北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 667-673. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2015.04.024

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

光、磁分子探针在脑组织间隙内的扩散分布规律

李怀业1,2,3,赵越1,2,3,左龙3,4,傅瑜3,5,李楠6,袁兰2△,张殊佳1△,韩鸿宾3,4△   

  1. (1. 大连大学环境与化学工程学院,辽宁大连116622; 2. 北京大学医药卫生分析中心,北京100191; 3. 北京市磁共振成像设备与技术重点实验室,北京100191; 4. 北京大学第三医院放射科,北京100191; 5. 北京大学第三医院神经科,北京100191; 6. 北京大学第三医院临床流行病学研究中心,北京100191)
  • 出版日期:2015-08-18 发布日期:2015-08-18
  • 通讯作者: 袁兰,张殊佳,韩鸿宾 E-mail:hanhongbin@bjmu.edu.cn; yuan_lan@bjmu.edu.cn; shujiazhang@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(61450004、91330103)、北京市科技专项(z141107004414031)和高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20130001130013)资助

Diffusion of fluorescent and magnetic molecular probes in brain interstitial space

LI Huai-ye1,2,3, ZHAO Yue1,2,3, ZUO Long3,4, FU Yu3,5, LI Nan6, YUAN Lan2△, ZHANG Shu-jia1△, HAN Hong-bin3,4△   

  1. (1. College of Environment and Chemical Engineering, Dalian University, Liaoning Dalian 116622, China; 2. Peking University Medical and Health Analysis Center, Beijing 100191, China; 3. Beijing Key Lab of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Device and Technique, Beijing 100191, China; 4. Department of Radiology,Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; 5.Department of  Neurology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; 6. Research Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China)
  • Online:2015-08-18 Published:2015-08-18
  • Contact: YUAN Lan, ZHANG Shu-jia, HAN Hong-bin E-mail:hanhongbin@bjmu.edu.cn; yuan_lan@bjmu.edu.cn; shujiazhang@163.com
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61450004,91330103),Beijing Science and Technology Projects(z141107004414031) and the Special Scientific Research Foundation for Doctoral Discipline Area of the Institution of Higher Learning(20130001130013)

摘要:

目的:对比荧光分子探针四甲基罗丹明-葡聚糖(dextran-tetramethylrhodamine, DT)和荧光黄(lucifer yellow CH, LY)、磁性分子探针钆-二乙三胺五乙酸(gadolinium-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid, Gd-DTPA)在多孔介质中的动态扩散分布规律,筛选合适的荧光分子探针用于大鼠脑组织间隙(interstitial space, ISS)光学成像。方法:琼脂糖凝胶分为DT组、LY组、Gd-DTPA组,分别导入相应分子探针, 应用激光扫描共聚焦显微镜分别动态观察DT、LY在琼脂糖凝胶内的扩散分布,与磁共振成像显示的Gd-DTPA在琼脂糖凝胶内的动态扩散过程进行比较。LY分别导入18只大鼠尾状核,对不同时间点离体脑切片进行荧光成像,其成像数据与相应导入Gd-DTPA的大鼠的磁共振在体检测成像数据进行对比。结果:DT、LY及Gd-DTPA在琼脂糖凝胶中的扩散分布均表现为各向同性,平均扩散分布速率分别为:(0.07±0.02)×10-2 mm2/s、(1.54±0.47)×10-2 mm2/s、(1.45±0.50)×10-2 mm2/s,DT与LY、DT与Gd-DTPA间差异均有统计学意义(ANOVA, F=367.15, P<0.001; Post-Hoc LSD, P<0.001),LY与Gd-DTPA间差异无统计学意义 (Post-Hoc LSD, P =0.091)。重复测量方差分析比较分子探针的扩散分布面积随时间变化的趋势:DT与LY、DT与Gd-DTPA间的变化规律差异均有统计学意义 (Bonferroni校正, α=0.0125, P<0.001),LY与Gd-DTPA间差异无统计学意义 (Bonferroni校正, α=0.0125, P =0.203)。LY与Gd-DTPA在大鼠尾状核ISS内分布随时间变化呈各向异性,均表现为指向同侧皮层区的单方向楔形扩散,平均扩散分布速率分别为 (1.03±0.29)×10-3 mm2/s和(0.81±0.27)×10-3 mm2/s, t=0.759, P =0.490;信号衰减半衰期分别为 (2.58±0.04) h和(2.46±0.10) h, t=2.025, P =0.113。LY与Gd-DTPA间扩散分布面积比率在0.5、1、2、3、7 h差异无统计学意义(t=2.249, P=0.088; t=2.582, P=0.061; t=1.966, P=0.121; t=0.132, P=0.674; t=0.032, P=0.976),在11 h差异有统计学意义(t=2.917, P =0.043)。结论:LY与Gd-DTPA在多孔介质内的扩散分布规律一致,是ISS荧光成像的适用分子探针,可用于脑ISS的微观、宏观、离体检测。

关键词: 脑, 组织间隙, 分子探针, 磁共振成像, 荧光染料

Abstract:

Objective: To compare the diffusion properties of fluorescent probes dextran-tetramethylrhodamine (DT) and lucifer yellow CH (LY) and magnetic probe gadolinium-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) in porous media and to screen out a suitable fluorescent probe for optical imaging of brain interstitial space (ISS). Methods:Agarose gels sample were divided into DT group, LY group and Gd-DTPA group, and the corresponding molecular probes were imported in each group. The dynamic diffusions of DT and LY in agarose gels at different time points (15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min) were scanned with laser scanning confocal microscope, the dynamic diffusion of Gd-DTPA was imaged with magnetic resonance imaging. The average diffusion speed of LY were demonstrated to be consistent with those of Gd-DTPA. The LY was introduced into caudate putamen of 18 rats, respectively, the diffusion of LY in the sequential slices of rat brain at different time points (0.5, 1, 2, 3, 7, 11 h) were scanned, and the results were compared with those of rats’ brain with Gd-DTPA imported and imaged in vivo with magnetic resonance imaging.Results:The diffusions of the three probes were isotropic in the agarose gels, and the average diffusion speeds of DT, LY and Gd-DTPA were: (0.07±0.02)×10-2 mm2/s, (1.54±0.47)×10-2  mm2/s, (1.45±0.50)×10-2 mm2/s, respectively. The speed of DT was more slower than both LY and Gd-DTPA (ANOVA, F=367.15, P<0.001; Post-Hoc LSD, P<0.001), and there was no significant difference between the speeds of LY and Gd-DTPA (Post-Hoc LSD, P=0.091). The variation tendency of diffusion area of DT was different with both that of LY and that of Gd-DTPA (Bonferroni correction, α=0.0125, P<0.001), and there was no significant difference between LY and Gd-DTPA (Bonferroni correction, α=0.0125, P=0.203),  in analysis by repeated measures data of ANOVA. The diffusions of LY and Gd-DTPA were anisotropy in rat caudate putamen,and the average diffusion speeds of LY and Gd-DTPA were: (1.03±0.29)×10-3 mm2/s, (0.81±0.27)×10-3 mm2/s, respectively, no significant difference was demonstrated (t=0.759, P=0.490); half-time of single intensity of LY and Gd-DTPA was (2.58±0.04) h, (2.46±0.10) h, respectively, no significant difference was found (t=2.025, P=0.113). The diffusion area ratios between LY and Gd-DTPA in rat caudate putamen was not statistically different at hours 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 7 (t=2.249, P=0.088; t=2.582, P=0.061; t=1.966, P=0.121; t=0.132, P=0.674; t=0.032, P=0.976), while, a slightly difference was found at 11 h (t=2.917, P=0.043,in analysis by t test) .Conclusion:LY present the same diffusion property with GdDTPA in porous media witch including agarose gels and live rat brain tissue, indicates that LY is a suitable fluorescent probe for optical imaging of brain ISS, and it can be used for microscopic, macro and in vitro measure of brain ISS.

Key words: Brain, Interstitial space, Molecular probes, Magnetic resonance imaging, Fluorescent dye

中图分类号: 

  • R329.481
[1] 邢念增,王明帅,杨飞亚,尹路,韩苏军. 前列腺免活检创新理念的临床实践及其应用前景[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 565-566.
[2] 田宇轩,阮明健,刘毅,李德润,吴静云,沈棋,范宇,金杰. 双参数MRI改良PI-RADS评分4分和5分病灶的最大径对临床有意义前列腺癌的预测效果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 567-574.
[3] 李晋娜,许丽娜,李敏,宋怡,张静,贾龙斌. 急性脑梗死患者血清BDNF、IL-18、hs-CRP水平与血管性认知障碍的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 708-714.
[4] 龙仁,毛鑫,高天姿,解倩,谈瀚博,李子寅,韩鸿宾,袁兰. 熊果酸改善精神分裂症小鼠脱髓鞘和脑组织间液引流紊乱[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 487-494.
[5] 刘毅,袁昌巍,吴静云,沈棋,肖江喜,赵峥,王霄英,李学松,何志嵩,周利群. 靶向穿刺+6针系统穿刺对PI-RADS 5分患者的前列腺癌诊断效能[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 812-817.
[6] 袁昌巍,李德润,李志华,刘毅,山刚志,李学松,周利群. 多参数磁共振成像中动态对比增强状态在诊断PI-RADS 4分前列腺癌中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 838-842.
[7] 刘颖,霍然,徐慧敏,王筝,王涛,袁慧书. 磁共振血管壁成像评估颈动脉中重度狭窄患者斑块特征与脑血流灌注的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 646-651.
[8] 傅强,高冠英,徐雁,林卓华,孙由静,崔立刚. 无症状髋关节前上盂唇撕裂超声与磁共振检查的对比研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 665-669.
[9] 范常锋,黄亚平,李霞,陈芸,李真,乔淑冬. 以发作性体位性视物双影为前期症状的后循环卒中1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 762-765.
[10] 于欢,杨若彤,王斯悦,吴俊慧,王梦莹,秦雪英,吴涛,陈大方,武轶群,胡永华. 2型糖尿病患者使用二甲双胍与缺血性脑卒中发病风险的队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 456-464.
[11] 叶珊,金萍萍,张楠,邬海博,石林,赵强,杨坤,袁慧书,樊东升. 肌萎缩侧索硬化患者认知功能改变与脑皮层厚度分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1158-1162.
[12] 蔡颖,万巧琴,蔡宪杰,高亚娟,韩鸿宾. 光生物调节加速脑组织间液引流及其机制[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 1000-1005.
[13] 陈素华,杨军,陈新,杨辰龙,孙建军,林国中,于涛,杨欣,韩芸峰,吴超,司雨,马凯明. 大型、巨大型上矢状窦中后1/3侵犯颅外复发脑膜瘤的手术治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 1006-1012.
[14] 陆林,刘晓星,袁凯. 中国脑科学计划进展[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 791-795.
[15] 杜燕燕,王健,贺兰,季丽娜,徐樨巍. 儿童川崎病合并轻微脑炎/脑病伴可逆性胼胝体压部病变综合征1例并文献复习[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(4): 756-761.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!