北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 196-200. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2017.02.003

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

直接前入路全髋关节置换后早期三维步态分析

王浩洋,康鹏德△,聂涌,赵海燕,杨周源,裴福兴   

  1. (四川大学华西医院骨科, 成都610041)
  • 出版日期:2017-04-18 发布日期:2017-04-18
  • 通讯作者: 康鹏德 E-mail:Kangpd@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    卫生部卫生公益性行业科研专项(201302007)资助

Gait analysis at the early stage after direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty

WANG Hao-yang, KANG Peng-de△, NIE Yong, ZHAO Hai-yan, YANG Zhou-yuan, PEI Fu-xing   

  1. (Department of Orthopaedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China)
  • Online:2017-04-18 Published:2017-04-18
  • Contact: KANG Peng-de E-mail:Kangpd@163.com
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the Specific Research Project of Health Pro Bono Secters, Ministry of Health, China (201302007)

摘要:

目的:探讨直接前入路(direct anterior approach,DAA)行人工全髋关节置换术后早期效果及患者手术前后的步态变化。方法: 20例因股骨头坏死或髋关节发育不良继发骨关节炎的患者于直接前入路下行单侧初次人工关节置换,采集患者一般资料并记录患者术前、术后视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale, VAS)、Harris评分等,分别于手术前及手术后6周、12周行步态分析,记录并分析患者手术前后步态变化并与正常成人对比。结果: 患者术后平均住院时间3.3 d,术后3 d内VAS评分均低于4分,患者假体安放位置满意,至术后12周随访无脱位。步态分析结果中,步速患者组为术前0.64 m/s、术后6周0.77 m/s、术后12周1.07 m/s,正常对照组为1.19 m/s;步频患者组为术前43.15步/min、术后6周51.42步/min、术后12周55.52步/min,正常对照组为57.15步/min;行走时髋关节活动度患者组为术前31.00°、术后6周39.62°、术后12周40.40°,正常对照组为45.67°;行走时膝关节活动度患者组为术前50.52°、术后6周59.28°、术后12周67.29°,正常对照组为70.42°。患者组内比较,除术后6周的步速和行走时膝关节活动度外其他数据差异均有统计学意义;与正常对照组相比,入组患者的步态分析数据仍不及正常对照,术后12周时患者步态数据已接近正常对照组,步速、步频、行走时膝关节活动度结果组间差异无统计学意义。结论: DAA作为全髋关节置换的可选手术入路,患者术后12周步态已接近正常人群,但尚需进一步的更大样本量的研究。

关键词: 关节成形术, 置换, 髋, 直接前入路, 步态

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the result of operation and gait analysis at the early stage after direct anterior approach (DAA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: In this study, 20 patients who suffered from necrosis of femoral head or developmental dysplasia of the hip were scheduled to undergo THA. The basic information and visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Harris score before and after surgery were recorded. All of the patients finished the gait analysis before the surgery and 6 weeks and 12 weeks after the surgery, the data were compared with those of normal adult people. Results: Their hospital stay after the operation was 3.3 d, the VAS score after the operation was no more than 4 points, the positions of prosthesis were satisfactory, and there was no dislocation. The gait analysis results contained step speed, stride, the range of motion (ROM) of hip and knee. The step speed before the surgery (preoperation, Pre) was 0.64 m/s, 6 weeks after the surgery (6W) was 0.77 m/s, 12 weeks after the surgery (12W) was 1.07 m/s, and the control group was 1.19 m/s. The stride at Pre, 6W, 12W, and control group were 43.15 steps/min, 51.42 steps/min, 55.52 steps/min, and 57.15 steps/min, respectively. The ROM of hip joint at Pre, 6W, 12W, and control group were 31.00°, 39.62°, 40.40°, and 45.67°, respectively. The ROM of knee joint at Pre, 6W, 12W, and control group were 50.52°, 59.28°, 67.29°, and 70.42°, respectively. The results of the gait analysis showed that the gait recovery after the direct anterior total hip arthroplasty was very fast and at the 12th week after surgery the gait of the patients was close to the normal adult people. Conclusion: The direct anterior approach is one of the choosable approach of the THA, and this kind of surgery has a better recovery of gait after the operation, and at the end of 12 weeks after the surgery the gait is very close to the normal adult people. But we also need more studies to prove this conclusion.

Key words: Arthroplasty, replacement, hip, Direct anterior approach, Gait

中图分类号: 

  • R687.4
[1] 刘园梅, 傅义程, 郝靖欣, 张福春, 刘慧琳. 老年髋部骨折患者住院期间发生术后心力衰竭的列线图预测模型的构建及验证[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 874-883.
[2] 汪琪伟, 包鹏宇, 洪士皓, 杨昕, 王宇, 曹永平. 改良股骨颈截骨术在伴严重屈曲畸形强直性脊柱炎患者手术治疗过程中的疗效[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 884-889.
[3] 安思兰,郑群怡,王锴,高姗. 全膝关节置换术后患者早期疼痛的特点及其影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 167-173.
[4] 赵然,刘延青,田华. 应用累积和控制图分析全膝关节置换术中电子压力垫片指导软组织平衡的学习曲线[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 658-664.
[5] 傅强,高冠英,徐雁,林卓华,孙由静,崔立刚. 无症状髋关节前上盂唇撕裂超声与磁共振检查的对比研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 665-669.
[6] 叶一林,刘恒,潘利平,柴卫兵. 全膝关节置换术后假体周围痛风发作误诊1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(2): 362-365.
[7] 王梓,张军军,左力,王悦,李文歌,程虹,蔡广研,裴华颖,王利华,周绪杰,师素芳,刘立军,吕继成,张宏. 血浆置换治疗新月体型IgA肾病的有效性分析: 多中心队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 1038-1046.
[8] 姜保国,张培训. 老年髋部骨折的围手术期风险评估[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 803-809.
[9] 贾金凤,梁菲,黄建伟,王昊,韩璞青. 双重血浆分子吸附系统模式人工肝治疗对血小板的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(3): 548-551.
[10] 李志昌,侯云飞,周之伟,姜龙,张舒,林剑浩. 影响全膝关节置换术患者术前预期的患者因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 170-176.
[11] 董寒梅,吴睿麒,高冠英,刘镕阁,徐雁. 关节镜下盂唇重建治疗髋关节撞击综合征12例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 1007-1011.
[12] 吴浩,潘利平,刘恒,塔拉提百克·买买提居马,王洪彬,宁太国,曹永平. 胫骨假体的不同后倾角度对内侧间室单髁置换术后膝关节功能的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 877-882.
[13] 王鑫光,耿霄,李杨,吴天晨,李子剑,田华. 便携式导航与计算机导航辅助在全膝关节置换力线对准和手术时间的比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 728-733.
[14] 及松洁,黄野,王兴山,柳剑,窦勇,姜旭,周一新. Oxford膝关节单间室置换术后内翻多因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(2): 293-297.
[15] 柯岩,张蔷,马云青,李儒军,陶可,桂先革,李克鹏,张洪,林剑浩. 全髋关节置换术治疗脊柱骨骺发育不良患者Tönnis 3级髋关节骨关节炎的早期疗效[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1): 175-182.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!