不同浓度七氟烷麻醉与不同刺激电压对脊髓手术中运动诱发电位波幅和潜伏期的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.02.022

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的：评价七氟烷在不同呼气末浓度和不同刺激电压时对脊髓手术中运动诱发电位（motor evoked potentials，MEPs）监测的影响，为临床需要进行MEPs监测手术的麻醉用药提供选择依据。方法：选择年龄18~65岁、ASA Ⅰ~Ⅱ级、需择期行胸腰段脊髓肿瘤切除手术的患者48例。常规全身麻醉（全麻）诱导后，在手术重要操作步骤开始前分别测定刺激电压为300 V、400 V、500 V、600 V时和七氟烷呼气末浓度分别为0.0%、0.5%、1.0%、1.5%时的MEPs波幅和潜伏期。全麻期间瑞芬太尼的输注速度维持在0.2 μg/（kg·min），适当调整丙泊酚泵注速度维持脑电双频谱指数（bispectral index，BIS）在30～50范围内。结果：七氟烷呼气末浓度和电生理监测仪的刺激电压显著影响MEPs的波幅，在同一刺激电压下，随七氟烷呼气末浓度的提高，MEPs的波幅下降,呼气末浓度1.5%时MEPs波幅（左侧20.50 μV、70.71 μV、135.97 μV、190.00 μV，右侧14.29 μV、50.71 μV、73.10 μV、77.50 μV）明显低于呼气末浓度0.5%时MEPs波幅（左侧100.00 μV、362.57 μV、444.05 μV、435.00 μV ，右侧115.00 μV、207.15 μV、258.34 μV、358.50 μV）以及0.0%时MEPs波幅（左侧143.00 μV、388.10 μV、484.53 μV、500.00 μV，右侧176.00 μV、407.60 μV、384.35 μV、451.00 μV），差异有统计学意义（左侧χ2= 27.46, P< 0.01，右侧χ2=60.49, P< 0.01；左侧χ2= 20.73, P< 0.01，右侧 χ2=55.05,P< 0.01；左侧χ2= 34.25,P< 0.01，右侧χ2=33.58,P< 0.01；左侧χ2= 28.61,P< 0.01，右侧 χ2= 49.04,P< 0.01）；MEPs的潜伏期也有延长，但结果差异无统计学意义（P=0.26）。同一呼气末浓度下，随刺激电压的增大，MEPs波幅增高，电压300 V时MEPs波幅（左侧 143.00 μV、100.00 μV、61.50 μV、20.50 μV，右侧176.00 μV、115.00 μV、41.07 μV、14.29 μV）明显低于400 V时MEPs波幅（左侧388.10 μV、362.57 μV、198.81 μV、70.71 μV，右侧407.60 μV、207.15 μV、89.00 μV、50.71 μV）、500 V时MEPs波幅（左侧484.53 μV、444.05 μV、216.24 μV、135.97 μV，右侧 384.35 μV、258.34 μV、187.50 μV、73.10 μV）与600 V时MEPs波幅（左侧500.00 μV、435.00 μV、344.00 μV、190.00 μV，右侧451.00 μV、385.50 μV、156.00 μV、77.50 μV），差异有统计学意义（左侧χ2= 45.55,P< 0.01，右侧χ2= 25.73,P< 0.01；左侧χ2= 46.67,P< 0.01，右侧χ2= 55.30,P< 0.01；左侧χ2= 47.36,P< 0.01，右侧χ2= 47.82,P< 0.01；左侧χ2= 38.67,P< 0.01 ，右侧χ2= 45.87,P< 0.01）。同一呼气末浓度下，随刺激电压的增大，MEPs的潜伏期逐渐缩短，电压300 V时MEPs潜伏期与400 V、500 V、600 V MEPs潜伏期比较差异有统计学意义（左侧 F=7.50，P=0.01；右侧F=13.33，P<0.01），但是这种潜伏期的变化没有临床意义。同一刺激电压下，随七氟烷呼气末浓度的提高，MEPs的成功率下降，呼气末浓度1.5%时MEPs的成功率(左侧43.8%、70.8%、77.1%、81.3%，右侧37.5%、60.4%、75.0%、66.7%)明显低于呼气末浓度0.5%时MEPs的成功率（左侧72.9%、89.6%、95.8%、95.8%，右侧66.7%、89.6%、95.8%、97.9%）及0.0%时MEPs的成功率（左侧79.2%、87.5%、95.8%、93.8% ，右侧75.0%、95.8%、95.8%、95.8%），而同一呼气末浓度下，增大刺激电压可以提高MEPs的成功率，电压300 V时MEPs的成功率（左侧79.2%、72.9%、62.5%、43.8%，右侧75.0%、66.7%、60.4%、37.5%）明显低于400 V MEPs的成功率（左侧87.5%、89.6%、77.1%、70.8%，右侧95.8%、89.6%、79.2%、60.4%）、500 V MEPs的成功率（95.8%、95.8%、91.7%、77.1%，右侧95.8%、95.8%、81.3%、75.0%）以及600 V时MEPs的成功率（左侧93.8%、95.8%、89.6%、81.3%，右侧95.8%、97.9%、89.6%、66.7%），刺激电压600 V、七氟烷呼气末浓度为1.5%时MEPs的成功率与刺激电压300 V、七氟烷呼气末浓度为0.0%时MEPs的成功率差异无统计学意义（P=0.22）。结论：七氟烷对术中MEPs监测具有剂量依赖性抑制作用，但通过增加刺激电压，可以增大MEPs的波幅，缩短MEPs的潜伏期，提高MEPs监测的成功率，扩大了七氟烷在脊髓功能监测手术中的适用范围。

关键词: 诱发电位, 运动, 七氟醚, 脊髓, 外科手术, 麻醉, 吸入

Abstract:

Objective： To evaluate the effects of increasing end-tidal concentrations of sevoflurane and increasing stimulation voltage on motor evoked potentials, so as to provide evidence in making anesthesia plan for intraspinal tumor surgery. Methods: In the study, 48 patients scheduled to undergo intraspinal tumor surgery ［American Society of Anesthesiology,(ASA) Ⅰ-Ⅱ, 18-65 years old］ were enrolled. After general anesthesia induction, the patients were assigned to receive sevoflurane anesthesia of increa-sing end-tidal concentration in the sequence of 0.0%, 0.5%, 1.0% and 1.5% respectively, under a background of propofol and remifentanil. All the observations were done before the important steps of surgery. Remifentanil infusion rate was 0.2 μg /(kg·min), while the propofol infusion rate was adjusted to maintain the bispectral index values within the range of 30-50. At each concentration, 4 stimulation voltages of 300 V, 400 V, 500 V and 600 V were employed to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs). The amplitude and latency of each MEP were compared. The success ratio was also recorded. Results: The concentration of sevoflurane and the stimulation voltage had impacts on the amplitude and latency of MEPs. Under each stimulation voltage, the MEPs amplitude decreased following increasing end-tidal sevoflurane concentrations, and significant differences were found in comparing 1.5% sevoflurane (left 20.50 μV, 70.71 μV, 135.97 μV, 190.00 μV , right 14.29 μV, 50.71 μV, 73.10 μV, 77.50 μV) with 0.0% sevoflurane (left 143.00 μV, 388.10 μV, 484.53 μV, 500.00 μV, right 176.00 μV, 407.60 μV, 384.35 μV, 451.00 μV) and 0.5% sevoflurane (left 100.00 μV, 362.57 μV, 444.05 μV, 435.00 μV, right 115.00 μV, 207.15 μV, 258.34 μV, 358.50 μV), left χ2= 27.46,P<0.01, right χ2= 60.49,P<0.01；left χ2= 20.73,P<0.01, right χ2= 55.05,P<0.01；left χ2= 34.25,P<0.01,right χ2=33.58,P<0.01；left χ2= 28.61,P<0.01 ,right χ2= 49.04,P<0.01; while there were no statistical differences in the latency changes (P=0.26). Under each end-tidal sevoflurane concentration, the MEPs amplitude increased following increasing stimulation voltages, and significant differences were found in comparing 300 V (left 143.00 μV, 100.00 μV, 61.50 μV, 20.50 μV , right 176.00 μV, 115.00 μV, 41.07 μV, 14.29 μV) with 400 V (left 388.10 μV, 362.57 μV, 198.81 μV, 70.71 μV, right 407.60 μV, 207.15 μV, 89.00 μV, 50.71 μV) and 500 V (left 484.53 μV, 444.05 μV, 216.24 μV, 135.97 μV, right 384.35 μV, 258.34 μV, 187.50 μV, 73.10 μV) and 600 V (left 500.00 μV, 435.00 μV, 344.00 μV, 190.00 μV, right 451.00 μV, 385.50 μV, 156.00 μV, 77.50 μV), left χ2= 45.55,P<0.01, right χ2= 25.73,P<0.01; left χ2= 46.67,P<0.01, right χ2= 55.30,P<0.01；left χ2= 47.36,P<0.01,right χ2= 47.82,P<0.01; left χ2= 38.67,P<0.01, right χ2= 45.87,P<0.01; while the latencies were decreased， and significant dif-ferences were found in comparing 300 V with 400 V and 500 V and 600V（left F=7.50，P=0.01 , right F=13.33，P<0.01）, but the differences had little clinical significance. The success ratio decreased by increasing end-tidal sevoflurane concentration, and significant differences were found in comparing 1.5% sevoflurane (left 43.8%，70.8%，77.1%，81.3%, right 37.5%，60.4%，75.0%，66.7%) with 0.0% sevoflurane (left 79.2%，87.5%，95.8%，93.8%, right 75.0%，95.8%，95.8%， 95.8%) and 0.5% sevoflurane (left 72.9%，89.6%，95.8%，95.8%, right 66.7%，89.6%，95.8%， 97.9%); the success ratio increased by increasing stimulation voltage, and significant differences were found in comparing 300 V（left 79.2%，72.9%，62.5%，43.8%, right 75.0%，66.7%，60.4%， 37.5%）with 400 V（left 87.5%，89.6%，77.1%，70.8% , right 95.8%，89.6%，79.2%，60.4%）and 500 V（left 95.8%，95.8%，91.7%，77.1%, right 95.8%，95.8%，81.3%，75.0%）and 600 V (left 93.8%， 95.8%，89.6%，81.3%, right 95.8%，97.9%，89.6%，66.7%）, but there were no statistical differences in the success ratio of MEPs between the group with stimulation voltage of 600 V , end tidal sevoflurane concentration of 1.5% and the group with stimulation voltage of 300 V, end tidal sevoflurane concentration of 0.0% (P=0.22). Conclusion: Sevoflurane inhibited MEPs in a dose-dependent manner. It can decrease the amplitudes and prolong the latencies. But increasing stimulation voltage will facilitate MEPs monitoring and increase the success ratio. Sevoflurane can be used in larger parts of MEPs monitoring surgery by increasing the stimulation voltage.

Key words: Evoked potentials, motor, Sevoflurane, Spinal cord, Surgical procedures, operative, Anesthesia, inhalation

中图分类号:

R614.21

王丽薇，孟秀丽，郭向阳，赵薇，王振宇. 不同浓度七氟烷麻醉与不同刺激电压对脊髓手术中运动诱发电位波幅和潜伏期的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(2): 297-303.

WANG Li-wei， MENG Xiu-li， GUO Xiang-yang， ZHAO Wei， WANG Zhen-yu. Influence of sevoflurane concentration and stimulation voltage on motor evoked potentials in intraspinal tumor surgery[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(2): 297-303.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	王军, 姚兰, 张宁, 索利斌, 李红培, 魏越, 查鹏, 梁正, 刘鲲鹏. 单侧胸椎旁阻滞对实施双腔气管插管患者血流动力学和意识水平的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(5): 890-895.
[2]	王明瑞,刘军,熊六林,于路平,胡浩,许克新,徐涛. 经皮微通道-微电子肾镜-微超声探针碎石术治疗1.5~2.5 cm肾结石的疗效和安全性[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(4): 605-609.
[3]	应沂岑,杜毅聪,李志华,张一鸣,李新飞,王冰,张鹏,朱宏建,周利群,杨昆霖,李学松. 机器人辅助腹腔镜下颊黏膜补片输尿管成形术治疗复杂输尿管狭窄[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(4): 640-645.
[4]	郭煌达,彭和香,王斯悦,侯天姣,李奕昕,章涵宇,王梦莹,武轶群,秦雪英,唐迅,李劲,陈大方,胡永华,吴涛. 短期大气颗粒物暴露和MTNR1B基因多态性对甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数影响的家系研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(3): 375-383.
[5]	胡攀攀,李彦,刘啸,唐彦超,李梓赫,刘忠军. 自稳式人工椎体在颈椎前路手术中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 161-166.
[6]	徐心雨,吴灵,宋凤岐,李自力,张益,刘筱菁. 基于下颌运动轨迹的正颌外科术中下颌骨髁突定位方法及初步精度验证[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 57-65.
[7]	蔡安东,王晓霞,周文娟,柳忠豪. 下颌前突畸形患者上颌骨及髁突虚拟位置与术后现实位置的比较[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 74-80.
[8]	吴洁,张雯,梁舒,秦艺璐,范文强. 妊娠期原发性干燥综合征合并视神经脊髓炎谱系疾病危重症1例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(6): 1118-1124.
[9]	张心灵,林志禹,陈玉杰,董文芳,杨欣. 脊柱后路内固定术后切口愈合不良的整形外科治疗[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(5): 910-914.
[10]	马建勋,夏有辰,李比,赵红梅,雷玉涛,布希. 乳腺癌改良根治术后即刻乳房重建的方式选择[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(4): 612-618.
[11]	林国中,谢京城,陈晓东,杨军. 成人原发性脊髓拴系综合征的分型及显微外科手术治疗[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(4): 641-645.
[12]	陈斌,吴超,刘彬,于涛,王振宇. 脊髓髓内海绵状血管瘤患者不同治疗方式的预后[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(4): 652-657.
[13]	张雯,刘筱菁,李自力,张益. 基于解剖标志的鼻翼基底缩窄缝合术对正颌患者术后鼻唇部形态的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(4): 736-742.
[14]	崔云鹏,施学东,刘佳,米川,王冰,潘元星,林云飞. 经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定联合可扩张管状牵开器下肿瘤切除治疗脊柱转移瘤的效果[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(3): 530-536.
[15]	史成梅,周阳,杨宁,李正迁,陶一帆,邓莹,郭向阳. 丙泊酚用于无痛胃肠镜检查对患者术后精神活动的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(2): 324-327.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed