 deaths in hybrid repair group. The 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year all-cause survival rates were 72%, 54%, and 29%, respectively. In open repair group, reintervention was performed in 1 case and 5 cases died, and the 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year all-cause survival rates were 81%, 71%, and 35%, respectively. There was no significant difference between hybrid repair and open repair in all-cause survival and aneurysm-specific survival. Conclusion: Hybrid approach utilizing visceral debranching with endovascular aneurysm repair is a safe and effective surgical method for high-risk patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. The incidence of early postoperative complications and mortality is significantly reduced compared with traditional surgery, but the efficacy in the medium and long term still needs to be improved.

Key words: Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, Endovascular procedures, Postoperative complications, Treatment outcome

CLC Number: 

  • R654.3

Table 1

Demographics of the patients with hybrid and open repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm"

Items Hybrid repair (n=11) Open repair (n=18) P value
Age/years 53±12 46±13 0.207
Male 8 (73%) 11 (61%) 0.694
BMI/(kg/m2) 23.0±3.4 23.2±4.4 0.911
Hyperlipemia 4 (36%) 3 (17%) 0.375
Hypertension 10 (91%) 13 (72%) 0.362
Stroke 1 (9%) 1 (6%) >0.999
COPD 1 (9%) 2 (11%) >0.999
Renal insufficiency 6 (55%) 3 (17%) 0.048
History of smoking 5 (46%) 6 (33%) 0.696
Prior aortic surgery 1 (9%) 5 (28%) 0.362
LVEF/% 64±6 67±6 0.362
Baseline creatinine/(mmol/L) 152±123 77±55 0.033
Previous aortic dissection 8 (73%) 5 (28%) 0.027
Connective tissue disease 0 (0) 5 (28%) 0.126
Ruptured 3 (27%) 2 (11%) 0.339
ASA score ≥3 8 (73%) 4 (22%) 0.018

Figure 1

Comparative long-term outcomes between hybrid and open repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm"

[1] 张小明, 张永保, 李清乐, 等. 胸腹主动脉瘤的治疗[J]. 中国血管外科杂志: 电子版, 2014, 6(3):137-142.
[2] 来志超, 孙晓宁, 古丽丹娜·沙艳, 等. 胸腹主动脉瘤的手术方式与外科治疗选择[J]. 中国血管外科杂志: 电子版, 2018, 10(4):233-236.
[3] 赵纪春, 陈熹阳. 胸腹主动脉瘤: 杂交手术现状[J]. 中华血管外科杂志, 2016, 1(2):78-81.
[4] Di Marco L, Murana G, Leone A, et al. Hybrid repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysm: An alternative strategy for preventing major complications in high risk patients[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2018, 271:31-35.
doi: S0167-5273(18)31046-5 pmid: 30223362
[5] Jain A, Flohr TF, Johnston WF, et al. Staged hybrid repair of extensive thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms secondary to chronic aortic dissection[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2016, 63(1):62-69.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.060
[6] Coselli JS, Amarasekara HS, Zhang Q, et al. The impact of preoperative chronic kidney disease on outcomes after Crawford extent Ⅱ thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2018, 156(6): 2053-2064. e1.
[7] Girardi LN, Ohmes LB, Lau C, et al. Open repair of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with preoperative renal failure[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2017, 51(5):971-977.
doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx007
[8] Cina CS, Clase CM. Coagulation disorders and blood product use in patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair[J]. Transfus Med Rev, 2005, 19(2):143-154.
doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2004.11.003
[9] 闫兵, 张雷, 黄骏咏, 等. 去分支技术治疗胸腹主动脉瘤[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2014, 52(7):536-538.
[10] Moulakakis KG, Mylonas SN, Avgerinos ED, et al. Hybrid open endovascular technique for aortic thoracoabdominal pathologies[J]. Circulation, 2011, 124(24):2670-2680.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.041582
[11] 张宏鹏, 郭伟, 刘小平, 等. 杂交技术治疗胸腹主动脉瘤[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2009, 47(9):657-660.
[1] Jin-man ZHUANG,Tian-run LI,Xuan LI,Jing-yuan LUAN,Chang-ming WANG,Qi-chen FENG,Jin-tao HAN. Application of Rotarex mechanical thrombectomy system in acute lower limb ische-mia [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(6): 1159-1162.
[2] Zheng-da ZHU,Yan GAO,Wen-xiu HE,Xin FANG,Yang LIU,Pan WEI,Zhi-min YAN,Hong HUA. Efficacy and safety of Nocardia rubra cell wall skeleton for the treatment of erosive oral lichen planus [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 964-969.
[3] Yan-fang JIANG,Jian WANG,Yong-jian WANG,Jia LIU,Yin PEI,Xiao-peng LIU,Ying-fang AO,Yong MA. Mid-to-long term clinical outcomes and predictors after anterior cruciate ligament revision [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 857-863.
[4] Wen-min DONG,Ming-rui WANG,Hao HU,Qi WANG,Ke-xin XU,Tao XU. Initial clinical experience and follow-up outcomes of treatment for ureteroileal anastomotic stricture with Allium coated metal ureteral stent [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 637-641.
[5] Jian GAO,Li-bao HU,Chen CHEN,Xin ZHI,Tao XU. Interventional treatment of hemorrhage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 667-671.
[6] Xiao LI,Jia-zeng SU,Yan-yan ZHANG,Li-qi ZHANG,Ya-qiong ZHANG,Deng-gao LIU,Guang-yan YU. Inflammation grading and sialoendoscopic treatment of131I radioiodine-induced sialadenitis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(3): 586-590.
[7] Kai MA,Xing-ke QU,Qing-quan XU,Liu-lin XIONG,Xiong-jun YE,Li-zhe AN,Wei-nan CHEN,Xiao-bo HUANG. Endoscopic treatment for ureterovesical junction stenosis in patients with kidney transplantation: 13 cases report [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(6): 1155-1158.
[8] Ying ZHAN,Yi-tian DU,Zhen-zhen YANG,Chun-li ZHANG,Xian-rong QI. Preparation and characterization of paclitaxel microspheres in situ gel and its antitumor efficacy by local injection [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(3): 477-486.
[9] Chen LIANG,Wei-yu ZHANG,Hao HU,Qi WANG,Zhi-wei FANG,Ke-xin XU. Comparison of effectiveness and complications between two different methods of augmentation cystoplasty [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(2): 293-297.
[10] Ze-chuan YANG,Chao-xu LIU,Yang LIN,Wei-hua HU,Wen-jian CHEN,Feng LI,Heng ZENG. All levels miniplate fixation and a modified hybrid fixation method in expansive open-door cervical laminoplasty: a retrospective comparative study [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(1): 187-193.
[11] Wen-zhe YOU,Gui-li DOU,Bin XIA. Two-year outcomes and the influence factors of indirect pulp treatment in primary teeth: a retrospective study [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(1): 65-69.
[12] Xin yi LI,Jin xia ZHAO,Xiang yuan LIU. Diagnosis and treatment of antiphospholipid antibody:related recurrent spontaneous abortion and analysis of therapeutic drugs and pregnancy outcome in 75 patients with antiphospholipid syndrome [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(6): 956-961.
[13] Jia-xuan XU,Hong-zhi WANG,Jun DONG,Xiao-jie CHEN,Yong YANG,Ren-xiong CHEN,Guo-dong WANG. Analysis of risk factors for acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome after esophagectomy [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(6): 1057-1062.
[14] ZHANG Ming-ming, ZHENG Ying-dong, LIANG Yu-hong. A prognostic model for assessment of outcome of root canal treatment in teeth with pulpitis or apical periodontitis#br# [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(1): 123-130.
[15] HAN Xiao-feng, GUO Xi, LI Tie-zheng, LIU Guang-rui, HUANG Lian-jun. Application and analysis of abdominal aortic branch malperfusion pattern in thoracic endovascular aortic repair for Stanford B aortic dissection [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(6): 996-1002.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2002, 34(3): 271 -275 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2002, 34(5): 627 -629 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2008, 40(1): 80 -82 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(1): 74 -77 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2003, 35(5): 515 -520 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2006, 38(4): 375 -380 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2006, 38(6): 581 -585 .
[8] GAO Ling, Li-Xiao-Hong, Zhao-Jian-Qing, Lu-Ji-Hong, Zhao-Jia-Gang, Zhu-Jia-Shi, , , △ . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2012, 44(3): 454 -463 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2013, 45(1): 152 -155 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2013, 45(5): 732 -737 .