Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2024, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (6): 987-993. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.06.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Assessment of residual symptoms in patients with axial spondyloarthritis with low disease activity and analysis of its related factors

Jiayu ZHAI, Jinxia ZHAO, Zhuo AN, Rui LIU*()   

  1. Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2024-08-22 Online:2024-12-18 Published:2024-12-18
  • Contact: Rui LIU E-mail:maryllr@163.com

RICH HTML

  

Abstract:

Objective: To comprehensively assess the occurrence of residual symptoms in patients with axial spondyloarthritis who have successfully attained the treatment goal of low disease activity, and to conduct a thorough analysis of the related factors. Methods: An analysis was performed on axial spondyloarthritis patients who achieved low disease activity for the first time during their visits at the Rheumatology and Immunology Department of Peking University Third Hospital, spanning from May 1, 2021, to February 29, 2024. Based on the ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score-C-reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP), the patients who achieved low disease activity were divided into a non-remission low disease activity group and a remission group. The occurrence of residual fatigue and pain symptoms in both groups was assessed, and binary Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the related factors. Results: In the study, 201 patients achieved low disease activity during treatment. The gender distribution was skewed towards males, with 151 male patients (75.1%) and 50 female patients (24.9%). The median age of the patients who achieved low disease activity was 32.0 (28.0, 37.0) years, and the median disease duration was 6.7 (3.8, 11.5) years. Notably, 140 patients (69.7%) achieved low disease activity but did not experience complete remission, while 61 patients (30.3%) attained remission. A substantial proportion of the patients, 45.8%, reported residual fatigue visual analogue scale (VAS) ≥4, with a marked difference between the non-remission low disease activity group and the remission group (53.6% vs. 27.9%, P=0.001). Similarly, 24.4% of the patients had residual pain VAS ≥4, with a significant disparity between the non-remission low disease activity group and the remission group (30.0% vs. 11.5%, P=0.005). Binary Logistic regression analysis revealed that C-reactive protein levels had a notable negative influence on residual fatigue symptom (B=-0.142, P=0.008, OR=0.868), whereas ASAS-HI had a positive effect on residual fatigue (B=0.288, P < 0.001, OR=1.334). Gender was found to have a significant impact on residual pain symptoms, with females exhibiting a higher risk (B=1.135, P=0.002, OR=3.112). Conclusion: The residual fatigue and pain symptoms are common in axial spondyloarthritis patients who have achieved low disease activity, particularly among female patients. More assessment and recognition of the residual disease burden in these patients will be needed to optimize the treatment strategies.

Key words: Axial spondyloarthritis, Disease activity, Pain, Fatigue, Related factors

CLC Number: 

  • R593.2

Table 1

Comparison of clinical characteristics between patients achieving non-remission LDA and those achieving remission"

Items Total LDA (ASDAS-CRP<2.1) (n=201) Remission (ASDAS-CRP<1.3) (n=61) Non-remission LDA (1.3≤ASDAS-CRP<2.1) (n=140) Z/χ2 P
Male, n(%) 151 (75.1) 46 (75.4) 105 (75.0) 0.004 0.951
Age/years, M(P25, P75) 32.0 (28.0, 37.0) 30.0 (26.5, 36.0) 33.0 (28.3, 37.0) -1.708 0.088
Symptom duration/years, M(P25, P75) 6.7 (3.8, 11.5) 6.8 (3.8, 10.5) 6.5 (3.8, 11.9) -0.334 0.739
Higher educationa, n(%) 163 (81.1) 56 (91.8) 107 (76.4) 6.551 0.010
BMI≥24 kg/m2, n(%) 86 (42.8) 20 (32.8) 66 (47.1) 3.577 0.059
Positive HLA-B27, n(%) 169 (84.1) 50 (82.0) 119 (85.0) 0.292 0.589
History of EMMs, n(%)
  Uveitis 46 (22.9) 13 (21.3) 33 (23.6) 0.123 0.726
  IBD 3 (1.5) 1 (1.6) 2 (1.4) 0.013 0.910
  PsO 5 (2.5) 2 (3.3) 3 (2.1) 0.226 0.635
Smoking, n(%) 1.375 0.241
  Never 147 (73.1) 48 (78.7) 99 (70.7)
  Occasional 11 (5.5) 0 11 (7.9)
  Frequent 21 (10.4) 6 (9.8) 15 (10.7)
  Second hand 7 (3.5) 2 (3.3) 5 (3.6)
  Former 15 (7.5) 5 (8.2) 10 (7.1)
Medication use, n(%)
  NSAIDs 147 (73.1) 36 (59.0) 111 (79.3) 8.884 0.003
  csDMARDs 37 (18.4) 10 (16.4) 27 (19.3) 0.237 0.627
  TNF inhibitor 77 (38.3) 29 (47.5) 48 (34.3) 3.159 0.076
  IL-17 inhibitor 35 (17.4) 11 (18.0) 24 (17.1) 0.023 0.878
ASDAS, M(P25, P75) 1.5 (1.2, 1.8) 1.0 (0.7, 1.1) 1.7 (1.5, 1.9) -11.299 <0.001
BASDAI, M(P25, P75) 1.6 (1.0, 2.4) 1.0(0.5, 1.8) 2.0 (1.2, 2.6) -5.109 <0.001
BASFI, M(P25, P75) 0.6 (0.1, 1.2) 0.3 (0.0, 0.9) 0.8 (0.2, 1.3) -2.912 0.004
ASAS-HI, M(P25, P75) 2 (0, 4) 1 (0, 2) 2 (1, 4) -2.992 0.003
CRP/(mg/L),M(P25, P75) 2.9 (1.8, 6.1) 1.9 (1.2, 2.7) 4.9 (2.1, 7.0) -6.622 <0.001
Fatigue VAS≥4, n(%) 92 (45.8) 17 (27.9) 75 (53.6) 11.308 0.001
Pain VAS≥4, n(%) 49 (24.4) 7 (11.5) 42 (30.0) 7.909 0.005
ASAS-HI>5, n(%) 38 (18.9) 8 (13.1) 30 (21.4) 1.916 0.166

Table 2

Univariate analysis of residual fatigue symptom"

Items Fatigue VAS<4 (n=109) Fatigue VAS≥4 (n=92) Z/χ2 P
Sex, n(%) 7.062 0.008
Male 90 (82.6) 61 (66.3)
Female 19 (17.4) 31 (33.7)
Age/years, M(P25, P75) 33.0 (28.0, 37.0) 32.0 (27.0, 36.0) -1.064 0.287
Symptom duration/years, M(P25, P75) 7.0 (3.9, 11.4) 6.0 (3.8, 11.6) -0.651 0.515
History of EMMs, n(%)
Uveitis 20 (18.3) 26 (28.3) 2.778 0.096
IBD 2 (1.8) 1 (1.1) 0.190 0.663
PsO 2 (1.8) 3 (3.3) 0.418 0.518
Smoking, n(%) 1.749 0.782
Never 80 (73.4) 67 (72.8)
Occasional 5 (4.6) 6 (6.5)
Frequent 10 (9.2) 11 (12.0)
Secondhand 5(4.6) 2 (2.2)
Former 9 (8.3) 6 (6.5)
Medication use, n(%)
NSAIDs 79 (72.5) 68 (73.9) 0.052 0.819
csDMARDS 25 (22.9) 12 (13.0) 3.251 0.071
TNF inhibitor 40 (36.7) 37 (40.2) 0.262 0.609
IL-17 inhibitor 18 (16.5) 17 (18.5) 0.134 0.714
BASFI, M (P25, P75) 0.4 (0.0, 1.1) 0.7 (0.2, 1.5) -2.001 0.045
ASAS-HI, M (P25, P75) 1.0 (0.0, 3.0) 3.0 (1.0, 5.0) -4.981 0.000
CRP/(mg/L), M (P25, P75) 4.1 (1.9, 7.0) 2.3 (1.6, 5.0) -2.777 0.005

Table 3

Binary Logistic analysis of residual fatigue symptom"

Items B S.E. Wald P OR (95%CI)
Sex (Female) 0.581 0.371 2.450 0.118 1.787 (0.864-3.697)
CRP -0.142 0.053 7.070 0.008 0.868 (0.782-0.963)
BASFI 0.012 0.222 0.003 0.956 1.012 (0.655-1.566)
ASAS-HI 0.288 0.080 12.989 <0.001 1.334 (1.141-1.561)
Constant -0.425 0.340 1.564 0.211 0.654

Table 4

Univariate analysis of residual pain symptom"

Items Pain VAS<4 (n=152) Pain VAS≥4 (n=49) Z/χ2 P
Sex, n (%) 8.811 0.003
Male 122 (80.3) 29 (59.2)
Female 30 (19.7) 20 (40.8)
Age/years, M (P25, P75) 32.0 (28.0, 37.0) 32.0 (26.5, 37.0) -2.557 0.011
Symptom duration/years, M (P25, P75) 7.2 (4.0, 11.6) 4.5 (3.5, 10.0) -2.071 0.038
History of EMMs, n (%)
Uveitis 33 (21.7) 13 (26.5) 0.488 0.485
IBD 3 (2.0) 0 (0) 0.982 0.322
PsO 4 (2.6) 1 (2.0) 0.053 0.817
Smoking, n (%) 3.812 0.432
Never 110 (72.4) 37 (75.5)
Occasional 9 (5.9) 2 (4.1)
Frequent 18 (11.8) 3 (6.1)
Secondhand 6 (3.9) 1 (2.0)
Former 9 (5.9) 6 (12.2)
Medication use, n (%)
NSAIDs 109 (71.7) 38 (77.6) 0.643 0.423
csDMARDS 30 (19.7) 7 (14.3) 0.733 0.392
TNF inhibitor 59 (38.8) 18 (36.7) 0.068 0.794
IL-17 inhibitor 30 (19.7) 5 (10.2) 2.342 0.126
BASFI, M (P25, P75) 0.5 (0.1, 1.2) 0.7 (0.2, 1.3) -1.041 0.298
ASAS-HI, M (P25, P75) 1.0 (0.0, 3.0) 3.0 (0.5, 5.0) -0.527 0.598
CRP/(mg/L), M (P25, P75) 3.9 (1.8, 6.4) 2.3 (1.7, 5.7) -1.787 0.074

Table 5

Binary Logistic analysis of residual pain symptom"

Items B S.E. Wald P OR (95%CI)
Sex (Female) 1.135 0.372 9.314 0.002 3.112 (1.501-6.453)
Age -0.021 0.025 0.732 0.392 0.979 (0.933-1.027)
Symptom duration -0.031 0.035 0.795 0.373 0.969 (0.905-1.038)
Constant -0.519 0.711 0.534 0.465 0.595
1 Sieper J , Poddubnyy D . Axial spondyloarthritis[J]. Lancet, 2017, 390 (10089): 73- 84.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31591-4
2 Rudwaleit M , Landewé R , van der Heijde D , et al. The development of assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part Ⅰ): Classification of paper patients by expert opinion including uncertainty appraisal[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2009, 68 (6): 770- 776.
doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.108217
3 Rudwaleit M , van der Heijde D , Landewé R , et al. The Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society classification criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis and for spondyloarthritis in general[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2011, 70 (1): 25- 31.
doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.133645
4 Korotaeva T , Dina O , Holdsworth E , et al. Investigating diagnosis, treatment, and burden of disease in patients with ankylosing spondylitis in Central Eastern Europe and the United States: A real-world study[J]. Clin Rheum, 2021, 40 (12): 4915- 4926.
doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-05864-8
5 Liu V , Fong W , Kwan YH , et al. Residual disease burden in patients with axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis despite low disease activity states in a multiethnic Asian population[J]. J Rheum, 2021, 48 (5): 677- 684.
doi: 10.3899/jrheum.200934
6 Ramiro S , Nikiphorou E , Sepriano A , et al. ASAS-EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis: 2022 update[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2023, 82 (1): 19- 34.
doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-223296
7 Molto A , López-Medina C , Van den Bosch FE , et al. Efficacy of a tight-control and treat-to-target strategy in axial spondyloarthritis: Results of the open-label, pragmatic, cluster-randomised TICOSPA trial[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2021, 80 (11): 1436- 1444.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219585
8 Webers C , Boonen A , Vonkeman HE , et al. Factors associated with residual disease in axial spondyloarthrltls: Results from a clinical practice registry[J]. J Rheum, 2023, 50 (11): 1430- 1438.
doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2023-0194
9 D'Angelo S , Salvarani C , Marando F , et al. Residual disease in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: A post-hoc analysis of the QUASAR study[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11 (12): 3553.
doi: 10.3390/jcm11123553
10 Al Mohamad F , Rios Rodriguez V , Haibel H , et al. Association of nociplastic and neuropathic pain components with the presence of residual symptoms in patients with axial spondyloarthritis recei-ving biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs[J]. RMD Open, 2024, 10 (1): e004009.
doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-004009
11 Bolt JW , Aalbers CJ , Walet L , et al. Treatment decisions in axial spondyloarthritis daily clinical practice are more than treat-to-target[J]. Rheumatology, 2024, 63 (1): 34- 40.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead155
12 Qu X , Xu X , Jiang Q , et al. Clinical performance of the ASAS health index in chinese patients with ankylosing spondylitis and its influencing factors[J]. Clin Rheum, 2024, 43 (8): 2541- 2550.
doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-07045-9
13 Fitzgerald GE , Maguire S , Lopez-Medina C , et al. Tender to touch-Prevalence and impact of concomitant fibromyalgia and enthesitis in spondyloarthritis: An ancillary analysis of the ASAS PerSpA study[J]. Joint Bone Spine, 2022, 89 (6): 105420.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2022.105420
14 Provan SA , Dean LE , Jones GT , et al. The changing states of fibromyalgia in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: Results from the British Society of Rheumatology Biologics Register for Ankylosing Spondylitis[J]. Rheumatology, 2021, 60 (9): 4121- 4129.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa888
15 Son SM , Kim DS , Lee JS . Fibromyalgia in axial spondyloarthritis: A meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Rheum, 2022, 28 (1): e222- e227.
doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000001612
16 Chimenti MS , Alten R , D'Agostino MA , et al. Sex-associated and gender-associated differences in the diagnosis and management of axial spondyloarthritis: Addressing the unmet needs of female patients[J]. RMD Open, 2021, 7 (3): e001681.
doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001681
17 Rusman T , van Bentum RE , van der Horst-Bruinsma IE . Sex and gender differences in axial spondyloarthritis: Myths and truths[J]. Rheumatology, 2020, 59 (Suppl 4): iv38- iv46.
18 Vogel K , Muhammad LN , Song J , et al. Sex differences in pain and quantitative sensory testing in patients with rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Arthritis Care Res, 2023, 75 (12): 2472- 2480.
doi: 10.1002/acr.25178
19 Mogil JS . Qualitative sex differences in pain processing: Emerging evidence of a biased literature[J]. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2020, 21 (7): 353- 365.
doi: 10.1038/s41583-020-0310-6
20 Dougados M , Taylor PC , Bingham CO 3rd , et al. The effect of tofacitinib on residual pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis[J]. RMD Open, 2022, 8 (2): e002478.
doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002478
[1] Meijuan LONG, Yidan WANG, Shiya WU, Zihao LI, Yanting LI, Yang LI, Juan JIAO. Effects of overweight and obesity on symptoms, overall condition and quality of life in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(6): 1001-1008.
[2] Hongyan WANG, Xinming LI, Kechi FANG, Huaqun ZHU, Rulin JIA, Jing WANG. Analysis of characteristics related to the disease activity of systemic lupus erythematosus and construction of an evaluation model [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(6): 1017-1022.
[3] Hanwei KE, Qi WANG, Kexin XU. Optimization study of an animal model for interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome based on the dose effect of cyclophosphamide [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(5): 908-912.
[4] Hailong HE,Qing LI,Tao XU,Xiaowei ZHANG. Construction of a predictive model for postoperative pain relief after microscopic spermatic cord surgery for spermatic cord pain [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(4): 646-655.
[5] Limin REN,Chuchu ZHAO,Yi ZHAO,Huiqiong ZHOU,Liyun ZHANG,Youlian WANG,Lingxun SHEN,Wenqiang FAN,Yang LI,Xiaomei LI,Jibo WANG,Yongjing CHENG,Jiajing PENG,Xiaozhen ZHAO,Miao SHAO,Ru Li. Low disease activity and remission status of systemic lupus erythematosus in a real-world study [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(2): 273-278.
[6] Silan AN,Qunyi ZHENG,Kai WANG,Shan GAO. Characteristics and influencing factors of early pain in patients after total knee arthroplasty [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(1): 167-173.
[7] Jing-feng ZHANG,Yin-ji JIN,Hui WEI,Zhong-qiang YAO,Jin-xia ZHAO. Correlation analysis between body mass index and clinical characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(6): 993-999.
[8] Hui-li LIU,Yan-han LV,Xiao-xiao WANG,Min LI. Factors influencing the chronic post-surgical pain after laparoscopic surgery for elderly patients with urinary tract tumors [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(5): 851-856.
[9] Ci TIAN,Yi BAI,Qing-bian MA,Hong-xia GE. Clinical characteristics of 7 cases of hepatic portal venous gas [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(4): 743-747.
[10] Jing-feng ZHANG,Yin-ji JIN,Hui WEI,Zhong-qiang YAO,Jin-xia ZHAO. Cross-sectional study on quality of life and disease activity of rheumatoid arthritis patients [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(6): 1086-1093.
[11] Zhan-peng SHANG,Yang YI,Rong YU,Jing-jing FAN,Yu-xi HUANG,Xue QIAO,Min YE. Bioactive compounds of Jingfang Granules against SARS-CoV-2 virus proteases 3CLpro and PLpro [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(5): 907-919.
[12] Lin ZHU,Wei-yu ZHANG,Ke-xin XU. Urodynamic and histological evaluation of cyclophosphamide-induced bladder pain syndrome in SD rats [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(4): 735-740.
[13] Jing-xian ZHU,Sheng-nan LU,Yan-fang JIANG,Ling JIANG,Jian-quan WANG. Influencing factors of preoperative pulmonary function in elderly patients undergoing rotator cuff surgery [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 902-906.
[14] Jian-mei ZOU,Li-jun WU,Cai-nan LUO,Ya-mei SHI,Xue WU. Relationship of serum 25- hydroxy vitamin D and systemic lupus erythematosus [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 938-941.
[15] Peng ZHANG,Bo JIA,Xiao-kun CHEN,Yu WANG,Wei HUANG,Ren-jie LAI,Zhi-wei WANG,Jian XIONG,Tian-bing WANG. Effects of ulnar styloid and sigmoid notch fractures on postoperative wrist function of patients with distal radius fracture [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(3): 578-581.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!