Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2025, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (6): 1018-1023. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.06.002

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Rheumatic disease spectrum and immunological profile of anti-PM/Scl antibodies in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Yirui LIAN1, Jingxuan LIU2, Liang ZHAO1, Jing ZHAO1, Sitian ZANG1, Yuhui LI1,2,*()   

  1. 1. Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking University People' s Hospital, Beijing 1000444, China
    2. Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking University People' s Hospital Qingdao Hospital, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, China
  • Received:2025-08-30 Online:2025-12-18 Published:2025-10-21
  • Contact: Yuhui LI

RICH HTML

  

Abstract:

Objective: To systematically investigate the rheumatic disease spectrum associated with anti-PM/Scl antibodies and to clarify their clinical significance in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). Methods: Patients who were tested positive for anti-PM/Scl antibodies by immunoblotting at Peking University People' s Hospital from January 2016 to December 2024 were enrolled. Clinical and immunolo gical data were systematically collected and compared across the subgroups defined by anti-PM/Scl75, anti-PM/Scl100, or dual antibody positivity. Results: A total of 422 anti-PM/Scl-positive patients were enrolled. Among them, 83.2% (351/422) were diagnosed with connective tissue disease (CTD), 7.8% (33/422) were not diagnosed with CTD, and 9.0% (38/422) had an undetermined clinical diagnosis. Among 422 patients, most commonly represented by IIM (19.7%), systemic sclerosis (SSc, 14.2%), overlap syndrome (11.8%), undifferentiated CTD (UCTD, 10.4%), rheumatoid arthritis (6.9%), Sjögren syndrome (6.4%), and systemic lupus erythematosus (6.2%), the remaining diseases accounting for 24.4%. Within the IIM subgroup, dermatomyositis predominated (74.7%), followed next by anti-synthetase syndrome (21.7%) and immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (3.6%). Anti-PM/Scl75 antibodies were detected in 52.1% (220/422) of the total patients, anti-PM/Scl100 in 43.6% (184/422), and both in 4.3% (18/422). In the subsequent detailed analysis of the anti-PM/ Scl-positive subgroup, double-positive patients showed a significantly higher prevalence of SSc (38.9% vs. 14.1% vs. 12.0%, P=0.015) and interstitial lung disease (ILD, 70.6% vs. 28.8% vs. 35.4%, P=0.002) than those individuals with single antibody positivity alone. Raynaud phenomenon was observed more frequently in both the double-positive and anti-PM/Scl75-positive groups than in the anti-PM/Scl100-positive group (29.4% vs. 21.3% vs. 10.9%, P=0.007). The measured proportion of peri-pheral CD8+ T cells was also higher in double-positive patients (35.9%±14.1% vs. 30.4%±11.2% vs. 26.5%±9.7%, P= 0.008), whereas absolute regulatory T-cell levels were lower in the anti-PM/Scl75-positive group compared directly with the anti-PM/Scl100-positive group [7.6% (5.4%, 10.9%) vs. 9.0% (7.9%, 12.0%) vs. 8.8% (5.2%, 9.7%), P=0.017]. Additionally, co-positivity for anti-PM/Scl and other myositis- specific or myositis-associated antibodies was strongly associated with an increased frequency of ILD (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Anti-PM/Scl antibodies define a broad disease spectrum encompassing IIM, SSc, overlap syndromes, and UCTD. Dual positivity for anti-PM/Scl75 and anti-PM/Scl100 identifies patients prone to systemic sclerosis and pulmonary involvement, suggesting additive pathogenic effects of the two antibody specificities.

Key words: Anti-PM/Scl antibody, Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy, Connective tissue disease, CD8+ T cells

CLC Number: 

  • R593.2

Table 1

Clinical and immunological characteristics of anti-PM/Scl antibody subgroups"

Variables Anti-PM/Scl75 (+), n(%) Anti-PM/Scl100 (+), n(%) Anti-PM/Scl75/100 (+), n(%) P value
Female 181 (82.3) 138 (75.0) 16 (88.9) 0.134c
DM 29 (13.2) 27 (14.7) 6 (33.3) 0.077c
IMNM 3 (1.4) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0.346c
ASyS 8 (3.6) 10 (5.4) 0 (0) 0.560c
SSc 31 (14.1)a 22 (12.0)a 7 (38.9)b 0.015c
Gottron sign 27/212 (12.7) 25/174 (14.4) 5/17 (29.4) 0.159c
Heliotrope rash 17/211 (8.1) 19/174 (10.9) 0 (0) 0.377c
Mechanic’s hands 25/211 (11.8)a 17/174 (9.8)a 6/17 (35.3)b 0.018c
Muscle weakness 38/211 (18.0) 30/174 (17.2) 5/17 (29.4) 0.425c
Myalgia 49/209 (23.4) 42/171 (24.6) 5/17 (29.4) 0.787c
Raynaud phenomenon 45/211 (21.3)b 19/174 (10.9)a 5/17 (29.4)b 0.007c
ILD 61/212 (28.8)a 62/175 (35.4)a 12/17 (70.6)b 0.002c
Arthritis 98/211 (46.4) 88/173 (50.9) 10/17 (58.8) 0.487
Elevated CK 41/200 (20.5) 29/154 (18.8) 1/16 (6.3) 0.461c
ANA(+) 135/202 (66.8) 107/174 (61.5) 11/16 (68.8) 0.539
Anti-Jo-1(+) 10 (4.5) 6 (3.3) 0 (0) 0.810c
Anti-PL7(+) 7 (3.2) 2 (1.1) 0 (0) 0.382c
Anti-PL12(+) 6 (2.7) 6 (3.3) 0 (0) 0.869c
Anti-Mi-2(+) 8 (3.6) 9 (4.9) 1 (5.6) 0.620c
Anti-MDA5(+) 5 (2.3) 1 (0.5) 0 (0) 0.405c
Anti-TIF1γ(+) 1 (0.5) 2 (1.1) 0 (0) 0.644c
Anti-NXP2(+) 2 (0.9) 1 (0.5) 0 (0) >0.999c
Anti-SAE(+) 1 (0.5) 0 (0) 0 (0) >0.999c
Anti-SRP(+) 6 (2.7) 3 (1.6) 0 (0) 0.676c
Anti-HMGCR(+) 1 (0.5) 0 (0) 0 (0) >0.999c
Anti-Scl70(+) 9 (4.1) 3 (1.6) 0 (0) 0.344c
Anti-U1RNP(+) 12 (5.5) 5 (2.7) 0 (0) 0.337c
Anti-Ro52(+) 39/194 (20.1) 20/161 (12.4) 2/14 (14.3) 0.147c

Table 2

Comparison of immunological characteristics of anti-PM/Scl antibody subgroups"

Variables Anti-PM/Scl 75(+) (n=220) Anti-PM/Scl 100(+) (n=184) Anti-PM/Scl 75/100(+) (n=18) P value
Lymphocyte T/μL 1 064.0 (743.0, 1 389.0) 1 070.0 (694.0, 1 350.5) 808.0 (730.5, 1 762.3) 0.885
CD3+total T/% 73.3 (66.2, 82.0)b 68.9 (60.1, 74.5)a 78.9 (68.4, 84.2)a, b 0.001
CD4+ helper T/μL 556.0 (357.0, 759.0) 528.0 (374.3, 824.5) 445.0 (295.0, 946.7) 0.899
CD4+helper T/% 40.0±11.6 37.6±10.0 39.2±11.9 0.346
CD8+cytotoxic T /μL 404.8 (235.5, 571.3) 360.7 (195.0, 525.4) 490.0 (289.0, 743.6) 0.396
CD8+cytotoxic T/% 30.4±11.2b 26.5±9.7a 35.9±14.1b 0.008
CD19+B /μL 162.0 (74.0, 300.0) 196.4 (94.2,363.0) 149.0 (93.4,230.5) 0.378
CD19+B /% 11.5 (6.3, 15.6) 13.6 (8.1, 22.6) 11.0 (5.4, 15.8) 0.123
CD56+CD16+NK /μL 117.0 (65.0, 266.0) 197.0 (87.5, 297.0) 138.0 (84.9, 224.5) 0.099
CD56+CD16+NK/% 10.2 (4.6, 15.3) 13.0 (7.9, 19.1) 11.4 (4.8, 16.1) 0.062
pTfh/% 2.1 (1.4,3.1) 3.1 (1.7,4.0) 2.0 (1.0,3.1) 0.078
Treg/% 7.6 (5.4, 10.9)a 9.0 (7.9, 12.0)b 8.8 (5.2, 9.7)a, b 0.017

Table 3

Clinical and immunological features of anti-PM/Scl-positive patients with or without additional MAAs/MSAs"

Variables Anti-PM/Scl(+) (n=348) Anti-PM/Scl with MAAs/MSAs(+) (n=74) P value
Female 276 (79.3%) 59 (79.7%) 0.539
Age of onset/years 51.1±15.9 48.9±17.5 0.296
Mechanic’s hands 33/332 (9.9%) 15/70 (21.4%) 0.009
Gottron sign 36/332 (10.8%) 21/71 (29.6%) <0.001
Shawl sign 13/329 (4.0%) 14/71 (19.7%) <0.001a
V-sign 18/329 (5.5%) 15/71 (21.1%) <0.001
Skin ulceration 19/327 (5.8%) 8/71 (11.3%) 0.086a
Myalgia 73/326 (22.4%) 23/71 (32.4%) 0.054
Muscle weakness 52/331 (15.7%) 21/71 (29.6%) 0.007
Pruritus 14/329 (4.3%) 11/71 (15.5%) 0.001a
Skin hypercalcemia 4/329 (1.2%) 1/71 (1.4%) 0.626a
Arthritis 161/331 (48.6%) 35/70 (50.0%) 0.470
Raynaud phenomenon 60/332 (18.1%) 9/70 (12.9%) 0.192
ILD 104/333 (31.2%) 31/71 (43.7%) 0.032
Elevated CK 54/304 (17.8%) 17/66 (25.8%) 0.095
CD3+total T/% 70.8±12.2 69.7±14.7 0.647
CD4+helper T/% 38.9±10.9 39.4±11.8 0.798
CD8+cytotoxic T/% 27.4 (21.7,36.4) 27.4 (18.2,37.4) 0.652
CD19+B /% 11.9 (6.8,17.4) 12.1 (9.0,20.5) 0.552
CD56+CD16+NK/% 11.5 (6.2,16.7) 9.1 (2.9,18.5) 0.181
Treg/% 8.5 (6.8,10.9) 7.2 (5.1,9.4) 0.114
pTfh/% 2.3 (1.5,3.5) 2.0 (1.3, 4.9) 0.663
1
Brouwer R , Vree Egberts WTM , Hengstman GJD , et al. Autoantibodies directed to novel components of the PM/Scl complex, the human exosome[J]. Arthritis Res, 2002, 4(2): 134- 138.
2
Zhu L , Zong C , Chen Y , et al. Clinical characteristics of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies patients with anti-PM/Scl antibo-dies[J]. Semin Arthritis Rheum, 2024, 68, 152536.

doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152536
3
Liu Y , Zheng Y , Hao H , et al. Narrative review of autoantibodies in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2023, 11(7): 291.

doi: 10.21037/atm-21-475
4
Muro Y , Hosono Y , Sugiura K , et al. Anti-PM/Scl antibodies are found in Japanese patients with various systemic autoimmune conditions besides myositis and scleroderma[J]. Arthritis Res Ther, 2015, 17(1): 57.

doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0573-x
5
McHugh NJ , Tansley SL . Autoantibodies in myositis[J]. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 2018, 14(5): 290- 302.

doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2018.56
6
Cavazzana I , Vojinovic T , Airo' P , et al. Systemic sclerosis-specific antibodies: Novel and classical biomarkers[J]. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol, 2023, 64(3): 412- 430.
7
Wodkowski M , Hudson M , Proudman S , et al. Clinical correlates of monospecific anti-PM75 and anti-PM100 antibodies in a tri-nation cohort of 1 574 systemic sclerosis subjects[J]. Autoimmunity, 2015, 48(8): 542- 551.

doi: 10.3109/08916934.2015.1077231
8
Musai J , Mammen AL , Pinal-Fernandez I . Recent updates on the pathogenesis of inflammatory myopathies[J]. Curr Rheumatol Rep, 2024, 26(12): 421- 430.

doi: 10.1007/s11926-024-01164-7
9
Ogawa-Momohara M , Muro Y . Myositis-specific and myositis-associated autoantibodies: Their clinical characteristics and potential pathogenic roles[J]. Immunol Med, 2025, 48(2): 104- 116.

doi: 10.1080/25785826.2024.2413604
10
Damoiseaux J , Vulsteke JB , Tseng CW , et al. Autoantibodies in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: Clinical associations and laboratory evaluation by mono- and multispecific immunoassays[J]. Autoimmun Rev, 2019, 18(3): 293- 305.

doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2018.10.004
11
Parker MJS , Oldroyd A , Roberts ME , et al. The performance of the European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology idiopathic inflammatory myopathies classification criteria in an expert-defined 10 year incident cohort[J]. Rheumatology, 2019, 58(3): 468- 475.

doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key343
12
van den Hoogen F , Khanna D , Fransen J , et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: An American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism Collaborative Initiative[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2013, 72(11): 1747- 1755.

doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204424
13
Wielosz E , Dryglewska M , Majdan M . The prevalence and significance of anti-PM/Scl antibodies in systemic sclerosis[J]. Ann Agric Environ Med, 2021, 28(1): 189- 192.
14
Leurs A , Dubucquoi S , Machuron F , et al. Extended myositis-specific and-associated antibodies profile in systemic sclerosis: A cross-sectional study[J]. Joint Bone Spine, 2021, 88(1): 105048.

doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2020.06.021
15
Lazzaroni MG , Marasco E , Campochiaro C , et al. The clinical phenotype of systemic sclerosis patients with anti-PM/Scl antibo-dies: Results from the EUSTAR cohort[J]. Rheumatology, 2021, 60(11): 5028- 5041.

doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab152
16
do Amaral Barbosa R , Shinjo SK . Patients with anti-PM/Scl-positive and idiopathic inflammatory myopathy resemble anti-synthetase syndrome[J]. Adv Rheumatol, 2025, 65(1): 9.

doi: 10.1186/s42358-025-00441-y
17
Nimmerjahn F , Ravetch JV . Fcgamma receptors as regulators of immune responses[J]. Nat Rev Immunol, 2008, 8(1): 34- 47.

doi: 10.1038/nri2206
18
Tsuji H. Pathogenesis and treatment of interstitial lung disease accompanied by anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5-positive idiopathic inflammatory myopathies[J/OL]. Intern Med, 2025, 8(2025-08-28)[2025-08-29]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40866269.
19
Truchetet ME , Brembilla NC , Chizzolini C . Current concepts on the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis[J]. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol, 2023, 64(3): 262- 283.
20
Ghobadinezhad F , Ebrahimi N , Mozaffari F , et al. The emerging role of regulatory cell-based therapy in autoimmune disease[J]. Front Immunol, 2022, 13, 1075813.

doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1075813
[1] Jingwen LAN, Zhe CHEN, Yongjing CHENG, Like ZHAO. Clinical characteristics, efficacy and safety of antifibrotic agents in elderly patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2025, 57(6): 1101-1106.
[2] Jia-chen LI,Zhan-hong LAI,Miao SHAO,Yue-bo JIN,Xiao-juan GAO,Ke ZHANG,Jing HOU,Yan-ying ZHANG,Zhan-guo LI,Yu-hui LI. Significance of anti-Jo-1 antibody's clinical stratification in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy and disease spectrum [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(6): 958-965.
[3] Fang-ning YOU,Liang LUO,Xiang-jun LIU,Xue-wu ZHANG,Chun LI. Analysis of pregnancy outcomes, disease progression, and risk factors in patients with undifferentiated connective tissue disease [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(6): 1045-1052.
[4] YI Wen-xia,WEI Cui-jie,WU Ye,BAO Xin-hua,XIONG Hui,CHANG Xing-zhi. Long-term rituximab treatment of refractory idiopathic inflammatory myopathy: A report of 3 cases [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(6): 1191-1195.
[5] XIAO Yun-shu,ZHU Feng-yun-zhi,LUO Lan,XING Xiao-yan,LI Yu-hui,ZHANG Xue-wu,SHEN Dan-hua. Clinical and immunological characteristics of 88 cases of overlap myositis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(6): 1088-1093.
[6] Shi-xiong WEI,Shu-jia LI,Yi LIU. Clinical characteristics and biological treatment of adult patient with juvenile idiopathic arthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(6): 1014-1022.
[7] Hai-hong YAO,Yi-ni WANG,Xia ZHANG,Jin-xia ZHAO,Yuan JIA,Zhao WANG,Zhan-guo LI. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of macrophage activation syndrome in adults: A case series of 67 patients [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(6): 996-1002.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!