Email Alert | RSS

Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (6): 1037-1042. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.06.005

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Agreement between ultrasound-detected inflammation and clinical signs in ankles and feet joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

DENG Xue-rong,SUN Xiao-ying,ZHANG Zhuo-li()   

  1. Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
  • Received:2021-09-10 Online:2021-12-18 Published:2021-12-13
  • Contact: Zhuo-li ZHANG E-mail:zhuoli.zhang@126.com
  • Supported by:
    Youth Clinical Research Project of Peking University First Hospital(2018CR04)

RICH HTML

   

PDF (PC)

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the agreement between clinical signs (tenderness and/or swelling) in ankles and feet joints and ultrasound findings in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: RA patients with at least 1 tender and/or swollen joint in bilateral ankles and metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints detected by physical examination were enrolled and underwent ultrasound examination by greyscale (GS) and power Doppler (PD) mode. The agreement between clinical signs and ultrasound-detected inflammation (joint effusion, synovitis, or tenosynovitis) was analyzed. Results: In the study, 113 consecutive RA patients were included, with mean age of (52.5±12.6) years, median duration of 60 (13, 129) months, mean disease activity score in 28 joints based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate [DAS28 (ESR)] of 5.1±1.7,mean disease activity score in 28 joints based on C reactive protein[DAS28 (CRP)]of 4.6±1.5. The tenderness and swelling was most commonly detected in ankles (52.7% and 31.9%, respectively), while GS (+) synovitis was most frequently detectable in MTP2 (34.1%), followed by ankles (32.7%) and MTP1 (27.9%),and PD (+) synovitis was most frequently detectable in MTP1 (14.2%), followed by ankles (12.4%) and MTP2 (10.6%). The prevalence of tenosynovitis was 41.1%, which mostly located in tibialis posterior tendon (22.1% of GS positive and 17.6% of PD positive). The highest prevalence of joint effusion was detected in ankles (9.7%), while that of bone erosion in MTP5 (19%). The overall concordance rate between positive clinical signs and ultrasound-determined joint inflammation was poor in the above joints (κ<0.2, P<0.05), in which swelling had the highest κ coefficient with ultrasound-determined joint inflammation in ankles (κ=0.225, P<0.05). Moreover, swelling had the highest κ coefficient with synovitis in ankles (κ=0.231, P<0.05).The concordance between tenosynovitis and signs in ankles was also poor (κ<0.20, P<0.05). There was no significant agreement between joint effusion and clinical signs (P>0.05). Conclusion: The overall concordance between clinical signs and inflammation on ultrasound was poor in ankles and feet joints. Tenderness and swelling was more common in ankles, while more lesions were detected by ultrasound at MTP joints. Ultrasound is useful in assessing the lesions besides physical examination in patients with RA.

Key words: Arthritis, rheumatoid, Ankles and feet joints, Ultrasound

CLC Number: 

  • R593.22

Table 1

Clinical characteristic of 113 patients with rheumatoid arthritis"

Items Values
n 113
Age/year, $\overline{x}$±s 52.5 ± 12.6
Female, n (%) 93 (82.3)
Disease duration/months, M (P25,P75) 60.0 (13-129)
PGA/mm, $\overline{x}$±s 55.9±25.1
EGA/mm, $\overline{x}$±s 48.5±24.3
HAQ, M (P25,P75) 12.0 (3.5-23.5)
ESR/(mm/h), M (P25,P75) 35 (19-65)
CRP/(mg/L), M (P25,P75) 11.9 (5.5-36.4)
DAS28 (ESR), $\overline{x}$±s 5.1±1.7
DAS28 (CRP), $\overline{x}$±s 4.6±1.5
CDAI, $\overline{x}$±s 22.8±14.2
SDAI, $\overline{x}$±s 25.1±16.4

Table 2

Frequencies of clinical signs in bilateral ankles and feet joints"

Joint Tenderness Swelling
n % n %
Ankle 715 52.7 432 31.9
MTP1 244 18.1 108 8.0
MTP2 252 18.6 47 3.5
MTP3 591 21.7 40 3.1
MTP4 501 21.2 40 3.1
MTP5 538 22.6 80 6.2

Table 3

Frequencies of lesions detected by ultrasound in bilateral ankles and feet joints"

Joint GS (+)
synovitis/%		 PD (+)
synovitis/%		 Effusion/% Bone erosion/%
Ankle 32.7 12.4 9.7 11.5
MTP1 27.9 14.2 4.0 16.4
MTP2 34.1 10.6 2.7 1.3
MTP3 23.0 8.0 0.9 0.9
MTP4 14.2 5.8 0 0.9
MTP5 11.5 9.3 0 19.0

Table 4

Concordance between clinical signs and ultrasound-detected inflammation at each joint"

Joint Number of joints κ P
PE+/US+ PE+/US- PE-/US+ PE-/US-
Ankle 84 50 41 51 0.178 0.007
MTP1 14 31 58 123 -0.008 0.904
MTP2 21 22 59 124 0.125 0.041
MTP3 13 40 40 133 0.089 0.181
MTP4 13 35 20 158 0.179 0.006
MTP5 11 44 15 156 0.137 0.023

Table 5

Concordance between positive signs and ultrasound-detected inflammation at each joint"

Joint Tenderness (+) & US (+) Swelling (+) & US (+)
κ P κ P
Ankle 0.128 0.054 0.225 0.000
MTP1 -0.024 0.694 0.058 0.232
MTP2 0.111 0.066 0.028 0.579
MTP3 0.083 0.033 0.014 0.832
MTP4 0.210 0.000 0.179 0.006
MTP5 0.127 0.039 0.079 0.230

Table 6

Concordance between clinical signs and synovitis at each joint"

Joint T/S (+) & synovitis T (+) & synovitis S (+) & synovitis
κ P κ P κ P
Ankle 0.069 0.234 0.018 0.769 0.231 0.001
MTP1 -0.037 0.566 0.060 0.350 0.056 0.277
MTP2 0.118 0.056 0.104 0.091 0.032 0.333
MTP3 0.020 0.764 0.095 0.153 0.086 0.029
MTP4 0.187 0.004 0.187 0.004 0.217 0.000
MTP5 0.137 0.023 0.127 0.039 0.076 0.230

Table 7

Concordance between clinical signs and tenosynovitis at ankle"

Items κ P
T/S (+) & GS (+) tenosynovitis 0.146 0.008
T/S (+) & PD (+) tenosynovitis 0.136 0.008
T (+) & GS (+) tenosynovitis 0.126 0.034
T(+) & PD (+) tenosynovitis 0.121 0.029
S(+) & GS (+) tenosynovitis 0.083 0.212
S(+) & PD (+) tenosynovitis 0.097 0.136
[1] Inamo J, Kaneko Y, Sakata K, et al. Impact of subclinical synovitis in ankles and feet detected by ultrasonography in patients with rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Int J Rheum Dis, 2019, 22(1):62-67.
doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13399 pmid: 30338640
[2] Kapral T, Dernoschnig F, Machold KP, et al. Remission by composite scores in rheumatoid arthritis: are ankles and feet important?[J]. Arthritis Res Ther, 2007, 9(4):R72.
doi: 10.1186/ar2270
[3] Wechalekar MD, Lester S, Hill CL, et al. Active foot synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: unstable remission status, radiographic progression, and worse functional outcomes in patients with foot synovitis in apparent remission[J]. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2016, 68(11):1616-1623.
doi: 10.1002/acr.22887 pmid: 26991415
[4] Sun X, Deng X, Xie W, et al. The agreement between ultrasound-determined joint inflammation and clinical signs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Arthritis Res Ther, 2019, 21(1):100.
doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1892-0
[5] Le Boedec M, Jousse-Joulin S, Ferlet JF, et al. Factors influencing concordance between clinical and ultrasound findings in rheumatoid arthritis[J]. J Rheumatol, 2013, 40(3):244-252.
doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120843
[6] Padovano I, Costantino F, Breban M, et al. Prevalence of ultrasound synovial inflammatory findings in healthy subjects[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2016, 75(10):1819-1823.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208103 pmid: 26613767
[7] Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 2010, 62(9):2569-2581.
doi: 10.1002/art.27584
[8] Möller I, Janta I, Backhaus M, et al. The 2017 EULAR standardised procedures for ultrasound imaging in rheumatology[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2017, 76(12):1974-1979.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211585
[9] Terslev L, Naredo E, Aegerter P, et al. Scoring ultrasound synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: a EULAR-OMERACT ultrasound taskforce-Part 2: reliability and application to multiple joints of a standardised consensus-based scoring system[J]. RMD Open, 2017, 3(1):e000427.
doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000427
[10] Hammer HB, Michelsen B, Sexton J, et al. Swollen, but not tender joints, are independently associated with ultrasound synovitis: results from a longitudinal observational study of patients with established rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2019, 78(9):1179-1185.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215321
[11] Hirata A, Ogura T, Hayashi N, et al. Concordance of patient-reported joint symptoms, physician-examined arthritic signs, and ultrasound-detected synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2017, 69(6):801-806.
doi: 10.1002/acr.23006 pmid: 27564121
[12] Lukas C, van der Heijde D, Fatenajad S, et al. Repair of erosions occurs almost exclusively in damaged joints without swelling[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2010, 69(5):851-855.
doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.119156
[13] Sun X, Deng X, Geng Y, et al. A simplified and validated ultrasound scoring system to evaluate synovitis of bilateral wrists and hands in patients with rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Clin Rheumatol, 2018, 37(1):185-191.
doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3785-4
[14] Toyota Y, Tamura M, Kirino Y, et al. Musculoskeletal ultrasonography delineates ankle symptoms in rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Mod Rheumatol, 2017, 27(3):425-429.
doi: 10.1080/14397595.2016.1222650
[15] Ohrndorf S, Fischer IU, Kellner H, et al. Reliability of the novel 7-joint ultrasound score: results from an inter- and intraobserver study performed by rheumatologists[J]. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2012, 64(8):1238-1243.
doi: 10.1002/acr.21679 pmid: 22438306
[16] Zayat AS, Ellegaard K, Conaghan PG, et al. The specificity of ultrasound-detected bone erosions for rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2015, 74(5):897-903.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204864
[17] Di Matteo A, Mankia K, Duquenne L, et al. Ultrasound erosions in the feet best predict progression to inflammatory arthritis in anti-CCP positive at-risk individuals without clinical synovitis[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2020, 79(7):901-907.
[1] Dongwu LIU, Jie CHEN, Mingli GAO, Jing YU. Rheumatoid arthritis with Castleman-like histopathology in lymph nodes: A case report [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(5): 928-931.
[2] Zhengfang LI,Cainan LUO,Lijun WU,Xue WU,Xinyan MENG,Xiaomei CHEN,Yamei SHI,Yan ZHONG. Application value of anti-carbamylated protein antibody in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(4): 729-734.
[3] Huina HUANG,Jing ZHAO,Xiangge ZHAO,Ziran BAI,Xia LI,Guan WANG. Regulatory effect of lactate on peripheral blood CD4+ T cell subsets in patients with rheumatoid arthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(3): 519-525.
[4] Xiaofei TANG,Yonghong LI,Qiuling DING,Zhuo SUN,Yang ZHANG,Yumei WANG,Meiyi TIAN,Jian LIU. Incidence and risk factors of deep vein thrombosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(2): 279-283.
[5] Hongguang LI,Weihua HAN,Xun WU,Jiling FENG,Gang LI,Juanhong MENG. Preliminarily study of arthrocentesis combined with liquid phase concentrated growth factor injection in the treatment of unilateral temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(2): 338-344.
[6] Xue ZOU,Xiao-juan BAI,Li-qing ZHANG. Effectiveness of tofacitinib combined with iguratimod in the treatment of difficult-to-treat moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(6): 1013-1021.
[7] Qi WU,Yue-ming CAI,Juan HE,Wen-di HUANG,Qing-wen WANG. Correlation between dyslipidemia and rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(6): 982-992.
[8] Jing-feng ZHANG,Yin-ji JIN,Hui WEI,Zhong-qiang YAO,Jin-xia ZHAO. Correlation analysis between body mass index and clinical characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(6): 993-999.
[9] Yin-ji JIN,Lin SUN,Jin-xia ZHAO,Xiang-yuan LIU. Significance of IgA isotype of anti-v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homologue B1 antibody in rheumatoid arthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(4): 631-635.
[10] Wen-xin CAI,Shi-cheng LI,Yi-ming LIU,Ru-yu LIANG,Jing LI,Jian-ping GUO,Fan-lei HU,Xiao-lin SUN,Chun LI,Xu LIU,Hua YE,Li-zong DENG,Ru LI,Zhan-guo LI. A cross-sectional study on the clinical phenotypes of rheumatoid arthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(6): 1068-1073.
[11] Fang CHENG,Shao-ying YANG,Xing-xing FANG,Xuan WANG,Fu-tao ZHAO. Role of the CCL28-CCR10 pathway in monocyte migration in rheumatoid arthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(6): 1074-1078.
[12] Rui LIU,Jin-xia ZHAO,Liang YAN. Clinical characteristics of patients with rheumatoid arthritis complicated with venous thrombosis of lower extremities [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(6): 1079-1085.
[13] Jing-feng ZHANG,Yin-ji JIN,Hui WEI,Zhong-qiang YAO,Jin-xia ZHAO. Cross-sectional study on quality of life and disease activity of rheumatoid arthritis patients [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(6): 1086-1093.
[14] Yang LIU,Fang CHENG,Yan-ling WANG,Xiang-yan AI,Zhen-hang ZHU,Fu-tao ZHAO. Diagnostic performances of salivary gland ultrasonography for Sjögren's syndrome [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(6): 1123-1127.
[15] Shu-heng ZHAI,Pan-pan HU,Xiao-guang LIU. Intraoperative ultrasound assisted circumferential decompression for multilevel ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in thoracic vertebrae [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(5): 1021-1027.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2001, 33(3): 238 -242 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2001, 33(3): 288 -289 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2002, 34(2): 112 -116 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2002, 34(5): 431 -433 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2008, 40(2): 214 -218 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2008, 40(5): 459 -464 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2008, 40(5): 465 -470 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2008, 40(5): 486 -488 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2011, 43(1): 29 -33 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(5): 565 -570 .
Copyright © Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd