Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2024, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (6): 1075-1082. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.06.021

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Surgical management of the distal urethral stricture diseases

Jie WANG, Jianwei WANG, Haizhui XIA, Xiao XU, Jianpo ZHAI, Feng HE, Guanglin HUANG*(), Guizhong LI   

  1. Department of Urology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical Universitay, Beijing 100035, China
  • Received:2024-03-17 Online:2024-12-18 Published:2024-12-18
  • Contact: Guanglin HUANG E-mail:hgljiayou@163.com

RICH HTML

  

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the surgical methods for treating distal urethral stricture. Methods: The clinical data of 80 patients with distal urethral stricture in Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Captial Medical University between January 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively collected. Including male genital lichen sclerosus (MGLS) 33 cases, iatrogenic injury 25 cases, postoperative hypospadias 12 cases, and other causes such as trauma 10 cases. Among these cases, strictures involved the urethral meatus in 54 instances, of which 38 were treated with meatotomy (MO), 7 with penile skin flap urethroplasty (PSFU), and 9 with oral mucosa graft urethroplasty (OMGU). There were also 26 instances where strictures involved both the navicular fossa and meatus; one case underwent PSFU while 25 underwent OMGU. Based on different surgical methods used for treatment purposes we divided the patients into MO group, PSFU group and OMGU group. The age of the three groups was (48.8±20.0) years, (53.3±21.8) years and (44.5±16.4) years. The mean±SD body mass index (BMI) was (28.6±3.9) kg/m2, (29.6±3.2) kg/m2 and (29.2±4.8) kg/m2. The preoperative maximum flow rate was (5.8±2.3) mL/s, (6.8±2.4) mL/s and (5.7±3.1) mL/s. Results: All the operations were successfully completed without Clavien Ⅲ or Ⅳ complications. The median length of strictures (measured intraoperatively) in the three groups were 1.1 (1.0, 1.6), 1.5 (1.1, 2.0) and 4.0 (2.5, 5.0) cm. The median operation time was 60.0 (60.0, 75.0), 85.0 (75.0, 112.5) and 180.0 (75.0, 330.0) min. The median estimated blood loss was 5.0 (2.0, 10.0), 15.0 (5.0, 42.5) and 180.0 (135.0, 216.3) mL. The median postoperative hospital stay was 3.5 (2.0, 5.0), 6.5 (3.5, 7.0) and 7.5 (7.0, 11.3) days. The median follow-up duration was 40.0 (26.3, 57.3), 55.0 (18.8, 62.8) and 52.5 (30.5, 64.0) months. The median postoperative maximum flow rate was 18.3 (15.5, 19.8), 19.2 (16.1, 20.1) and 17.2 (14.2, 19.6) mL/s. Among the 38 patients with MO, 33 cases had normal urination without reintervention, and 5 cases experienced recurrent strictures and required regular urethral dilation. Among the 8 patients with PSFU, 7 cases had normal urination without reintervention, and one case developed a urinary fistula, for which intervention was recommended but the patient opted to maintain the status quo. Among the 34 patients with OMGU, 28 cases had normal urination without reintervention. There were 6 instances of stenosis recurrence, with 5 cases requiring regular urethral dilations and one case requiring reconstructive surgery. The overall success rate of operation was 85.0%, and the reintervention rate was 15.0%. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in etiologies among the three groups (P=0.002), as well as in stricture locations (P < 0.001), length of strictures (P < 0.001), operation time (P < 0.001), estimated blood loss (P < 0.001) and postoperative hospital stays (P < 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed in terms of age, BMI, history of previous urethral stricture surgeries, preoperative maximum flow rate, follow-up duration, postoperative maximum flow rate and reintervention rate. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses indicated that a history of previous urethral stricture surgeries was a risk factor for postoperative reintervention (P=0.026). Conclusion: MO and PSFU are primarily suitable for treating short-segment (≤1.5 cm) distal penile urethral strictures, whereas OMGU is more appropriate for longer segment strictures. MO and OMGU can both be utilized in managing MGLS cases. PSFU and OMGU are more conducive to improving the appearance of the urethral meatus. The success rate of surgical management of distal penile urethral stricture is 85.0%, 15.0% of the patients still require surgical intervention after surgery, and having history of previous urethral stricture surgeries is a risk factor for postoperative reintervention.

Key words: Urethral meatus, Navicular fossa, Penile skin flap, Oral mucosa, Urethroplasty

CLC Number: 

  • R697.1

Table 1

Demographic characteristics, perioperative parameters and follow-up data of patients"

Items MO (n=38) PSFU (n=8) OMGU (n=34) P value
Age/years, $\bar x \pm s$ 48.8±20.0 53.3±21.8 44.5±16.4 0.410
BMI/(kg/m2), $\bar x \pm s$ 28.6±3.9 29.6±3.2 29.2±4.8 0.751
Etiology, n (%) 0.002*
  MGLS 18 (47.4) 0 (0) 15 (44.1)
  Iatrogenic 15 (39.5) 4 (50.0) 6 (17.7)
  Hypospadias 1 (2.6) 1 (12.5) 10 (29.4)
  Others 4 (10.5) 3 (37.5) 3 (8.8)
Stricture locations, n (%) < 0.001*
  Pure meatus 38 (100) 7 (87.5) 9 (26.5)
  Navicular fossa and meatus 0 (0) 1 (12.5) 25 (73.5)
History of previous urethral stricture surgeriesa, n (%) 0.098
  Yes 16 (42.1) 2 (25.0) 21 (61.8)
  No 22 (57.9) 6 (75.0) 13 (38.2)
Preoperative cystostomy, n (%) 0.249
  Yes 8 (21.1) 3 (37.5) 13 (38.2)
  No 30 (78.9) 5 (62.5) 21 (61.8)
Preoperative urine culture, n (%) 0.935
  Positive 10 (26.3) 2 (25.0) 10 (29.4)
  Negative 28 (73.7) 6 (75.0) 24 (70.6)
Hypertension, n (%) 0.808
  Yes 11 (28.9) 2 (25.0) 7 (20.6)
  No 27 (71.1) 6 (75.0) 27 (79.4)
Diabetes, n (%) 0.215
  Yes 14 (36.8) 5 (62.5) 10 (29.4)
  No 24 (63.2) 3 (37.5) 24 (70.6)
Preoperative Qmax/(mL/s), $\bar x \pm s$ 5.8±2.3 6.8±2.4 5.7±3.1 0.544
Stricture length/cm, M (P25, P75) 1.1 (1.0, 1.6) 1.5 (1.1, 2.0) 4.0 (2.5, 5.0) < 0.001*
Operation time/min, M (P25, P75) 60.0 (60.0, 75.0) 85.0 (75.0, 112.5) 180.0 (75.0, 330.0) < 0.001*
Estimated blood loss/mL, M (P25, P75) 5.0 (2.0, 10.0) 15.0 (5.0, 42.5) 180.0 (135.0, 216.3) < 0.001*
Postoperative hospital stay/d, M (P25, P75) 3.5 (2.0, 5.0) 6.5 (3.5, 7.0) 7.5 (7.0, 11.3) < 0.001*
Follow-up duration/months, M (P25, P75) 40.0 (26.3, 57.3) 55.0 (18.8, 62.8) 52.5 (30.5, 64.0) 0.443
Postoperative Qmax/(mL/s), M (P25, P75) 18.3 (15.5, 19.8) 19.2 (16.1, 20.1) 17.2 (14.2, 19.6) 0.064
Reintervention, n (%) 5 (13.2) 1 (12.5) 6 (17.6) 0.898

Figure 1

Meatotomy of patient A, preoperative urethrography showed stricture of urethral meatus (red arrow); B, appearance of urethral meatus; C, a longitudinal incision was made ventral from the urethral meatus to the normal lumen; D, the urethral mucosa and penile skin were sutured intermittently, the new urethral meatus was like hypospadias."

Figure 2

Penile skin flap urethroplasty of patient A, appearance of urethral meatus; B, an "inverted Y-shaped" incision mark at the ventral side of the penis near the urethral meatus (yellow dotted line); C, the penile skin flap of "inverted V-shaped"; D, a longitudinal incision was made ventral from the urethral meatus to the normal lumen; E, F, the urethral mucosa and penile skin flap were sutured intermittently, and the urethral meatus was reconstructed by Y-V plasty; G, the glans was appropriately reshaped; H, 26# urethral probe can successfully enter the urethra."

Figure 3

Buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty of patient A, preoperative urethrography showed distal urethral stricture, involving the urethral meatus and navicular fossa; B, appearance of urethral meatus; C, annular incision of coronal groove skin, anterograde degloved penile skin, and a longitudinal incision was made ventral from the urethral meatus to the normal lumen (black suture was for temporary hemostasis); D, a piece of buccal mucosa was embedded into the dorsal graft bed of the urethra; E, cover the ventral urethra with another piece of buccal mucosa (the area between the two black dashed lines); F, a new urethral meatus was reconstructed."

Figure 4

Appearance after buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty of patient A, appearance of the buccal mucosa was rosy one week after operation; B, appearance at two weeks after operation, excessive secretions in the surgical area; C, appearance of the buccal mucosa two months after operation, mucosa healed well, and no secretions was observed."

Table 2

Univariate and multivariate Logistic analysis of postoperative reintervention"

ItemsUnivariate analysis Multivariate analysis
OR (95%CI) P value OR (95%CI) P value
Age/years 0.976 (0.942, 1.010) 0.167
BMI/(kg/m2) 0.967 (0.811, 1.153) 0.712
Etiology
  MGLS 1 0.578
  Iatrogenic 0.487 (0.086, 2.747) 0.415
  Hypospadias 1.867 (0.371, 9.399) 0.449
  Others 1.400 (0.227, 8.626) 0.717
Stricture locations 1.599 (0.455, 5.623) 0.465
History of previous urethral stricture surgeriesa 15.714 (1.918, 128.751) 0.010* 13.943 (1.365, 142.394) 0.026**
Preoperative cystostomy 1.200 (0.324, 4.442) 0.785
Preoperative urine culture 0.863 (0.210, 3.521) 0.833
Hypertension 1.000 (0.242, 4.126) 1.000
Diabetes 4.476 (1.213, 16.521) 0.024* 3.840 (0.882, 16.708) 0.073
Preoperative Qmax/(mL/s) 1.176 (0.922, 1.500) 0.191
Length of strictures/cm 1.241 (0.824, 1.869) 0.302
Operation time/min 1.008 (1.000, 1.017) 0.059* 0.999 (0.985, 1.014) 0.945
Estimated blood loss/mL 1.013 (1.000, 1.026) 0.046* 1.011 (0.991, 1.030) 0.287
Postoperative hospital stay/d 1.220 (1.030, 1.446) 0.022* 1.090 (0.839, 1.416) 0.519
Follow-up duration/months 1.012 (0.979, 1.047) 0.471
Postoperative Qmax/(mL/s) 0.753 (0.624, 0.908) 0.003*
1 Fenton AS , Morey AF , Aviles R , et al.Anterior urethral strictures: Etiology and characteristics[J].Urology,2005,65(6):1055-1058.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.12.018
2 Abbasi B , Shaw NM , Lui JL , et al.Comparative review of the guidelines for anterior urethral stricture[J].World J Urol,2022,40(8):1971-1980.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-03988-3
3 Meeks JJ , Barbagli G , Mehdiratta N , et al.Distal urethroplasty for isolated fossa navicularis and meatal strictures[J].BJU Int,2012,109(4):616-619.
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10248.x
4 Dielubanza EJ , Han JS , Gonzalez CM .Distal urethroplasty for fossa navicularis and meatal strictures[J].Transl Androl Urol,2014,3(2):163-169.
5 Vetterlein MW , Fisch MM , Zumstein V .Update on the management of penile and meatal strictures[J].Curr Opin Urol,2021,31(5):493-497.
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000910
6 黄晓东, 吕军, 张小明, 等.MGLSc并发阴茎头部尿道狭窄手术治疗的临床研究[J].中国男科学杂志,2014,(5):3-6.
7 Virasoro R , Eltahawy EA , Jordan GH .Long-term follow-up for reconstruction of strictures of the fossa navicularis with a single technique[J].BJU Int,2007,100(5):1143-1145.
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07078.x
8 冯超, 张炯, 谢弘, 等.带蒂岛状转位筋膜皮瓣治疗尿道外口及舟状窝狭窄的临床研究[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2019,40(6):408-411.
9 张楷乐, 傅强.尿道狭窄治疗中的误区[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2018,39(11):867-869.
10 赵亚伟, 刘园园, 马龙, 等.超声在尿道狭窄诊治中的诊断价值[J].中国超声医学杂志,2018,34(12):1126-1128.
11 张林琳.评估分析男性尿道狭窄的术前诊断手段: 尿道造影、超声尿道成像和磁共振尿道成像, 谁是诊断的金标准?[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2022,27(2):166.
12 Mikolaj F , Karolina M , Oliwia K , et al.Retrograde urethrography, sonouretrography and magnetic resonance urethrography in evaluation of male urethral strictures. Should the novel methods become the new standard in radiological diagnosis of urethral stricture disease?[J].Int Urol Nephrol,2021,53(12):2423-2435.
doi: 10.1007/s11255-021-02994-5
13 刘启宇, 李养群, 杨喆, 等.V形瓣法在尿道外口和阴茎头成形术中的应用[J].中华整形外科杂志,2016,32(1):49-51.
14 Campos-Juanatey F , Osman NI , Greenwell T , et al.European Association of Urology Guidelines on urethral stricture disease (Part 2): Diagnosis, perioperative management, and follow-up in males[J].Eur Urol,2021,80(2):201-212.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.05.032
15 张伟, 张志明, 焦点, 等.经尿道口腔黏膜尿道成形术修复尿道外口和舟状窝狭窄的安全性和疗效[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2023,44(8):581-585.
16 Daneshvar M , Simhan J , Blakely S , et al.Transurethral ventral buccal mucosa graft inlay for treatment of distal urethral strictures: International multi-institutional experience[J].World J Urol,2020,38(10):2601-2607.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-03061-6
[1] WANG Jian-wei,XU Xiao,BAO Zheng-qing,LIU Zhen-hua,HE Feng,HUANG Guang-lin,MAN Li-bo. Outcomes of partial pubectomy assisted anastomotic urethroplasty for male patients with pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(4): 798-802.
[2] Jian-wei WANG,Li-bo MAN,Xiao XU,Zhen-hua LIU,Feng HE,Guang-lin HUANG,Jian-po ZHAI,Ning ZHOU,Wei LI. Combined transperineal and transpubic urethroplasty for patients with complex male pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 646-650.
[3] Jian-wei WANG,Li-bo MAN,Guang-lin HUANG,Feng HE,Hai WANG,Hai-dong WANG,Xiao XU,Wei LI,Jian-po ZHAI,Zhen-hua LIU. Single-stage repair of penile urethral stricture using combined dorsal onlay oral mucosa grafting with ventral onlay penile skin flap [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(4): 641-645.
[4] WANG Jian-wei, MAN Li-bo, HUANG Guang-lin, WANG Hai, Xu Xiao, ZHU Xiao-fei, LI Wei, LIU Zhen-hua. “3-step” strategy of transperineal anastomotic urethroplasty for the simple pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect in male patients [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(4): 617-620.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!