Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2025, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (1): 78-84. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.01.012

Previous Articles     Next Articles

One-stage mandibular reconstruction combining iliac flap with immediate implant-based denture

Yifan KANG1, Yanjun GE2, Xiaoming LV1, Shang XIE1, Xiaofeng SHAN1,*(), Zhigang CAI1,*()   

  1. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NHC Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry & NMPA Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing 100081, China
    2. Department of Prosthodontic, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NHC Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry & NMPA Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2024-09-25 Online:2025-02-18 Published:2025-01-25
  • Contact: Xiaofeng SHAN, Zhigang CAI E-mail:bdkqsxf@163.com;c2013xs@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Capital' s Funds for Health Improvement and Research(CFH2024-2-4104)

RICH HTML

  

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and define the indications for a one-stage mandibular reconstruction technique that combines iliac bone flaps with immediate implant-based dentures, and to assess both the accuracy of surgical planning and the long-term success of the procedure. Methods: A total of ten patients underwent the procedure at Peking University Hospital of Stomatology between June 2020 and August 2023. The preoperative biopsy pathology of all the patients confirmed a benign tumor. In this technique, iliac bone flaps were used for mandibular reconstruction, and immediate implant-based dentures were placed during the same surgical session. Various outcome measures were evaluated, including the accuracy of the surgical reconstruction, implant placement deviations (entry point, apical point, depth, and angle), and long-term outcomes, such as cervical bone resorption, implant survival, and the cumulative survival rate. Results: Thirty-eight implants were successfully inserted into the iliac flaps of the ten patients. The median follow-up duration was 23.5 months, and no significant complications occurred during the follow-up period, such as infections, titanium plate exposure, implant loosening, or damage to the implants and dentures. The accuracy of preoperative virtual surgical planning (VSP) was highly reliable. The repeatability of the VSP model compared to the postoperative reconstructed mandible was as follows: 67.82% ±10.16% within 1 mm, 82.14% ±6.58% within 2 mm, and 90.61% ±4.62% within 3 mm. The average maximum deviation from the plan was (6.10±0.89) mm, with an average overall deviation of (1.14±0.31) mm. For the implants, deviations in critical parameters were as follows: entry point deviation was (2.02±0.58) mm, apical point deviation was (2.25± 0.66) mm, depth deviation was (1.26±0.51) mm, and angular deviation was 1.84°±1.10°. The implant survival rate remained 100% during the follow-up, with a cumulative survival rate of 97.37% from 1 to 4 years. Average cervical bone resorption was 0.94 mm. Conclusion: The combination of iliac bone flaps with immediate implant-based dentures for one-stage mandibular reconstruction demonstrated pro-mising clinical outcomes, including high implant survival and minimal complications. This technique proved to be safe and reliable for mandibular reconstruction. However, further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are necessary to confirm the long-term efficacy and optimal indications for this procedure.

Key words: Mandibular reconstruction, Iliac flaps, Implant-supported dental prosthesis, Immediate implant-based denture, Treatment outcome

CLC Number: 

  • R782.23

Figure 1

Preoperative virtual surgical planning A, virtual mandibular reconstruction with iliac bone flap; B, three-dimensional printed model and pre-bent titanium plate; C, three-dimensional printed surgical guides; D, the position of implants and dental prothesis were designed; E, three-dimensional printed implant guides; F, dental prothesis."

Figure 2

Surgical procedure of one-stage mandibular reconstruction combining iliac flap with immediate implant-based denture A, mandibulectomy under the guidance of the surgical guide; B, use model and titanium plate to check the range of mandibulectomy; C, iliac bone flap harvesting and shaping; D, dental implants insertion; E, individual abutments were connected for the fabrication of the implant prothesis using a resin adhesive; F, the prosthesis, implants, iliac bone flap, and titanium plate became a fixed complex, which was transferred to the recipient site as a whole."

Figure 3

Three-dimensional error grade color map represents the surface deviation (mm) between the postoperative and virtual surgical planning mandible models"

Figure 4

Accuracy measurement of dental implants A: Angular deviation, the angle between the long axes of the two implants (green); Depth deviation, depth between the entry point of the two implants (blue); Entry point deviation, distance between the entry point of the two implants (red); Apical point deviation, distance between the apical point of the two implants (yellow). B: Actual measurement example in software."

Figure 5

Profiles of patient preoperatively, postoperatively and at 1-year postoperatively A, preoperative intraoral profile; B, intraoral profile during the surgery; C, intraoral profile at 1 year postoperatively; D, preoperative facial profile; E, facial profile at 1 week postoperatively; F, facial profile at 1 year postoperatively."

1 Hidalgo DA . Fibula free flap: A new method of mandible reconstruction[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1989, 84 (1): 71- 79.
doi: 10.1097/00006534-198907000-00014
2 Taylor GI , Townsend P , Corlett R . Superiority of the deep circumflex iliac vessels as the supply for free groin flaps. Clinical work[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1979, 64 (6): 745- 759.
doi: 10.1097/00006534-197912000-00001
3 Cuesta-Gil M , Ochandiano Caicoya S , Riba-García F , et al. Oral rehabilitation with osseointegrated implants in oncologic patients[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009, 67 (11): 2485- 2496.
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.03.001
4 Zhu HW , Zhang L , Cai ZG , et al. Dental implant rehabilitation after jaw reconstruction assisted by virtual surgical planning[J]. Int J Oral Max Impl, 2019, 34 (5): 1219- 1226.
5 Zhang L , Ding Q , Liu C , et al. Survival, function, and complications of oral implants placed in bone flaps in jaw rehabilitation: A systematic review[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2016, 29 (2): 115- 125.
doi: 10.11607/ijp.4402
6 Urken ML , Buchbinder D , Weinberg H , et al. Primary placement of osseointegrated implants in microvascular mandibular reconstruction[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1989, 101 (1): 56- 73.
doi: 10.1177/019459988910100111
7 Rohner D , Jaquiery C , Kunz C , et al. Maxillofacial reconstruction with prefabricated osseous free flaps: A 3-year experience with 24 patients[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2003, 112 (3): 748- 757.
doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000069709.89719.79
8 Levine JP , Bae JS , Soares M , et al. Jaw in a day: Total maxillofacial reconstruction using digital technology[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2013, 131 (6): 1386- 1391.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31828bd8d0
9 邹四海, 付小明, 喻娜, 等. 下颌骨与种植体支持的牙列同日重建一例[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2021, 56 (12): 1267- 1270.
10 Yang ZY , Kang YF , Lv XM , et al. Iliac crest towards alveolar processes or mandibular inferior margin in mandibular reconstruction with a vascularized iliac bone flap: Which is better?[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2023, 27 (2): 751- 758.
11 Kang YF , Ge YJ , Lv XM , et al. One-stage jaw reconstruction and prosthetic rehabilitation with an iliac flap: A case report and literature review[J]. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg, 2024, 46 (1): 3.
doi: 10.1186/s40902-024-00413-0
12 Runyan CM , Sharma V , Staffenberg DA , et al. Jaw in a day: State of the art in maxillary reconstruction[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2016, 27 (8): 2101- 2104.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003139
13 Qaisi M , Kolodney H , Swedenburg G , et al. Fibula jaw in a day: State of the art in maxillofacial reconstruction[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016, 74 (6): 1284. e1- 1284. e15.
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.01.047
14 Patel A , Harrison P , Cheng A , et al. Fibular reconstruction of the maxilla and mandible with immediate implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation: Jaw in a day[J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 2019, 31 (3): 369- 386.
doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2019.03.002
15 Khatib B , Cheng A , Sim F , et al. Challenges with the jaw in a day technique[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2020, 78 (10): 1869. e1- 1869. e10.
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.06.007
16 Sukato DC , Hammer D , Wang W , et al. Experience with "jaw in a day" technique[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2020, 31 (5): 1212- 1217.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006369
17 Chang YM , Wei FC . Fibula jaw-in-a-day with minimal computer-aided design and manufacturing: Maximizing efficiency, cost-effectiveness, intraoperative flexibility, and quality[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2021, 147 (2): 476- 479.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007546
18 Panchal H , Shamsunder MG , Petrovic I , et al. Dental implant survival in vascularized bone flaps: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2020, 146 (3): 637- 648.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007077
19 Khadembaschi D , Brierly GI , Chatfield MD , et al. Systematic review and pooled analysis of survival rates, success, and outcomes of osseointegrated implants in a variety of composite free flaps[J]. Head Neck, 2020, 42 (9): 2669- 2686.
doi: 10.1002/hed.26238
20 Kang YF , Ding MK , Qiu SY , et al. Mandibular reconstruction using iliac flap based on occlusion-driven workflow transferred by digital surgical guides[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2022, 80 (11): 1858- 1865.
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2022.07.140
21 Kang YF , Ge YJ , Ding MK , et al. A comparison of accuracy among different approaches of static-guided implant placement in patients treated with mandibular reconstruction: A retrospective study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2024, 35 (3): 251- 257.
doi: 10.1111/clr.14219
22 Shan XF , Han D , Ge YJ , et al. Clinical outcomes of keratinized mucosa augmentation in jaws reconstructed with fibula or iliac bone flaps[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2022, 51 (7): 949- 956.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.11.013
[1] Wenjing LI,Baozhou ZHANG,Heng LI,Liangpeng LAI,Hui DU,Ning SUN,Xiaofeng GONG,Ying LI,Yan WANG,Yong WU. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis for end-stage ankle and hindfoot arthropathy: Short- and mid-term clinical outcomes [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(2): 299-306.
[2] Congwei WANG,Min GAO,Yao YU,Wenbo ZHANG,Xin PENG. Clinical analysis of denture rehabilitation after mandibular fibula free-flap reconstruction [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(1): 66-73.
[3] Xue ZOU,Xiao-juan BAI,Li-qing ZHANG. Effectiveness of tofacitinib combined with iguratimod in the treatment of difficult-to-treat moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(6): 1013-1021.
[4] Min QIU,You-long ZONG,Bin-shuai WANG,Bin YANG,Chu-xiao XU,Zheng-hui SUN,Min LU,Lei ZHAO,Jian LU,Cheng LIU,Xiao-jun TIAN,Lu-lin MA. Treatment outcome of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in patients with renal tumors of moderate to high complexity [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(5): 833-837.
[5] Lei WANG,Tian-dong HAN,Wei-xing JIANG,Jun LI,Dao-xin ZHANG,Ye TIAN. Comparison of safety and effectiveness of active migration technique and in situ lithotripsy technique in the treatment of 1-2 cm upper ureteral calculi by flexible ure-teroscopy [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(3): 553-557.
[6] LI Wei-hao,LI Wei,ZHANG Xue-min,LI Qing-le,JIAO Yang,ZHANG Tao,JIANG Jing-jun,ZHANG Xiao-ming. Comparison of the outcomes between open and hybrid approaches in the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms repair [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(1): 177-181.
[7] Yan-fang JIANG,Jian WANG,Yong-jian WANG,Jia LIU,Yin PEI,Xiao-peng LIU,Ying-fang AO,Yong MA. Mid-to-long term clinical outcomes and predictors after anterior cruciate ligament revision [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 857-863.
[8] Zheng-da ZHU,Yan GAO,Wen-xiu HE,Xin FANG,Yang LIU,Pan WEI,Zhi-min YAN,Hong HUA. Efficacy and safety of Nocardia rubra cell wall skeleton for the treatment of erosive oral lichen planus [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 964-969.
[9] Xiao LI,Jia-zeng SU,Yan-yan ZHANG,Li-qi ZHANG,Ya-qiong ZHANG,Deng-gao LIU,Guang-yan YU. Inflammation grading and sialoendoscopic treatment of131I radioiodine-induced sialadenitis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(3): 586-590.
[10] Ying ZHAN,Yi-tian DU,Zhen-zhen YANG,Chun-li ZHANG,Xian-rong QI. Preparation and characterization of paclitaxel microspheres in situ gel and its antitumor efficacy by local injection [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(3): 477-486.
[11] Ze-chuan YANG,Chao-xu LIU,Yang LIN,Wei-hua HU,Wen-jian CHEN,Feng LI,Heng ZENG. All levels miniplate fixation and a modified hybrid fixation method in expansive open-door cervical laminoplasty: a retrospective comparative study [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(1): 187-193.
[12] Wen-zhe YOU,Gui-li DOU,Bin XIA. Two-year outcomes and the influence factors of indirect pulp treatment in primary teeth: a retrospective study [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(1): 65-69.
[13] Xin yi LI,Jin xia ZHAO,Xiang yuan LIU. Diagnosis and treatment of antiphospholipid antibody:related recurrent spontaneous abortion and analysis of therapeutic drugs and pregnancy outcome in 75 patients with antiphospholipid syndrome [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(6): 956-961.
[14] ZHANG Ming-ming, ZHENG Ying-dong, LIANG Yu-hong. A prognostic model for assessment of outcome of root canal treatment in teeth with pulpitis or apical periodontitis#br# [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(1): 123-130.
[15] LI Xu, LI Feng-long, LU Yi, ZHU Yi-ming, GUO Si-yi, LI Yi-jun, JIANG Chun-yan. Clinical study on locking plate for the treatment of non-osteoporotic complex proximal humeral fractures [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(5): 855-860.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!