Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2023, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (1): 156-159. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.01.024

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Radiographic diagnosis of distal fibula avulsion fractures: Comparison of ankle X-ray and three-dimensional reconstruction of CT

Shi-kai XIONG,Wei-li SHI,An-hong WANG,Xing XIE,Qin-wei GUO*()   

  1. Department of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital; Institute of Sports Medicine, Peking University; Beijing Key Laboratory of Joint Injuries in Sports Medicine; Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2021-06-04 Online:2023-02-18 Published:2023-01-31
  • Contact: Qin-wei GUO E-mail:guoqinwei@vip.sina.com
  • Supported by:
    the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFF0301100);the Clinical Key Project of Peking University Third Hospital(BYSY2018011)

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the difference in sensitivity between X-ray and three-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography (3D-CT) for the diagnosis of distal fibular avulsion fracture, and the radiographic presentation of the ossicle. Methods: From January to October 2018, 92 patients with distal fibular avulsion fracture were visited for surgical treatment in Department of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, and 60 cases were finally enrolled according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Intraoperative detection was regarded as the gold standard, and the diagnostic sensitivity of preoperative ankle X-ray and 3D-CT for the distal fibular avulsion fractures was statistically determined. The ossicle maximum diameter as well as the degree of its displacement were also measured. On 3D-CT, the distance from the ossicle center point to the anterior fibular tuberosity (a), the distance to the fibular tip (b), and the a/b value was used to present the ossicle displacement. Results: Among the 60 patients, 36 and the 52 patients were correctly detected by X-ray and 3D-CT, respectively, and the sensitivities was 60.0% and 86.7%, respectively (P=0.004). The mean diameter of the ossicle on X-ray and 3D-CT was (9.2±3.9) mm and (10.5±3.2) mm, respectively. The mean distance from the ossicle center to the anterior fibular tuberosity (a) was (17.5±3.6) mm and the mean distance to the fibular tip (b) was (17.4±4.8) mm, with mean a/b values of 1.1±0.7. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for each measurement ranged from 0.891-0.998 with a high degree of consistency. Conclusion: Compared with X-ray, 3D-CT has higher sensitivity in diagnosing distal fibular avulsion fractures, can help clinicians evaluate ossicle's location and choose surgical methods, and is recommended to be performed in patients with suspected distal fibula avulsion fractures in clinical practice.

Key words: Ankle joint, Avulsion fracture, Lateral ankle ligament, Imaging, three-dimensional

CLC Number: 

  • R683.42

Figure 1

The ossicle of distal fibula avulsion fractures (white arrow) and its diameter (white line)"

Figure 2

The bone fracture diameter (white line), the distance from the bone fracture to the fibular anterior tubercle (a, blue line) and to the fibular tip (b, orange line) in the 3D-CT A and B, preoperative 3D-CT images of the right ankle of a patients with an old avulsion fracture ossicle near the distal fibula. 3D-CT, three dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography."

Table 1

Demographic data of 60 patients with distal fibular avulsion fracture"

Parameter Data
Age/years, $\bar x \pm s$ 27.9±11.2
Gender, n (%)
  Male 27 (45.0)
  Female 33 (55.0)
Side, n (%)
  Left 27 (45.0)
  Right 33 (55.0)
BMI, $\bar x \pm s$ 23.8±4.3
Duration time/month, $\bar x \pm s$ 25.2±46.2

Table 2

Diameter and displacement degree of the ossicle measured by two observers"

Parameter Ossicle, $\bar x \pm s$ ICC value
X-ray diameter/mm, n=36 9.2±3.9 0.987
3D-CT diameter/mm, n=52 10.5±3.2 0.891
a value/mm, n=52 17.5±3.6 0.995
b value/mm, n=52 17.4±4.8 0.979
a/b value, n=52 1.1±0.7 0.998
1 Waterman BR , Owens BD , Davey S , et al. The epidemiology of ankle sprains in the United States[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2010, 92 (13): 2279- 2284.
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01537
2 Milgrom C , Shlamkovitch N , Finestone A , et al. Risk factors for lateral ankle sprain: A prospective study among military recruits[J]. Foot Ankle, 1991, 12 (1): 26- 30.
doi: 10.1177/107110079101200105
3 Bridgman SA , Clement D , Downing A , et al. Population based epidemiology of ankle sprains attending accident and emergency units in the West Midlands of England, and a survey of UK practice for severe ankle sprains[J]. Emerg Med J, 2003, 20 (6): 508- 510.
doi: 10.1136/emj.20.6.508
4 Cordova ML , Sefton JM , Hubbard TJ . Mechanical joint laxity associated with chronic ankle instability: A systematic review[J]. Sports Health, 2010, 2 (6): 452- 459.
doi: 10.1177/1941738110382392
5 Reiner MM , Sharpe JJ . The role of the accessory malleolar ossicles and malleolar avulsion fractures in lateral ankle ligament reconstruction[J]. Foot Ankle Spec, 2018, 11 (4): 308- 314.
doi: 10.1177/1938640017729498
6 Kim BS , Choi WJ , Kim YS , et al. The effect of an ossicle of the lateral malleolus on ligament reconstruction of chronic lateral ankle instability[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2010, 31 (3): 191- 196.
doi: 10.3113/FAI.2010.0191
7 Choi WJ , Lee JW , Han SH , et al. Chronic lateral ankle instability: The effect of intra-articular lesions on clinical outcome[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2008, 36 (11): 2167- 2172.
doi: 10.1177/0363546508319050
8 Chun TH , Park YS , Sung KS . The effect of ossicle resection in the lateral ligament repair for treatment of chronic lateral ankle instability[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2013, 34 (8): 1128- 1133.
doi: 10.1177/1071100713481457
9 Haraguchi N , Kato F , Hayashi H . New radiographic projections for avulsion fractures of the lateral malleolus[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1998, 80 (4): 684- 688.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.80B4.0800684
10 Boutis K , Narayanan UG , Dong FF , et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of clinically suspected Salter-Harris I fracture of the distal fibula[J]. Injury, 2010, 41 (8): 852- 856.
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.04.015
11 Nakasa T , Fukuhara K , Adachi N , et al. Evaluation of anterior talofibular ligament lesion using 3-dimensional computed tomography[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2006, 30 (3): 543- 547.
doi: 10.1097/00004728-200605000-00032
12 Allen GM , Wilson DJ , Bullock SA , et al. Extremity CT and ultrasound in the assessment of ankle injuries: Occult fractures and ligament injuries[J]. Br J Radiol, 2020, 93 (1105): 20180989.
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180989
13 Boszczyk A , Fudalej M , Kwapisz S , et al. X-ray features to predict ankle fracture mechanism[J]. Forensic Sci Int, 2018, 291, 185- 192.
doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.08.042
14 Han SH , Choi WJ , Kim S , et al. Ossicles associated with chronic pain around the malleoli of the ankle[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2008, 90 (8): 1049- 1054.
15 Vahvanen V , Westerlund M , Nikku R . Lateral ligament injury of the ankle in children. Follow-up results of primary surgical treatment[J]. Acta Orthop Scand, 1984, 55 (1): 21- 25.
doi: 10.3109/17453678408992305
16 Takakura Y , Yamaguchi S , Akagi R , et al. Diagnosis of avulsion fractures of the distal fibula after lateral ankle sprain in children: A diagnostic accuracy study comparing ultrasonography with radiography[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2020, 21 (1): 276.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03287-1
17 Davidson RS , Mistovich RJ . Operative indications and treatment for chronic symptomatic os subfibulare in children[J]. JBJS Essent Surg Tech, 2014, 4 (3): e18.
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.M.00065
18 Ahn HW , Lee KB . Comparison of the modified Broström procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability with and without subfibular ossicle[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2016, 44 (12): 3158- 3164.
19 Kim BS , Woo S , Kim JY , et al. Radiologic findings for prediction of rehabilitation outcomes in patients with chronic symptomatic os subfibulare[J]. Radiol Med, 2017, 122 (10): 766- 773.
doi: 10.1007/s11547-017-0786-y
20 Kubo M , Yasui Y , Sasahara J , et al. Simultaneous ossicle resection and lateral ligament repair give excellent clinical results with an early return to physical activity in pediatric and adolescent patients with chronic lateral ankle instability and os subfibulare[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2020, 28 (1): 298- 304.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05718-6
[1] HOU Zong-chen,AO Ying-fang,HU Yue-lin,JIAO Chen,GUO Qin-wei,HUANG Hong-shi,REN Shuang,ZHANG Si,XIE Xing,CHEN Lin-xin,ZHAO Feng,PI Yan-bin,LI Nan,JIANG Dong. Characteristics and related factors of plantar pressure in the chronic ankle instability individuals [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(2): 279-285.
[2] Dong JIANG,Yue-lin HU,Chen JIAO,Qin-wei GUO,Xing XIE,Lin-xin CHEN,Feng ZHAO,Yan-bin PI. Mid-to-long term outcomes and influence factors of postoperative concurrent chronic ankle instability and posterior ankle impingement [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(3): 505-509.
[3] WANG Rong-li, ZHOU Zhi-hao, XI Yu-cheng, WANG Qi-ning, WANG Ning-hua, HUANG Zhen. Preliminary study of robot-assisted ankle rehabilitation for children with cerebral palsy [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(2): 207-212.
[4] JI Hong-quan, ZHOU Fang, TIAN Yun, ZHANG Zhi-shan, GUO Yan, LV Yang, YANG Zhong-wei, HOU Guo-jin. One of the pitfalls in the surgical treatment of maisonneuve fractures: a case report [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(2): 354-356.
[5] GONG Xiao-feng, LYU Yan-wei, WANG Jin-hui, WANG Yan, WU Yong, WANG Man-yi. A correlation analysis of the ankle CT and ankle fracture classification [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(2): 281-285.
[6] WANG Zi-yun, WU Xin-bao. Anterior dislocation of the fibula resulting from surgical malreduction: a case report [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(2): 361-365.
[7] ZHANG Zi-an, WU Xin-bao, WANG Man-yi. A comparative research on the treatment of ankle fracture with dislocation between emergency surgery and selective surgery [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(5): 791-795.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2001, 33(1): 50 -53 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2002, 34(2): 140 -143 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(4): 476 -479 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2008, 40(2): 208 -210 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2008, 40(5): 459 -464 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(4): 434 -436 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2001, 33(3): 288 -289 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2002, 34(2): 97 -98 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2002, 34(2): 112 -116 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2011, 43(1): 29 -33 .