北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (1): 94-100. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.01.014

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

氧化锆陶瓷表面硅锂喷涂层的摩擦磨损性能

李伟伟,陈虎,王勇,孙玉春*()   

  1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院口腔医学数字化研究中心, 口腔修复教研室, 国家口腔医学中心, 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心, 口腔生物材料和数字诊疗装备国家工程研究中心, 口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室, 国家卫生健康委口腔医学计算机应用工程技术研究中心, 北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-11 出版日期:2023-02-18 发布日期:2023-01-31
  • 通讯作者: 孙玉春 E-mail:kqsyc@bjmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(52035001);首都科技领军人才培养工程(Z191100006119022);北大医学顶尖学科及学科群发展专项(BMU2022XKQ003)

Research on friction and wear behaviors of silicon-lithium spray coating on zirconia ceramics

Wei-wei LI,Hu CHEN,Yong WANG,Yu-chun SUN*()   

  1. Center of Digital Dentistry, Faculty of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NHC Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2022-10-11 Online:2023-02-18 Published:2023-01-31
  • Contact: Yu-chun SUN E-mail:kqsyc@bjmu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Foundation of China(52035001);Capital's Training Project for Science and Technology Leading Talents(Z191100006119022);Peking University Medicine Fund for World's Leading Discipline or Discipline Cluster Development(BMU2022XKQ003)

RICH HTML

  

摘要:

目的: 研究氧化锆陶瓷表面硅锂喷涂层的微观形貌和摩擦磨损性能, 初步评估其美观效果, 为其临床应用提供指导和支持。方法: 将氧化锆陶瓷试样随机分为三组: 涂层组(有2个亚组)、抛光组(有2个亚组)和上釉组(有4个亚组), 每个亚组10个样本。涂层组的两个亚组是对未处理和初步抛光的氧化锆陶瓷表面分别喷涂硅锂喷涂层; 抛光组的两个亚组分别是氧化锆陶瓷表面初步抛光和精细抛光; 上釉组的4个亚组分别是对初步抛光的氧化锆陶瓷表面分别上Biomic釉和Stain/Glaze釉, 未处理的氧化锆陶瓷表面分别上Biomic釉和Stain/Glaze釉。对磨物选用滑石瓷球, 与上述8个亚组的氧化锆陶瓷试样构成摩擦副。应用扫描电镜观测涂层组表面和断面的微观形貌, 测量涂层和釉层的厚度; 应用激光三维形貌显微镜测量涂层组和抛光组表面的线粗糙度; 应用显微硬度计测量各组的维氏硬度。制作氧化锆陶瓷全冠, 初步评价硅锂喷涂层的美观效果。应用口腔咀嚼模拟试验机, 在50 N垂直载荷及人工唾液润滑下进行50 000次咀嚼循环的摩擦磨损试验。应用白光干涉仪, 测量滑石瓷球磨斑的宽度并计算其磨损深度; 测量氧化锆陶瓷试件磨斑的最大深度和体积, 计算磨损率。应用Kruskal-Wallis非参数检验和Dunn's多重检验分析各组的磨损深度, 检验水准α = 0.05。结果: 氧化锆陶瓷表面未处理和初步抛光后形成的两种硅锂喷涂层微观形貌均有突起缺陷, 两者的线粗糙度均大于抛光组。氧化锆陶瓷表面初步抛光后形成的硅锂喷涂层厚度中位数为13.0 μm [四分位距(interquartile range, IQR): 11.6, 17.9], 氧化锆陶瓷表面未处理形成的硅锂喷涂层厚度中位数为4.4 μm(IQR: 4.1, 4.7)。涂层组的维氏硬度值和磨损率均介于抛光组和上釉组之间。对磨的滑石瓷球磨斑深度由大到小依次是上釉组、涂层组和抛光组, 上釉组和抛光组的滑石瓷球磨损深度差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);各组内随着抛光程度的增加, 滑石瓷球的磨损深度减小。各氧化锆陶瓷试件磨斑的最大深度和体积由大到小依次是上釉组、涂层组和抛光组, 上釉组和抛光组的氧化锆陶瓷试件的磨损深度差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论: 氧化锆陶瓷表面硅锂喷涂层与抛光处理相比, 增加了氧化锆陶瓷表面美观; 与上釉处理相比, 减少了对磨的滑石瓷球的磨损, 可以作为一种氧化锆陶瓷表面处理的新方法。

关键词: 氧化锆陶瓷, 表面处理, 硅锂喷涂层, 摩擦磨损

Abstract:

Objective: To study microstructure, friction and wear behaviors of silicon-lithium spray coating on the surface of zirconia ceramics and to preliminarily evaluate its esthetic so as to provide support and guidance for the clinical application. Methods: Zirconia ceramic specimens were randomly divided into three groups: coating group (two subgroups), polishing group (two subgroups), and glazing group (four subgroups), with 10 samples in each subgroup. The two subgroups of coating group were the zirconia ceramics with the untreated and preliminary polishing surfaces sprayed with silicon-lithium coating, respectively. The two subgroups of polishing group were preliminary polishing and fine polishing of zirconia ceramics, respectively. The four subgroups of glazing group were preliminarily polished zirconia ceramics glazed with Biomic and Stain/Glaze products, respectively; and untreated zirconia ceramics glazed with Biomic and Stain/Glaze products, respectively. The above 8 subgroups of zirconia ceramic specimens were used as friction pairs with 80 steatite ceramics for 50 000 chewing cycles under 50 N vertical load and artificial saliva lubrication using chewing simulation. Scanning electron microscope was used to observe the microstructure of the surface and section of the coating group, and the thickness of the coating and glazing were measured. The linear roughness of the coating and polishing groups was mea-sured using a laser confocal scanning microscope. Vickers hardness was measured using a microhardness tester and the esthetic of zirconia ceramic full crown sprayed with silicon-lithium coating was preliminarily evaluated. White light interferometer was used to measure the width, the maximum depth and the volume of the wear scars of each group, and the wear depth of steatite ceramics and wear rate of zirconia ceramic specimens were calculated. Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test and Dunn's multiple comparisons test were used to analyze the wear depth of each group (α=0.05). Results: The microstructures of the silica-lithium spray coatings on the untreated and preliminarily polished zirconia ceramic surfaces showed the protruding defects, and the line roughness of coating group was larger than that of the polishing group. The median thickness of the silica-lithium spray coating on the preliminarily polished zirconia ceramic was 13.0 μm (interquartile range, IQR: 11.6, 17.9), while that of the silica-lithium spray coating on the untreated zirconia ceramic was 4.4 μm (IQR: 4.1, 4.7). The Vickers hardness and wear rate of the coating group were between the polishing group and the glazing group. The wear depths of the wear scars of steatite ceramics were the glazing group, coating group, and polishing group in descending order, and there was statistically significant difference between glazing and polishing groups (P < 0.05). With the increase of polishing procedure, the wear depth of steatite ceramics decreased in each subgroups. The orders of maximum depth and volume of wear scars of zirconia ceramic were the glazing group, coating group, and polishing group in descending order, and there was statistically significant difference in the maximum depth of wear scars between glazing and polishing groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The silica-lithium spray coating on the zirconia ceramic, can be used as a new method for zirconia ceramic surface treatment, because it can increase the esthetic of zirconia ceramics compared with polishing and reduce the wear of steatite ceramics compared with glazing.

Key words: Zirconia ceramics, Surface treatment, Silicon-lithium spray coating, Friction and wear behaviors

中图分类号: 

  • R781.0

图1

氧化锆陶瓷表面的硅锂喷涂层的微观形貌"

图2

氧化锆陶瓷表面的硅锂喷涂层断面的微观形貌"

图3

上釉组断面的微观形貌"

图4

不同处理的氧化锆陶瓷表面的线粗糙度"

图5

氧化锆陶瓷表面不同处理后的表面维氏硬度值"

图6

滑石瓷球和不同表面处理的氧化锆陶瓷的磨损深度"

图7

不同表面处理的氧化锆陶瓷表面磨斑的微观形貌"

图8

不同表面处理的氧化锆陶瓷的磨损率"

图9

四种不同表面处理的氧化锆陶瓷全冠"

1 李文晶, 李天舒, 骆雪, 等. 口腔陶瓷修复体调磨后表面处理方法研究进展[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2018, 11 (1): 57- 60.
2 Aljomard Y , Altunok E , Kara H . Enamel wear against monolithic zirconia restorations: A meta-analysis and systematic review of in vitro studies[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2022, 34 (3): 473- 489.
doi: 10.1111/jerd.12823
3 Gou M , Chen H , Kang J , et al. Antagonist enamel wear of tooth-supported monolithic zirconia posterior crowns in vivo: A systema-tic review[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2019, 121 (4): 598- 603.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.06.005
4 Stawarczyk B , Özcan M , Schmutz F , et al. Two-body wear of monolithic, veneered and glazed zirconia and their corresponding enamel antagonists[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 2013, 71 (1): 102- 112.
doi: 10.3109/00016357.2011.654248
5 Tang Z , Zhao X , Wang H . Quantitative analysis on the wear of monolithic zirconia crowns on antagonist teeth[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2021, 21 (1): 94.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01452-z
6 Amer R , Kürklü D , Kateeb E , et al. Three-body wear potential of dental yttrium-stabilized zirconia ceramic after grinding, polishing, and glazing treatments[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2014, 112 (5): 1151- 1155.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.021
7 崔丹, 刘逵仲, 张兆钰, 等. 二氧化锆与钴铬合金修复体精细抛光后对天然牙磨耗的影响[J]. 口腔医学, 2018, 38 (1): 10- 14.
8 胡国新, 杨瑛, 江月梅, 等. 微波烧结与常规烧结对牙科用氧化锆摩擦磨损性能的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2017, 35 (2): 150- 154.
9 Li H , Zhou ZR . Wear behaviour of human teeth in dry and artificial saliva conditions[J]. Wear, 2001, 249 (10/11): 980- 984.
10 Selvaraj U , Koli DK , Jain V , et al. Evaluation of the wear of glazed and polished zirconia crowns and the opposing natural teeth: A clinical pilot study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2021, 126 (1): 52- 57.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.04.007
11 陈济芬, 丁宏. 抛光及上釉对氧化锆全冠与釉质间磨耗性能的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2016, 43 (2): 165- 167.
12 黎敏斯, 周丽琰, 苏晓晖. 不同表面处理全解剖式氧化锆全瓷冠磨耗性能的对比研究[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2018, 34 (10): 591- 594.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1634.2018.10.005
13 Deval P , Tembhurne J , Gangurde A , et al. A clinical comparative evaluation of the wear of enamel antagonist to monolithic zirconia and metal-ceramic crowns[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2021, 34 (6): 744- 751.
14 Alfrisany NM , Shokati B , Tam LE , et al. Simulated occlusal adjustments and their effects on zirconia and antagonist artificial enamel[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2019, 11 (3): 162- 168.
15 Branco AC , Silva R , Jorge H , et al. Tribological performance of the pair human teeth vs. 3D printed zirconia: An in vitro chewing simulation study[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2020, 110, 103900.
16 郑靖, 沙伟, 周仲荣. 不同年龄段天然牙的摩擦磨损行为研究[J]. 摩擦学学报, 2004, 24 (5): 471- 475.
[1] 唐仁韬,李欣海,于江利,冯琳,高学军. 复合树脂与玻璃陶瓷微拉伸粘接强度的体外研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(4): 755-761.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨天智, 陈大兵, 张强. 不同吸收促进剂及酶抑制剂对胰岛素体内及体外口腔黏膜渗透性的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2001, 33(3): 238 -242 .
[2] 柳晓辉, 那加, 刘玲玲, 罗斌. 头颈部血管肉瘤3例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2001, 33(3): 288 -289 .
[3] 梁成, 王兴, 伊彪, 李自力, 王晓霞. 骨性颞下颌关节强直伴小颌畸形及阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征的牵引成骨治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2002, 34(2): 112 -116 .
[4] 郭应禄, 张凯. 临床研究所要创高水平医疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2002, 34(5): 431 -433 .
[5] 方鹏骞, 徐娟, 张佳慧, 李翠, 杨芳, 孔鹏, 孙杨. 艾滋病高危人群规模间接估计方法的应用及其结果的外推研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2008, 40(2): 214 -218 .
[6] 胡维亨, 任军. 人乙型肝炎病毒DNA阳性血清对人骨髓间充质干细胞向肝细胞分化的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2008, 40(5): 459 -464 .
[7] 龚继芳, 袁艳华, 宋国红, 余靖, 贾军, 任军. CD44+/CD24-/low/ABCG2-乳腺癌干细胞比例增高与临床治疗相关的探索性研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2008, 40(5): 465 -470 .
[8] 邸立军, 任军, 宋国红, 余靖, 方健, 车利, 祝毓琳. 自体外周血CD34+干细胞来源树突状细胞体外扩增治疗恶性体腔积液[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2008, 40(5): 486 -488 .
[9] 张勇, 栾庆先. 牙周维护治疗在保持牙周长期疗效中的作用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2011, 43(1): 29 -33 .
[10] 曾百进, 余日月, 周永胜, 徐军, 倪永伟, 刘云松, 许永伟. rhTNF-α对成骨向分化前后的人脂肪基质细胞分泌血管生成相关生长因子的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(5): 565 -570 .