Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2025, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (1): 85-90. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.01.013

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Accuracy of dynamic navigation system for immediate dental implant placement

Hong LI, Feifei MA*(), Jinlong WENG, Yang DU, Binzhang WU, Feng SUN   

  1. First Clinical Division, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2022-10-10 Online:2025-02-18 Published:2025-01-25
  • Contact: Feifei MA E-mail:mafeifei824@126.com
  • Supported by:
    the Program of New Clinical Techniques and Therapies of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology(PKUSSNCT-22B06)

RICH HTML

  

Abstract:

Objective: Dynamic navigation approaches are widely employed in the context of implant placement surgery. Implant surgery can be divided into immediate and delayed surgery according to the time of implantation. This retrospective study was developed to compare the accuracy of dynamic navigation system for immediate and delayed implantations. Methods: In the study, medical records from all patients that had undergone implant surgery between August 2019 and June 2021 in the First Clinical Division of the Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology were retrospectively reviewed. There were 97 patients [53 males and 44 females, average age (47.14±11.99) years] and 97 implants (delayed group: 51; immediate group: 46) that met with study inclusion criteria and were included. Implant placement accuracy was measured by the superposition of the planned implant position in the preoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image and the actual implant position in the postoperative CBCT image. The 3-dimensional (3D) entry deviation (3D deviation in the coronal aspect of the alveolar ridge), 3D apex deviation (3D deviation in the apical area of the implant) and angular deviation were analyzed as the main observation index when comparing these two groups. The 2-dimensional (2D) horizontal deviation of the entry point and apex point, and the deviation of entry point depth and apex point depth were the secondary observation index. Results: The overall implant restoration survival rate was 100%, and no mechanical or biological complications were reported. The implantation success rate was 100%. The 3D entry deviation, 3D apex deviation and angular deviation of all analyzed implants were (1.146±0.458) mm, (1.276±0.526) mm, 3.022°±1.566°, respectively; while in the delayed group these respective values were (1.157±0.478) mm, (1.285±0.481) mm and 2.936°±1.470° as compared with (1.134±0.440) mm, (1.265±0.780) mm, 3.117°±1.677° in the immediate group. No significant differences (P=0.809, P=0.850, P=0.575) in accuracy were observed when comparing these two groups. Conclusion: Dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery system promotes accurate implantation, and both the immediate and delayed implantations exhibit similar levels of accuracy under dynamic navigation system that meets the clinical demands. Dynamic navigation system is feasible for immediate implantation.

Key words: Dynamic navigation system, Dental implantation, Immediate implantation, Accuracy

CLC Number: 

  • R783.6

Figure 1

Workflow of patients' enrollment"

Figure 2

The dynamic navigation system A, Dcarer® work diagram: 1, infrared receiver (optical camera); 2, reference board; 3, software interface. B, Dcarer® software interface during surgical procedures."

Figure 3

The process of dynamic navigation implant operation A, implant operation in oral; B, real-time navigation in software."

Figure 4

The measurement methods of the deviations between the planed and inserted implants ①, entry deviation (3D deviation in the coronal aspect of the alveolar ridge); ②, apex deviation (3D deviation in the apical area of the implant); ③, angular deviation; ④, entry horizontal deviation; ⑤, apex horizontal deviation; ⑥, entry depth deviation; ⑦, apex depth deviation."

Table 1

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the included patients"

ItemsDelayed groupImmediate groupP value
Age/years, ±s44.92± 12.1949.61±11.390.087
Gender, male/female37/1416/30
Total number of implants5146
Implant position
  Maxillary
    Middle incisor1122
    Lateral incisor107
    Canine38
  Mandible
    Middle incisor102
    Lateral incisor166
    Canine11

Table 2

Distribution of buccal-lingual and mesial-distal directions of the implants"

GroupTooth position
1112132122233132334142
Delayed group47273169147
Immediate group132495404122

Table 3

Models of the included implants"

GroupImplants
3.5 mm× 10.0 mm3.5 mm× 11.5 mm3.5 mm× 13.0 mm3.5 mm× 15.0 mm3.5 mm× 18.0 mm4.3 mm× 10.0 mm4.3 mm× 11.5 mm4.3 mm× 13.0 mmTotal
Delayed group214247031051
Immediate group0121413410246
Total2263820441297

Table 4

Accuracy of dynamic navigation system for the immediate and delayed implantations"

ItemsAll enrolled, ${\bar x}$±sDelayed group, ${\bar x}$±sImmediate group, ${\bar x}$±stP value
Numbers975146
Entry deviation/mm1.146±0.4581.157±0.4781.134±0.4400.2430.809
Apex deviation/mm1.276±0.5261.285±0.4811.265±0.7800.1890.850
Angular deviation/(°)3.022±1.5662.936±1.4703.117±1.677-0.5620.575
EH/mm0.820±0.4620.860±0.4570.777±0.4690.8750.384
AH/mm0.990±0.5241.015±0.5010.964±0.5530.4730.637
ED/mm0.511±0.6120.596±0.4620.416±0.7381.4550.149
AD/mm0.508±0.6050.583±0.4590.425±0.7301.2820.203

Table 5

Distribution of buccal-lingual and mesial-distal directions of the immediate and delayed implantations"

ItemsDBMBDLML
Entry deviation
  Delayed group201777
  Immediate group151696
Apex deviation
  Delayed group11161014
  Immediate group10141012
1 Wei SM , Li Y , Deng K , et al. Does machine-vision-assisted dynamic navigation improve the accuracy of digitally planned prosthetically guided immediate implant placement? A randomized controlled trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2022, 33 (8): 804- 815.
doi: 10.1111/clr.13961
2 Aydemir CA , Arisan V . Accuracy of dental implant placement via dynamic navigation or the freehand method: A split-mouth rando-mized controlled clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2020, 31 (3): 255- 263.
doi: 10.1111/clr.13563
3 Geng N , Ren J , Zhou T , et al. Clinical study of dynamic real-time navigation assisted immediate implant without flapping in the esthetic zone[J]. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2023, 124 (Suppl 1): 101278.
4 Pozzi A , Arcuri L , Kan J , et al. Navigation guided socket-shield technique for implant and pontic sites in the esthetic zone: A proof-of-concept 1-year prospective study with immediate implant placement and loading[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2022, 34 (1): 203- 214.
doi: 10.1111/jerd.12867
5 Pozzi A , Arcuri L , Carosi P , et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes of novel digital workflow and dynamic navigation for single-implant immediate loading in aesthetic zone: 1-year prospective case series[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2021, 32 (12): 1397- 1410.
doi: 10.1111/clr.13839
6 Emery RW , Merritt SA , Lank K , et al. Accuracy of dynamic navigation for dental implant placement-model-based evaluation[J]. J Oral Implantol, 2016, 42 (5): 399- 405.
doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00025
7 Mischkowski RA , Zinser MJ , Neugebauer J , et al. Comparison of static and dynamic computer-assisted guidance methods in implantology[J]. Int J Comput Dent, 2006, 9 (1): 23- 35.
8 Golob DJ , Bencharit S , Carrico CK , et al. Exploring training dental implant placement using computer-guided implant navigation system for predoctoral students: A pilot study[J]. Eur J Dent Educ, 2019, 23 (4): 415- 423.
doi: 10.1111/eje.12447
9 Wei SM , Shi JY , Qiao SC , et al. Accuracy and primary stability of tapered or straight implants placed into fresh extraction socket using dynamic navigation: A randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2022, 26 (3): 2733- 2741.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04247-2
10 苏恩典, 陈莹晖, 杨松, 等. 即刻与延期种植导航手术的术者操作误差分析[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2020, 36 (11): 673- 676.
11 Zhan Y , Wang M , Cheng X , et al. Evaluation of a dynamic navigation system for training students in dental implant placement[J]. J Dent Educ, 2021, 85 (2): 120- 127.
doi: 10.1002/jdd.12399
[1] Xinkai XU, Jianjiang ZHAO, Sukun TIAN, Zhongning LIU, Xiaoyi ZHAO, Xiaobo ZHAO, Tengfei JIANG, Xiaojun CHEN, Chao MA, Yuchun SUN. Evaluation of the accuracy of three-dimensional data acquisition from liquid- interference surfaces assisted by a scanner head with a compressed airflow system [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2025, 57(1): 121-127.
[2] Xiaoqiang LIU,Yin ZHOU. Risk factors of perioperative hypertension in dental implant surgeries with bone augmentation [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(1): 93-98.
[3] Meng-en OU,Yun DING,Wei-feng TANG,Yong-sheng ZHOU. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of cement flow in abutment margin-crown platform switching [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(3): 548-552.
[4] WANG Juan,YU Hua-jie,SUN Jing-de,QIU Li-xin. Application evaluation of prefabricated rigid connecting bar in implants immediate impression preparation of edentulous jaw [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(1): 187-192.
[5] Yang YANG,Ting-ting PU,Li CHEN,Jian-guo TAN. Morphology accuracy evaluation of direct composite occlusal veneer using two types of modified stamp-technique [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 977-982.
[6] LIU Xiao-qiang,YANG Yang,ZHOU Jian-feng,LIU Jian-zhang,TAN Jian-guo. Blood pressure and heart rate changes of 640 single dental implant surgeries [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(2): 390-395.
[7] WANG Ying-chun,HUANG Yong-hui,CHANG Hong,YAO Wei,YAN Xiu-e,LI Ke,ZHANG Yao-peng,ZHENG Wei. Characteristics of benign and malignant lesions of ampullary polyps and the accuracy of forceps biopsy [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(1): 204-209.
[8] GUO Dan-ni,PAN Shao-xia,HENG Mo-di,QU Jian,WEI Xiu-xia,ZHOU Yong-sheng. Comparison of the registration methods for the three-dimensional facial scans applied to the design of full-arch implant supported restoration [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(1): 83-87.
[9] Di XU,Dong-hao WEI,Ya-chi ZHANG,Ping DI,Ye LIN. Effect of disinfectant with benzethon chloramine and isopropanol as main active ingredients on the accuracy of dental impression [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(6): 1112-1116.
[10] Ke-yi HAO,Jia LUO,Ping DI,Hou-zuo GUO,Hui-dan SHEN,Yan-ping LIU,Yu ZHANG,Ye LIN. Validation of the digital integration technology for evaluating the nasolabial morphology variation after the cross-arch fixed restoration of maxillary implant-supported prostheses [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(5): 924-930.
[11] Yue CAO,Jun-kai CHEN,Ke-hui DENG,Yong WANG,Yu-chun SUN,Yi-jiao ZHAO. Accuracy of three intraoral scans for primary impressions of edentulous jaws [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2020, 52(1): 129-137.
[12] Wei-ting LI,Peng LI,Mu-zi PIAO,Fang ZHANG,Jie DI. Study on bone volume harvested from the implant sites with different methods [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2020, 52(1): 103-106.
[13] Qiang LUO,Qian DING,Lei ZHANG,Qiu-fei XIE. Quantitative analysis of occlusal changes in posterior partial fixed implant supported prostheses [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(6): 1119-1123.
[14] CHAI Jin-you, LIU Jian-zhang, WANG Bing, QU Jian, SUN Zhen, GAO Wen-hui, GUO Tian-hao, FENG Hai-lan, PAN Shao-xia. Evaluation of the fabrication deviation of a kind of milling digital implant surgical guides#br# [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(5): 892-898.
[15] WU Min-jie, ZOU Li-dong, LIANG Feng. Clinical observation on soft and hard tissue changes of immediate implantation and immediate reconstruction in anterior region after loading 3 years [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(4): 694-699.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!