Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2025, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (4): 698-703. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.04.011

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Risk assessment of perioperative adverse events and management of antiplatelet therapy in patients with bladder cancer and coronary atherosclerotic heart disease undergoing transurethral resection of bladder cancer

Qi MIAO, Baoan HONG, Xuezhou ZHANG, Zhipeng SUN, Wei WANG, Yuxuan WANG, Yuxuan BO, Jiahui ZHAO, Ning ZHANG*()   

  1. Department of Urology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China
  • Received:2025-02-28 Online:2025-08-18 Published:2025-08-02
  • Contact: Ning ZHANG
  • Supported by:
    Beijing Anzhen Hospital National Cardiovascular Disease Clinical Medical Research Center High Level Research Project(2024AZC3001)

RICH HTML

  

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the risk factors of adverse events during the perioperative period of transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) in bladder cancer patients with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease (CAD). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of bladder cancer patients who underwent TURBT in Beijing Anzhen Hospital from June 2022 to September 2024. All patients with bladder cancer and CAD underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for diagnosis and assessment of CAD before surgery. Based on the CCTA results, the patients with bladder cancer and CAD were divided into two groups: those with mild to moderate coronary stenosis and those with severe coronary stenosis. The severe coronary stenosis group was further divided into two subgroups based on whether they received low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) bridging therapy or continued their antiplatelet treatment before surgery. Perioperative anticoagulation and antiplatelet strategies were adjusted according to the opinions of the specialists. The incidence of adverse events within 30 days postoperatively was followed up and analyzed. Results: A total of 80 bladder cancer patients with CAD who underwent TURBT were included in the study. Among the 80 patients with CAD, 55 (68.8%) had mild to moderate coronary stenosis, and 25 (31.2%) had severe coronary stenosis. Compared with those had mild to moderate coronary stenosis, the patients who had severe coronary stenosis had a higher incidence of postoperative bleeding and pulmonary embolism, although the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). However, the incidence of postoperative myocardial infarction was significantly higher in the patients who had severe coronary stenosis (P=0.034). Among the patients with severe coronary stenosis, 8 (32.0%) received LMWH bridging therapy before TURBT, and 17 (68.0%) continued their previous antiplatelet treatment. Compared with those who continued antiplatelet treatment, the patients who received LMWH bridging therapy had a higher incidence of postoperative bleeding and pulmonary embo-lism, although the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). However, the incidence of postoperative myocardial infarction was significantly higher in the LMWH bridging group (P=0.032). Conclusion: Patients with mild-to-moderate coronary stenosis demonstrate relatively low perioperative risk during TURBT procedures and may safely undergo TURBT following antiplatelet therapy discontinuation. Conversely, those with severe coronary stenosis exhibit significantly higher perioperative risk and require intensive monitoring. In bladder cancer patients with concomitant severe coronary stenosis, perioperative LMWH bridging therapy is associated with increased myocardial infarction risk, whereas continued antiplatelet therapy does not elevate postoperative bleeding risk. Current evidence therefore supports maintaining antiplatelet therapy in these patients, with appropriate bleeding risk assessment.

Key words: Bladder cancer, Transurethral resection of bladder tumor, Coronary atherosclerotic heart disease (CAD), Antithrombotic drugs

CLC Number: 

  • R737.14

Table 1

Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics of patients with bladder cancer and CAD"

Characteristics Severe Mild to moderate P value
Total 25 (31) 55 (69)
Gender 0.062
    Male 25 (100) 48 (87.3)
    Female 0 (0) 7 (12.7)
Age/years 72.7±8.2 73.9±8.3 0.554
BMI/(kg/m2) 26.2±3.5 25.3±3.3 0.328
Hypertension 0.486
    No 5 (20) 15 (27.3)
    Yes 20 (80) 40 (72.7)
Diabetes 0.487
    No 12 (48) 31 (56.4)
    Yes 13 (52) 24 (43.6)
T classification at TURBT 0.520
    Ta 16 (64) 31 (56.4)
    T1 9 (36) 24 (43.6)
Tumor number 0.305
    Single 11 (44) 31 (56.4)
    Multiple 14 (56) 24 (43.6)
Tumor maximum diameter/cm 0.594
    ≤1 8 (32) 21 (38.2)
    >1 17 (68) 34 (61.8)

Table 2

Perioperative adverse events in patients with bladder cancer and CAD"

Adverse events Severe Mild to moderate P value
Total 25 (31) 55 (69)
Postoperative bleeding 0.136
    No 24 (96) 55 (100)
    Yes 1 (4) 0 (0)
Myocardial infarction 0.034
    No 23 (92) 55 (100)
    Yes 2 (8) 0 (0)
Pulmonary embolism 0.136
    No 24 (96) 55 (100)
    Yes 1 (4) 0 (0)

Table 3

Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics of patients with bladder cancer and severe coronary artery disease"

Characteristics LMWH bridging Anti-plate treatment P value
Total 8 17
Age/years 70.4±9.6 73.9±7.5 0.328
BMI/(kg/m2) 26.7±4.4 26.0±3.3 0.677
Hypertension 0.133
    No 3 (37.5) 2 (11.8)
    Yes 5 (62.5) 15 (88.2)
Diabetes 0.015
    No 1 (12.5) 11 (64.7)
    Yes 7 (87.5) 6 (35.3)
T classification at TURBT 0.058
    Ta 3 (37.5) 13 (76.5)
    T1 5 (62.5) 4 (23.5)
Tumor number 0.653
    Single 3 (37.5) 8 (47.1)
    Multiple 5 (62.5) 9 (52.9)
Tumor maximum diameter/ cm 0.686
    ≤1 3 (37.5) 5 (29.4)
    >1 5 (62.5) 12 (70.6)

Table 4

Perioperative adverse events in patients with bladder cancer and severe coronary artery disease"

Adverse events LMWH bridging Anti-plate treatment P value
Total 8 17
Postoperative bleeding 0.137
    No 7 (87.5) 17 (100)
    Yes 1 (12.5) 0 (0)
Myocardial infarction 0.032
    No 6 (75) 17 (100)
    Yes 2 (25) 0 (0)
Pulmonary embolism 0.137
    No 7 (87.5) 17 (100)
    Yes 1 (12.5) 0 (0)
1
Siegel RL , Giaquinto AN , Jemal A . Cancer statistics, 2024[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2024, 74 (1): 12- 49.
2
GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators . Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019:A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019[J]. Lancet, 2020, 396 (10258): 1204- 1222.
3
Avraham S , Abu-Sharki S , Shofti R , et al. Early cardiac remodeling promotes tumor growth and metastasis[J]. Circulation, 2020, 142 (7): 670- 683.
4
Koelwyn GJ , Newman AAC , Afonso MS , et al. Myocardial infarction accelerates breast cancer via innate immune reprogramming[J]. Nat Med, 2020, 26 (9): 1452- 1458.
5
Bell CF , Lei X , Haas A , et al. Risk of cancer after diagnosis of cardiovascular disease[J]. JACC CardioOncol, 2023, 5 (4): 431- 440.
6
Florido R , Daya NR , Ndumele CE , et al. Cardiovascular disease risk among cancer survivors: The atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2022, 80 (1): 22- 32.
7
Zhang S , Liu L , Shi S , et al. Bidirectional association between cardiovascular disease and lung cancer in a prospective cohort study[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2024, 19 (1): 80- 93.
8
Read WL , Tierney RM , Page NC , et al. Differential prognostic impact of comorbidity[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2004, 22 (15): 3099- 3103.
9
Huntley C , Torr B , Sud A , et al. Utility of polygenic risk scores in UK cancer screening: A modelling analysis[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2023, 24 (6): 658- 668.
10
Sturgeon KM , Deng L , Bluethmann SM , et al. A population-based study of cardiovascular disease mortality risk in US cancer patients[J]. Eur Heart J, 2019, 40 (48): 3889- 3897.
11
Smilowitz NR , Berger JS . Perioperative cardiovascular risk assessment and management for noncardiac surgery: A review[J]. JAMA, 2020, 324 (3): 279- 290.
12
Oh AR , Park J , Lee JH , et al. Association between perioperative adverse cardiac events and mortality during one-year follow-up after noncardiac surgery[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2022, 11 (8): e024325.
13
Meacham LR , Chow EJ , Ness KK , et al. Cardiovascular risk factors in adult survivors of pediatric cancer: A report from the childhood cancer survivor study[J]. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2010, 19 (1): 170- 181.
14
Battisti NML , Welch CA , Sweeting M , et al. Prevalence of cardiovascular disease in patients with potentially curable malignancies: A national registry dataset analysis[J]. JACC CardioOncol, 2022, 4 (2): 238- 253.
15
Hershman DL , Till C , Shen S , et al. Association of cardiovascular risk factors with cardiac events and survival outcomes among patients with breast cancer enrolled in SWOG clinical trials[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2018, 36 (26): 2710- 2717.
16
Carpeggiani C , Landi P , Michelassi C , et al. Stress echocardiography positivity predicts cancer death[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2017, 6 (12): e007104.
17
Sung H , Ferlay J , Siegel RL , et al. Global cancer statistics 2020:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71 (3): 209- 249.
18
Weiser TG , Haynes AB , Molina G , et al. Estimate of the global volume of surgery in 2012:An assessment supporting improved health outcomes[J]. Lancet, 2015, 385 (Suppl 2): S11.
19
Devereaux PJ , Mrkobrada M , Sessler DI , et al. Aspirin in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery[J]. N Engl J Med, 2014, 370 (16): 1494- 1503.
20
Graham MM , Sessler DI , Parlow JL , et al. Aspirin in patients with previous percutaneous coronary intervention undergoing noncardiac surgery[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2018, 168 (4): 237- 244.
21
Roffi M , Patrono C , Collet JP , et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)[J]. Eur Heart J, 2016, 37 (3): 267- 315.
22
Meng J , Liu W , Xiao Y , et al. The role of aspirin versus low-molecular-weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Int J Surg, 2023, 109 (11): 3648- 3655.
23
Schmitt VH , Hobohm L , Sivanathan V , et al. Diabetes mellitus and its impact on mortality rate and outcome in pulmonary embolism[J]. J Diabetes Investig, 2022, 13 (4): 725- 737.
24
Lutsey PL , Zakai NA . Epidemiology and prevention of venous thromboembolism[J]. Nat Rev Cardiol, 2023, 20 (4): 248- 262.
25
Khan F , Tritschler T , Kahn SR , et al. Venous thromboembolism[J]. Lancet, 2021, 398 (10294): 64- 77.
[1] Huan-rui LIU,Xiang PENG,Sen-lin LI,Xin GOU. Risk modeling based on HER-2 related genes for bladder cancer survival prognosis assessment [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(5): 793-801.
[2] Fei WANG,Cai-peng QIN,Yi-qing DU,Shi-jun LIU,Qing LI,Tao XU. Optimal surveillance intensity of cystoscopy in intermediate-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(4): 669-673.
[3] Min QIU,Chu-xiao XU,Bin-shuai WANG,Ye YAN,Shao-hui DENG,Chun-lei XIAO,Cheng LIU,Jian LU,Xiao-jun TIAN,Lu-lin MA. Analysis of self-control trial results of narrow band imaging and white light in transurethral resection of bladder tumor [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 697-700.
[4] Fei-long YANG,Kai HONG,Guo-jiang ZHAO,Cheng LIU,Yi-meng SONG,Lu-lin MA. Construction of prognostic model and identification of prognostic biomarkers based on the expression of long non-coding RNA in bladder cancer via bioinformatics [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(4): 615-622.
[5] SHEN Qi, HU Shuai, LI Jun, WANG Jing-Hua, HE Qun. Incidence and clinicopathological characteristics of incidental prostatic adenocarcinoma in radical cystoprostatectomy specimens [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2014, 46(4): 515-518.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!