Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2023, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (5): 781-792. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.05.003

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Mechanism of nuclear protein 1 in the resistance to axitinib in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Yun-chong LIU,Zong-long WU,Li-yuan GE,Tan DU,Ya-qian WU,Yi-meng SONG,Cheng LIU*(),Lu-lin MA*()   

  1. Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2023-03-20 Online:2023-10-18 Published:2023-10-09
  • Contact: Cheng LIU,Lu-lin MA E-mail:chengliumd@163.com;malulinpku@163.com
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Foundation of China(81972381)

RICH HTML

  

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the potential mechanism of resistance to axitinib in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), with a view to expanding the understanding of axitinib resistance, facilitating the design of more specific treatment options, and improving the treatment effectiveness and survival prognosis of patients. Methods: By exploring the half maximum inhibitory concentration (IC50) of axitinib on ccRCC cell lines 786-O and Caki-1, cell lines resistant to axitinib were constructed by repeatedly stimulated with axitinib at this concentration for 30 cycles in vitro. Cell lines that were not treated by axitinib were sensitive cell lines. The phenotypic differences of cell proliferation and apoptosis levels between drug resistant and sensitive lines were tested. Genes that might be involved in the drug resistance process were screened from the differentially expressed genes that were co-upregulated in the two drug resistant lines by transcriptome sequencing. The expression level of the target gene in the drug resistant lines was verified by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and Western blot (WB). The expression differences of the target gene in ccRCC tumor tissues and adjacent tissues were analyzed in the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) public database, and the impact of the target gene on the prognosis of ccRCC patients was analyzed in the Kaplan-Meier Plotter (K-M Plotter) database. After knocking down the target gene in the drug resistant lines using RNA interference by lentivirus vector, the phenotypic differences of the cell lines were tested again. WB was used to detect the levels of apoptosis-related proteins in the different treated cell lines to find molecular pathways that might lead to drug resistance. Results: Cell lines 786-O-R and Caki-1-R resistant to axitinib were successfully constructed in vitro, and their IC50 were significantly higher than those of the sensitive cell lines (10.99 μmol/L, P < 0.01; 11.96 μmol/L, P < 0.01, respectively). Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay, colony formation, and 5-ethynyl-2 '-deoxyuridine (EdU) assay showed that compared with the sensitive lines, the proliferative ability of the resistant lines decreased, but apoptosis staining showed a significant decrease in the level of cell apoptosis of the resistant lines (P < 0.01). Although resistant to axitinib, the resistant lines had no obvious new replicated cells in the environment of 20 μmol/L axitinib. Nuclear protein 1 (NUPR1) gene was screened by transcriptome sequencing, and its RNA (P < 0.0001) and protein expression levels significantly increased in the resistant lines. Database analysis showed that NUPR1 was significantly overexpressed in ccRCC tumor tissue (P < 0.05); the ccRCC patients with higher expression ofNUPR1had a worse survival prognosis (P < 0.001). Apoptosis staining results showed that knockdown ofNUPR1inhibited the anti-apoptotic ability of the resistant lines to axitinib (786-O, P < 0.01; Caki-1, P < 0.05). WB results showed that knocking downNUPR1decreased the protein level of B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL2), increased the protein level of BCL2-associated X protein (BAX), decreased the protein level of pro-caspase3, and increased the level of cleaved-caspase3 in the resistant lines after being treated with axitinib. Conclusion: ccRCC cell lines reduce apoptosis through theNUPR1 -BAX/ BCL2 -caspase3 pathway, which is involved in the process of resistance to axitinib.

Key words: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma, Axitinib, Nuclear protein 1, Apoptosis, Drug resistance

CLC Number: 

  • R737.1

Figure 1

IC50 of different cell lines A,cell viability of axitinib resistant and sensitive lines of 786-O;B, cell viability of axitinib resistant and sensitive lines of Caki-1.** P < 0.01,*** P < 0.001,**** P < 0.000 1."

Figure 2

CCK-8 assay of different cell lines A,CCK-8 assay of 786-O cell lines;B,CCK-8 assay of Caki-1 cell lines.* P < 0.05,**** P < 0.000 1.CCK-8,cell counting kit-8;DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide;Axt,axitinib."

Figure 3

Colony formation assay of different cell lines The colony formation ability of the resistant lines was weaker than that of the sensitive lines in the plate cloning experiment in the drug-free environment.** P < 0.01,*** P < 0.001,**** P < 0.000 1;ns,no significance.DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide;Axt, axitinib."

Figure 4

EdU assay of different cell lines In the EdU assay, the proliferation ability of the resistant lines was weaker than that of the sensitive line in the drug-free environment.*P < 0.05,** P < 0.01,*** P < 0.001,**** P < 0.000 1;ns,no significance.DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide;Axt, axitinib."

Figure 5

Apoptosis staining assay of different cell lines In the apoptosis staining assay, the apoptosis level of resistant lines was significantly lower than that of sensitive lines in the presence of axitinib(**P < 0.01).PI,propidium iodide;FITC,fluoresceine isothiocyanate;DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide;Axt, axitinib."

Figure 6

Expression level of NUPR1 in different cell lines A,RNA expression level of NUPR1 in axitinib resistant lines was higher than that in sensitive lines(****P < 0.0001);B,protein expression level of NUPR1 in axitinib resistant lines was higher than that in sensitive lines.NUPR1,nuclear protein 1."

Figure 7

NUPR1 knockdown validation of 786-O and Caki-1 cell lines NUPR1 was successfully knocked down with sh-NUPR1 in 786-O and Caki-1 cell lines.NC,negative control;NUPR1,nuclear protein 1;Axt,axitinib."

Figure 8

Apoptosis staining results of 786-O cell lines Knocking down NUPR1 inhibited the anti-apoptosis ability of 786-O-R cell lines. **P < 0.01;ns,no significance.NC,negative control;NUPR1,nuclear protein 1;PI,propidium iodide;FITC,fluoresceine isothiocyanate;DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide;Axt,axitinib."

Figure 9

Apoptosis staining results of Caki-1 cell lines Silencing NUPR1 inhibited the anti-apoptosis ability of Caki-1-R cell lines. *P < 0.05;ns,no significance.NC,negative control;NUPR1,nuclear protein 1;PI,propidium iodide;FITC,fluoresceine isothiocyanate;DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide;Axt,axitinib."

Figure 10

Regulation of apoptosis related proteins by interfering NUPR1 A,silencing NUPR1 decreased the protein level of caspase3 and increased the level of cleaved-caspase3 in resistant lines treated with axitinib;B,silencing NUPR1 decreased the protein level of BCL2 and increased the protein level of BAX in resistant lines treated with axitinib.NC,negative control;NUPR1,nuclear protein 1;c-caspase3,cleaved-caspase3;BCL2,B-cell lymphoma-2;BAX,BCL2-associated X protein;DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide;Axt,axitinib."

1 SiegelRL , MillerKD , WagleNS ,et al.Cancer statistics, 2023[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2023,73(1):17-48.
doi: 10.3322/caac.21763
2 MotzerRJ , BukowskiRM , FiglinRA ,et al.Prognostic nomogram for sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma[J].Cancer,2008,113(7):1552-1558.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.23776
3 NerichV , HuguesM , PaillardMJ ,et al.Clinical impact of targeted therapies in patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma[J].Onco Targets Ther,2014,7,365-374.
4 PowlesT , PlimackER , SoulièresD ,et al.Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib monotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-426): Extended follow-up from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial[J].Lancet Oncol,2020,21(12):1563-1573.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30436-8
5 IncorvaiaL , MadoniaG , CorsiniLR ,et al.Challenges and advances for the treatment of renal cancer patients with brain metastases: From immunological background to upcoming clinical evidence on immune-checkpoint inhibitors[J].Crit Rev Oncol Hematol,2021,163,103390.
doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103390
6 ShepardDR , GarciaJA .Toxicity associated with the long-term use of targeted therapies in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma[J].Expert Rev Anticancer Ther,2009,9(6):795-805.
doi: 10.1586/era.09.29
7 RiniBI , EscudierB , TomczakP ,et al.Comparative effectiveness of axitinib versus sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (AXIS): A randomised phase 3 trial[J].Lancet,2011,378(9807):1931-1939.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61613-9
8 CaiW , CaiB , ZhouJ ,et al.Comparison of efficacy and safety among axitinib, sunitinib, and sorafenib as neoadjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective study[J].Cancer Commun (Lond),2019,39(1):56.
9 ZhouX , HouW , GaoL ,et al.Synergies of antiangiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint blockade in renal cell carcinoma: From theoretical background to clinical reality[J].Front Oncol,2020,10,1321.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01321
10 GulatiS , LabakiC , KarachaliouGS ,et al.First-line treatments for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: An ever-enlarging landscape[J].Oncologist,2022,27(2):125-134.
doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyab056
11 ChoueiriTK , MotzerRJ , RiniBI ,et al.Updated efficacy results from the JAVELIN Renal 101 trial: First-line avelumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma[J].Ann Oncol,2020,31(8):1030-1039.
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.04.010
12 BuchlerT , BortlicekZ , PoprachA ,et al.Outcomes for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma achieving a complete response on targeted therapy: A registry-based analysis[J].Eur Urol,2016,70(3):469-475.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.031
13 BuchlerT , PoprachA , BortlicekZ ,et al.Outcomes of patients with long-term treatment response to vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell cancer[J].Clin Genitourin Cancer,2017,15(6):e1047-e1053.
doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.06.006
14 LuS , SteinJE , RimmDL ,et al.Comparison of biomarker moda-lities for predicting response to PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].JAMA Oncol,2019,5(8):1195-1204.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1549
15 BallesterosP , ChamorroJ , Román-GilMS ,et al.Molecular mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy and antiangiogenic treatments in clear cell renal cell carcinoma[J].Cancers (Basel),2021,13(23):5981.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13235981
16 XiangY , ZhengG , ZhongJ ,et al.Advances in renal cell carcinoma drug resistance models[J].Front Oncol,2022,12,870396.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.870396
17 HeW , ChengF , ZhengB ,et al.NUPR1 is a novel potential biomarker and confers resistance to sorafenib in clear cell renal cell carcinoma by increasing stemness and targeting the PTEN/AKT/mTOR pathway[J].Aging (Albany NY),2021,13(10):14015-14038.
18 GotinkKJ , VerheulHM .Anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors: What is their mechanism of action?[J].Angiogenesis,2010,13(1):1-14.
doi: 10.1007/s10456-009-9160-6
19 EllisLM , HicklinDJ .VEGF-targeted therapy: Mechanisms of anti-tumour activity[J].Nat Rev Cancer,2008,8(8):579-591.
doi: 10.1038/nrc2403
20 ChenY , LuZ , QiC ,et al.N(6)-methyladenosine-modified TRAF1 promotes sunitinib resistance by regulating apoptosis and angiogenesis in a METTL14-dependent manner in renal cell carcinoma[J].Mol Cancer,2022,21(1):111.
doi: 10.1186/s12943-022-01549-1
21 SakaiI , MiyakeH , FujisawaM .Acquired resistance to sunitini-bin human renal cell carcinoma cells is mediated by constitutive activation of signal transduction pathways associated with tumour cell proliferation[J].BJU Int,2013,112(2):211-220.
22 AzamF , MehtaS , HarrisAL .Mechanisms of resistance to antiangiogenesis therapy[J].Eur J Cancer,2010,46(8):1323-1332.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.020
23 HuangH , ZhangJ , JiangP ,et al.FXR1 facilitates axitinib resistance in clear cell renal cell carcinoma via regulating KEAP1/Nrf2 signaling pathway[J].Anticancer Drugs,2023,34(2):248-256.
doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000001416
24 MalloGV , FiedlerF , CalvoEL ,et al.Cloning and expression of the rat p8 cDNA, a new gene activated in pancreas during the acute phase of pancreatitis, pancreatic development, and regeneration, and which promotes cellular growth[J].J Biol Chem,1997,272(51):32360-32369.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.51.32360
25 EmmaMR , IovannaJL , BachvarovD ,et al.NUPR1, a new target in liver cancer: implication in controlling cell growth, migration, invasion and sorafenib resistance[J].Cell Death Dis,2016,7(6):e2269.
doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.175
26 MartinTA , LiAX , SandersAJ ,et al.NUPR1 and its potential role in cancer and pathological conditions[J].Int J Oncol,2021,58(5):21.
doi: 10.3892/ijo.2021.5201
27 Santofimia-CastañoP , LanW , BintzJ ,et al.Inactivation of NUPR1 promotes cell death by coupling ER-stress responses with necrosis[J].Sci Rep,2018,8(1):16999.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35020-3
28 MaddenE , LogueSE , HealySJ ,et al.The role of the unfolded protein response in cancer progression: From oncogenesis to chemoresistance[J].Biol Cell,2019,111(1):1-17.
doi: 10.1111/boc.201800050
29 HetzC .The unfolded protein response: Controlling cell fate decisions under ER stress and beyond[J].Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol,2012,13(2):89-102.
doi: 10.1038/nrm3270
30 KowalczykT , SitarekP , SkałaE ,et al.Induction of apoptosis by in vitro and in vivo plant extracts derived from Menyanthes trifoliata L. in human cancer cells[J].Cytotechnology,2019,71(1):165-180.
doi: 10.1007/s10616-018-0274-9
31 KluckRM , Bossy-WetzelE , GreenDR ,et al.The release of cytochrome c from mitochondria: A primary site for Bcl-2 regulation of apoptosis[J].Science,1997,275(5303):1132-1136.
doi: 10.1126/science.275.5303.1132
[1] Tian-yu CAI,Zhen-peng ZHU,Chun-ru XU,Xing JI,Tong-de LV,Zhen-ke GUO,Jian LIN. Expression and significance of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(4): 628-635.
[2] Mei-ni ZUO,Yi-qing DU,Lu-ping YU,Xiang DAI,Tao XU. Correlation between metabolic syndrome and prognosis of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(4): 636-643.
[3] SU Jun-qi,SONG Yang,XIE Shang. Analysis of etiological characteristics and establishment of prediction model of postoperative infections in patients undergoing oral squamous cell carcinoma surgery with free flap reconstruction [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(1): 68-76.
[4] GAO Ya-dong,ZHU An,LI Lu-di,ZHANG Tao,WANG Shuo,SHAN Dan-ping,LI Ying-zi,WANG Qi. Cytotoxicity and underlying mechanism of evodiamine in HepG2 cells [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(6): 1107-1114.
[5] LOU Xue,LIAO Li,LI Xing-jun,WANG Nan,LIU Shuang,CUI Ruo-mei,XU Jian. Methylation status and expression of TWEAK gene promoter region in peripheral blood of patients with rheumatoid arthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(6): 1020-1025.
[6] Lei-zhen SU,Jie CHEN,Xian LI,Ping JI. Effects of salinomycin on proliferation and apoptosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(5): 902-906.
[7] Liang GENG,Jing LV,Jing FAN. Effect of Fei-Liu-Ping ointment combined with cyclophosphamide on lung cancer cell proliferation and acidic microenvironment [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(2): 247-253.
[8] Si-mei REN,Lu-yao LONG,Cheng-shan XU. Interaction between PSF and cytokeratin 18 mediates PSF relocation to cell membrane and maintains chemosensitivity of myeloid leukemia [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(2): 214-220.
[9] LI Man, LI Yuan, SUN Lin, SONG Jun-lai, LV Cong. High mobility group box 1 promotes apoptosis of astrocytes after oxygen glucose deprivation/reoxygenation by regulating the expression of Bcl-2 and Bax [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(5): 785-791.
[10] SUN Jing, SONG Wei-dong, YAN Si-yuan, XI Zhi-jun. Chloroquine inhibits viability of renal carcinoma cells and enhances sunitinib-induced caspase-dependent apoptosis [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(5): 778-784.
[11] WANG Hao, CHEN Liang, YE Xiao-yun. Triptolide induces oxidative stress and apoptosis and activates PIK3/Akt signaling pathway in TM4 sertoli cells [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(4): 607-612.
[12] WANG Yu-jie, GUO Xiang-yang, WANG Jun. Influences of repeated propofol anesthesia on hippocampal apoptosis and long-term learning and memory abilities of neonatal rats [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(2): 310-314.
[13] YANG Guang, CHENG Qing-li, LI Chun-lin, JIA Ya-li, YUE Wen, PEI Xue-tao, LIU Yang, ZHAO Jia-hui, DU Jing, AO Qiang-guo. High glucose reduced the repair function of kidney stem cells conditional medium to  the hypoxia-injured renal tubular epithelium cells [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(1): 125-130.
[14] CAO Pei, JIANG Xue-jun, XI Zhi-jun. Sunitinib induces autophagy via suppressing Akt/mTOR pathway in renal cell carcinoma [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(4): 584-589.
[15] LI Gang, ZHANG Hong-xian, WANG Yun-peng, ZHANG Jing,HONG Kai, TIAN Xiao-jun, MA Lu-lin. Protective effect of phloroglucinol on renal ischemia and reperfusion injury [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(5): 743-748.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!