Email Alert | RSS

Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2023, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (6): 1039-1044. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.06.013

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Anti-endothelial cell antibodies in predicting early miscarriage

Liang LUO1,2,Yun LI1,Hong-yan WANG1,Xiao-hong XIANG1,Jing ZHAO1,Feng SUN1,Xiao-ying ZHANG1,*(),Ru-lin JIA1,*(),Chun LI1   

  1. 1. Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
    2. Department of Chinese Medicine, the People's Hospital of Yubei District of Chongqing City, Chongqing 401120, China
  • Received:2023-08-20 Online:2023-12-18 Published:2023-12-11
  • Contact: Xiao-ying ZHANG,Ru-lin JIA E-mail:zhangxiaoying@pkuph.edu.cn;1036013457@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    the China International Medical Foundation(Z-2018-40-2101);Peking University People' s Hospital Scientific Research Development Funds(RD 2022-66)

RICH HTML

 2   

PDF (PC)

114

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the clinical significance of anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECA) in predicting early miscarriage. Methods: A total of 122 pregnant women with no history of autoimmune diseases who underwent prenatal examination at Peking University People's Hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 were selected, and they were tested for AECA. Based on the history of early miscarriage (gestational age at miscarriage < 12 weeks), the participants were divided into an early miscarriage group and a control group. t-tests, non-parametric Wilcoxon tests, Chi-square tests, and Fisher's exact probability method were used to compare general information and laboratory indicators between the two groups. A multivariate Logistic regression model was used to analyze the factors associated with early miscarriage. The natural miscarriage rates were assessed through follow-up with pregnant women, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was employed to compare the natural miscarriage rates between AECA-positive and AECA-negative pregnant women. Results: (1) A total of 122 pregnant women were enrolled, comprising 35 cases (28.7%) in the early miscarriage group, with an average age of (32.1±6.1) years, and 87 cases (71.3%) in the control group, with an average age of (30.7±5.1) years. The early miscarriage group had higher gravidity [3 (2, 4) vs. 1 (1, 2), Z=-6.402, P < 0.001] and a higher prevalence of hypertension (11.4% vs.1.1%, P=0.024). The positive rate of AECA in the early miscarriage group (34.3% vs. 8.0%, χ2=13.070, P < 0.001) and the proportion of elevated immunoglobulin G (17.1% vs. 4.6%, P=0.032) were significantly higher than that in the control group. (2) Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that higher gravidity (OR=4.149, 95%CI: 2.287-7.529, P < 0.001), AECA positivity (OR= 4.288, 95% CI: 1.157-15.893, P=0.029), and elevated immunoglobulin G levels (OR =6.177, 95%CI: 1.156-33.015, P=0.033) were risk factors for early miscarriage. (3) The 122 pregnant women were categorized into two groups: the AECA-positive group (19 cases) and the AECA-negative group (103 cases). Survival analysis demonstrated that at the end of 12 weeks of gestation, the fetal survival rate in the AECA-positive group was significantly lower than that in the AECA-negative group (84.2% vs. 96.1%, P= 0.035). Conclusion: Higher gravidity, AECA positivity, and elevated immunoglobulin G levels are significant risk factors for early miscarriage. The results demonstrate that AECA is a novel predicting test in early miscarriage.

Key words: Anti-endothelial cell antibodies, Early miscarriage, Risk factors

CLC Number: 

  • R593.2

Table 1

Comparisons of demographic characteristics between the early miscarriage group and control group"

Variables Early miscarriage group (n=35) Control group (n=87) Z/t/χ2 P
Age/years, ${\bar x}$±s 32.1±6.1 30.7±5.1 -1.129 0.264
Age at first conception/years, ${\bar x}$±s 26.9±5.1 28.0±4.6 1.125 0.265
Number of pregnancies, M (P25，P75) 3 (2, 4) 1 (1, 2) -6.402 < 0.001
Artificial insemination, n (%) 8 (22.9) 12 (13.8) 1.496 0.221
Hyperthyroidism, n (%) 0 (0) 1 (1.1) N/A >0.999
Hypothyroidism, n (%) 6 (17.1) 7 (8.0) 1.319 0.251
Hypertension, n (%) 4 (11.4) 1 (1.1) N/A 0.024
Diabetes, n (%) 2 (5.7) 1 (1.1) N/A 0.198
Hyperlipidemia, n (%) 0 (0) 2 (2.3) N/A >0.999
Uterine fibroids, n (%) 2 (5.7) 12 (13.8) N/A 0.346
Malignant tumor, n (%) 4 (11.4) 2 (2.3) N/A 0.056

Table 2

Comparison of laboratory indexes between the early miscarriage group and control group"

Variables Early miscarriage group (n=35) Control group (n=87) Z/t/χ2 P
WBC/(×109/L), ${\bar x}$±s 8.3 ± 4.5 8.9 ± 4.2 0.663 0.510
HGB/(g/L), ${\bar x}$±s 108.7 ± 24.2 110.3± 23.1 0.339 0.736
PLT/ (×109/L), ${\bar x}$±s 136.6 ± 89.3 171.3 ± 95.5 1.898 0.062
TG/(mmol/L)，${\bar x}$±s 2.7 ± 1.2 2.8 ± 1.9 0.384 0.702
HDL-C/(mmol/L), ${\bar x}$±s 1.6 ± 0.4 1.7 ± 0.5 1.383 0.171
LDL-C/(mmol/L), ${\bar x}$±s 3.1 ± 1.3 3.2 ± 1.0 0.211 0.834
T3/(μg/dL), ${\bar x}$±s 96.6 ± 48.4 121.0 ± 38.2 1.351 0.196
T4/(μg/dL), ${\bar x}$±s 8.6 ± 3.1 10.7 ± 3.7 1.582 0.128
ANA positive, n (%) 2 (5.7) 3 (3.4) N/A 0.624
AECA positive, n (%) 12 (34.3) 7 (8.0) 13.070 < 0.001
Anti-SSA antibody positive, n (%) 3 (8.6) 2 (2.3) N/A 0.142
Anti-SSB antibody positive, n (%) 2 (5.7) 0 (0) N/A 0.081
Anti-dsDNA antibody positive, n (%) 0 (0) 1 (1.1) N/A >0.999
Anti-U1-RNP antibody positive, n (%) 1 (2.9) 0 (0) N/A 0.287
Low C3, n (%) 4 (11.4) 8 (9.2) N/A 0.741
Low C4, n (%) 7 (20.0) 17 (19.5) 0.003 0.954
Elevated IgA, n (%) 0 (0) 2 (2.3) N/A >0.999
Elevated IgG, n (%) 6 (17.1) 4 (4.6) N/A 0.032
Elevated IgM, n (%) 1 (2.9) 3 (3.4) N/A >0.999
D-dimer/(μg/L), M (P25，P75) 412.5 (207.5, 791.0) 588.0 (346.0, 1138.8) -0.726 0.468

Table 3

Results of binary logistic regression analysis for early miscarriage"

Variables Univariate Multivariate
B Wald P OR 95%CI B Wald P OR 95%CI
Number of pregnancies 1.432 25.573 < 0.001 4.188 2.404-7.295 1.423 21.906 < 0.001 4.149 2.287-7.529
Hypertension 2.407 4.476 0.034 11.097 1.194-103.141
PLT/(×109/L) -0.004 3.288 0.070 0.996 0.992-1.000
AECA positive 1.786 11.292 0.001 5.963 2.105-16.889 1.456 4.743 0.029 4.288 1.157-15.893
Elevated IgG 1.457 4.583 0.032 4.293 1.131-16.296 1.821 4.534 0.033 6.177 1.156-33.015

Figure 1

Comparison of fetal survival rates between AECA-positive pregnant women and AECA-negative pregnant women ACEA, anti-endothelial cell antibodies."

1 Madendag IC , Sahin ME , Madendag Y , et al. Evaluation of the levels of secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor in the cervical mucus of women with unexplained infertility[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2020, 46 (7): 1128- 1132.
doi: 10.1111/jog.14299
2 Yang XL , Chen F , Yang XY , et al. Efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin on the outcomes of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection pregnancy in non-thrombophilic women: A meta-analysis[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2018, 97 (9): 1061- 1072.
doi: 10.1111/aogs.13359
3 Quenby S , Gallos ID , Dhillon-Smith RK , et al. Miscarriage matters: The epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss[J]. Lancet, 2021, 397 (10285): 1658- 1667.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00682-6
4 Jiang L , Xu X , Cao Z , et al. Comparison of frozen embryo transfer outcomes between uterine infusion of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and growth hormone application in patients with thin endometrium: A retrospective study[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2021, 12, 725202.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.725202
5 Qu P , Yan M , Zhao D , et al. Association between pre-pregnancy body mass index and miscarriage in an assisted reproductive technology population: A 10-year cohort study[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2021, 12, 646162.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.646162
6 Shankarkumar U , Pradhan VD , Patwardhan MM , et al. Autoantibody profile and other immunological parameters in recurrent spontaneous abortion patients[J]. Niger Med J, 2011, 52 (3): 163- 166.
doi: 10.4103/0300-1652.86126
7 Lindqvist KJ , Osterland CK . Human antibodies to vascular endothelium[J]. Clin Exp Immunol, 1971, 9 (6): 753- 760.
8 Alessandri C , Bombardieri M , Valesini G . Pathogenic mechanisms of anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECA): Their prevalence and clinical relevance[J]. Adv Clin Chem, 2006, 42, 297- 326.
9 杜欣莹, 管立学, 王美, 等. 血清抗内皮细胞抗体定量分析与复发性自然流产相关性研究[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志, 2009, 17 (6): 23- 25.
10 Cacciola R , Gentilini Cacciola E , Vecchio V , et al. Impact of anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECAs) in patients with polycythemia vera and thrombosis[J]. Diagnostics (Basel), 2022, 12 (5): 1077.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051077
11 Roussev RG , Stern JJ , Kaider BD . Anti-endothelial cell antibo-dies: Another cause for pregnancy loss?[J]. Am J Reprod Immunol, 1998, 39 (2): 89- 95.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1998.tb00340.x
12 蒋莎, 李娜, 张杨, 等. Toll样受体4通过调节性T细胞引起不明原因复发性流产的机制研究进展[J]. 中华生殖与避孕杂志, 2018, 38 (10): 6.
13 Zilla P , von Oppell U , Deutsch M . The endothelium: A key to the future[J]. J Card Surg, 1993, 8 (1): 32- 60.
doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.1993.tb00574.x
14 Youinou P , Le Dantec C , Bendaoud B , et al. Endothelium, a target for immune-mediated assault in connective tissue disease[J]. Autoimmun Rev, 2006, 5 (3): 222- 228.
doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2005.06.012
15 张梦莹, 李志, 吕坤, 等. 系统性红斑狼疮患者血清抗内皮细胞抗体和抗β2糖蛋白Ⅰ抗体水平及其对人脐静脉内皮细胞增殖的影响[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2013, 18 (2): 142- 146.
16 Hussain M , Chen P , Zhang Y , et al. Moesin expression is correlated with its involvement in patients with Behcet' s disease[J]. Arch Med Sci, 2020, 16 (4): 924- 930.
17 Mutoh T , Shirai T , Ishii T , et al. Identification of two major autoantigens negatively regulating endothelial activation in Takayasu arteritis[J]. Nat Commun, 2020, 11 (1): 1253.
18 Meyer O , Kaiser P , Haim T , et al. Anti-vascular endothelial cell antibodies (AECA): Comparison of two assay methods and clinical applications[J]. Rev Rhum Engl Ed, 1995, 62 (11): 737- 747.
19 Blank M , Krause I , Goldkorn T , et al. Monoclonal anti-endothe-lial cell antibodies from a patient with Takayasu arteritis activate endothelial cells from large vessels[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 1999, 42 (7): 1421- 1432.
20 Thomas AM , Gerogianni A , McAdam MB , et al. Complement component C5 and TLR molecule CD14 mediate heme-induced thromboinflammation in human blood[J]. J Immunol, 2019, 203 (6): 1571- 1578.
21 Belizna C , Duijvestijn A , Hamidou M , et al. Antiendothelial cell antibodies in vasculitis and connective tissue disease[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2006, 65 (12): 1545- 1550.
22 母洪洪, 张湘燕, 张程. 抗内皮细胞抗体检测临床应用研究进展[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2020, 36 (30): 374- 376.
23 Akhtar MA , Agrawal R , Brown J , et al. Thyroxine replacement for subfertile women with euthyroid autoimmune thyroid disease or subclinical hypothyroidism[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019, 6 (6): CD011009.
24 Arachchillage D , Pericleous C . Evolution of antiphospholipid syndrome[J]. Semin Thromb Hemost, 2023, 49 (3): 295- 304.
25 Poorolajal J , Cheraghi P , Cheraghi Z , et al. Predictors of miscarriage: A matched case-control study[J]. Epidemiol Health, 2014, 36, e2014031.
26 Walter K . Early pregnancy loss[J]. JAMA, 2023, 329 (16): 1426.
[1] Yu-fei LI,Ya-ni YAN,Jia-yang JIN,Chun LI,Qiu-yan PEI. Clinical characteristics of fetal cardiac disease in patients with anti-SSA antibody positive [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(6): 1053-1057.
[2] Hui WEI, Ci-dan-yang-zong, Yi-xi-la-mu, Bai-ma-yang-jin. Risk factors associated with different types of Henoch-Schönlein purpura in Tibetan patients at high altitude [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(5): 923-928.
[3] Wei ZHU,Bin ZHU,Xiao-guang LIU. Influential factors related to functional status after full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(3): 537-542.
[4] Zhe LIANG,Fang-fang FAN,Yan ZHANG,Xian-hui QIN,Jian-ping LI,Yong HUO. Rate and characteristics of H-type hypertension in Chinese hypertensive population and comparison with American population [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(5): 1028-1037.
[5] Jing QIAN,You-jia WEI,Yi-jing CHENG,Yi ZHANG,Bo PENG,Chun-mei ZHU. Analysis of clinical features and risk factors of necrotizing pneumonia in children [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(3): 541-547.
[6] SU Jun-qi,SONG Yang,XIE Shang. Analysis of etiological characteristics and establishment of prediction model of postoperative infections in patients undergoing oral squamous cell carcinoma surgery with free flap reconstruction [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(1): 68-76.
[7] XU Hao,ZHANG Guo-dong,FAN Guang-pu,CHEN Yu. Preoperative plasma predictive factors of new-onset atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A propensity score matching study [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(6): 1139-1143.
[8] NIU Zhan-yue,XUE Yan,ZHANG Jing,ZHANG He-jun,DING Shi-gang. Analysis of endoscopic and pathological features of gastric adenomatous polyps and risk factors for canceration [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(6): 1122-1127.
[9] Jing-xian ZHU,Sheng-nan LU,Yan-fang JIANG,Ling JIANG,Jian-quan WANG. Influencing factors of preoperative pulmonary function in elderly patients undergoing rotator cuff surgery [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 902-906.
[10] WANG Jia-wen,LIU Jing-chao,MENG Ling-feng,ZHANG Wei,LIU Xiao-dong,ZHANG Yao-guang. Quality of life and related factors in patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(4): 653-658.
[11] SUN Zheng-hui,HUANG Xiao-juan,DONG Jing-han,LIU Zhuo,YAN Ye,LIU Cheng,MA Lu-lin. Risk factors of renal sinus invasion in clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma patients undergoing nephrectomy [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(4): 659-664.
[12] ZHOU Bo-lin,LI Wei-shi,SUN Chui-guo,QI Qiang,CHEN Zhong-qiang,ZENG Yan. Risk factors for multiple debridements of the patients with deep incisional surgical site infection after spinal surgery [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(2): 286-292.
[13] LIU Xiao-qiang,YANG Yang,ZHOU Jian-feng,LIU Jian-zhang,TAN Jian-guo. Blood pressure and heart rate changes of 640 single dental implant surgeries [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(2): 390-395.
[14] XIA Fang-fang,LU Fu-ai,LV Hui-min,YANG Guo-an,LIU Yuan. Clinical characteristics and related factors of systemic lupus erythematosus with interstitial pneumonia [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(2): 266-272.
[15] HOU Guo-jin,ZHOU Fang,TIAN Yun,JI Hong-quan,ZHANG Zhi-shan,GUO Yan,LV Yang,YANG Zhong-wei,ZHANG Ya-wen. Risk factors of recurrent kyphosis in thoracolumbar burst fracture patients treated by short segmental pedicle screw fixation [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(1): 167-174.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright © Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd