Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (1): 204-209. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.01.031

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Characteristics of benign and malignant lesions of ampullary polyps and the accuracy of forceps biopsy

WANG Ying-chun,HUANG Yong-hui(),CHANG Hong,YAO Wei,YAN Xiu-e,LI Ke,ZHANG Yao-peng,ZHENG Wei   

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2020-02-09 Online:2021-02-18 Published:2021-02-07
  • Contact: Yong-hui HUANG E-mail:13911765322@163.com
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(81500502);National Natural Science Foundation of China(81470905);Capital Characteristic Clinic Project(z171100001017091)

RICH HTML

  

Abstract:

Objective: To distinguish the endoscopic and clinical features of ampullary polyps,to investigate the endoscopic cancer risk factors of ampullary polyps based on the compared differences of benign lesions and adenocarcinoma, and to assess the accuracy of forceps biopsy.Methods: Authors retrospectively analyzed the data extracted from patients treated with endoscopic papillectomy (EP) from January 2009 to May 2019 in the Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital. Endoscopic pictures and pathology reports were reevaluated and analyzed. Differences between benign and cancer groups were conducted.Results: In the study,42 cases were involved, 35 to 83 years old, containing 83.3% older than 50 years old patients. The histological types were as follows, 2 for inflammatory polyps (4.8%), 1 for neuroendocrine tumor (2.4%), 1 for hyperplastic polyp (2.4%), 5 for grade Ⅰ adenoma (11.9%), 10 for grade Ⅱ adenoma (23.8%), 4 for grade Ⅲ adenoma (9.5%) and 19 for adenocarcinoma (45.2%),and 90.5% were adenoma or adenocarcinoma. The average age of benign group (inflammatory polyps and adenomas) was (56.7±9.2), which was significantly younger than that of adenocarcinoma group [(66.0±9.8), P=0.004]. Tumor diameter in adenocarcinoma group[(2.3±0.8) cm] was significantly larger than that in benign group[(1.6±0.6) cm, P=0.002]. Benign lesions only showed Yamada type Ⅰ(57.1%)and type Ⅱ(42.9%). The percentage of Yamada type Ⅰ (36.8%)and type Ⅱ(31.6%) in adenocarcinoma group was lower than that in benign group. Moreover, Yamada type Ⅲ (31.5%) was only found in the adenocarcinoma group. Significant differences were observed between the two groups in Yamada types (P=0.046). Most of the benign lesions had clear boundary(18/21,85.7%). The percentage of clear boundary in adenocarcinoma group (2/19,10.5%) was significantly lower than that in the benign group (P<0.001). No significant differences were investigated in color (P=0.353) and surface (P=0.324) between benign and adenocarcinoma lesions. Pooling age, lesion diameter, Yamada type and clear boundary into Logistic regression analysis, only age (OR=1.186, 95%CI 1.025-1.373, P=0.022) and clear boundary (OR=66.218, 95%CI 3.421-1 281.840, P=0.006) were the independent cancer risk factors. Only 2 (10.5%) in the 19 cancer patients had positive biopsy results before EP. As compared with post-EP, 55.3% (21/38) biopsies were under-estimated, including 17 (17/19, 89.5%) adenocarcinomas and 4 (4/10, 40%) grade Ⅱ adenomas.Conclusion: adenoma and adenocarcinoma were the major histological type of ampullary po-lyps. Age and unclear boundary were the independent risk factors of ampullary adenocarcinoma. Forceps biopsy was not enough for ampullary polyp differentiation.

Key words: Adenoma, Adenocarcinoma, Risk factors, Pathological characteristics, Endoscopic papillectomy, Ampullary adenocarcinoma, Cancer risk factors, Accuracy of forceps biopsy

CLC Number: 

  • R574.51

Table 1

Characteristics of the patients"

Histological type Age/years Male, n
Inflammatory polyp (n=2) 60.5 ± 0.7 1
Neuroendocrine tumor (n=1) 37.0 0
Hyperplastic polyp (n=1) 35.0 1
Adenoma (n=19)
Grade Ⅰ (n=5) 61.2 ± 8.7 5
Grade Ⅱ (n=10) 51.4 ± 6.8 6
Grade Ⅲ (n=4) 62.5 ± 11.8 1
Adenocarcinoma (n=19) 66.0 ± 9.9 9
Total (n=42) 60.0 ± 11.6 23

Table 2

The clinical and endoscopic features of patients with ampullary polyp"

Histological type Total (n=40) Benign (n=21) Malignant (n=19) P value
Age/years, x-±s 61.1±10.5 56.7±9.2 66.0±9.8 0.004
Diameter/cm, x-±s 1.9±0.8 1.6±0.6 2.3±0.8 0.002
Color 0.353
Hyperemia, n(%) 19 (47.5) 7 (33.3) 12 (63.2)
Similar, n(%) 14 (35.0) 12 (57.1) 2 (10.5)
White, n(%) 7 (17.5) 2 (9.5) 5 (26.3)
Yamada type 0.046
Ⅰ, n(%) 19 (47.5) 12 (57.1) 7 (36.8)
Ⅱ, n(%) 15 (37.5) 9 (42.9) 6 (31.6)
Ⅲ, n(%) 6 (15.0) 0 (0) 6 (31.6)
Surface 0.324
Normal, n(%) 3 (7.5) 3 (14.3) 0 (0)
Ulcer, n(%) 1 (2.5) 0 (0) 1 (5.3)
Erosion, n(%) 4 (10.0) 0 (0) 4 (21.1)
Villous irregular, n(%) 23 (57.5) 16 (76.2) 7 (36.8)
Nodular inflat, n(%) 9 (22.5) 2 (9.5) 7 (36.8)
Clear boundary, n(%) 20 (50) 18 (85.7) 2 (10.5) 0.000

Figure 1

Typical endoscopic image of ampullary adenoma and adenocarcinoma A, endoscopic image of ampullary adenoma; B, endoscopic image of ampullary adenocarcinoma. Black arrow indicates the lesion."

Table 3

Logistic regression model showing adverse clinical and endoscopic features of patients with ampullary polyps"

Variable OR 95%CI P value
Age 1.186 1.025-1.373 0.022
Diameter 2.328 0.385-14.095 0.196
Yamada type 2.065 0.379-11.245 0.402
Clear boundary 66.218 3.421-1 281.840 0.006

Table 4

The histological features of ampullary polyps under forceps biopsies or papillectomy"

Histology of forceps biopsy Histology of papillectomy Total
Grade Ⅰ Grade Ⅱ Grade Ⅲ adenocarcinoma
Grade Ⅰ 2 4 0 2 8
Grade Ⅱ 3 5 0 6 14
Grade Ⅲ 0 1 3 9 13
Adenocarcinoma 0 0 1 2 3
Total 5 10 4 19 38

Figure 2

Accuracy of ampullary polyp forceps biopsy"

[1] Ridtitid W, Tan D, Schmidt SE, et al. Endoscopic papillectomy: risk factors for incomplete resection and recurrence during long-term follow-up[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2014,79(2):289-296.
pmid: 24094466
[2] Ridtitid W, Schmidt SE, Al-Haddad MA, et al. Performance characteristics of EUS for locoregional evaluation of ampullary lesions[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2015,81(2):380-388.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.08.005 pmid: 25293823
[3] Kang SH, Kim KH, Kim TN, et al. Therapeutic outcomes of endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary neoplasms: retrospective analysis of a multicenter study[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2017,17(1):69.
doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0626-5 pmid: 28558658
[4] El H, Coté GA. Endoscopic diagnosis and management of ampullary lesions[J]. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, 2013,23(1):95-109.
doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2012.10.004 pmid: 23168121
[5] 顾宗廷, 张永杰. 十二指肠乳头肿瘤的诊断与外科治疗[J]. 国际消化病杂志, 2015,35(6):428-435.
[6] Chathadi KV, Khashab MA, Acosta RD, et al. The role of endoscopy in ampullary and duodenal adenomas[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2015,82(5):773-781.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.06.027 pmid: 26260385
[7] 陆鉴, 陆文洁, 吴育连. 十二指肠乳头肿瘤的临床特点及诊治分析[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2016,54(3):187-190.
[8] Attila T, Parlak E, Alper E, et al. Endoscopic papillectomy of benign ampullary lesions: Outcomes from a multicenter study[J]. Turk J Gastroenterol, 2018,29(3):325-334.
doi: 10.5152/tjg.2018.17378 pmid: 29755017
[9] Wanders LK, East JE, Uitentuis SE, et al. Diagnostic performance of narrowed spectrum endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging, and confocal laser endomicroscopy for optical diagnosis of colonic polyps: a meta-analysis[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2013,14(13):1337-1347.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70509-6 pmid: 24239209
[10] Kim HN, Kim KM, Shin JU, et al. Prediction of carcinoma after resection in subjects with ampullary adenomas on endoscopic biopsy[J]. J Clin Gastroenterol, 2013,47(4):346-351.
doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318272f2ef pmid: 23442830
[11] 郝璐, 王伟, 施新岗, 等. 十二指肠乳头肿瘤内镜切除术的临床应用进展[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2017,34(6):451-454.
[12] Wee E, Lakhtakia S, Gupta R, et al. The diagnostic accuracy and strength of agreement between endoscopic ultrasound and histopathology in the staging of ampullary tumors[J]. Indian J Gastroenterol, 2012,31(6):324-332.
doi: 10.1007/s12664-012-0248-3 pmid: 22996048
[13] 张荣春, 陈杰, 于卫华, 等. 十二指肠乳头肿瘤内镜切除术[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2014,31(4):231-235.
[14] Bourgeois N, Dunham F, Verhest A, et al. Endoscopic biopsies of the papilla of Vater at the time of endoscopic sphincterotomy: difficulties in interpretation[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 1984,30(3):163-166.
doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(84)72357-1 pmid: 6735092
[1] Zhicun LI, Tianyu WU, Lei LIANG, Yu FAN, Yisen MENG, Qian ZHANG. Risk factors analysis and nomogram model construction of postoperative pathological upgrade of prostate cancer patients with single core positive biopsy [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(5): 896-901.
[2] Ye YAN,Xiaolong LI,Haizhui XIA,Xuehua ZHU,Yuting ZHANG,Fan ZHANG,Ke LIU,Cheng LIU,Lulin MA. Analysis of risk factors for long-term overactive bladder after radical prostatectomy [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(4): 589-593.
[3] Yan CHEN,Kuangmeng LI,Kai HONG,Shudong ZHANG,Jianxing CHENG,Zhongjie ZHENG,Wenhao TANG,Lianming ZHAO,Haitao ZHANG,Hui JIANG,Haocheng LIN. Retrospective study on the impact of penile corpus cavernosum injection test on penile vascular function [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(4): 680-686.
[4] Bo PANG,Tongjun GUO,Xi CHEN,Huaqi GUO,Jiazhang SHI,Juan CHEN,Xinmei WANG,Yaoyan LI,Anqi SHAN,Hengyi YU,Jing HUANG,Naijun TANG,Yan WANG,Xinbiao GUO,Guoxing LI,Shaowei WU. Personal nitrogen oxides exposure levels and related influencing factors in adults over 35 years old in Tianjin and Shanghai [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(4): 700-707.
[5] Jing HE,Zhongze FANG,Ying YANG,Jing LIU,Wenyao MA,Yong HUO,Wei GAO,Yangfeng WU,Gaoqiang XIE. Relationship between lipid metabolism molecules in plasma and carotid atheroscle-rotic plaques, traditional cardiovascular risk factors, and dietary factors [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(4): 722-728.
[6] Shan CAI,Yihang ZHANG,Ziyue CHEN,Yunfe LIU,Jiajia DANG,Di SHI,Jiaxin LI,Tianyu HUANG,Jun MA,Yi SONG. Status and pathways of factors influencing physical activity time among elementary and junior high school students in Beijing [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(3): 403-410.
[7] Zuhong ZHANG,Tianjiao CHEN,Jun MA. Associations between puberty timing and cardiovascular metabolic risk factors among primary and secondary students [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(3): 418-423.
[8] Yuting LIN,Huali WANG,Yu TIAN,Litong GONG,Chun CHANG. Factors influencing cognitive function among the older adults in Beijing [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(3): 456-461.
[9] Jinrong ZHU,Yana ZHAO,Wei HUANG,Weiwei ZHAO,Yue WANG,Song WANG,Chunyan SU. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 infection in patients undergoing hemodialysis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(2): 267-272.
[10] Zhanhong LAI,Jiachen LI,Zelin YUN,Yonggang ZHANG,Hao ZHANG,Xiaoyan XING,Miao SHAO,Yuebo JIN,Naidi WANG,Yimin LI,Yuhui LI,Zhanguo LI. A unicenter real-world study of the correlation factors for complete clinical response in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(2): 284-292.
[11] Xiaoqian SI,Xiujuan ZHAO,Fengxue ZHU,Tianbing WANG. Risk factors for acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with traumatic hemorrhagic shock [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(2): 307-312.
[12] Yangyang LI,Lin HOU,Zijun MA,Shanyamei HUANG,Jie LIU,Chaomei ZENG,Jiong QIN. Association of pregnancy factors with cow's milk protein allergy in infants [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(1): 144-149.
[13] Xiaoqiang LIU,Yin ZHOU. Risk factors of perioperative hypertension in dental implant surgeries with bone augmentation [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(1): 93-98.
[14] Liang LUO,Yun LI,Hong-yan WANG,Xiao-hong XIANG,Jing ZHAO,Feng SUN,Xiao-ying ZHANG,Ru-lin JIA,Chun LI. Anti-endothelial cell antibodies in predicting early miscarriage [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(6): 1039-1044.
[15] Yu-fei LI,Ya-ni YAN,Jia-yang JIN,Chun LI,Qiu-yan PEI. Clinical characteristics of fetal cardiac disease in patients with anti-SSA antibody positive [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(6): 1053-1057.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!