Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) ›› 2019, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (4): 660-664. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.04.011

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Treatment of crossing vessels in laparoscopic pyeloplasty

Hai-yue ZHAO,Xiong-jun YE(),Wei-nan CHEN,Li-zhe AN,Jun LIU,Liu-lin XIONG,Xiao-bo HUANG   

  1. Department of Urology and Lithotripsy Center, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
  • Received:2019-04-09 Online:2019-08-18 Published:2019-09-03
  • Contact: Xiong-jun YE E-mail:urologye@sina.com

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the management of crossing vessels compression in laparoscopic pyeloplasty.Methods: From January 2016 to June 2018, a total of 21 patients who were admitted to Peking University People’s Hospital with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) associated with crossing vascular compression were reviewed. There were 15 males and 6 females who formed this group, with a mean age of (33.9±15.0) years. There were 4 cases of mild hydronephrosis, 12 cases of moderate hydronephrosis and 5 cases of severe hydronephrosis before operation. All the patients underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty in our hospital, including 13 on the left and 8 on the right. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty (Anderson-Hynes) were performed in all the patients. Hem-o-lok suspension (14 cases in the suspension group) or translocation of the crossing vessels (7 cases in the translocation group) were used for the intraoperative management of the crossing vessels. Double J tubes were removed 8 weeks postoperatively. The patient demographic data were collected (including operation time, treatment time of crossing vessels, intraoperative blood loss, time of drainage tube removal after operation, and average length of hospital stay), postoperative outcomes were evaluated and the patients were followed up regularly.Results: In all the patients, the crossing vessels were successfully reserved, and none of them were ligated intra-operatively. Mean operative times were (202.2±57.0) min. The duration of intraoperative treatment of crossing vessels was (10.5±3.2) min, (6.1±2.0) min in the suspension group, and (13.7±5.2) min in the translocation group, respectively. Intraoperative blood loss was (47.8±25.6) mL, postope-rative drainage time was (4.8±2.6) d, and length of hospital stay was (11.5±3.3) d. Postoperative slight urinary leakage occurred in 1 case. Preoperative pyelectasis of the affected side of all the patients was (3.4±1.7) cm, compared with postoperative pyelectasis of (1.9±1.3) cm. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Postoperative follow-up of all the patients was carried out until December 2018. There was no significant difference in kidney size in all the patients before or after the operations, and hydronephrosis was alleviated compared with that before surgery.Conclusion: For UPJO patients with crossing vascular compression, according to the location of the crossing vessels, Hem-o-lok suspension or vessel transposition can be adopted to relieve the crossing vascular compression and improve the success rate of the surgery.

Key words: Laparoscopy, Pyeloplasty, Crossing vascular suspension, Crossing vascular transposition

CLC Number: 

  • R699.2

Table 1

Characteristics of patients and degree of hydronephrosis"

Items Suspension team (n=14) Translocation team (n=7) Total (n=21)
Age/years, x?±s 34.8±11.1 30.1±7.8 33.9±15.0
Gender (male/female), n 9/5 6/1 15/6
Side (left/right), n 10/4 3/4 13/8
Degree of hydronephrosis, n (%)
Mild 3 (21.4) 1 (14.3) 4 (19.0)
Moderate 8 (57.1) 4 (57.1) 12 (57.1)
Severe 4 (28.6) 1 (14.3) 5 (23.8)

Figure 1

Crossing vessel suspension 1A, before suspension; 1B, after suspension; 2A, before translocation; 2B, after translocation. P, pelvis; U, ureter; A, crossing artery."

Figure 2

Crossing vessel translocation 1A, before suspension; 1B, after suspension; 2A, before translocation; 2B, after translocation. P, pelvis; U, ureter; A, crossing artery."

Table 2

Preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative and follow-up data of two groups (x?±s)"

Items Suspension team (n=14) Translocation team (n=7) Total (n=21)
Operative time/min 199.3±20.1 205.7±40.6 202.2±57.0
Crossing vascular management time/min 6.1±2.0 13.7±5.2 10.5±3.2
Blood loss/mL 46.7±32.2 48.8±22.7 47.8±25.6
Drainage time/d 4.8±3.0 5.9±1.1 4.8±2.6
Hospitalization time/d 11.1±4.5 11.9±2.0 11.5±3.3
Preoperative hydronephrosis/cm 3.4±1.3 3.3±2.0 3.4±1.7
Postoperative hydronephrosis/cm 1.8±1.0 2.0±1.8 1.9±1.3*
Preoperative length of kidney/cm 11.5±1.7 11.3±1.9 11.4±1.6
Postoperative length of kidney/cm 11.9±1.3 11.1±1.8 11.5±2.0#
[1] Ellerkamp V, Kurth RR, Schmid E , et al. Differences between intrinsic and extrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction related to crossing vessels: histology and functional analyses[J]. World J Urol, 2016,34(4):577-583.
[2] Zhang X, Li HZ, Wang SG , et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: experience with 50 eases[J]. Urology, 2005,66(3):514-517.
[3] 张旭, 许凯, 张军 , 等. 后腹腔镜下Hellström术治疗异位血管导致的肾盂输尿管连接处狭窄[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2007,28(7):450-452.
[4] 郭刚, 洪宝发, 符伟军 , 等. 肾迷走血管致肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻20例报告[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2003,18(12):721-723.
[5] 王杭, 王国民 . CT尿路成像和IVU检查诊断泌尿系统疾病的比较研究[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2010,31(6):402-404.
[6] Hellström J, Giertz G, Lindblom K . Pathogenesis and treatment of hydronephrosis[J]. J Belge Drol, 1951,20(1):1-6.
[7] 中华医学会小儿外科学分会内镜外科学组. 腹腔镜肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻手术操作指南(2017版)[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2017,6(3):129-135.
[8] 邱敏, 吴红章, 马潞林 , 等. 肾异位血管压迫引起肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2014,52(9):702-705.
[9] 宋宏程, 白继武, 黄澄如 , 等. 迷走血管压迫致梗阻性肾积水34例临床分析[J]. 临床小儿外科杂志, 2009,8(6):3-5.
[10] Boylu U, Oommen M, Lee BR , et al. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction secondary to crossing vessels-to transpose or not? The robotic experience[J]. J Urol, 2009,181(4):1751-1755.
[1] ZHANG Fan,HUANG Xiao-juan,YANG Bin,YAN Ye,LIU Cheng,ZHANG Shu-dong,HUANG Yi,MA Lu-lin. Relationship between prostate apex depth and early recovery of urinary continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(4): 692-696.
[2] Bing-wei HUANG,Jie WANG,Peng ZHANG,Zhe LI,Si-cheng BI,Qiang WANG,Cai-bo YUE,Kun-lin YANG,Xue-song LI,Li-qun ZHOU. Application of indocyanine green in complex upper urinary tract repair surgery [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 651-656.
[3] Shu-dong ZHANG,Peng HONG,Bin-shuai WANG,Shao-hui DENG,Fan ZHANG,Li-yuan TAO,Cai-guang CAO,Zhen-hua HU,Lu-lin MA. Usefulness of the indocyanine green fluorescence imaging technique in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 657-662.
[4] Meng-meng ZHENG,Guang-pu DING,Wei-jie ZHU,Kun-lin YANG,Shu-bo FAN,Bao GUAN,Xin-fei LI,Yu-kun CAI,Jin-sheng ZHANG,Xue-song LI,Li-qun ZHOU. Application of preoperative three-dimensional image reconstruction in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 705-710.
[5] Sheng-wei XIONG,Jie WANG,Wei-jie ZHU,Si-da CHENG,Lei ZHANG,Xue-song LI,Li-qun ZHOU. Advance in re-do pyeloplasty for the management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after surgery [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 794-798.
[6] Si-da CHENG,Xin-fei LI,Sheng-wei XIONG,Shu-bo FAN,Jie WANG,Wei-jie ZHU,Zi-ao LI,Guang-pu DING,Ting YU,Wan-qiang LI,Yong-ming SUN,Kun-lin YANG,Lei ZHANG,Han HAO,Xue-song LI,Li-qun ZHOU. Robot-assisted laparoscopic upper urinary tract reconstruction surgery: A review of 108 cases by a single surgeon [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 771-779.
[7] Si-da CHENG,Wan-qiang LI,Li MU,Guang-pu DING,Bo ZHANG,Cheng SHEN,Ze-wei YING,Kun-lin YANG,Han HAO,Xue-song LI,Li-qun ZHOU. Application of totally extraperitoneal renal autotransplantation with Boari flap-pelvis anastomosis in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas treatment [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(4): 758-763.
[8] Hai-wen HUANG,Bing YAN,Mei-xia SHANG,Li-bo LIU,Han HAO,Zhi-jun XI. Propensity-matched comparison of laparoscopic and open radical cystectomy for female patients with bladder cancer [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(4): 698-705.
[9] Ling-fu ZHANG,Chun-sheng HOU,Yong-hui HUANG,Zhi XU,Li-xin WANG,Xiao-feng LING,Gang WANG,Long CUI,Dian-rong XIU. Comparison of the minimally invasive treatments of laparoscopic and endosopic for common bile duct stones after gastrojejunostomy [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(2): 345-348.
[10] Xiao-jun TIAN,Min QIU,Zhuo LIU,Ruo-tao XIAO,Yi HUANG,Guo-liang WANG,Xiao-fei HOU,Shu-dong ZHANG,Shen-rong ZHUANG,Lu-lin MA. Single-center study of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with Mayo 0-2 level inferior vena cava thrombectomy [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(6): 1053-1056.
[11] XU Ben, ZHANG Zhe-nan, LUO Cheng, SONG Hai-feng, ZHANG Qian. Comparison of safety and effectiveness between retroperitoneal laparoscopic tumor aspiration and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the treatment of renal angiomyolipoma [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(4): 700-704.
[12] LI Tao, CUI Long, WANG Gang, LING Xiao-feng, HOU Chun-sheng, WANG Li-xin, XU Zhi. Total laparoscopy to treat hepatolithiasis using gallbladder-hepatic duct subcutaneous tunnel [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(5): 915-918.
[13] CHEN Wei-nan, YE Xiong-jun, LIU Shi-jun, XIONG Liu-lin, HUANG Xiao-bo, XU Tao, WANG Xiao-feng. Comparison of three surgical methods of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in therapeutic effect and complication [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(5): 817-821.
[14] ZHANG Hong-xian, ZHAO Lei, MA Lu-lin, HOU Xiao-fei, LIU Lei, DENG Shao-hui. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy with autotransplantation for severe iatrogenic ureteral injury [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(4): 622-626.
[15] YE Xiong-jun, ZHONG Wen-long, XIONG Liu-lin, MA Kai1, XU Tao, HUANG Xiao-bo, WANG Xiao-feng. Retroperitoneoscopic renal pedicle lymphatic disconnection for chyluria via extra-adipose capsule [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(4): 618-621.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Author. English Title Test[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(1): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(1): 82 -84 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .