Email Alert | RSS

Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (6): 1123-1127. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.06.011

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Diagnostic performances of salivary gland ultrasonography for Sjögren's syndrome

Yang LIU,Fang CHENG,Yan-ling WANG,Xiang-yan AI,Zhen-hang ZHU,Fu-tao ZHAO*()   

  1. Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, the Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 201999, China
  • Received:2022-08-12 Online:2022-12-18 Published:2022-12-19
  • Contact: Fu-tao ZHAO E-mail:ftzhao@moisten.org
  • Supported by:
    the Shanghai Pujiang Young Rheumatologists Traning Program(SPROG202005)

RICH HTML

 5   

PDF (PC)

82

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performances of salivary gland ultrasonography(SGUS)in Sj?gren's syndrome(SS). Methods: A total of 246 patients with dry mouth and/or eyes who were treated in the outpatient department and inpatient department of Rheumatology and Immunology Department of the Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine from December 2019 to January 2022 were collected. All patients received SGUS examination and scored by 2019 outcome measures in rheumatology clinical trial (OMERACT)ultrasonic scoring system.Their general information, unstimulated saliva flow rate(USFR), Schirmer test and serological test results were recorded. In the study, 193 cases had lip gland biopsy. The 2016 American College of Rheumatology(ACR)/ European League Against Rheumatism(EULAR)classification criteria were adopted as the diagnostic standard of SS. χ2 test was used to compare the difference of salivary gland ultrasonic scores between the two groups. The receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve was used to evaluate the accuracy of SGUS in diagnosing SS, and the disease characteristics of SGUS positive group and negative group in the SS patients were compared. Results: A total of 175 patients were SS group according to the ACR/EULAR classification, and the remaining 71 patients were non-SS group.There was no significant difference in age [(54.2±11.8) years vs. (53.4±14.9) years, P=0.705] and female (94.4% vs.93.1%, P=1.000) between SS and non-pSS groups. A total of 109 patients were SGUS positive (≥ 2 points), of whom 104 patients met the SS diagnosis and 5 patients did not meet the SS diagnosis. The positive rate of SGUS in SS group was significantly higher than that in non-SS group (59.4% vs. 7.0%, P < 0.001). The accuracy of 2019 OMERACT ultrasonic scoring system to predict ACR/EULAR classification was good, with an area under the curve of 0.762 (95%CI 0.701-0.823). The absolute agreement between the SGUS outcome and ACR-EULAR classification was 69.1%(170/246), with a sensiti-vity of 59.4%(104/175), specificity of 93%(66/71), positive predictive value of 95.4%(104/109) and negative predictive value of 48.2% (66/137). A total of 81 patients were positive SGUS combined with anti-SSA antibody, 100% (81/81) fulfilled the ACR-EULAR criteria, 85 patients were negative SGUS and anti SSA antibody, and 60 patients(70.6%, 60/85) did not fulfil the ACR-EULAR criteria. SGUS positive group had higher antinuclear antibody(ANA) positive rate(83.1% vs. 98.1%, P < 0.001) in the patients with SS. Conclusion: The OMERACT ultrasonic scoring system has high diagnostic value in SS. The combination of SGUS and anti-SSA antibody can improve the diagnostic value.

Key words: Sj?gren's syndrome, Salivary gland, Ultrasound

CLC Number: 

  • R593.2

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the study population"

Items Non-SS (n=71) SS (n=175) t/χ2/Z P
Age/years, ${\bar x}$±s 54.2±11.8 53.4±14.9 0.860 0.391
Female, n (%) 67 (94.4) 163 (93.1) 0.005 0.946
Course of disease/months，M(P25, P75) 12 (3, 24) 36 (6, 96) -3.332 0.001
Enlargement of salivary gland, n (%) 3 (4.2) 33 (18.9) 8.656 0.003
Schirmer test, n (%) 52 (73.2) 147 (84.0) 3.784 0.052
USFR/(mL/15 min)，${\bar x}$±s 3.8±3.6 1.7±1.4 -5.716 < 0.001
ANA, n (%) 40 (56.3) 161 (92.0) 42.977 < 0.001
Anti-SSA antibody, n (%) 6 (8.5) 127 (72.6) 81.618 < 0.001
Anti-SSB antibody, n (%) 0 (0) 40 (22.9) 19.380 < 0.001
Anti-centrometric antibody, n (%) 5 (7.0) 31 (17.7) 4.605 0.032
RF，n (%) 8 (11.3) 71 (40.6) 19.895 < 0.001
IgG, n (%) 13 (18.3) 97 (55.4) 28.150 < 0.001
ESR/(mm/h), ${\bar x}$±s 17.5±14.2 31.1±21.2 5.039 < 0.001
SGUS, n (%) 5 (7.0) 104 (59.4) 56.172 < 0.001
Lip biopsy (n =193), n (%) 4(6.7) (n=58) 112(83) (n=135) 97.894 < 0.001

Figure 1

Receiver operating characteristic curve of salivary gland ultrasonography scores in diagnosis of Sj?gren's syndrome"

Table 2

Clinical characteristics of SGUS positive and negative groups in patients with SS"

Items SGUS negative (n=71) SGUS positive (n=104) t/χ2/Z P
Age/years, ${\bar x}$±s 53.9±15.1 53.0±14.9 0.396 0.693
Female, n (%) 66 (93.0) 97 (93.3) 0.000 1.000
Course of disease/months，M(P25, P75) 36 (6, 120) 36 (12, 60) -0.087 0.931
Schirmer test, n (%) 58 (81.7) 89 (85.6) 0.474 0.491
ANA, n (%) 59 (83.1) 102 (98.1) 12.862 < 0.001
Anti-SSA antibody, n (%) 46 (64.8) 81 (77.9) 3.635 0.057
Anti-SSB antibody, n (%) 12 (16.9) 28 (26.9) 2.403 0.121
Anti-centrometric antibody, n (%) 9 (12.7) 22 (21.2) 2.081 0.149
RF, n (%) 30 (42.3) 41 (39.7) 0.140 0.708
IgG, n (%) 35 (49.3) 61 (59.6) 1.819 0.177
ESR/(mm/h), ${\bar x}$±s 20.8±18.2 31.2±23.1 -0.118 0.906
USFR/(mL/15 min)，${\bar x}$±s 1.8±1.5 1.7±1.3 0.574 0.567
Lip biopsy, n (%) (n=135) 50/61 (82) (n=61) 62/74 (83.8) (n=74) 0.780 0.780
1 Shiboski CH , Shiboski SC , Seror R , et al. 2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for primary Sjögren's syndrome: A consensus and data-driven methodology involving three international patient cohorts[J]. Arthritis Rheumatol, 2017, 69 (1): 35- 45.
doi: 10.1002/art.39859
2 Theander E , Mandl T . Primary Sjögren's syndrome: Diagnostic and prognostic value of salivary gland ultrasonography using a simplified scoring system[J]. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2014, 66 (7): 1102- 1107.
doi: 10.1002/acr.22264
3 Salaffi F , Carotti M , Iagnocco A , et al. Ultrasonography of salivary glands in primary Sjögren's syndrome: A comparison with contrast sialography and scintigraphy[J]. Rheumatology (Oxford), 2008, 47 (8): 1244- 1249.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken222
4 Lee KA , Lee SH , Kim HR , et al. Diagnostic and predictive eva-luation using salivary glandultrasonography in primary Sjögren's syndrome[J]. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 2018, 112 (3): 165- 172.
5 Jousse-Joulin S , Gatineau F , Baldini C , et al. Weight of salivary gland ultrasonography compared toother items of the 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for Primary Sjögren's syndrome[J]. J Intern Med, 2020, 287 (2): 180- 188.
doi: 10.1111/joim.12992
6 van Nimwegen JF , Mossel E , Delli K , et al. Incorporation of salivary gland ultrasonography into the ACR EULAR criteria for primary Sjögren's syndrome[J]. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2020, 72 (4): 583- 590.
doi: 10.1002/acr.24017
7 Takagi Y , Nakamura H , Sumi M , et al. Combined classification system based on ACR/EULAR and ultrasonographic scores for improving the diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13 (4): e0195113.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195113
8 Jousse-Joulin S , D'Agostino MA , Nicolas C , et al. Video clip assessment of a salivary gland ultrasound scoring system in Sjögren's syndrome using consensual definitions: An OMERACT uhrasound working group reliability exercise[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2019, 78 (7): 967- 973.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215024
9 Zhou M , Song S , Wu S , et al. Diagnostic accuracy of salivary gland ultrasonography with different scoring systems in Sjögren's syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 8 (1): 17128.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35288-5
10 Ramsubeik K , Motilal S , Sanchez-Ramos L , et al. Diagnostic accuracy of salivary gland ultrasound in Sjögren's syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis, 2020, 12, 1- 21.
11 Jousse-Joulin S , Milic V , Jonsson MV , et al. Is salivary gland ultrasonography a useful tool in Sjögren's syndrome? A systematic review[J]. Rheumatology (Oxford), 2016, 55 (5): 789- 800.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev385
12 Carotti M , Sala F , Di Carlo M , et al. Diagnostic value of major salivary gland ultrasonography in primary Sjögren's syndrome: The role of grey-scale and colour/power Doppler sonography[J]. Gland Surg, 2019, 8 (Suppl 3): S159- S167.
13 Mossel E , Arends S , van Nimwegen JF , et al. Scoring hypoechogenic areas in one parotid and one submandibular gland increases feasibility of ultrasound in primary Sjögren's syndrome[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2018, 77 (4): 556- 562.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211992
14 Izzetti R , Fulvio G , Nisi M , et al. Reliability of OMERACT scoring system in ultra-high frequency ultrasonography of minor salivary glands: Inter-rater agreement study[J]. J Imaging, 2022, 8 (4): 111.
doi: 10.3390/jimaging8040111
15 Al Tabaa O , Gouze H , Hamroun S , et al. Normal salivary gland ultrasonography could rule out the diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome in anti-SSA-negative patients with sicca syndrome[J]. RMD Open, 2021, 7 (1): e001503.
doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001503
16 Fana V , Dohn UM , Krabbe S , et al. Application of the OMERACT grey-scale ultrasound scoring system for salivary glands in a single-centre cohort of patients with suspected Sjögren's syndrome[J]. RMD Open, 2021, 7 (2): e001516.
doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001516
17 Robin F, Albert JD, Lescoat A, et al. Diagnostic performances of ultrasound evaluation of major salivary glands according to the 2019 OMERACT US scoring system[J/OL]. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2021, 5 (2021-05-10)[2022-04-15]. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acr.24631.
18 Gazeau P , Cornec D , Jousse-Joulin S , et al. Time-course of ultrasound abnormalities of major salivary glands in suspected Sjögren's syndrome[J]. Joint Bone Spine, 2018, 85 (2): 227- 232.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2017.02.007
19 Zandonella-Callegher S , Zabotti A , Giovannini I , et al. Normal-appearing salivary gland ultrasonography identifies a milder phenotype of primary Sjögren's syndrome[J]. Front Med (Lausanne), 2020, 7, 602354.
20 Mossel E , Delli K , Nimwegen GF , et al. Ultrasonography of major salivary glands compared with parotid and labial gland biopsy and classification criteria in patients with clinically suspected primary Sjögren's syndrome[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2017, 76 (11): 1883- 1889.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211250
21 Kim JW , Lee H , Park SH , et al. Salivary gland ultrasonography findings are associated with clinical, histological, and serologic features of Sjögren's syndrome[J]. Scand J Rheumatol, 2018, 47 (4): 303- 310.
doi: 10.1080/03009742.2017.1374451
22 Jousse-Joulin S , Devauchelle-Pensec V , Cornec D , et al. Brief report: Ultrasonographic assessment of salivary gland response to rituximab in primary Sjögren's syndrome[J]. Arthritis Rheumatol, 2015, 67 (6): 1623- 1628.
doi: 10.1002/art.39088
23 Lorenzon M , Spina E , Di Franco FT , et al. Salivary gland ultrasound in primary Sjögren's syndrome: Current and future perspectives[J]. Open Access Rheumatol, 2022, 14, 147- 160.
doi: 10.2147/OARRR.S284763
[1] Shu-heng ZHAI,Pan-pan HU,Xiao-guang LIU. Intraoperative ultrasound assisted circumferential decompression for multilevel ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in thoracic vertebrae [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(5): 1021-1027.
[2] YU Guang-yan,LIU Deng-gao,LI Wei,HONG Xia,ZHANG Yan-yan,ZHU Wen-xuan,ZHANG Ke-fu,LI Xiao,LI Zhan-guo,LIU Yan-ying,CHEN Yan,GAO Yan,SU Jia-zeng. Studies on newly recognized chronic sialadenitis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(1): 13-17.
[3] PENG Zhe,DING Ya-min,PEI Lin,YAO Hai-hong,ZHANG Xue-wu,TANG Su-mei. Clinical characteristics of crystal deposits in joints and tendons in patients with gout [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(6): 1067-1071.
[4] SONG Zhi-bo,GENG Yan,DENG Xue-rong,ZHANG Xiao-hui,ZHANG Zhuo-li. Benefit of ultrasound in the phenotype recognition of psoriatic arthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(6): 1061-1066.
[5] DENG Xue-rong,SUN Xiao-ying,ZHANG Zhuo-li. Agreement between ultrasound-detected inflammation and clinical signs in ankles and feet joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(6): 1037-1042.
[6] ZHU Yi-ying,MIN Sai-nan,YU Guang-yan. Effect of topical injection of cyclosporine A on saliva secretion and inflammation in the submandibular gland of non-obese diabetic mice [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(4): 750-757.
[7] Huan-bin YU,Wen-jie WU,Xiao-ming LV,Yan SHI,Lei ZHENG,Jian-guo ZHANG. 125I seed brachytherapy for recurrent salivary gland carcinoma after external radiotherapy [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(5): 919-923.
[8] Hao WANG,Shu-kun JIANG,Ran PENG,Yi HUANG,Ming-qing WANG,Jun-jie WANG,Cheng LIU,Fan ZHANG,Lu-lin MA. Individual control of urine volume to improve stability of bladder volume in radiotherapy of urinary tumor [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 688-691.
[9] Ning KANG,Yi-hang JIANG,Yu-guang JIANG,Li-yang WU,Ji-qing ZHANG,Yi-nong NIU,Jun-hui ZHANG. Endoscopic combined ultrasound-guided access vs. ultrasound-guided access in endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 692-696.
[10] Ye ZHANG,Ni ZHANG,Xiao-xiao LIU,Chuan-xiang ZHOU. Cervical lymph node metastasis in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary glands: A clinicopathologic study [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2020, 52(1): 30-34.
[11] Yan GENG,Bo-rui LI,Zhuo-li ZHANG. Musculoskeletal ultrasound findings of symptomatic joints in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2020, 52(1): 163-168.
[12] Li-wei LI,Zhuo LIU,Guo-liang WANG,Hua ZHANG,Wen CHEN,Jing MA,Li ZHANG,Wei HE,Lu-lin MA,Shu-min WANG. Comparison of various imaging in the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus combined with bland thrombus [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(4): 678-683.
[13] Cui-ping ZHANG,Pei-pei LIU,Qiang FU,Guan-ying GAO,Li-gang CUI,Yan XU,Jian-quan WANG. Application of ultrasound-guided hip joint drug injection in the postoperative rehabilitation of arthroscopie repair of acetabular labral tears [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(2): 265-267.
[14] Guang-ya YU,Xia HONG,Wei LI,Yan-yan ZHANG,Yan GAO,Yan CHEN,Zu-yan ZHANG,Xiao-yan XIE,Zhan-guo LI,Yan-ying LIU,Jia-zeng SU,Wen-xuan ZHU,Zhi-peng SUN. Clinicopathological characteristics and diagnosis of IgG4-related sialadenitis [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(1): 1-3.
[15] SHEN Cheng, ZHANG Bo, HAN Wen-ke, LIN Jian, WANG Gang, ZHANG Xiao-chun, SONG Yi, ZHAO Zheng, ZHANG Zhong-yuan, JIN Jie, YU Wei. Percutaneous renal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy guided by contrast enhanced ultrasound: a single-center preliminary experience in China [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(6): 1071-1075.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(5): 507 -510 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2000, 32(4): 300 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2008, 40(2): 146 -150 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2008, 40(4): 369 -373 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(2): 126 -130 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2001, 33(2): 181 -182 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(6): 663 -665 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2008, 40(1): 39 -42 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(6): 739 -745 .
Copyright © Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd