Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2024, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (6): 994-1000. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.06.008

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application status of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Yijun HAN, Xiaoli CHEN, Changhong LI, Jinxia ZHAO*()   

  1. Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2024-08-08 Online:2024-12-18 Published:2024-12-18
  • Contact: Jinxia ZHAO E-mail:zhao-jinxia@163.com
  • Supported by:
    the Clinical Cohort Construction Program of Peking University Third Hospital(BYSYDL2022017)

RICH HTML

  

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the current status of methotrexate (MTX) application in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Methods: The clinical and laboratory data of RA patients who attended in the Department of Rheumatology and Immunology of Peking University Third Hospital from January 1, 2022 to November 31, 2023 were collected retrospectively. In order to figure out the relationship between MTX use and RA disease control, we recorded information including the starting dose, maximum dose, current dose, reasons of discontinuation of MTX, etc. The t test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test, Fisher' s exact probability and multivariable Logistic regression were used for analysis. Results: A total of 239 RA patients were enrolled, including 201 females and 38 males with a mean age of (54.5±14.3) years. Among them, 101 patients reached the therapeutic target [clinical remission or low disease activity assessed by 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28)-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)], accounting for 42.2% of the RA patients. Twenty-six patients met the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) definition of difficult-to-treat (D2T) RA, accounting for 10.9% of RA patients. The proportion of the RA patients who had ever used MTX was 84. 1%, and those who were currently on it accounted for only 39.7%. The MTX dose was generally low, with a starting dose of (9.5±3.0) mg/week, the maximum dose of 15.0 (10.0, 15.0) mg/week, and the current dose being (12.4±2.7) mg/week. The most common reasons for MTX dose reduction or discontinuation were adverse reactions, mainly including abnormalities of hepatic function, gastrointestinal discomfort, leucopenia, etc. Those who were currently on MTX had a higher rate of treatment to target (52.6% vs. 35.4%, P>0.05), lower disease activity score (DAS28-ESR, 3.6±1.8 vs. 4.2±1.8, P < 0.05), and fewer tender joint counts (4.8±8.3 vs. 8.6±10.4, P < 0.05) as compared with those who were not taking the drug, while swollen joint count, pain visual analog score and patient' s global score, C-reactive protein (CRP) level and ESR level were not significantly different between the two groups. Compared with those who did not reach the target of treatment, those who did had a higher rate of current MTX application (48.5% vs. 33.3%, P < 0.05), but the history of MTX did not differ between the two groups (84.2% vs. 84.1%, P>0.05). The maximum dose of MTX (median 15.0 mg/week vs. 13.7 mg/week, P>0.05) and the current dose [(12.9±2.5) mg/week vs. (11.8±2.8) mg/week, P>0.05] was higher in those who achieved the target, while the starting dose [(9.6±2.8) mg/week vs. (9.5±3.1) mg/week, P>0.05] and the rate of prior MTX (84.2% vs. 83.3%, P>0.05) was comparable between the two groups. The D2T RA patients had a higher rate of previous MTX use (96.2% vs. 82.6%, P < 0.05) and a higher starting dose [(11.6±4.3) mg/week vs. (9.8±2.7) mg/week, P>0.05], while the maximum dose (median 12.5 mg/week vs. 15.0 mg/week, P>0.05) and the current dose were both lower [(11.6±3.2) mg/week vs. (12.5±2.6) mg/week, P>0.05] than the non-D2T RA patients. Conclusion: The proportion of regular use of MTX among RA patients was low and the dose was generally small. The RA patients with regular use of MTX had a higher rate of achieving treatment target and lower disease activity. Those who achieved the target had a higher rate of current MTX use, higher maximum and current doses than those who did not. The D2T RA patients had lower maximum and current doses of MTX than the non-D2T RA patients. Therefore, increasing the usage and dosage of MTX in RA patients may help to improve the rate of achieving treatment targets.

Key words: Rheumatoid arthritis, Methotrexate, Dose-response relationship, drug, Treat-to-target

CLC Number: 

  • R593.22

Table 1

Clinical characteristics of RA patients"

Items Data (n=239)
Female 201 (84.1)
Age/years 54.5±14.3
Disease duration/year 11.0±9.2
RF positivity 170 (71.1)
Anti-CCP antibody positivity 210 (87.9)
Swollen joint count 4.6±7.3
Tender joint count 6.2±9.0
Pain visual analog score (0-100) 35.9±28.7
Patient global score (0-100) 45.4±27.8
CRP/(mg/L) 1.6±2.9
ESR/(mm/h) 21.3±17.1
DAS28-ESR 3.9±1.8
History of MTX 201 (84.1)
Current use of MTX 95 (39.7)

Table 2

Comparison of clinical characteristics between RA patients with and without current MTX use"

Items RA (n=239) Current MTX use (n=95) Not use MTX (n=144) P
MTX starting dose/(mg/week) 9.5±3.0 (n=201) 10.0±2.9 8.6±2.8 (n=106) 0.009
MTX maximum dose/(mg/week) 15.0 (10.0, 15.0) (n=201) 15.0 (11.2, 18.8) 10.0 (7.5, 12.5) (n=106) <0.010
MTX current dose/(mg/week) 12.4±2.7 (n=95) 12.4±2.7 0
Swollen joint count 4.6±7.3 3.5±6.3 5.1±7.7 0.088
Tender joint count 6.2±9.0 4.8±8.3 8.6±10.4 0.021
Pain visual analog score (0-100) 35.9±28.7 34.6±30.0 36.6±27.7 0.381
Patient global score 45.4±27.8 43.3±29.3 50.9±25.7 0.078
CRP/(mg/L) 1.6±2.9 1.8±3.4 1.5±1.9 0.263
ESR/(mm/h) 21.3±17.1 21.8±17.5 20.7±17.1 0.648
DAS28-ESR 3.9±1.8 3.6±1.8 4.2±1.8 0.025
Low disease activity or remission 101 (42.2) 50 (52.6) 51 (35.4) 0.068

Table 3

Comparison of MTX use and concomitant medication between RA patients who achieved low disease activity or remission and those who did not"

Items RA (n=239) Low disease activity/remission (n=101) Moderate/severe disease activity (n=138) P
History of MTX 201 (84.1) 85 (84.2) 116 (84.1) 0.983
Current use of MTX 95 (39.7) 49 (48.5) 46 (33.3) 0.018
MTX starting dose/(mg/week) 9.5±3.0 (n=201) 9.6±2.8 (n=85) 9.5±3.1 (n=116) 0.828
MTX maximum dose/(mg/week) 15.0 (10.0, 15.0) (n=201) 15.0 (12.5, 15.0) (n=85) 13.7 (10.0, 15.0) (n=116) 0.074
MTX current dose/(mg/week) 12.4±2.7 (n=95) 12.9±2.5 (n=50) 11.8±2.8 (n=45) 0.071
MTX monotherapy 18 (7.5) 15 (14.8) 3 (2.2) 0.059
Current use of other csDMARDs
  IGU 44 (18.4) 18 (17.8) 26 (18.8) 0.700
  HCQ 92 (38.5) 42 (41.6) 50 (36.2) 0.598
  SASP 21 (8.8) 9 (8.9) 12 (8.7) 0.949
  LEF 38 (15.9) 14 (13.8) 24 (17.4) 0.366
  TG 31 (13.0) 10 (9.9) 21 (15.2) 0.175
Current use of b/tsDMARDs 102 (42.7) 31 (30.7) 71 (51.4) <0.001
  ETN 10 (4.2) 2 (1.9) 8 (5.8) 0.125
  ADA 15 (6.3) 3 (2.9) 12 (8.7) 0.058
  TOC 22 (9.2) 2 (1.9) 20 (14.5) 0.001
  TOF 25 (10.5) 8 (7.9) 17 (12.3) 0.220
  BARI 31 (13.0) 16 (15.8) 15 (10.8) 0.330

Table 4

Comparison of clinical characteristics between RA patients with MTX monotherapy and combination therapy"

Items RA with current use of MTX (n=95) MTX monotherapy (n=18) Combination therapy (n=77) P
MTX starting dose/(mg/week) 10.0±2.9 12.1±2.2 9.8±3.0 0.176
MTX maximum dose/(mg/week) 15.0 (11.2, 18.8) 15.0 (15.0, 15.0) 12.5 (10.0, 15.0) 0.117
MTX current dose/(mg/week) 12.4±2.7 14.3±1.9 12.1±2.7 0.036
Swollen joint count 3.5±6.3 1.1±3.3 3.8±6.5 0.170
Tender joint count 4.8±8.3 3.1±8.3 5.0±8.4 0.269
Pain visual analog score (0-100) 34.6±30.0 24.3±33.6 35.1±30.0 0.540
Patient global score 43.3±29.3 27.1±31.9 45.1±28.7 0.069
CRP/(mg/L) 1.8±3.4 0.7±1.3 1.9±3.6 0.502
ESR/(mm/h) 21.8±17.5 17.6±8.9 21.8±16.2 0.996
DAS28-ESR 3.6±1.8 2.7±1.8 3.8±1.8 0.074
Low disease activity or remission 50 (52.6) 15 (81.8) 35 (45.5) 0.033

Table 5

Comparison of MTX use between difficult-to-treat RA and non-difficult-to-treat RA patients"

Items RA (n=239) D2T-RA (n=26) Non-D2T-RA (n=213) P
History of MTX 201 (84.1) 25 (96.2) 176 (82.6) 0.041
Current use of MTX 95 (39.7) 14 (53.8) 81 (38.0) 0.844
MTX starting dose/(mg/week) 9.5±3.0 (n=201) 10.5±4.1 (n=25) 9.4±2.7 (n=176) 0.450
MTX maximum dose/(mg/week) 15.0 (10.0, 15.0) (n=201) 12.5 (7.5, 17.5) (n=25) 15.0 (11.9, 18.1) (n=176) 0.761
MTX current dose/(mg/week) 12.4±2.7 (n=95) 11.6±3.2 (n=14) 12.5±2.6 (n=81) 0.482
1 Smolen JS , Landewé RBM , Bergstra SA , et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2023, 82 (1): 3- 18.
doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-223356
2 耿研, 谢希, 王昱, 等. 类风湿关节炎诊疗规范[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2022, 61 (1): 51- 59.
3 Yu C , Li M , Duan X , et al. Chinese registry of rheumatoid arthritis (CREDIT): Ⅰ. Introduction and prevalence of remission in Chinese patients with rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 2018, 36 (5): 836- 840.
4 Sun X , Li R , Cai Y , et al. Clinical remission of rheumatoid arthritis in a multicenter real-world study in Asia-Pacific region[J]. Lancet Reg Health West Pac, 2021, 15, 100240.
5 Sokka T , Kautiainen H , Toloza S , et al. QUEST-RA: Quantitative clinical assessment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis seen in standard rheumatology care in 15 countries[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2007, 66 (11): 1491- 1496.
doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.069252
6 田新平, 李梦涛, 曾小峰. 我国类风湿关节炎诊治现状与挑战: 来自中国类风湿关节炎2019年年度报告[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2021, 60 (7): 593- 598.
7 Aletaha D , Neogi T , Silman AJ , et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2010, 69 (9): 1580- 1588.
doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.138461
8 Nagy G , Roodenrijs NMT , Welsing PM , et al. EULAR definition of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2021, 80 (1): 31- 35.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217344
9 Kearsley-Fleet L , Davies R , de Cock D , et al. Biologic refractory disease in rheumatoid arthritis: Results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2018, 77 (10): 1405- 1412.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213378
10 Roodenrijs NMT , van der Goes MC , Welsing PMJ , et al. Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis: Contributing factors and burden of disease[J]. Rheumatology (Oxford), 2021, 60 (8): 3778- 3788.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa860
11 Valerio V , Kwok M , Loewen H , et al. Systematic review of recommendations on the use of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Clin Rheumatol, 2021, 40 (4): 1259- 1271.
doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05363-2
12 代丽怡, 赵金霞. 甲氨蝶呤单药治疗类风湿关节炎的再认识[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2022, 102 (37): 2909- 2913.
13 Wang W , Zhou H , Liu L . Side effects of methotrexate therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review[J]. Eur J Med Chem, 2018, 158, 502- 516.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.09.027
14 Friedman B , Cronstein B . Methotrexate mechanism in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Joint Bone Spine, 2019, 86 (3): 301- 307.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.07.004
15 Smolen JS , Aletaha D , McInnes IB . Rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Lancet, 2016, 388 (10055): 2023- 2038.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30173-8
16 Brown PM , Pratt AG , Isaacs JD . Mechanism of action of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis, and the search for biomarkers[J]. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 2016, 12 (12): 731- 742.
doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.175
17 Ling S , Bluett J , Barton A . Prediction of response to methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Expert Rev Clin Immunol, 2018, 14 (5): 419- 429.
doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2018.1465409
18 Gehringer CK , Martin GP , Hyrich K , et al. Developing and externally validating multinomial prediction models for methotrexate treatment outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Results from an international collaboration[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2024, 166, 111239.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.111239
19 Saevarsdottir S , Wedren S , Seddighzadeh M , et al. Patients with early rheumatoid arthritis who smoke are less likely to respond to treatment with methotrexate and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: Observations from the Epidemiological Investigation of Rheumatoid Arthritis and the Swedish Rheumatology Register cohorts[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 2011, 63 (1): 26- 36.
doi: 10.1002/art.27758
20 Sysojev AÖ , Saevarsdottir S , Diaz-Gallo LM , et al. Genome-wide investigation of persistence with methotrexate treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Rheumatology (Oxford), 2024, 63 (5): 1221- 1229.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead301
21 Palmowski A , Strehl C , Pfeiffenberger M , et al. Identification of gene expression biomarkers to predict clinical response to methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Clin Rheumatol, 2024, 43 (1): 511- 519.
doi: 10.1007/s10067-023-06814-2
22 Jenko B , Tomsic M , Jekic B , et al. Clinical pharmacogenetic models of treatment response to methotrexate monotherapy in slovenian and serbian rheumatoid arthritis patients: Differences in patient ' s management may preclude generalization of the models[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2018, 9, 20.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00020
23 Ally MM , Hodkinson B , Meyer PW , et al. Circulating anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies, cytokines and genotype as biomarkers of response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2015, 16, 130.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0587-1
[1] Peiwen JIA, Ying YANG, Yaowei ZOU, Zhiming OUYANG, Jianzi LIN, Jianda MA, Kuimin YANG, Lie DAI. Clinical characteristics of overlapping syndromes of low muscle mass in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and their impact on physical function [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(6): 1009-1016.
[2] Doudou MA, Zhemin LU, Qian GUO, Sha ZHU, Jin GU, Yan DING, Lianjie SHI. Successful treatment of rheumatoid arthritis complicated with myasthenia gravis with low-dose rituximab: A case report [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(6): 1110-1114.
[3] Rui YAN, Dan KE, Yan ZHANG, Li LI, Huanran SU, Wei CHEN, Mingxia SUN, Xiaomin LIU, Liang LUO. Diagnostic significance of serum chemokine CXCL-10 and Krebs von den lungen-6 level in patients with rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(6): 956-962.
[4] Liang ZHAO, Chenglong SHI, Ke MA, Jing ZHAO, Xiao WANG, Xiaoyan XING, Wanxing MO, Yirui LIAN, Chao GAO, Yuhui LI. Immunological characteristics of patients with anti-synthetase syndrome overlap with rheumatoid arthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(6): 972-979.
[5] Dongwu LIU, Jie CHEN, Mingli GAO, Jing YU. Rheumatoid arthritis with Castleman-like histopathology in lymph nodes: A case report [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(5): 928-931.
[6] Huina HUANG,Jing ZHAO,Xiangge ZHAO,Ziran BAI,Xia LI,Guan WANG. Regulatory effect of lactate on peripheral blood CD4+ T cell subsets in patients with rheumatoid arthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(3): 519-525.
[7] Xiaofei TANG,Yonghong LI,Qiuling DING,Zhuo SUN,Yang ZHANG,Yumei WANG,Meiyi TIAN,Jian LIU. Incidence and risk factors of deep vein thrombosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(2): 279-283.
[8] Xue ZOU,Xiao-juan BAI,Li-qing ZHANG. Effectiveness of tofacitinib combined with iguratimod in the treatment of difficult-to-treat moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(6): 1013-1021.
[9] Qi WU,Yue-ming CAI,Juan HE,Wen-di HUANG,Qing-wen WANG. Correlation between dyslipidemia and rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(6): 982-992.
[10] Jing-feng ZHANG,Yin-ji JIN,Hui WEI,Zhong-qiang YAO,Jin-xia ZHAO. Correlation analysis between body mass index and clinical characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(6): 993-999.
[11] Yin-ji JIN,Lin SUN,Jin-xia ZHAO,Xiang-yuan LIU. Significance of IgA isotype of anti-v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homologue B1 antibody in rheumatoid arthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(4): 631-635.
[12] Wen-xin CAI,Shi-cheng LI,Yi-ming LIU,Ru-yu LIANG,Jing LI,Jian-ping GUO,Fan-lei HU,Xiao-lin SUN,Chun LI,Xu LIU,Hua YE,Li-zong DENG,Ru LI,Zhan-guo LI. A cross-sectional study on the clinical phenotypes of rheumatoid arthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(6): 1068-1073.
[13] Fang CHENG,Shao-ying YANG,Xing-xing FANG,Xuan WANG,Fu-tao ZHAO. Role of the CCL28-CCR10 pathway in monocyte migration in rheumatoid arthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(6): 1074-1078.
[14] Rui LIU,Jin-xia ZHAO,Liang YAN. Clinical characteristics of patients with rheumatoid arthritis complicated with venous thrombosis of lower extremities [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(6): 1079-1085.
[15] Jing-feng ZHANG,Yin-ji JIN,Hui WEI,Zhong-qiang YAO,Jin-xia ZHAO. Cross-sectional study on quality of life and disease activity of rheumatoid arthritis patients [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(6): 1086-1093.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!